Pure Global AI
TGA · structured requirements

🇦🇺 Australia medical device regulatory data

Explore the medical device requirements currently available for Australia, organized by topic and linked to official sources.

43 facts23 dimensions19 official sourceslatest verification 2026-09-18

Advertising, claims & promotion

Which claims, audiences, channels, approvals, and restrictions apply?

Compare countries

Advertising Code instrument

advertising.advertising-code-2021
Fact-level verified

Advertising of therapeutic goods (including medical devices) must comply with the Therapeutic Goods (Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code) Instrument 2021 (F2021L01661), which specifies requirements to protect the public from unethical, inaccurate or misleading advertising practices.

Conditions
  • Applies to advertising of therapeutic goods to consumers.

Off-label advertising offence

advertising.off-label-advertising-offence
Fact-level verified

Advertising material for medical devices must be limited to the approved intended purpose under the ARTG inclusion, and it is an offence to advertise a device by any means for any other purpose; the claim 'TGA approved' must not be used in advertising except with explicit TGA authorisation, and restricted representations require prior approval.

Conditions
  • Applies to all advertising of included devices.

Approval validity & renewal

What expires, what is retained periodically, and when must renewal start?

Compare countries

Retention via annual charge

validity.annual-charge-nonpayment-cancellation
Fact-level verified

ARTG inclusion of a kind of medical device may be cancelled under s 41GL(f) of the Act (or suspended under s 41GA(1)(b)) if the annual charge is not paid within 20 working days of it becoming payable; TGA issues invoices for all non-ACE entries each July, so inclusion is retained by paying annual charges rather than by periodic renewal.

Conditions
  • Annual Charge Exemption (ACE) scheme entries and low-value exemptions are excepted until turnover commences.

Conformity assessment certificate expiry

validity.ca-certificate-recertification
Fact-level verified

TGA Conformity Assessment certificates are issued for a finite period and expire: manufacturers must apply for recertification of a certificate that is about to expire, lodge new applications for substantial changes, and remain subject to TGA surveillance audits while certified.

Conditions
  • Applies to manufacturers holding TGA Conformity Assessment certificates.

Authority & regime

Which authority and binding regime govern this product, task, and date?

Compare countries

Competent authority

authority.competent-authority
Fact-level verified

Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), part of the Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, is the regulator for medical devices and IVDs under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 and the Therapeutic Goods (Medical Devices) Regulations 2002.

Conditions
  • Applies to all device and IVD classes.

TGA administers ARTG inclusion, conformity assessment, audits and post-market oversight.

Penalties for supplying unapproved devices

authority.unapproved-supply-penalties
Fact-level verified

Supplying or importing medical devices not included in the ARTG (absent an exemption) is a criminal offence carrying up to five years imprisonment and/or 5,000 penalty units (one penalty unit valued at AUD 330 under the Crimes Act 1914).

Conditions
  • Applies to supply contrary to the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989
  • Penalty unit value as stated on the TGA page at review date

Change control

Does the event require internal documentation, notice, prior approval, transfer, or a new application?

Compare countries

Change-control outcomes

change.available-outcomes
Fact-level verified
Outcomes
  • Notification Or Administrative Update
  • Prior Approval Amendment Or Variation
  • New Registration Or New Application
Description

An ARTG variation is limited to the same kind of device; variations are made under s 9D(1) of the Act and must meet the s 41BE criteria.

Conditions
  • Variation, Device Change Request and IVD Variation forms in TBS are used depending on device class.

New-application triggers

change.new-application-triggers
Fact-level verified
  • change creating a different kind of medical device (kind defined by unique product identifier for Class III/AIMD/Class 4 IVD and companion diagnostics, reg 1.6)
  • change to the manufacturer's quality management system or design controls (e.g. acquisition, bankruptcy, death, winding up)
  • change of legal manufacturer without a sponsor transfer
Conditions
  • A new inclusion application is required because a variation cannot change the kind of device.

Variation before approval is a breach

change.variation-before-approval-breach
Fact-level verified

Implementing a variation to an ARTG entry before the Secretary has approved it breaches a condition of inclusion in the ARTG.

Conditions
  • Applies to all variations requiring prior approval.

Clinical investigation & performance

Which clinical or IVD performance evidence or study is required and accepted?

Compare countries

Clinical evidence requirement

clinical.evidence-essential-principles
Fact-level verified

Clinical evidence is required to substantiate a kind of medical device's compliance with the Essential Principles (Schedule 1 and Part 8 of Schedule 3 of the MD Regulations); clinical evaluation procedures must be applied to the device under reg 3.11(1), and TGA's Clinical evidence guidelines for medical devices set out how to compile and present the evidence.

Conditions
  • Applies to all device classes; level of evidence proportionate to classification, type and intended purpose.

Device definition & scope

Is the product a device, IVD, accessory, software, or borderline product locally?

Compare countries

Device definition

scope.device-definition-s41bd
Fact-level verified

A medical device is defined in s 41BD of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989; in vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices are medical devices whose definition is set out in the Therapeutic Goods (Medical Devices) Regulations 2002. Software and accessories meeting the definition are regulated as devices.

Conditions
  • Definition determines whether ARTG inclusion obligations apply.

Dossier requirements

Which evidence, local deltas, formats, and signatures are required?

Compare countries

Documents required to pass preliminary assessment

dossier.preliminary-assessment-documents
Fact-level verified
Requirement

Class-specific documents (per Table 2 of TGA's market authorisation evidence guidance) must be attached to the TGA application to pass preliminary assessment

Australian Deltas
  • Australian Declaration of Conformity made under Schedule 3 of the MD Regulations (a declaration to the European MDD requirements is not acceptable)
  • Product information supplied with the device must be clear, legible and in English
  • Clinical evidence substantiating Essential Principles compliance (Schedule 1 and Part 8 of Schedule 3)
Mra Note

Certificates issued under MRAs may no longer be acceptable for some higher-risk devices including Class III and AIMDs

Conditions
  • Document set depends on device classification and kind, including IVDs.

Economic-operator roles

Which manufacturer, representative, holder, applicant, importer, and distributor roles apply?

Compare countries

Local market-entry role

market-entry.local-role
Fact-level verified
Archetype

Sponsor Or Local Market Entry Owner

Name

Australian sponsor

Required For Foreign

yes

Registration Relation

Owns ARTG Inclusion And Market Entry Obligations

Importer Relation

May Be Same But Each Sponsor Needs Own ARTG Entry

Distributor Relation

Can Be Separate

Combination

allowed

Note

A health professional who supplies a device to the Australian market, including by using it in clinical practice, becomes the sponsor of the device.

Conditions
  • Sponsor must be a recognised Australian-based legal entity.

Representative or holder change

market-entry.representative-change
Fact-level verified
Path Code

Sponsor Transfer By Operation Of Law Or New ARTG Inclusion

Fresh Registration

No If Transfer Notified Yes If No Transfer

Timing

Sponsorship changes by operation of law under regs 10AB, 10F and 10H of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 at the time of the triggering event (death, bankruptcy, winding up, business transfer), regardless of notification

Notification

New sponsor must notify TGA as soon as possible after the event; current official guidance states no fee and no fixed statutory window

Processing

TGA updates the ARTG entries usually within 10 working days of a complete signed notification

Consent

The transfer form cannot be used without the current sponsor's consent; third parties such as manufacturers cannot lawfully transfer sponsorship

Manufacturer Evidence

Sponsor transfer does not transfer Manufacturer Evidence; the new sponsor must arrange appropriate manufacturer evidence

Conditions
  • Applies to changes of sponsorship of ARTG entries.

Correction: the baseline claimed a 3-month notification window; the current official page urges notification as soon as possible and states no 3-month window, no fee, and 10-working-day ARTG update.

Sponsor must be Australian-based

market-entry.sponsor-australian-entity
Fact-level verified

The sponsor must meet the definition of sponsor under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989, which requires a recognised Australian-based legal entity; sponsors are usually the Australian importer of overseas-manufactured medical devices.

Conditions
  • Required for any sponsor seeking ARTG inclusion.

Establishment, import & distribution

Which establishment licences, importer permissions, and distribution controls apply?

