Urine Retention Rate Between Spinal and General Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery
- Disease/Condition
- Anorectal Disorder
- Drug/Device/Intervention
- General anesthesia plus local infiltration
- Study type
- Observational
- Intervention type
- procedure
- Primary sponsor
- Taichung Veterans General Hospital
- Location
- Taichung, Taiwan
- Phase
- N/A
- Start date
- Jan 01, 2017
- End date
- Sep 30, 2022
- Enrollment
- 1400 participants
Urine retention rate,Pain score
Anorectal surgery includes pilonidal sinus, hemorrhoidectomy, anal fissure, and anal fistula
 operations. General and spinal anesthesia were common anesthetic methods in anorectal
 surgery. We designed this study to test the hypothesis that general anesthesia was superior
 than spinal anesthesia with respect to urine retention rate, pain score, recovery time, and
 side effects.
- Registry
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Trial ID
- NCT05571202
- Type
- Non-Device Trial
Access comprehensive clinical trial information for NCT05571202 through Pure Global AI's free database. This phase not specified trial is sponsored by Taichung Veterans General Hospital and is currently Completed. The study focuses on Anorectal Disorder. Target enrollment is 1400 participants.
This page provides complete trial specifications, intervention details, outcomes, and location information. Pure Global AI offers free access to ClinicalTrials.gov data, helping medical device and pharmaceutical companies navigate clinical research efficiently.