A Comparative Assessment of Ocular Prostheses Motility in Atrophia Bulbi Versus Implanted Anophthalmic Sockets (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial) - Trial PACTR202306612520344
Access comprehensive clinical trial information for PACTR202306612520344 through Pure Global AI's free database. This Not Applicable trial is sponsored by Department of Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University and is currently Not yet recruiting. The study focuses on Eye Diseases.
This page provides complete trial specifications, intervention details, outcomes, and location information. Pure Global AI offers free access to Pan Africa Clinical Trials Registry data, helping medical device and pharmaceutical companies navigate clinical research efficiently.
Study Focus
device
Sponsor & Location
Department of Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University
Mervat El Sayed AbdELLAH
Timeline & Enrollment
Not Applicable
Jan 01, 1900
Jan 01, 1900
Summary
Loss of an eye caused by cancer, trauma, or congenital defect creates a deep psychological impact on an individual’s life especially social and professional life. There are two types of ocular prosthesis available: Ready-made or “stock: shells, which are readily available, inexpensive and can be fitted instantly; and customized prosthesis, which are tailored and customized to the individual user. Customization is an important aspect of prosthetic rehabilitation which brings the cosmetic appearance to near normal levels, provides a better fit to the eye socket, and less discomfort to the patient in the long term. The aim of this study is to compare the relationship between customized and ready-made ocular prostheses thickness and size and their motility in patients with either atrophia bulbi or implanted anophthalmic sockets.
ICD-10 Classifications
Data Source
Pan Africa Clinical Trials Registry
PACTR202306612520344
Device Trial