Compare countries

Each sponsor needs its own ARTG entry

establishment.each-sponsor-own-artg-entry
Fact-level verified

Every sponsor must apply to the TGA to have its imported medical devices included in the ARTG, even when another sponsor already has an ARTG entry for the same device; there is no separate importer licence regime — the sponsor's ARTG inclusion authorises import and supply.

Conditions
  • Applies to all imported devices requiring ARTG inclusion.

Fees

What regulator fee applies to this class, route, event, and date?

Compare countries

Audit fee condition

fees.audit-fee-mandatory-selection
Fact-level verified

An audit fee must be paid only when an application is selected for mandatory audit by law; no audit fee is payable when an application is selected for non-mandatory audit, and the audit cannot start until fees are paid.

Conditions
  • Mandatory audit selection is set by law (s 41FH of the Act).

Label, IFU & language

Which label and IFU elements, languages, symbols, and translation controls apply?

Compare countries

English language requirement

label.english-required
Fact-level verified

Device information may be supplied in multiple languages, but if the device is supplied in Australia one of those languages must be English; information supplied with the device must be clear, legible and provided in English. Labelling content requirements are in Essential Principle 13 (Schedule 1, MD Regulations) and the sponsor's name and address must appear on supplied devices under Regulation 10.2.

Conditions
  • Applies to all devices supplied in Australia.

Manufacturer PMS

Which PMS plan, report, PMCF or PMPF, trend, and lifecycle-update duties apply?

Compare countries

Annual PMS reports for high-risk devices

pms.annual-reports-first-three-years
Fact-level verified

Sponsors must provide annual reports for the first three years where a Class III, Class IIb implantable, or Class 4 IVD device is included in the ARTG (s 41FO(2) of the Act; reg 5.11 of the MD Regulations).

Conditions
  • Class III, Class IIb implantable and Class 4 IVD devices only
  • First three years after inclusion.

Record retention periods

pms.records-retention-years
Fact-level verified

Records must be retained for 10 years for Class 4 IVDs, Class III and Class IIb implantable devices, or 5 years for other devices, after the last product has been distributed (s 41FO of the Act; regs 5.9, 5.10 and 8.1(b) of the MD Regulations).

Conditions
  • Retention runs from last distribution.

Official forms & portals

Which current form, portal, account, and submission package must be used?

Compare countries

Submission portal and account

forms.tbs-portal-client-id
Fact-level verified

Applications for ARTG inclusion are lodged through the TGA Business Services (TBS) portal; the sponsor needs a Client ID and TBS access before submitting a medical device application.

Conditions
  • Applies to all inclusion applications and most subsequent lifecycle transactions.

QMS, audit & inspection

Which QMS, audit, inspection, and certificate scope is accepted or required?

Compare countries

QMS and audit evidence for market access

qms.market-access-evidence
Fact-level verified
Iso Relation

Regulatory Qms Aligned With Iso

Local Regime

TGA audits the manufacturer's QMS as part of Conformity Assessment against regulatory requirements and ISO 13485:2016, with on-site or desktop assessments; surveillance audits continue after certificate issue

Iso Role

ISO 13485 certificates alone do not create ARTG inclusion; evidence of audits by comparable overseas regulators or MDSAP auditing organisations may support an abridged desktop assessment

Mdsap Role

Rac Member Audit Reuse

Conditions
  • Applies to manufacturers of devices requiring conformity assessment evidence (not the Class I self-declaration route).

Recall, FSCA & market surveillance

Which recall, FSCA, notice, and authority-coordination duties apply?

Compare countries

PRAC recall procedure

recall.prac-effective-2025-03-05
Fact-level verified

The Procedure for Recalls, Product Alerts and Product Corrections (PRAC) took effect on 5 March 2025 and replaced the Uniform Recall Procedure for Therapeutic Goods (URPTG); recall notifications are lodged via TGA Business Services, TGA aims to agree notifications within 7 business days, and actions are classified Class I/II/III with wholesale, hospital, retail and consumer levels, published in the DRAC database.

Conditions
  • Applies to all therapeutic goods market actions in Australia.

Effective from 2025-03-05

Corrects the brief's hint that URPTG still applies.

Registration pathways

Which registration, notification, listing, reliance, or conformity route applies?

Compare countries

Manufacturer's Evidence prerequisite

registration.manufacturers-evidence-prerequisite
Fact-level verified

Manufacturer's Evidence must be submitted to and accepted by TGA before the sponsor commences the device inclusion application; documents attached to the application are assessed in addition to that evidence.

Conditions
  • Applies to device classes requiring conformity evidence (i.e. other than the Class I / Class 1 self-declaration route).

Market-access route or official registration surface

registration.market-access-route
Fact-level verified

Unless exempt, a device must be included in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) before supply: the Australian sponsor lodges an inclusion application via TGA Business Services after acceptable Manufacturer's Evidence is in place, and TGA performs a 20-working-day preliminary assessment plus any mandatory or discretionary audit before inclusion.

Conditions
  • Class I non-sterile/non-measuring devices and Class 1 IVDs (non-self-test/point-of-care) follow a sponsor self-declaration application route without conformity assessment certificates
  • All other classes require TGA-accepted Manufacturer's Evidence before the application

Reliance & recognition

Which foreign decisions or evidence can be reused, with what effect and conditions?

Compare countries

Existing records include acceptance, restrictions and evidence reuse. The applicable product scope and conditions are preserved below; a reference does not by itself confer market access.

Australia approvals and evidence in other markets (86 records)

ArmeniaBrazil ANVISA · EU conformity assessment · US FDA · Health Canada · Singapore HSA · UK MHRA · South Korea MFDS · Japan MHLW / PMDA · NMPA · Australia TGA · Türkiye conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Import of an unregistered device requires proof of authorisation in the country of manufacture or in an IMDRF member country

reliance.origin-country-or-imdrf-authorisation-evidence-for-unregistered-import
Fact-level verified
Statement

A device that has no Armenian state registration can still be imported, but the import (conformity) certificate file must contain a document confirming that the device is authorised for use — state registration or free circulation — in its country of manufacture or in an IMDRF member country, or a reasoned reference to such a document, including a Declaration of Conformity with references to the relevant registers. This is the origin-country free-sale certificate requirement: a Turkish, Korean, Chinese or European exporter must produce its home-country registration/free-sale evidence (or an IMDRF-country equivalent) even though the device is not registered in Armenia. The document is mandatory paperwork; the Armenian expert organisation still examines the file and the Ministry of Health still decides.

Source Approval

Registration / free circulation in the country of manufacture, or in any IMDRF member country — US FDA, EU member states (CE), Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS, China NMPA, Canada, Australia, Brazil, Singapore, UK — evidenced by a registration certificate, free-sale certificate or a Declaration of Conformity with register references

Edge Type

Origin Country Evidence

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

Import Control

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The obligation attaches to the import (conformity) certificate for devices without Armenian state registration; for devices that do have Armenian state registration the equivalent item is a copy of the Armenian registration certificate, and the origin-country evidence is not required.
  • One of the ten statutory grounds for refusing the import certificate is that the imported device has no Armenian state registration, except in the cases the Law allows (Article 47.2(7)(8)). The origin/IMDRF evidence does not cure that ground where registration was required; it is the supporting document for the unregistered-device import cases the Law permits.
  • The file also requires, for every batch, a quality conformity certificate or equivalent, and the instructions for use or a reference to their electronic version (Annex 2, para. 2(2)(b), (c)).
  • The document list was extended by Government Decree No. 1731-Ն of 12.10.2023 and No. 1619-Ն of 17.10.2024.

Language: Armenian. Verbatim, Government Decree No. 429-Ն of 30.03.2023, Annex No. 2, para. 2(2)(a): "պետական գրանցում չունեցող բժշկական արտադրատեսակների համար՝ ա. բժշկական արտադրատեսակի արտադրող երկրում կամ Բժշկական արտադրատեսակների կարգավորող մարմինների միջազգային համաժողովի (IMDRF) անդամ երկրներում կիրառման թույլտվությունը (պետական գրանցումը, ազատ կիրառումը) հավաստող փաստաթուղթ կամ դրա վերաբերյալ փաստարկված տեղեկանք, այդ թվում՝ բժշկական արտադրատեսակների համապատասխանության հայտարարագիր (Declaration of Conformity) համապատասխան գրանցամատյանների հղումով". Translation: "for medical devices without state registration: a. a document confirming authorisation for use (state registration, free circulation) in the country of manufacture of the medical device or in member countries of the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF), or a reasoned reference thereto, including a Declaration of Conformity for the medical device with reference to the relevant registers".

