A Comparative Assessment of Ocular Prostheses Motility in Atrophia Bulbi Versus Implanted Anophthalmic Sockets (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
- Disease/Condition
- Eye Diseases
- Intervention type
- device
- Primary sponsor
- Department of Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University
- Funder
- Mervat El Sayed AbdELLAH
- Location
- Egypt
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Start date
- Jan 01, 1900
- End date
- Jan 01, 1900
Loss of an eye caused by cancer, trauma, or congenital defect creates a deep psychological impact on an individual’s life especially social and professional life. There are two types of ocular prosthesis available: Ready-made or “stock: shells, which are readily available, inexpensive and can be fitted instantly; and customized prosthesis, which are tailored and customized to the individual user. Customization is an important aspect of prosthetic rehabilitation which brings the cosmetic appearance to near normal levels, provides a better fit to the eye socket, and less discomfort to the patient in the long term. The aim of this study is to compare the relationship between customized and ready-made ocular prostheses thickness and size and their motility in patients with either atrophia bulbi or implanted anophthalmic sockets.
- Registry
- Pan Africa Clinical Trials Registry
- Trial ID
- PACTR202306612520344
- Type
- Device Trial
Access comprehensive clinical trial information for PACTR202306612520344 through Pure Global AI's free database. This Not Applicable trial is sponsored by Department of Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University and is currently Not yet recruiting. The study focuses on Eye Diseases.
This page provides complete trial specifications, intervention details, outcomes, and location information. Pure Global AI offers free access to Pan Africa Clinical Trials Registry data, helping medical device and pharmaceutical companies navigate clinical research efficiently.