Pure Global AI
Australia flag

Australia medical device regulations

Official sources linked

TGA rules and guidance for medical device market access, registration, and lifecycle compliance. Each code opens a metadata page with the official source and readable HTML when available.

10 documents3 categories100% linked to official sourcesauthority TGA2 readable HTML
CodeRegulationCategoryEffectiveProvenance
Therapeutic Goods (Medical Devices) Regulations 2002
Therapeutic Goods (Medical Devices) Regulations 2002
Current FRL compilation F2026C00610 (compilation 71, start 1 July 2026) of Statutory Rules No. 236, 2002. Series F2002B00237. Ingested from the official EPUB, including Essential Principles and classification-rule schedules.
GeneralOctober 3, 2002Official
Animal Origin Devices
Medical Devices Containing Medicinal/Animal Origin Substances
TGA guidance page. Not ingested in this FRL family.
General—Official
ARGMD
Australian Regulatory Guidelines for Medical Devices (ARGMD)
TGA guidance index, not the Act or Regulations. Not ingested in this FRL family.
General—Official
Health Practitioner Guidance
Regulatory Basics for Health Practitioners (PDF)
Exact TGA PDF locator, not yet ingested: re-probed 2026-08-29 and tga.gov.au serves an IP-reputation block page (reference 18.871c1602.1788047640.d5806fdf) to every egress available to this project — direct HTTP/2 (stream reset), HTTP/1.1 (tarpit), datacenter Browserless (block page), and stealth /unblock (solved:false, 403). Ingest from AU/residential egress or after a TGA WAF reputation change.
General—Official
Medical Devices Regulations 2002
Therapeutic Goods (Medical Devices) Regulations 2002 - TGA Summary
TGA summary page, not the FRL instrument. Full text is au-legislation-full.
General—Official
Processing Timeframes
Understanding Processing Timeframes for Medical Device Applications
TGA guidance page. Not ingested in this FRL family.
Registration—Official
Medical Devices Reforms
Medical Devices Reforms - Regulatory Changes
TGA reforms overview page. Not ingested.
General—Official
Software-Based Medical Devices
Regulatory Changes for Software-Based Medical Devices (PDF)
Exact TGA PDF locator, not yet ingested: re-probed 2026-08-29 and tga.gov.au serves an IP-reputation block page (reference 18.871c1602.1788047640.d5806fdf) to every egress available to this project — direct HTTP/2 (stream reset), HTTP/1.1 (tarpit), datacenter Browserless (block page), and stealth /unblock (solved:false, 403). Ingest from AU/residential egress or after a TGA WAF reputation change.
Software/SaMD—Official
Standards & Guidelines
Standards, Guidelines & Publications for Medical Devices and IVDs
TGA publications collection page. Not ingested.
General—Official
Therapeutic Goods Act 1989
Therapeutic Goods Act 1989
Current FRL compilation C2025C00525 (compilation 89, start 5 September 2025) of Act No. 21, 1990. Official series id C2004A03952. Section 2 ties commencement to parliamentary approval rather than the assent year, so no unsupported effective date is asserted. The previous metadata URL C2017C00225 was an old compilation id. Currentness re-verified 2026-09-07: the FRL documents API still reports C2025C00525 (compilation 89, start 2025-09-05, rectification 0) as the newest EPUB expression and the official 394,994-byte EPUB re-fetched byte-identical to the stored SHA-256.
General—Official
Exports carry source + retrieval date

Changes after registration in Australia

Source-linked rules for common changes to a registered medical device. Read the scope and conditions with each rule; unverified details are listed separately.

Does changing a device brand name or logo require an update?

A change to the registered brand name and a change to logo artwork can follow different rules. The legal manufacturer, device design and intended purpose remain the same.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Same kind and unchanged manufacturer responsibility

Fact-level verified

An ARTG variation must preserve the same kind of device: sponsor, manufacturer, GMDN, class and the applicable prescribed characteristics/UPI. For manufacturer name or address changes, TGA checks whether responsibility for design, production, packaging and labelling and the QMS remain the same. A same-entity office/name update with unchanged QMS can be accepted; changed control or QMS can require a new inclusion. A sponsor transfer is a different legal event.