ArmeniaBrazil ANVISA · EU conformity assessment · US FDA · Health Canada · Singapore HSA · UK MHRA · South Korea MFDS · Japan MHLW / PMDA · NMPA · Australia TGA · IMDRF member authorities · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

Simplified national registration for a device registered in an IMDRF member country or prequalified by WHO

reliance.imdrf-member-or-who-prequalified-simplified-registration
Fact-level verified
Statement

Armenia registers medical devices under two national procedures: a general procedure and a simplified procedure. The simplified procedure applies to a device that is registered in a country that is a member of the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) or that is prequalified by the World Health Organization. IMDRF members include the United States (FDA), the EU member states (CE marking), Japan (PMDA), Korea (MFDS), China (NMPA), Canada, Australia, Brazil, Singapore and the United Kingdom, so a US FDA 510(k)/PMA clearance, an EU CE mark, a Japan PMDA approval and a Korea MFDS approval all satisfy the gate. The device is still registered in Armenia by the Armenian authority — the foreign registration opens the shortened procedure, it does not replace the Armenian certificate.

Source Approval

Registration in any IMDRF member country — US FDA 510(k)/PMA, EU CE marking under MDR/IVDR (any EU member state), Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS, China NMPA, Health Canada, Australia TGA, Brazil ANVISA, Singapore HSA, UK MHRA — or WHO prequalification of the device

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The provision is written as an annex to part 3 of the same article: 'under the procedure laid down by part 3 of this article' devices are registered under the general and simplified procedures. Part 3 is itself the Armenia-only route, and a footnote to Article 46 states that part 3 operates only until the end of the transitional period set by Article 11 of the EAEU Agreement of 23 December 2014 (footnote inserted by Article 3(2) of the Law of 5 December 2024 ՀՕ-502-Ն). The transitional period was extended by the Protocol signed in Moscow on 29 December 2025, which replaced '2025' with '2027' in the first paragraph of Article 11 of that Agreement and '2026' with '2028' in the third and fourth paragraphs.
  • Bounded claim: the Law names IMDRF membership and WHO prequalification as the gate for the simplified procedure. It does not name the FDA, the CE mark, the PMDA or the MFDS; those follow from their countries' IMDRF membership, not from the text.
  • The operational content of the 'simplified procedure' (dossier list, clocks, certificate form) sits in the Government procedure that Article 46(3) contemplates; that instrument was not located in this session (see unresolved: registration-pathways).
  • Devices are registered by the Ministry of Health (the լիազոր մարմին / authorised body) with the examination carried out by the expert organisation designated by Government decision (Article 46(2), (5)).

Language: Armenian. Verbatim, Article 46(4): "Սույն հոդվածի 3-րդ մասով սահմանված կարգի համաձայն՝ բժշկական արտադրատեսակները գրանցվում են ընդհանուր և պարզեցված ընթացակարգերով: Պարզեցված ընթացակարգը կիրառվում է բժշկական արտադրատեսակների շրջանառությունը կարգավորող մարմինների միջազգային համաժողովի (IMDRF) անդամ երկրում գրանցված կամ Առողջապահության համաշխարհային կազմակերպության նախաորակավորած բժշկական արտադրատեսակների համար:" Translation: "Under the procedure laid down by part 3 of this article, medical devices are registered under general and simplified procedures. The simplified procedure applies to medical devices registered in a member country of the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) or prequalified by the World Health Organization." Article 46 was amended by the Law of 5 December 2024 ՀՕ-502-Ն; the consolidated expression is the version in force from 31.05.2026.

BahrainSaudi Arabia · US FDA · Australia TGA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Ireland · Swissmedic · France · Germany

Prior approval / evidence record

Registration certificate from SFDA (Saudi Arabia), US FDA, TGA (Australia), PMDA (Japan), MHRA (United Kingdom), HPRA (Ireland), Swissmedic (Switzerland), ANSM (France) or BfArM (Germany)

Authority

Registration certificate from SFDA (Saudi Arabia), US FDA, TGA (Australia), PMDA (Japan), MHRA (United Kingdom), HPRA (Ireland), Swissmedic (Switzerland), ANSM (France) or BfArM (Germany)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Article (7) bis of Resolution No. (48) of 2020, inserted by Resolution No. (69) of 2024, provides by way of exception to the ordinary Article (7) prohibition that medical devices and products registered in one of the nine listed reference countries 'shall also be registered in the Kingdom of Bahrain' on the basis of that country's registration certificate, on payment of the applicable fee. This is a documentary registration route rather than a full de novo technical assessment, but the application is still filed by a licensed Bahraini Authorized Representative and NHRA retains the decision.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

BahrainUS FDA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Saudi Arabia · Australia TGA · UK MHRA · Ireland · Swissmedic · France · Germany

Prior approval / evidence record

Registration certificate from a listed reference country is an alternative basis for Bahraini registration (Art. 7 bis)

reliance.reference-country-registration-certificate-route
Fact-level verified
Statement

Article (7) bis of Resolution No. (48) of 2020, inserted by Resolution No. (69) of 2024, provides that by way of exception to the ordinary Article (7) prohibition, medical devices and products registered in one of nine listed reference countries 'shall also be registered in the Kingdom of Bahrain' on the basis of the registration certificate issued by that country, following payment of the applicable fee. The listed reference authorities are SFDA (Saudi Arabia), FDA (United States), TGA (Australia), PMDA (Japan), MHRA (United Kingdom), HPRA (Ireland), Swissmedic (Switzerland), ANSM (France) and BfArM (Germany). A holder of a US FDA or Japan PMDA registration therefore has a documentary registration route in Bahrain rather than a full de novo technical assessment.

Source Approval

US FDA registration/clearance; Japan PMDA approval; Saudi SFDA registration; Australia TGA registration; UK MHRA registration; Ireland HPRA registration; Swissmedic (Switzerland) registration; France ANSM registration; Germany BfArM registration

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Only the nine authorities named in Article (7) bis are listed; Korea MFDS, Health Canada and China NMPA are not among them
  • The EU CE mark as such is not listed; the Union route appears only through three named national authorities (HPRA, ANSM, BfArM)
  • The application is still made by a Bahraini licensed Authorized Representative and the applicable fee must be paid
  • In force from the day following publication in the Official Gazette (No. 3781, 21 November 2024)
  • Resolution No. (69) of 2024 replaced Article (10) of Resolution No. (48) of 2020 so that marketing authorisation runs for three years

Effective from 2024-11-22

Verbatim source passage: "By way of exception to Article (7) of this Resolution, medical devices and products registered in one of the following reference countries shall also be registered in the Kingdom of Bahrain: 1. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - Represented by the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA). 2. United States of America - Represented by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 3. Australia - Represented by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). 4. Japan - Represented by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). 5. United Kingdom - Represented by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). 6. Ireland - Represented by the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA). 7. Switzerland - Represented by Swissmedic(Swissmedic). 8. France - Represented by the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM). 9. Germany - Represented by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM). Based on the registration certificate issued by one of these countries, following the payment of the applicable fee."

BahrainSaudi Arabia · US FDA · UK MHRA · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Swissmedic · Ireland · Denmark · New Zealand · France · Netherlands · Belgium

Prior approval / evidence record

Free Sale Certificate may be issued by the country of origin or by a reference country

reliance.free-sale-certificate-origin-or-reference-country
Fact-level verified
Statement

At renewal, Bahrain requires a Free Sale Certificate (FSC) or Certificate to Foreign Government issued by the regulatory authority of the country of origin or of a reference country (Registration Guideline 9.1, section 10 item 4). The guideline's glossary (item 14) defines reference countries as Saudi Arabia, USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Japan, Switzerland, Ireland, Denmark, New Zealand, France, Holland and Belgium, so a certificate from one of those authorities substitutes for an origin-country free-sale certificate. A Free Sale Certificate is also required on manufacturer acquisition (section 12).

