Pure Global

Rate Control Efficacy in Atrial Fibrillation With Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: Lenient vs Strict Rate Control Strategies - Trial NCT06409533

Access comprehensive clinical trial information for NCT06409533 through Pure Global AI's free database. This phase not specified trial is sponsored by University of Brawijaya and is currently Recruiting. The study focuses on Atrial Fibrillation,Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis,Arrhythmias, Cardiac. Target enrollment is 100 participants.

This page provides complete trial specifications, intervention details, outcomes, and location information. Pure Global AI offers free access to ClinicalTrials.gov data, helping medical device and pharmaceutical companies navigate clinical research efficiently.

Free Database
Powered by Pure Global AI
840K+ Trials
NCT06409533
Recruiting
other
Trial Details
ClinicalTrials.gov โ€ข NCT06409533
View on ClinicalTrials.gov
Pure Global
DJ Fang

DJ Fang

MedTech Regulatory Expert

Need help with 30+ markets registration?

Pricing
Rate Control Efficacy in Atrial Fibrillation With Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: Lenient vs Strict Rate Control Strategies
Rate Control Efficacy in Atrial Fibrillation With Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: Assessing Clinical Outcomes of Lenient Versus Strict Heart Rate Control in Reducing Hospitalizations, Improving Quality of Life, and Enhancing Functional Capacity

Study Focus

Rate control

Interventional

other

Sponsor & Location

University of Brawijaya

Malang,Pasuruan,Tulung Agung, Indonesia

Timeline & Enrollment

N/A

Mar 01, 2023

Dec 01, 2024

100 participants

Primary Outcome

Number of Hospitalizations,Quality of Life as Measured by the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire,Functional Capacity as Measured by 6-Minutes Walk Test (6MWT)

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if different types of heart rate control work to
 improve the clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation related to rheumatic
 mitral stenosis in terms of reducing hospitalizations, improving quality of life, and
 enhancing physical functional capacities. The two types of heart rate (HR) control are strict
 (resting HR of 60-80 bpm) versus lenient (resting HR of 81-110 bpm) rate control strategies.
 The main questions it aims to answer are:
 
 - Can lenient versus strict heart rate control reduce rehospitalization in patients with
 atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral stenosis?
 
 - Does lenient versus strict heart rate control improve the quality of life (QoL) in
 patients with atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral stenosis?
 
 - Does lenient versus strict heart rate control enhance functional capacity in patients
 with atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral stenosis?
 
 Researchers will compare strict rate control to lenient rate control to see if a particular
 rate control strategy is non-inferior to the other.
 
 Participants will:
 
 - Take standardized drugs as per PERKI (Indonesian Heart Association) guidelines for
 Atrial Fibrillation, which would be either beta-blockers, digoxin, or in combination.
 This standardized treatment of Atrial Fibrillation will be monitored once every month to
 see if the dose needs to be titrated in order to reach targeted heart rate control.
 
 - After the target of HR control is reached, the participant will be followed up every two
 weeks via telephone to check for any signs and symptoms.
 
 - Furthermore, after the HR target is reached, the participant will visit the cardiology
 outpatient clinics once every month for 3 consecutive months to see the clinical
 outcomes of hospitalization, QoL via SF-36 questionnaire, and functional capacities with
 6MWT (6-minute walk test).
 
 - Additionally, the cardiac function would be evaluated by echocardiography at the
 baseline (time of enrollment) and at the end of the follow up period.

ICD-10 Classifications

Chronic atrial fibrillation
Persistent atrial fibrillation
Mitral stenosis
Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, unspecified
Atrial fibrillation and flutter

Data Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT06409533

Non-Device Trial