Conditions
  • Map a brand or REF to actual public and dossier-held information; do not equate a commercial order code with UPI, model or UDI.
  • Retain the actual class and UPI criteria; the guidance allows selected UPI variations but does not remove the statutory same-kind test.
  • Unchanged QMS alone does not establish that a different responsible legal manufacturer is the same manufacturer for the statutory kind test. If that same-manufacturer criterion is no longer met, an ARTG variation cannot be used to bypass a new inclusion.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

MD variation forms and evidence

Fact-level verified

For MDs, the Class III/AIMD variation form addresses UPI, total-device count, functional description or variants; other relevant updates generally use DCR. Support the actual change with sponsor explanation, manufacturer/notified-body evidence and applicable DoC, design certificate, IFU, label, surgical technique and significant-change approval. Where the certification change requires notified-body approval, complete that before seeking the ARTG variation. Wait for the ARTG decision before implementation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

English language requirement

Fact-level verified

Device information may be supplied in multiple languages, but if the device is supplied in Australia one of those languages must be English; information supplied with the device must be clear, legible and provided in English. Labelling content requirements are in Essential Principle 13 (Schedule 1, MD Regulations) and the sponsor's name and address must appear on supplied devices under Regulation 10.2.

Conditions
  • Applies to all devices supplied in Australia.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific government fees

MD variation fee and narrow EU-evidence reduction

Fact-level verified

Current Schedule 9 item 2A (f) sets AUD 1133 for a non-IVD medical-device ARTG variation not covered by (g), excluding data evaluation. Item 2A (g) instead sets AUD 215 per ten entries or part only when the kind is EU-transition affected, the variation solely updates manufacturer evidence, and the same evidence is involved for all entries. General brand, name, address or REF changes do not establish those three conditions.

Conditions
  • The summary table and statute are not identical in their wording; the statutory conditions control.
  • This is not the fee for sponsor transfer, new inclusion, conformity assessment or an export certificate.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific review time

Variation evaluation has no general legislated clock

Fact-level verified

The current-linked TGA variation guide expressly says there is no legislated timeframe for evaluating an ARTG variation. Its 3-5-business-day target applies only to the stated Class III programming-software variation after the new hardware is approved. The reasonable information-request response period of at least ten working days is an applicant deadline, not a general evaluation SLA.

Conditions
  • Do not substitute initial ARTG inclusion or conformity-assessment timelines for a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

Brand/model UDI changes are distinct from an order REF

Fact-level verified

For a UDI medical device, Essential Principle 13C.2 treats the listed brand-name, model/version and packaging changes as a different type of model, with corresponding database identifiers. Changes made in the same production change are treated together; the pre-change device remains its prior type. Database timing depends on the applicable general start day and supply event. A commercial REF must first be mapped to these fields; UDI consequences do not themselves determine ARTG new-kind or variation classification.

Conditions
  • Select the actual UDI scope, class, start-day and supply dates; do not apply all future stages as current.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate optional export certificate after ARTG accuracy

Fact-level verified

If the importing country needs a certificate, the sponsor/authorised agent may seek CFS for current Australian-supply ARTG devices or Export Certificate for export-only entries. Correct ARTG details before applying; the exports team does not amend them. The form needs sponsor/client and ARTG/GMDN details, declaration and the applicable payment; one form/one optional schedule per certificate. More than five devices need a schedule, not automatic rejection. TGA aims for ten working days; this is a separate export service, not ordinary change approval or automatic certificate reissue.

Conditions
  • The current webpage and January 2026 form differ on payment method/details; use the current operational instructions before submitting.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.

How do I update a manufacturer's name without changing the legal entity?

The same legal manufacturer changes its name, potentially alongside the device brand. A transfer to another legal entity is a separate question; permission to combine filings needs its own evidence.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Same kind and unchanged manufacturer responsibility

Fact-level verified

An ARTG variation must preserve the same kind of device: sponsor, manufacturer, GMDN, class and the applicable prescribed characteristics/UPI. For manufacturer name or address changes, TGA checks whether responsibility for design, production, packaging and labelling and the QMS remain the same. A same-entity office/name update with unchanged QMS can be accepted; changed control or QMS can require a new inclusion. A sponsor transfer is a different legal event.