Source Approval

Free Sale Certificate or Certificate to Foreign Government from the country of origin or from a reference country (Saudi Arabia, USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Japan, Switzerland, Ireland, Denmark, New Zealand, France, Holland, Belgium)

Edge Type

Origin Country Evidence

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The classification guideline separately accepts a Free Sale Certificate OR Registration Certificate from one of the reference countries as a classification requirement
  • The reference-country list in the registration guideline glossary includes Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands ('Holland') and New Zealand, which are not in the Article (7) bis list of Resolution No. (69) of 2024, and omits Germany
  • Free Sale Certificate is also required on manufacturer acquisition (Section 12)

Verbatim source passages: "Free Sale Certificate (FSC) or Certificate to foreign government issued by the regulatory authority of the country of origin or a reference country." and "Reference countries: Saudi Arabia, USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Japan, Switzerland, Ireland, Denmark, New Zealand, France, Holland, Belgium."

BahrainSaudi Arabia · US FDA · UK MHRA · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Swissmedic · Ireland · Denmark · New Zealand · France · Netherlands · Belgium

Prior approval / evidence record

Classification of a product as a medical device may be evidenced by a registration certificate from a reference country

reliance.reference-country-certificate-for-classification
Fact-level verified
Statement

To obtain an NHRA classification letter, the applicant must supply a Free Sale Certificate or Registration Certificate issued by the competent authority of the country of origin or by one of the reference countries listed in the classification guideline (SFDA, USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Japan, Switzerland, Ireland, Denmark, New Zealand, France, Holland, Belgium), together with a recognised quality assurance certificate such as ISO 13485, CE mark or FDA.

Source Approval

Registration certificate or Free Sale Certificate from SFDA (Saudi Arabia), US FDA, UK, Australia, Canada, Japan, Switzerland, Ireland, Denmark, New Zealand, France, Holland or Belgium

Edge Type

Origin Country Evidence

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

classification

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • A classification letter is a separate, fee-bearing NHRA service that precedes importation and registration
  • The reference-country list here is broader than the Article (7) bis list in Resolution No. (69) of 2024 and omits Germany and includes Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands and New Zealand
  • For class I products without CE marking a manufacturer's Declaration of Conformity may be provided

Verbatim source passage: "1. Free Sale Certificate OR Registration Certificate issued from competent authority in country of origin classifies the product as a medical device. 2. Free Sale Certificate OR Registration Certificate issued from one of the following reference countries: (SFDA, USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Japan, Switzerland, Ireland, Denmark, Newzland, France, and Holland, Belgium.)."

BangladeshEU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Regulatory reference

Free Sale Certificate requirements by class

reliance.fsc-origin-rules
Fact-level verified

Dossier must include regulatory status evidence: for Class C and D devices a Free Sale Certificate from any one of EU, USA, Canada, Australia and Japan plus an FSC from the country of origin; a conformity-assessment certificate or equivalent must also be submitted. (Class B: FSC from country of origin.)

Guideline s.4.7 accepts QMS/product certification or marketing authorization issued by a National Regulatory Authority/notified body outside Bangladesh; a Device Master File is required only where CE/US FDA approvals are not available.

BotswanaIMDRF member authorities · WHO · MDSAP

Prior approval / evidence record

The broad reliance and mutual-recognition provisions in the 2025 Act and the draft 2026 Regulations are not yet an operating route

reliance.draft-2026-regulations-reliance-provisions-not-in-force
Fact-level verified
Statement

The Medicines and Related Substances Act, 2025 introduces reliance on decisions by trusted authorities and mutual recognition agreements, and the draft Medical Devices Regulations, 2026 would let BoMRA rely on approvals from IMDRF member authorities, African Medical Devices Forum recognised authorities, WHO prequalification, WHO Listed Authorities and Maturity Level 3/4 authorities, and on MDSAP audit outcomes. Neither instrument is in force: the Act's commencement is 'ON NOTICE' and the Regulations are unpublished drafts. A holder of a foreign approval therefore has no route under these provisions today.

Source Approval

none

Edge Type

No Reliance Route

Market Access Strength

none

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The document is an unpublished draft: its cover reads '(Published on __________, 2026)' and the companion Fees Regulations read 'Made this ___ day of ___, 2026'.
  • BoMRA's press release of 31 August 2026 states the regulations are 'both still in draft form and open for stakeholder input'.
  • The 2025 Act on which the draft depends has its commencement 'ON NOTICE'.
  • Draft reg. 17(3) preserves BoMRA's power to request Botswana-specific information, impose local conditions, conduct independent assessment and take independent regulatory action.

Status is official-source-verified for the text of the draft; the conditions and the reliance-recognition value record that the instrument is not in force. This is the deliberate 'do not upgrade a policy aspiration into an operating route' fact for Botswana. The draft would also give registration a five-year term (draft reg. 20(1)).

BotswanaEU conformity assessment · US FDA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Swissmedic · Health Canada · Australia TGA · Iceland · Norway

Prior approval / evidence record

Stringent Regulatory Authority approval — ICH members (European Commission, US FDA, Japan MHLW/PMDA), ICH observers (Swissmedic, Health Canada) or an authority associated with an ICH member through a legally binding mutual recognition agreement (including Australia, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway)

Authority

Stringent Regulatory Authority approval — ICH members (European Commission, US FDA, Japan MHLW/PMDA), ICH observers (Swissmedic, Health Canada) or an authority associated with an ICH member through a legally binding mutual recognition agreement (including Australia, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway)

Accepted

No

Benefit

The SRA definition in G01 s.3.1.26 is used for dossier and reference purposes rather than as an automatic grant: an SRA approval does not by itself confer a Botswana registration, and it benefits the applicant only through the abridged pathway's proof-of-reference-agency requirement, which is defined by the separate Reference Regulatory Authority concept.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

BotswanaEU conformity assessment · US FDA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Swissmedic · Health Canada · Australia TGA · Iceland · Norway · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

A prior approval from an SRA, an RRA, or WHO (with ISO 13485) opens the abridged assessment pathway

reliance.abridged-assessment-on-sra-rra-or-who-approval
Fact-level verified
Statement

For a Class B, C or D general medical device, an existing approval from a Stringent Regulatory Authority, a BoMRA-recognised Reference Regulatory Authority, or WHO prequalification, together with a valid ISO 13485 certificate, qualifies the application for the abridged assessment pathway instead of full evaluation. Class B accepts one approval from an RRA, an SRA or WHO. Class C requires at least one SRA or WHO approval, plus at least three years on the market in an SRA jurisdiction and no safety issues in the previous three years. Class D requires approvals from at least two RRAs including one SRA, plus the same three-year marketing and safety conditions. The local application and the final BoMRA decision are retained in all cases.

Source Approval

Any Stringent Regulatory Authority (ICH member: European Commission, US FDA, Japan MHLW/PMDA; ICH observers: EFTA/Swissmedic, Health Canada; ICH-associated via MRA: Australia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway) or a BoMRA-recognised Reference Regulatory Authority, or WHO (with valid ISO 13485 certification or equivalent)

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Each class has its own threshold: Class B - one RRA, SRA or WHO approval; Class C - one SRA or WHO approval plus 3 years marketed in an SRA jurisdiction; Class D - two RRAs including one SRA plus 3 years marketed.
  • The three-year safety test is defined as no reported deaths, no reported serious deterioration in the state of health of any person, and no open field safety corrective actions including recalls at the point of submission.
  • A prior rejection or withdrawal by a foreign jurisdiction for quality, performance/efficacy or safety reasons disqualifies the abridged route.
  • The RRA list itself is not published in the guideline; it lives in BOMRA-ER-MED-Policy No.1, which BoMRA's site did not serve.
  • Regulatory layer is premarket_review: the abridged route shortens the assessment, it does not dispense with BoMRA's registration.

