Pure Global AI
Free · No signup · Official source links

Does my medical device need Arrêté royal du 17 mars 2013 substance restriction (RoHS) in Belgium?

Describe your device to check whether Arrêté royal du 17 mars 2013 substance restriction (RoHS) may apply, why, what facts are missing, and which official source to review.

7 maintained routes12 official source links
Preliminary applicability · country-specific scope

Check Arrêté royal du 17 mars 2013 substance restriction (RoHS)

Try an example

Include power, radio modules and bands, measurement functions, radiation or energy, batteries, materials, accessories, intended use, and existing test reports.

Preliminary decision support — not a regulator determination or legal advice.0 / 8,000
Market being checked
Belgium

Fair-use limits apply. Your input and result are not a regulator determination or legal advice.

What you receive

Not just a yes or no

A route-by-route answer. Separate product certificates, dossier evidence, import documents, and facility licences stay separate.

Trigger reasoning. See which product facts matter and which missing facts prevent a reliable conclusion.

Official starting points. Open the regulator or government sources behind the maintained country matrix.

Maintained country rule

What this Arrêté royal du 17 mars 2013 substance restriction (RoHS) check is screening

Identifies RoHS, WEEE/EPR, battery, recycling, and producer obligations without miscalling them safety certificates. Evidence may be required, but the matrix does not identify a generic separate certificate.

Requirement family
Environmental and battery obligations
Regulatory object
electrical electronic medical device
Maintained rule status
evidence only no separate certificate
Useful product facts
Battery chemistry/capacity, electrical equipment, importer/producer role, packaging, and market date.

Article 1 of the arrêté royal of 17 March 2013, last updated 24 December 2024, states that it transposes Directive 2011/65/EU, and its Chapter III carries the prohibition on placing non-compliant equipment on the market. The instrument issues from the SPF Santé publique, Sécurité de la Chaîne alimentaire et Environnement. Directive 2011/65/EU Annex I category 8 covers medical devices, Article 4(3) has bound medical devices since 22 July 2014 and in vitro diagnostic medical devices since 22 July 2016, and Article 2(4)(h) excludes active implantable medical devices.

How to read the answer

Classification is only the first layer

A device may have one medical risk class and still trigger separate radio, electrical, measurement, radiation, environmental, import, or installation requirements. The checker keeps each regulatory object separate.

Product approval

A certificate or approval attached to the finished product, component, or radio host.

Dossier or import evidence

Testing can belong inside the medical dossier, while some documents apply to each shipment.

Site or operator licence

Radiation, installation, use, or measurement controls may apply to a facility or operator.

Country-specific scope

Other Belgium routes to check

Check every Belgium route →

Official starting points

Use these authority pages to confirm current scope, technical rules, application routes, and transition dates. A linked source does not turn a preliminary result into an authority decision.

About this checker

A preliminary tool, not a regulatory determination

Describe the complete product — radio, power, measurement, radiation, battery, materials, accessories, intended use, import route, and existing approvals. The free checker maps those facts to the maintained Belgium scheme matrix and links each route to its official source.

Use the result to identify questions and official sources. Final scope can depend on exact models, modules, bands, components, claims, HS codes, import structure, installation site, and current authority interpretation.

Is this the same as medical device classification in Belgium?
No. Risk classification determines the main medical-device pathway. This checker runs after classification and looks for additional product certificates, dossier evidence, import documents, and facility or operator licences.
Does “no separate certificate” mean no testing is required?
No. Safety, EMC, performance, or other evidence can still be required inside the medical-device dossier even when there is no separate national product certificate.
Is the result an official regulatory determination?
No. It is a preliminary applicability assessment. Review the linked official source and confirm the final route with the relevant authority, certification body, importer, or regulatory professional.
DJ Fang
DJ Fang
MedTech Regulatory Expert

Need help confirming a classification or planning your registration?

Pricing
Keep researching this market
View the Belgium resource hub →
Compare certification checker across all countries →