Conditions
  • Map a brand or REF to actual public and dossier-held information; do not equate a commercial order code with UPI, model or UDI.
  • Retain the actual class and UPI criteria; the guidance allows selected UPI variations but does not remove the statutory same-kind test.
  • Unchanged QMS alone does not establish that a different responsible legal manufacturer is the same manufacturer for the statutory kind test. If that same-manufacturer criterion is no longer met, an ARTG variation cannot be used to bypass a new inclusion.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

MD variation forms and evidence

Fact-level verified

For MDs, the Class III/AIMD variation form addresses UPI, total-device count, functional description or variants; other relevant updates generally use DCR. Support the actual change with sponsor explanation, manufacturer/notified-body evidence and applicable DoC, design certificate, IFU, label, surgical technique and significant-change approval. Where the certification change requires notified-body approval, complete that before seeking the ARTG variation. Wait for the ARTG decision before implementation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval

DCR batching is limited to the same request

Fact-level verified

One DCR may cover up to ten ARTG entries only where the requested change is the same for each entry. This is distinct from listing additional entries in a sponsor-transfer form and from the conditional 215-dollar evidence-update tariff. Separate approval prerequisites still apply; these provisions do not establish every transfer-plus-name/brand/REF event as one filing.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific government fees

MD variation fee and narrow EU-evidence reduction

Fact-level verified

Current Schedule 9 item 2A (f) sets AUD 1133 for a non-IVD medical-device ARTG variation not covered by (g), excluding data evaluation. Item 2A (g) instead sets AUD 215 per ten entries or part only when the kind is EU-transition affected, the variation solely updates manufacturer evidence, and the same evidence is involved for all entries. General brand, name, address or REF changes do not establish those three conditions.

Conditions
  • The summary table and statute are not identical in their wording; the statutory conditions control.
  • This is not the fee for sponsor transfer, new inclusion, conformity assessment or an export certificate.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific review time

Variation evaluation has no general legislated clock

Fact-level verified

The current-linked TGA variation guide expressly says there is no legislated timeframe for evaluating an ARTG variation. Its 3-5-business-day target applies only to the stated Class III programming-software variation after the new hardware is approved. The reasonable information-request response period of at least ten working days is an applicant deadline, not a general evaluation SLA.

Conditions
  • Do not substitute initial ARTG inclusion or conformity-assessment timelines for a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

English language requirement

Fact-level verified

Device information may be supplied in multiple languages, but if the device is supplied in Australia one of those languages must be English; information supplied with the device must be clear, legible and provided in English. Labelling content requirements are in Essential Principle 13 (Schedule 1, MD Regulations) and the sponsor's name and address must appear on supplied devices under Regulation 10.2.

Conditions
  • Applies to all devices supplied in Australia.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

Brand/model UDI changes are distinct from an order REF

Fact-level verified

For a UDI medical device, Essential Principle 13C.2 treats the listed brand-name, model/version and packaging changes as a different type of model, with corresponding database identifiers. Changes made in the same production change are treated together; the pre-change device remains its prior type. Database timing depends on the applicable general start day and supply event. A commercial REF must first be mapped to these fields; UDI consequences do not themselves determine ARTG new-kind or variation classification.

Conditions
  • Select the actual UDI scope, class, start-day and supply dates; do not apply all future stages as current.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate optional export certificate after ARTG accuracy

Fact-level verified

If the importing country needs a certificate, the sponsor/authorised agent may seek CFS for current Australian-supply ARTG devices or Export Certificate for export-only entries. Correct ARTG details before applying; the exports team does not amend them. The form needs sponsor/client and ARTG/GMDN details, declaration and the applicable payment; one form/one optional schedule per certificate. More than five devices need a schedule, not automatic rejection. TGA aims for ten working days; this is a separate export service, not ordinary change approval or automatic certificate reissue.

Conditions
  • The current webpage and January 2026 form differ on payment method/details; use the current operational instructions before submitting.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.

What changes when the manufacturer's office address changes?