Effective from 2024-12-09

SRA is defined in the same guideline at s. 3.1.26 as an ICH member (European Commission, US FDA, MHLW/PMDA), an ICH observer (EFTA as represented by Swissmedic, and Health Canada), or an authority associated with an ICH member through a legally binding mutual recognition agreement (Australia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway). China NMPA is NOT an SRA on that definition. RRA is defined at s. 3.1.25 by cross-reference to BoMRA policy 'Recognition and-or Reliance on Information on Medical Devices including IVDs from Regional and International Regulatory Agencies BOMRA-ER-MED-Policy No.1', which was not found published on the BoMRA site.

BrazilAustralia TGA

Regulatory reference

Reference authority: Australia TGA

reliance.aree-au-tga
Fact-level verified

Australia Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) listing on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) is accepted under the optimized review procedure for class III/IV device registration.

Conditions
  • Requires authorization by at least one listed AREE and essentially identical device/indications (IN 290/2024 Art. 7º).
  • IN 290/2024 Art. 2º: applies to class III/IV primary registration petitions.
  • ANVISA decides independently (RDC 741/2022 Art. 13).

Effective from 2024-06-03

Framework: RDC 741/2022 (in force 1 September 2022) + IN 290/2024 (in force 3 June 2024).

BrazilUS FDA · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Brazil ANVISA

Prior approval / evidence record

Optimized analysis (procedimento otimizado, IN 290/2024)

Name

Optimized analysis (procedimento otimizado, IN 290/2024)

Description

ANVISA uses the analysis already performed by a recognised equivalent foreign regulator as the sole or complementary reference for the registration decision. It shortens how much ANVISA has to re-review, not where the petition sits in the queue: Art. 10 states expressly that adopting the optimized procedure does not change the chronological order of petitions, and ANVISA publishes no reduced deadline for it.

Timeline Reduction

No published reduction — the RDC 743/2022 deadlines still apply and Art. 10 preserves queue position

Eligibility
  • Class III and IV primary registration petitions only, medical devices and IVDs (Art. 2)
  • Prior authorisation by one of the four recognised AREE: TGA via the ARTG, Health Canada via a Medical Device Licence, US FDA via 510(k), PMA or De Novo, or Japan MHLW via Shonin (Art. 6)
  • The device must be essentially identical to the one the AREE authorised, down to composition, indications, manufacturer and manufacturing process (Art. 5 II)
  • Excluded if the AREE itself granted the authorisation through an abbreviated route similar to ANVISA optimized analysis (Art. 4)
  • Filed as a secondary aditamento petition; omit it and the registration is analysed by the ordinary route (Art. 11)
  • ANVISA keeps the right to revert to ordinary analysis with reasons (Art. 9) and to decide differently from the AREE (Art. 13)

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

BrazilAustralia TGA

Prior approval / evidence record

TGA (Australia)

Authority

TGA (Australia)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Recognised AREE for IN 290/2024, evidenced by the ARTG entry

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

BruneiUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Foreign approvals appear in Brunei only as a government-procurement technical specification, not as a regulatory route

reliance.procurement-international-safety-standard
Fact-level verified
Statement

In at least one Ministry of Health procurement, equipment must comply with one of five named international safety standards — US FDA Standard, European Union CE MARK, Australian TGA Standard, Canadian CSA Standard or Japanese Standard. This is a tender technical requirement for the supply of equipment, not a market-authorisation recognition rule: it creates no registration pathway, shortens no review, and does not name Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS or China NMPA.

Source Approval

US FDA standard; EU CE Marking; Australian TGA standard; Canadian CSA standard; Japanese standard (named generically, not as PMDA approval)

Edge Type

Procurement Admission

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

procurement

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • The requirement is a specification in Tender Reference No. KK/179/2025/JPR/(TC), Annex 5A (Technical and Procurement Requirement), for the provision of automated peritoneal dialysis services to the Department of Renal Services.
  • It is the only place found in any official Brunei document where foreign approvals are named; it must not be read as a registration or recognition mechanism.
  • The accompanying requirement is that the equipment 'must also comply with relevant AAMI Standards such as UL2601 and IEC601-1'.

Verbatim from the tender document (44 pages, text layer, retrieved HTTP 200, 629,727 bytes): 'The equipment must comply to either one of the five international safety standards namely; US FDA Standard, European Union CE MARK, Australian TGA Standard, Canadian CSA Standard or Japanese Standard. The equipment must also comply with relevant AAMI Standards such as UL2601 and IEC601-1.' Searches of the document for 'PMDA', 'MFDS', 'NMPA', 'Korea' and 'China' return no matches, which is why the sourceApproval string does not name those authorities. The bounded claim recorded in value is deliberately limited to what this one procurement states.

CanadaNMPA · US FDA · Australia TGA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Swissmedic · South Korea MFDS · Singapore HSA · Brazil ANVISA

Regulatory reference

Recognized foreign regulators (incorporated list)

reliance.list-of-regulatory-agencies
Fact-level verified

Health Canada maintains a List of Regulatory Agencies (around 40 authorities including US FDA, ANVISA, TGA, MHRA, PMDA/MHLW, COFEPRIS, MFDS, HSA, Swissmedic and NMPA) incorporated by reference into MDR ss.61.2 and 68.3; decisions of these agencies trigger Canada's 72-hour foreign risk notification duty.

Conditions
  • Applies to Class II-IV licence holders and importing MDEL holders.
  • Class I authorization holders excluded.

Page issued 2024-01-03, modified 2024-01-24.

ColombiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class IIa

Id

class-iia

Class Name

Class IIa

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Registration (NSO)

Official Timeline
Min

2

Max

2

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Decreto 4725 de 2005 — INVIMA statutory review clocks (Arts. 21-22)

Url

https://normograma.invima.gov.co/normograma/compilacion/docs/decreto_4725_2005.htm

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

1

Max

2

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

2

Max

3

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • FDA
  • Health Canada
  • Japan MHLW
  • Australia TGA
Notes
  • Decreto 4725/2005 Arts. 21-22: automatic registro administrative act within 2 working days once documents are complete (Classes I and IIa)
  • Reliance pathway available for recognized approvals
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ColombiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class IIb

Id

class-iib

Class Name

Class IIb

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Registration (RSO)

Official Timeline
Min

90

Max

90

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Decreto 4725 de 2005 — INVIMA statutory review clocks (Arts. 21-22)

Url

https://normograma.invima.gov.co/normograma/compilacion/docs/decreto_4725_2005.htm

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

6

Max

12

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

4

Max

6

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • FDA
  • Health Canada
  • Japan MHLW
  • Australia TGA
Notes
  • Decreto 4725/2005: 90 working days for registro sanitario evaluation once documents are complete (Classes IIb and III)
  • Incomplete dossiers are rejected at filing (not suspended)
  • Technical documentation review required
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ColombiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Regulatory reference

Reference-country free-sale certificate

reliance.reference-country-free-sale
Fact-level verified

For imported devices, a certificate from the competent authority of the country of origin stating the product is authorized for production or marketing there is required; if the product is not used in the country of origin, a free-sale certificate from a reference country (EU, United States, Canada, Japan, Australia) or a country with a mutual recognition agreement is required instead.

Conditions
  • Applies to imported devices seeking registro sanitario or permiso de comercialización.
ColombiaUS FDA · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Homologación for reference countries (Decreto 3275/2009)

Name

Homologación for reference countries (Decreto 3275/2009)

Description

Colombia does not run a separate reliance queue. What a reference-country approval buys is the right to skip specific numerals of the Formato Único: for Class I and IIa the technical studies and analytical checks, the sterilisation method and the disposal method; for Class IIb those three plus the clinical studies. Class III is outside the homologation and has to file all twenty numerals.

Timeline Reduction

None — the Decreto 4725/2005 clocks are unchanged; the saving is in dossier assembly

Eligibility
  • Device originates from a reference country: the European Community, the United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, or a country with a mutual recognition agreement
  • Risk class I, IIa or IIb — Class III devices file the complete Formato Único regardless of origin

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

CubaIMDRF member authorities

Regulatory reference

Prior registration in origin/IMDRF country exempts listed evidence

reliance.imdrf-evidence-exemption
Fact-level verified

Per Article 47 of the Reglamento (acápite 3.2.4), devices with prior registration in their country of origin or in another country with a device regulatory program based on the same essential safety/efficacy requirements as the Cuban program (such as IMDRF members) are exempt from presenting: software validation report, biological pre-clinical evidence, safety/environmental/parametric test reports, raw-material certificates of analysis, and stability study. In lieu they present the Certificate of Registration of the origin country or an internationally recognized regulatory program; where the device circulates under manufacturer responsibility without registration, a manufacturer declaration plus evidence of circulation suffices.

