Pure Global

Comparing the efficacy of two different anesthetic solutions in pain control during extraction of mandibular primary molars - Trial PACTR202202848424858

Access comprehensive clinical trial information for PACTR202202848424858 through Pure Global AI's free database. This Not Applicable trial is sponsored by Rasha Sharaf and is currently Completed. The study focuses on Anaesthesia.

This page provides complete trial specifications, intervention details, outcomes, and location information. Pure Global AI offers free access to Pan Africa Clinical Trials Registry data, helping medical device and pharmaceutical companies navigate clinical research efficiently.

Free Database
Powered by Pure Global AI
840K+ Trials
PACTR202202848424858
Not Applicable
Completed
other
Trial Details
Pan Africa Clinical Trials Registry โ€ข PACTR202202848424858
Pure Global
DJ Fang

DJ Fang

MedTech Regulatory Expert

Need help with 30+ markets registration?

Pricing
Comparing the efficacy of two different anesthetic solutions in pain control during extraction of mandibular primary molars
Biological Evaluation of the efficacy of two different anesthetic solutions in pain control during extraction of mandibular second primary molars

Study Focus

Anaesthesia

other

Sponsor & Location

Rasha Sharaf

Rasha F. Sharaf

Egypt

Timeline & Enrollment

Not Applicable

Nov 10, 2021

Jan 18, 2022

Summary

The current study will compare between alexadricaine 4% and mepevacaine 2% in pain control during extraction of mandibular primary molars in primary teeth, when administered by infiltration technique and the change that occurs in pulse rate before and after extraction in each group will be recorded.

ICD-10 Classifications

Anaesthetic, unspecified
Other and unspecified general anaesthetics
Other complications of anaesthesia
Local anaesthetics
Anaesthesia of skin

Data Source

Pan Africa Clinical Trials Registry

PACTR202202848424858

Non-Device Trial