An office address change for the same legal entity, potentially alongside name and brand changes. This does not cover moving a factory or manufacturing site, and a combined filing cannot be assumed.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Same kind and unchanged manufacturer responsibility

Fact-level verified

An ARTG variation must preserve the same kind of device: sponsor, manufacturer, GMDN, class and the applicable prescribed characteristics/UPI. For manufacturer name or address changes, TGA checks whether responsibility for design, production, packaging and labelling and the QMS remain the same. A same-entity office/name update with unchanged QMS can be accepted; changed control or QMS can require a new inclusion. A sponsor transfer is a different legal event.

Conditions
  • Map a brand or REF to actual public and dossier-held information; do not equate a commercial order code with UPI, model or UDI.
  • Retain the actual class and UPI criteria; the guidance allows selected UPI variations but does not remove the statutory same-kind test.
  • Unchanged QMS alone does not establish that a different responsible legal manufacturer is the same manufacturer for the statutory kind test. If that same-manufacturer criterion is no longer met, an ARTG variation cannot be used to bypass a new inclusion.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

MD variation forms and evidence

Fact-level verified

For MDs, the Class III/AIMD variation form addresses UPI, total-device count, functional description or variants; other relevant updates generally use DCR. Support the actual change with sponsor explanation, manufacturer/notified-body evidence and applicable DoC, design certificate, IFU, label, surgical technique and significant-change approval. Where the certification change requires notified-body approval, complete that before seeking the ARTG variation. Wait for the ARTG decision before implementation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval

DCR batching is limited to the same request

Fact-level verified

One DCR may cover up to ten ARTG entries only where the requested change is the same for each entry. This is distinct from listing additional entries in a sponsor-transfer form and from the conditional 215-dollar evidence-update tariff. Separate approval prerequisites still apply; these provisions do not establish every transfer-plus-name/brand/REF event as one filing.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific government fees

MD variation fee and narrow EU-evidence reduction

Fact-level verified

Current Schedule 9 item 2A (f) sets AUD 1133 for a non-IVD medical-device ARTG variation not covered by (g), excluding data evaluation. Item 2A (g) instead sets AUD 215 per ten entries or part only when the kind is EU-transition affected, the variation solely updates manufacturer evidence, and the same evidence is involved for all entries. General brand, name, address or REF changes do not establish those three conditions.

Conditions
  • The summary table and statute are not identical in their wording; the statutory conditions control.
  • This is not the fee for sponsor transfer, new inclusion, conformity assessment or an export certificate.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific review time

Variation evaluation has no general legislated clock

Fact-level verified

The current-linked TGA variation guide expressly says there is no legislated timeframe for evaluating an ARTG variation. Its 3-5-business-day target applies only to the stated Class III programming-software variation after the new hardware is approved. The reasonable information-request response period of at least ten working days is an applicant deadline, not a general evaluation SLA.

Conditions
  • Do not substitute initial ARTG inclusion or conformity-assessment timelines for a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

English language requirement

Fact-level verified

Device information may be supplied in multiple languages, but if the device is supplied in Australia one of those languages must be English; information supplied with the device must be clear, legible and provided in English. Labelling content requirements are in Essential Principle 13 (Schedule 1, MD Regulations) and the sponsor's name and address must appear on supplied devices under Regulation 10.2.

Conditions
  • Applies to all devices supplied in Australia.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

Brand/model UDI changes are distinct from an order REF

Fact-level verified

For a UDI medical device, Essential Principle 13C.2 treats the listed brand-name, model/version and packaging changes as a different type of model, with corresponding database identifiers. Changes made in the same production change are treated together; the pre-change device remains its prior type. Database timing depends on the applicable general start day and supply event. A commercial REF must first be mapped to these fields; UDI consequences do not themselves determine ARTG new-kind or variation classification.

Conditions
  • Select the actual UDI scope, class, start-day and supply dates; do not apply all future stages as current.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate optional export certificate after ARTG accuracy

Fact-level verified

If the importing country needs a certificate, the sponsor/authorised agent may seek CFS for current Australian-supply ARTG devices or Export Certificate for export-only entries. Correct ARTG details before applying; the exports team does not amend them. The form needs sponsor/client and ARTG/GMDN details, declaration and the applicable payment; one form/one optional schedule per certificate. More than five devices need a schedule, not automatic rejection. TGA aims for ten working days; this is a separate export service, not ordinary change approval or automatic certificate reissue.