Conditions
  • Foreign registration must be current at the time of the Cuban application (Proceder B requirement).

Effective from 2016-07-29

Reinforced by E 132-25 epígrafe 3.8: the CECMED will, as appropriate, take into account decisions of other regulatory authorities and regional/international bodies.

Dominican RepublicUS FDA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Australia TGA · EU conformity assessment · Iceland · Norway

Prior approval / evidence record

WHO Strict Authorities — US FDA, Health Canada, Japan NIHS, Australia TGA, EMA, Icelandic Medicines Agency, Norwegian Medicines Agency, Liechtenstein AML

Authority

WHO Strict Authorities — US FDA, Health Canada, Japan NIHS, Australia TGA, EMA, Icelandic Medicines Agency, Norwegian Medicines Agency, Liechtenstein AML

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Eligibility for the simplified registration procedure under Resolución No. 000004 on a Certificate of Free Sale plus a good-manufacturing-practices certificate from that authority, for new registrations and renewals of imported products; the remaining legal requirements still apply and DIGEMAPS retains the decision.

Timeline Savings

No published period: the MSP service listing shows 'Inmediatamente' rather than a number of days.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

Dominican RepublicUS FDA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Australia TGA · EU conformity assessment · Iceland · Norway · Brazil ANVISA

Prior approval / evidence record

Simplified registration for imported products previously authorised by a WHO Strict Authority or a PAHO/PARF regional reference authority

reliance.strict-authority-prior-authorisation-simplified-procedure
Fact-level verified
Statement

An imported product that has previously been authorised by a WHO Strict Authority or by a regional reference regulatory authority (ARNr) of the PAHO/PARF network may be registered through the simplified procedure, evidenced by a Certificate of Free Sale and a Certificate of Good Manufacturing Practices issued by that authority, in addition to the other requirements of current legislation. Products that any of those authorities has refused to authorise are excluded from the simplified procedure.

Source Approval

WHO Strict Authorities: US FDA; Health Canada; Japan NIHS (National Institute of Health Science); Australia TGA; EMA; Icelandic Medicines Agency; Norwegian Medicines Agency; Liechtenstein (Amt für Lebensmittelkontrolle und Veterinärwesen). PAHO/PARF regional reference authorities (ARNr): ANMAT (Argentina), ANVISA (Brazil), CECMED (Cuba), INVIMA (Colombia), COFEPRIS (Mexico)

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Eligibility runs to 'nuevos registros sanitarios y renovaciones' (new registrations and renewals of existing registrations) of imported products.
  • The prior authorisation is evidenced by a Certificate of Free Sale plus a Certificate of Good Manufacturing Practices issued by the listed authority; the rest of the legally established requirements still apply.
  • A product that one of the listed authorities has refused to authorise may not use the simplified procedure (CUARTO).
  • Products identified as having quality failures in post-market monitoring or serious safety reports are excluded (PÁRRAFO of SEGUNDO).
  • Resolution in force from 1 April 2016 (SEXTO).
  • The resolution is drafted around the medicines framework; the MSP service listing for the simplified procedure expressly covers 'Productos Sanitarios' with its own fee, but the MSP listing shows Productos Sanitarios under the renewal modality only, while the fee table lists them under both new and renewal — the scoping for new device registrations is therefore stated by the MSP rather than by the resolution text itself.

Effective from 2016-04-01

Spanish. Source PDF is an image-only scan (Adobe 'Image Conversion Plug-in'); the passage below was read from the scan by OCR and OCR spacing artefacts were normalised. Original: "Productos importados que previamente hayan sido autorizados por Autoridades Estrictas (OMS) y/o de Autoridades Reguladoras de Referencia Regional (ARNr) de la Red Panamericana para la Armonización de la Reglamentación Farmacéutica (RED PARF/OPS), lo cual debe ser avalado mediante la presentación del 1. Certificado de Libre Venta y Certificado de Buenas Prácticas de Manufactura emitido por las referidas autoridades en adición a los demás requisitos establecidos en la legislación vigente." English: imported products previously authorised by WHO Strict Authorities and/or PAHO/PARF regional reference authorities, evidenced by the free-sale and GMP certificates issued by those authorities, in addition to the other requirements of current legislation. The recognised-authority list (TERCERO) names FDA, Health Canada, NIHS, TGA, EMA, the Icelandic and Norwegian medicines agencies and Liechtenstein as Strict Authorities, and ANMAT, ANVISA, CECMED, INVIMA and COFEPRIS as ARNr.

EcuadorIMDRF member authorities

Regulatory reference

IMDRF recognition for simplified registration

reliance.imdrf-simplified
Fact-level verified

From 28 January 2027, the simplified procedure requires registration from an authority that satisfies BOTH high-vigilance status and IMDRF membership (Article 31). Article 32 additionally requires device marketing in an IMDRF Management Committee country, device-scope authorisation and ARCSA risk classification I-IV. IMDRF membership alone is not sufficient, and NMPA eligibility is not established by this general rule.

Conditions
  • Apply both authority conditions together; the route is not in force before 2027-01-28.
  • Maximum 100 references for DMI/DMNI/DMA and 50 for IVD; the remaining requirements in Articles 33-34 still apply.

Effective from 2027-01-28

Recognition opens a simplified procedure; it is not a full reliance approval.

EcuadorIMDRF member authorities

Regulatory reference

Accepted Certificate of Free Sale sources

reliance.clv-sources
Fact-level verified

For imported devices, a Certificate of Free Sale (CLV) or equivalent is accepted from the country of manufacture or export, from a high-vigilance agency, or from an IMDRF member country; if the CLV or the product-owner authorization states no validity date, ARCSA considers it valid for a maximum of two years from issuance. Electronic CLVs are accepted without apostille when verifiable on the issuing authority's website.

Conditions
  • Applies to imported devices; CLV must state commercial name, product codes/references, manufacturer and manufacturing sites.

Effective from 2027-01-28

Current regime already requires a CLV/Certificate of Exportation for imports (2016 Art. 16.a).

EgyptUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Swissmedic · Norway · New Zealand · Ireland · Iceland

Regulatory reference

List of reference countries

reliance.reference-countries
Fact-level verified

EDA recognizes reference countries: EU member states plus Australia, Canada, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States of America; devices from these countries get reduced documentation, while devices from non-reference countries need extra evidence.

Variation guideline v03 (res-eg-variations) lists the same set plus Croatia and Liechtenstein.

EthiopiaUS FDA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Australia TGA · Singapore HSA · EU conformity assessment · UK MHRA · Health Canada · South Korea MFDS

Prior approval / evidence record

Registration route for devices approved by a listed Stringent Regulatory Authority (FDA, EU, Japan, Australia, Singapore, UK, Canada, Korea)

reliance.sra-verification-route
Fact-level verified
Statement

A medical device that already holds a marketing authorisation, registration certificate or free-sale certificate from one of the authorities EFDA lists as a Stringent Regulatory Authority can be filed on the SRA route (EFDA/GDL/046 §9.4). The applicant still submits the complete administrative and technical dossier required by the ordinary registration guidelines, but EFDA reviews it as a verification exercise focused on the genuineness of the submitted information rather than a de-novo assessment, so the application takes shorter processing time. EFDA keeps the right to conduct a full assessment and to request further information whenever it deems necessary.

