Comparison of Two Videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC vs Airtraq) for Awake Intubation - Trial NCT05428995
Access comprehensive clinical trial information for NCT05428995 through Pure Global AI's free database. This phase not specified trial is sponsored by Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago and is currently Recruiting. The study focuses on Intubation. Target enrollment is 90 participants.
This page provides complete trial specifications, intervention details, outcomes, and location information. Pure Global AI offers free access to ClinicalTrials.gov data, helping medical device and pharmaceutical companies navigate clinical research efficiently.
Study Focus
Sponsor & Location
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Timeline & Enrollment
N/A
Jun 15, 2022
Dec 31, 2023
Primary Outcome
Difference in the first attempt intubation success rate (percentage)
Summary
Patients with anticipated difficult airway are recommended to be managed with an awake
 tracheal intubation. Initially fibreoptic bronchoscopy was considered the gold standard, but
 in the last decade videolaryngoscopes have been demonstrated to be an efficacy alternative
 technique. Recently, a systematic review and meta-analysis was published investigating the
 efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy compared with fibreoptic bronchoscopy for awake
 tracheal intubation. Eight prospective, randomized studies were included, with different
 videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC, GlideScope, Pentax AWS, McGraft, and Bullard). However, a direct
 comparison of two different videolaryngoscopes for awake tracheal intubation in patients with
 anticipated difficult airway has not been performed.
ICD-10 Classifications
Data Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05428995
Device Trial