Conditions
  • The current webpage and January 2026 form differ on payment method/details; use the current operational instructions before submitting.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.

Does a catalogue or reference code change affect registration or UDI?

Check which identifier actually changes. A commercial catalogue, REF or order code is not automatically a device model, registered identifier, GTIN or UDI-DI. Rules for one identifier do not establish the route for another.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Same kind and unchanged manufacturer responsibility

Fact-level verified

An ARTG variation must preserve the same kind of device: sponsor, manufacturer, GMDN, class and the applicable prescribed characteristics/UPI. For manufacturer name or address changes, TGA checks whether responsibility for design, production, packaging and labelling and the QMS remain the same. A same-entity office/name update with unchanged QMS can be accepted; changed control or QMS can require a new inclusion. A sponsor transfer is a different legal event.

Conditions
  • Map a brand or REF to actual public and dossier-held information; do not equate a commercial order code with UPI, model or UDI.
  • Retain the actual class and UPI criteria; the guidance allows selected UPI variations but does not remove the statutory same-kind test.
  • Unchanged QMS alone does not establish that a different responsible legal manufacturer is the same manufacturer for the statutory kind test. If that same-manufacturer criterion is no longer met, an ARTG variation cannot be used to bypass a new inclusion.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

MD variation forms and evidence

Fact-level verified

For MDs, the Class III/AIMD variation form addresses UPI, total-device count, functional description or variants; other relevant updates generally use DCR. Support the actual change with sponsor explanation, manufacturer/notified-body evidence and applicable DoC, design certificate, IFU, label, surgical technique and significant-change approval. Where the certification change requires notified-body approval, complete that before seeking the ARTG variation. Wait for the ARTG decision before implementation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval

DCR batching is limited to the same request

Fact-level verified

One DCR may cover up to ten ARTG entries only where the requested change is the same for each entry. This is distinct from listing additional entries in a sponsor-transfer form and from the conditional 215-dollar evidence-update tariff. Separate approval prerequisites still apply; these provisions do not establish every transfer-plus-name/brand/REF event as one filing.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific government fees

MD variation fee and narrow EU-evidence reduction

Fact-level verified

Current Schedule 9 item 2A (f) sets AUD 1133 for a non-IVD medical-device ARTG variation not covered by (g), excluding data evaluation. Item 2A (g) instead sets AUD 215 per ten entries or part only when the kind is EU-transition affected, the variation solely updates manufacturer evidence, and the same evidence is involved for all entries. General brand, name, address or REF changes do not establish those three conditions.

Conditions
  • The summary table and statute are not identical in their wording; the statutory conditions control.
  • This is not the fee for sponsor transfer, new inclusion, conformity assessment or an export certificate.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific review time

Variation evaluation has no general legislated clock

Fact-level verified

The current-linked TGA variation guide expressly says there is no legislated timeframe for evaluating an ARTG variation. Its 3-5-business-day target applies only to the stated Class III programming-software variation after the new hardware is approved. The reasonable information-request response period of at least ten working days is an applicant deadline, not a general evaluation SLA.

Conditions
  • Do not substitute initial ARTG inclusion or conformity-assessment timelines for a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

English language requirement

Fact-level verified

Device information may be supplied in multiple languages, but if the device is supplied in Australia one of those languages must be English; information supplied with the device must be clear, legible and provided in English. Labelling content requirements are in Essential Principle 13 (Schedule 1, MD Regulations) and the sponsor's name and address must appear on supplied devices under Regulation 10.2.

Conditions
  • Applies to all devices supplied in Australia.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

Brand/model UDI changes are distinct from an order REF

Fact-level verified

For a UDI medical device, Essential Principle 13C.2 treats the listed brand-name, model/version and packaging changes as a different type of model, with corresponding database identifiers. Changes made in the same production change are treated together; the pre-change device remains its prior type. Database timing depends on the applicable general start day and supply event. A commercial REF must first be mapped to these fields; UDI consequences do not themselves determine ARTG new-kind or variation classification.