Source Approval

US FDA marketing authorisation / registration certificate / free-sale certificate; Japan MHLW; Australia TGA; Singapore HSA; a competent authority of one of the 27 EU Member States (Directive 93/42/EEC, Directive 98/79/EC, MDR 745/2017, IVDR 746/2017); UK MHRA; Health Canada; South Korea MFDS

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The route is a shortened review, not a dossier waiver: 'The applicants should submit all documentation required for registration of medical devices through full assessment path way, but it takes shorter processing time as it will focus on verifiying genuinness of submitted information.'
  • The claim must be supported by a marketing authorisation certificate or registration certificate or free-sale certificate issued by the listed authority (or by WHO/UNFPA prequalification evidence).
  • EFDA determines eligibility for the SRA route after screening the eRIS submission; an application filed as SRA on misleading information is rejected at screening or evaluation.
  • EFDA may still carry out a full assessment and request further information where a foreign approval does not provide the same assurance for use in Ethiopia.
  • The SRA list is published in GDL/046 §9.4 and 'will be updated as deemed necessary'.
  • The same list also appears (without Singapore HSA, UK MHRA and Korea MFDS) in the non-IVD and IVD registration requirement guidelines, which state that registration with those authorities is 'considered to be registered with Stringent Regulatory Authority approved devices registration procedures'.

Effective from 2026-06-25

Verbatim: 'At present, EFDA accepts the registration submissions as an SRA or prequalified products application if they're supported by one or more of the following document(s). 1. A Marketing Authorization certificate or registration certificate or free sale certificate issued by one of the following competent national regulatory authority: US Food and Drug Administration; Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan; Trapeutic Goods Administration, Australia; Health Science Authority, Singapore; Competent Authorities from one of the 27 Member States of the European Union who are responsible in Europe for the oversight of Directive 93/42/EEC, Directive 98/79/EC, MDR 745/2017, IVDR 746/2017.; Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, UK; Health Canada, Canada; Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, South Korea'. The passage also states: 'The applicants should submit all documentation required for registration of medical devices through full assessment path way, but it takes shorter processing time as it will focus on verifiying genuinness of submitted information.' Typographical errors are reproduced as they appear in the source.

Hong KongNMPA · US FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · South Korea MFDS · Singapore HSA

Regulatory reference

Recognised jurisdictions for marketing approvals

reliance.recognised-jurisdictions
Fact-level verified

Pathway 2 accepts marketing approval documents from eight recognised jurisdictions (Chinese Mainland NMPA, USA FDA, EU, Canada, Japan, Singapore, South Korea MFDS, Australia TGA); for example the USA accepts 510(k), PMA or De Novo, and all model/code variants must be covered by the certificate.

Conditions
  • Applies to Class II/III/IV GMD listings.
  • The same eight jurisdictions apply to Class B/C/D IVD listings under GN-06.

A valid Certificate of Free Sale may be requested; certificates must remain valid during assessment (GN-02 clause 8.1).

IndiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · GHTF

Prior approval / evidence record

Class A

Id

class-a

Class Name

Class A

Risk Level

low

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

45

Max

45

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

CDSCO Medical Devices Rules, 2017 (G.S.R. 78(E))

Url

https://cdsco.gov.in/opencms/resources/UploadCDSCOWeb/2022/m_device/Medical%20Devices%20Rules%2C%202017.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

6

Max

9

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

3

Max

5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • GHTF country approval (FDA, EU, Japan, Australia, UK)
Notes
  • Licence granted or rejected within 45 days of application (Rule 20(4)); Notified Body audit happens within 120 days after licence grant, not before (Rule 20(4) proviso (ii))
  • GHTF approval provides significant advantage
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

IndiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA

Regulatory reference

Free sale certificate reliance for import

reliance.fsc-import
Fact-level verified

Where a free sale certificate has been issued by the national regulatory authority of Australia, Canada, Japan, an EU country, the United Kingdom or the United States, the import licence is granted without carrying out clinical investigation.

Conditions
  • United Kingdom added to the rule 36(3) list by G.S.R. 174(E) w.e.f. 04.03.2022.
  • Devices from other countries: Class C/D need Indian clinical investigation (rule 36(4)); Class A/B need published safety/performance data or country-of-origin investigation plus FSC (rule 36(5)).

Effective from 2018-01-01

G.S.R. 174(E): for the words 'or the United States of America' the words 'United Kingdom or the United States of America' shall be substituted.

IndiaAustralia TGA

Prior approval / evidence record

Australia TGA

Authority

Australia TGA

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Named in Rule 36(3) and in the Rule 63(1) proviso, so both the clinical investigation waiver and the no-predicate relief are available.

Timeline Savings

None published — the saving is the clinical investigation, not the clock

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

IsraelUS FDA · UK MHRA · Germany · France · Italy · Spain · Netherlands · Belgium · Ireland · Denmark · Sweden · Finland · Norway · Iceland · Greece · Portugal · Austria · Swissmedic · Australia TGA · Health Canada · New Zealand

Regulatory reference

Recognized-state registration route

reliance.recognized-country-route
Fact-level verified

A device registered, or approved for marketing and actually marketed, in a 'recognized state' (מדינה מוכרת) is registered in the Israeli register for a period not exceeding the period it may be marketed in that state, capped at 5 years from Israeli registration. Recognized states are listed in the First Addendum to the law — 21 states including the US, UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Ireland, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Iceland, Greece, Portugal, Austria, Switzerland, Australia, Canada and New Zealand (no single 'EU' entry: member states are listed individually).

Conditions
  • Device must be registered or permitted for marketing and actually marketed in the recognized state.

First Addendum list per the official Sefer HaChukim text of the law held from gov.il.

IsraelUS FDA · Australia TGA · Health Canada · EU conformity assessment

Regulatory reference

Health Canada evidence

reliance.health-canada-evidence
Fact-level verified

Health Canada medical device licences are among the accepted reference approvals for AMAR registration (listed in the official registration guidelines alongside FDA, CE and TGA); Canadian registrations in principle have no expiry, so a validity of 5 years from the submission date is entered in the approvals table when filing.

Conditions
  • No-expiry approvals are assigned 5-year validity from submission.

Health Canada listed as accepted approval per the AMAR registration guidelines PDF.

IsraelAustralia TGA · Health Canada

Prior approval / evidence record

Health Canada or Australia TGA

Authority

Health Canada or Australia TGA

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

REG-2024/06 restricts the regulatory certificate types that can be entered on an application to CE, FDA, FDA K510, Australian Ministry of Health and Canadian Ministry of Health, so a Canadian or Australian approval is a first-class reference certificate on the same terms as a US or EU one.

Timeline Savings

Same track placement as the US and EU certificates above

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

IsraelAustralia TGA

Regulatory reference

Australia TGA and Health Canada evidence

reliance.au-ca-no-expiry-5y
Fact-level verified

Australian and Canadian registrations in principle have no expiry; when filing (fast track), a validity of 5 years from the submission date is entered in the approvals table. TGA approvals are accepted only of the REGISTRATION type (not ARTG listing types other than registration).

Conditions
  • TGA evidence limited to REGISTRATION type.
  • No-expiry approvals are assigned 5-year validity from submission.

TGA REGISTRATION-only condition per the AMAR registration guidelines PDF.

KenyaUS FDA · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Swissmedic · WHO

Regulatory reference

Reliance mechanisms guideline

reliance.reliance-mechanisms
Fact-level verified

PPB's Guidelines on Reliance Mechanisms for Marketing Authorization apply to all health products and technologies including medical devices: PPB may base part or all of its regulatory decisions on prior evaluations conducted by trusted reference authorities while retaining authority for final approval. Eligible reference mechanisms listed include WHO Prequalification Programme / Collaborative Registration Procedure, Stringent Regulatory Authorities (US FDA, EMA, Health Canada, Swissmedic, PMDA Japan, TGA Australia) and the East African Community Medicines Regulatory Harmonization (EAC-MRH).

Conditions
  • Reliance approaches for devices are adapted to device class and public health impact.
  • Local application still required; national decision retained.
KenyaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Swissmedic · Ireland · Saudi Arabia

Regulatory reference

Recognized reference regulatory agencies

reliance.reference-agencies
Fact-level verified

The medical device registration guideline recognizes marketing clearances from eight listed reference regulatory agencies: Australia TGA, Health Canada, EU Notified Bodies (MDD/AIMDD/IVD Directive certificates), Japan MHLW, US FDA (510(k) or PMA), Ireland HPRA, Saudi Arabia SFDA and Swissmedic. US FDA 510(k)-exempt products do not qualify for the abridged route. Approvals from EU and TGA count as independent reference approvals only if the devices were reviewed and approved by those agencies themselves and not registered on the basis of a Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA).

