Can the tool decide whether an event is reportable?
No. It identifies possible reporting paths, missing facts and decisions requiring current official-rule review. The accountable manufacturer makes and documents the final determination.

Organize an incident into traceable facts, unknowns, health-risk questions, potential reporting paths and field-action options across the markets you name. Patient-identifying information should never be pasted.
The agent separates supplied facts, documents, assumptions and unknowns.
Every finding stays tied to the evidence you actually supplied.
Turn the result into a practical worklist and save it as a branded PDF.
Remove patient identifiers. Include dates, device identifiers, outcome, malfunction, returned-device findings, similar events, distributed scope, risk-file information, and every market in scope.


Need help confirming a classification or planning your registration?
Remove names, medical-record numbers and other patient identifiers. Include the awareness date, event, outcome, device identifiers and market.
Add returned-device evidence, prior complaints, distribution scope, health-risk analysis, CAPA status and any proposed customer or authority action.
Move from this workpaper into the next connected review. Pasted evidence stays on this page and is never placed in a link.
Structure containment, root-cause hypotheses, actions, effectiveness, and risk linkage
Review hazards, controls, verification, residual risk, traceability, and post-market updates
Connect post-market signals, clinical evidence, risk, CAPA, and lifecycle reports
No. It identifies possible reporting paths, missing facts and decisions requiring current official-rule review. The accountable manufacturer makes and documents the final determination.
Yes. Name only markets actually in scope and include local representative or sponsor information when known.
No. Remove direct and indirect patient identifiers. A regulatory workpaper normally needs the event facts and outcome, not identifying personal data.
No. It can identify inputs and gaps for a notice and action plan, but the controlled final communication requires market-specific review and approval.