Conditions
  • Select the actual UDI scope, class, start-day and supply dates; do not apply all future stages as current.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate optional export certificate after ARTG accuracy

Fact-level verified

If the importing country needs a certificate, the sponsor/authorised agent may seek CFS for current Australian-supply ARTG devices or Export Certificate for export-only entries. Correct ARTG details before applying; the exports team does not amend them. The form needs sponsor/client and ARTG/GMDN details, declaration and the applicable payment; one form/one optional schedule per certificate. More than five devices need a schedule, not automatic rejection. TGA aims for ten working days; this is a separate export service, not ordinary change approval or automatic certificate reissue.

Conditions
  • The current webpage and January 2026 form differ on payment method/details; use the current operational instructions before submitting.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.

Can several changes be filed together?

Changes to brand, manufacturer name, office address and reference codes may occur together, including with a real transfer to another legal manufacturer, registration holder or owner. Assess transfer with each single change, and transfer with brand plus reference, manufacturer name plus reference, or office address plus reference changes: seven transfer combinations in total. Evidence must establish the exact combination and the order of filings and approvals. These combinations and their sequence are not all verified by the rules below; a rule for one change does not prove that a single application, fee or review period covers the combination.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Same kind and unchanged manufacturer responsibility

Fact-level verified

An ARTG variation must preserve the same kind of device: sponsor, manufacturer, GMDN, class and the applicable prescribed characteristics/UPI. For manufacturer name or address changes, TGA checks whether responsibility for design, production, packaging and labelling and the QMS remain the same. A same-entity office/name update with unchanged QMS can be accepted; changed control or QMS can require a new inclusion. A sponsor transfer is a different legal event.

Conditions
  • Map a brand or REF to actual public and dossier-held information; do not equate a commercial order code with UPI, model or UDI.
  • Retain the actual class and UPI criteria; the guidance allows selected UPI variations but does not remove the statutory same-kind test.
  • Unchanged QMS alone does not establish that a different responsible legal manufacturer is the same manufacturer for the statutory kind test. If that same-manufacturer criterion is no longer met, an ARTG variation cannot be used to bypass a new inclusion.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

MD variation forms and evidence

Fact-level verified

For MDs, the Class III/AIMD variation form addresses UPI, total-device count, functional description or variants; other relevant updates generally use DCR. Support the actual change with sponsor explanation, manufacturer/notified-body evidence and applicable DoC, design certificate, IFU, label, surgical technique and significant-change approval. Where the certification change requires notified-body approval, complete that before seeking the ARTG variation. Wait for the ARTG decision before implementation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Sponsor transfer and same-person name change

Fact-level verified

Under Regulations 10F/10FA, qualifying sponsor succession/assignment and sponsor-name events are notified in the approved manner within three months. An agreed business/interest transfer carries the inclusion to the new sponsor when the event occurs; it is not a discretionary transfer by a foreign manufacturer. A same sponsor with unchanged ABN/ACN uses the name form; changed ABN/ACN requires new organisation identification and the applicable transfer process.

Conditions
  • A true new legal manufacturer is separately assessed under manufacturer/QMS and same-kind rules; do not substitute a local sponsor change for that assessment.

Conditions for this question

  • Only if the local sponsor/registrant/company also changes; this does not substitute for a true foreign legal-manufacturer/product-owner transfer.
  • Filing route and prior approval

DCR batching is limited to the same request

Fact-level verified

One DCR may cover up to ten ARTG entries only where the requested change is the same for each entry. This is distinct from listing additional entries in a sponsor-transfer form and from the conditional 215-dollar evidence-update tariff. Separate approval prerequisites still apply; these provisions do not establish every transfer-plus-name/brand/REF event as one filing.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Combined filing
  • Supporting documents

Transfer documents and manufacturer-evidence sequence

Fact-level verified

The transfer form identifies both sponsors/client IDs, affected ARTG entries, event/date and declarations by authorised representatives; extra entries use an attached list. Submit after the transfer has occurred and identify pending variations. Manufacturer Evidence is not transferred with sponsorship: the new sponsor first obtains accepted evidence, then submits DCR to link it to the ARTG. That order is separate from the legal event transferring sponsorship.

Conditions for this question

  • Only if the local sponsor/registrant/company also changes; this does not substitute for a true foreign legal-manufacturer/product-owner transfer.
  • Only the expressly cited sequence or pending-application constraint is supported for the actual local role/process. This does not establish one combined application, total fee or shared approval date for a REF/brand/name/office/manufacturer-transfer tuple.
  • Change-specific government fees

MD variation fee and narrow EU-evidence reduction

Fact-level verified

Current Schedule 9 item 2A (f) sets AUD 1133 for a non-IVD medical-device ARTG variation not covered by (g), excluding data evaluation. Item 2A (g) instead sets AUD 215 per ten entries or part only when the kind is EU-transition affected, the variation solely updates manufacturer evidence, and the same evidence is involved for all entries. General brand, name, address or REF changes do not establish those three conditions.

Conditions
  • The summary table and statute are not identical in their wording; the statutory conditions control.
  • This is not the fee for sponsor transfer, new inclusion, conformity assessment or an export certificate.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific government fees
  • Change-specific review time

Sponsor-notification processing target

Fact-level verified

There is no fee for the sponsor transfer/name notification itself. TGA says it normally updates the ARTG within ten working days of a fully completed, signed notification and any required information; the form describes this as an aim. This administrative processing target does not defer legal sponsorship responsibility until the record is updated or price additional ARTG variations.

Conditions for this question

  • Only if the local sponsor/registrant/company also changes; this does not substitute for a true foreign legal-manufacturer/product-owner transfer.
  • Change-specific review time

Variation evaluation has no general legislated clock

Fact-level verified

The current-linked TGA variation guide expressly says there is no legislated timeframe for evaluating an ARTG variation. Its 3-5-business-day target applies only to the stated Class III programming-software variation after the new hardware is approved. The reasonable information-request response period of at least ten working days is an applicant deadline, not a general evaluation SLA.

Conditions
  • Do not substitute initial ARTG inclusion or conformity-assessment timelines for a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

English language requirement

Fact-level verified

Device information may be supplied in multiple languages, but if the device is supplied in Australia one of those languages must be English; information supplied with the device must be clear, legible and provided in English. Labelling content requirements are in Essential Principle 13 (Schedule 1, MD Regulations) and the sponsor's name and address must appear on supplied devices under Regulation 10.2.

Conditions
  • Applies to all devices supplied in Australia.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

Brand/model UDI changes are distinct from an order REF

Fact-level verified

For a UDI medical device, Essential Principle 13C.2 treats the listed brand-name, model/version and packaging changes as a different type of model, with corresponding database identifiers. Changes made in the same production change are treated together; the pre-change device remains its prior type. Database timing depends on the applicable general start day and supply event. A commercial REF must first be mapped to these fields; UDI consequences do not themselves determine ARTG new-kind or variation classification.

Conditions
  • Select the actual UDI scope, class, start-day and supply dates; do not apply all future stages as current.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate optional export certificate after ARTG accuracy

Fact-level verified

If the importing country needs a certificate, the sponsor/authorised agent may seek CFS for current Australian-supply ARTG devices or Export Certificate for export-only entries. Correct ARTG details before applying; the exports team does not amend them. The form needs sponsor/client and ARTG/GMDN details, declaration and the applicable payment; one form/one optional schedule per certificate. More than five devices need a schedule, not automatic rejection. TGA aims for ten working days; this is a separate export service, not ordinary change approval or automatic certificate reissue.

Conditions
  • The current webpage and January 2026 form differ on payment method/details; use the current operational instructions before submitting.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
Regulation codes

What these codes are

Each row above represents one regulatory instrument. Its code is the authority’s identifier. A regulation page collects the metadata and official source; when readable HTML is available, article links can open and highlight the exact cited passage.

Use this market context

Continue from regulations into practical research

Keep Australia as the target market while you move into registration records, classification, cross-country product research, or pathway planning.

Keep researching this market
View the Australia resource hub →
Compare regulations across all countries →
Tracked from official TGA publications · row IDs are stable — cite as regulations:australia:au-animal-origin