Conditions
  • Used to qualify devices for abridged, expedited (EBR/ECR/EDR) and immediate (IBR) routes.
  • Applies at the time of application.
KuwaitHealth Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Brazil ANVISA · Australia TGA

Prior approval / evidence record

Health Canada, Japan MHLW/PMDA, UK MHRA, Brazil ANVISA and Australia TGA approvals

Authority

Health Canada, Japan MHLW/PMDA, UK MHRA, Brazil ANVISA and Australia TGA approvals

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Also recognised reference authorities under the Abridged Review Pathway, on the same terms as the FDA and EU routes: identical product required, national requirements still assessed, final acceptance decided by the Administration.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

LebanonUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Health Canada · Australia TGA · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Clinical evaluation is not re-performed in Lebanon; the work of GHTF regulatory authorities is used

reliance.clinical-evaluation-uses-reference-authority-work
Fact-level verified
Statement

The Lebanese assessment of an implantable device does not address the clinical-evaluation aspects at all: the MOPH health technology unit explicitly relies on the work already carried out by the regulatory authorities of the GHTF countries. A device whose clinical evidence was assessed by the FDA, an EU notified body, Health Canada, the TGA or Japan therefore does not have that clinical evidence re-reviewed in Lebanon.

Source Approval

Regulatory authorities of the GHTF countries (US FDA, EU member states, Health Canada, Australia TGA, Japan MHLW/PMDA)

Edge Type

Assessment Report Reliance

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Stated in Part 2 of the procedure as the assessment strategy for implantable medical devices; the same section records that the unit verifies quality data, document authenticity and coherence with the online database instead.
  • The unit's effort is redirected to a sampling verification driven by the device's importance and criticality, its safety profile and the manufacturer's history.
  • edgeType `assessment_report_reliance` is an existing registry token, used deliberately here because the mechanism is reliance on another authority's completed assessment work rather than a documentary evidence requirement (which is filed separately as `reliance.accepted-conformity-certificate-menu`).

Effective from 2013-11-01

Source language French. Original: "Les aspects relatifs à l'évaluation clinique ne seront pas abordés en faveur d'une exploitation des travaux déjà effectués par les autorités réglementaires dans les pays de la GHTF." Translation: "The aspects relating to clinical evaluation will not be addressed, in favour of making use of the work already done by the regulatory authorities in the GHTF countries."

LebanonUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Health Canada · Australia TGA · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Conformity to a GHTF reference-authority regulation is a precondition of Lebanese marketing authorisation

reliance.ghtf-reference-authority-conformity-prerequisite
Fact-level verified
Statement

To obtain authorisation to place a medical device on the Lebanese market the device must conform to at least one of the regulations in force in Canada, Australia, Japan, the United States or an EU member state. An FDA, CE, Health Canada, TGA or Japan approval is therefore the conformity basis on which the Lebanese file is admitted rather than a starting point for a fresh assessment. The device must in addition satisfy Lebanese standards where such standards exist.

Source Approval

US FDA 510(k)/PMA; EU CE marking (notified-body certificate plus manufacturer declaration of conformity); Health Canada; Australia TGA; Japan MHLW/PMDA

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The list of jurisdictions is closed: Canada, Australia, Japan, the United States, EU member states. Korea, China and the United Kingdom are not named.
  • Conformity to one of the five is a precondition for the Lebanese authorisation, not a substitute for it — the MOPH health technology unit still evaluates the file and the Minister of Health issues the final decision.
  • Lebanese standards, where they exist, must be met in addition (LIBNOR standards, certification by the Industrial Research Institute).
  • The same closed list is restated at statutory level by Decision No. 455/1 of 16 April 2013, Article One (European Union, United States, Canada, Japan, Australia).
  • Instrument in force: the November 2013 national procedure read with Decisions 455/1 (2013) and 1506 (2014).

Effective from 2013-11-01

Source language French. Original: "Pour obtenir l'autorisation de mise sur le marché libanais, le dispositif médical doit être conforme à au moins une des réglementations en vigueur dans les pays suivants: Canada, Australie, Japon, Etats Unies, pays membres de l'union européenne. Le dispositif médical doit, par ailleurs, satisfaire les exigences des normes libanaises quand elles existent." Translation: "To obtain authorisation to place on the Lebanese market, the medical device must conform to at least one of the regulations in force in the following countries: Canada, Australia, Japan, United States, member states of the European Union. The medical device must, moreover, satisfy the requirements of Lebanese standards where they exist."

LebanonUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · IMDRF member authorities

Prior approval / evidence record

Registration file must carry at least one accepted foreign conformity certificate — FDA, CE, TGA/Health Canada/Japan or IRI

reliance.accepted-conformity-certificate-menu
Fact-level verified
Statement

A registration application must be accompanied by at least one of a closed menu of conformity documents: the US FDA approval (510(k) or PMA) or an FDA certificate for foreign governments; a CE marking certificate issued by a notified body plus the manufacturer's declaration of conformity; a safety certificate issued by a competent authority of Australia, Canada or Japan or other IMDRF countries; a certificate of conformity to Lebanese standards issued by the Industrial Research Institute; or — for products originating outside the EU, USA, Canada, Australia and Japan — an ISO 13485 quality-system certificate. A manufacturer's authorisation for the local distributor is required in all cases.

Source Approval

US FDA 510(k)/PMA and FDA certificate for foreign governments; EU CE marking certificate plus declaration of conformity; safety certificates of Australia TGA, Health Canada, Japan and other IMDRF member authorities; Lebanese IRI certificate

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The requirement is drafted as "at least one of" — one accepted certificate is sufficient documentary conformity evidence, but the substance of the review still runs locally.
  • Brazil ANVISA is added to the accepted certificate sources by Decision 1506/2014, Annex 2 (DMI-02) — see reliance.imdrf-free-sale-certificate-mandatory for the separate mandatory IMDRF free-sale certificate.
  • The notified body's name and number must appear clearly on the CE certificate.
  • Decision No. 455/1 Article Six imposes the same menu for implantable devices (EU declaration of conformity with notified-body certificates; FDA 510(k)/PMA marketing approval; a conformity certificate from the competent health authorities of Switzerland, Australia, Canada or Japan; or an IRI certificate for national products and products from countries not listed above).

Effective from 2013-11-01

Source language French. The excerpt is the contiguous run at the head of the list; the list continues on the next page, past a running header, with the CE and IMDRF bullets, quoted here separately: "o Certificat de marquage CE délivré par un organisme notifié (nom et numéro de l'organisme notifié doivent figurer d'une façon claire) ainsi que la déclaration de conformité faite par le fabricant. o Certificat garantissant la sécurité du dispositif délivré par l'une des autorités compétentes des pays suivants: Australie, Canada ou Japon et autres pays de l'IMDRF. o Certificat de conformité aux normes libanaises délivré par l'institut de recherche industriel (IRI) le cas échéant." Translation of the excerpt: "The registration application must be accompanied by at least one of the following documents: the approval of the US FDA administration (510(k) or PMA certificate); a US FDA certificate for foreign governments." Translation of the continuation: "a CE marking certificate issued by a notified body (notified body name and number must appear clearly) together with the declaration of conformity made by the manufacturer; a certificate guaranteeing the safety of the device issued by one of the competent authorities of the following countries: Australia, Canada or Japan and other IMDRF countries; a certificate of conformity to Lebanese standards issued by the industrial research institute (IRI), where applicable."

LebanonIMDRF member authorities

Prior approval / evidence record

GHTF/IMDRF member countries — free-sale certificate (شهادة بيع حر)

Authority

GHTF/IMDRF member countries — free-sale certificate (شهادة بيع حر)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

A mandatory document rather than a route: Decision 1506/1 Art. Four requires the registration application to carry a free-sale certificate issued by a country belonging to the GHTF/IMDRF group, meaning the device is sold in one of those countries whatever its origin, and the Ministry's service records require a free-sale certificate with an ISO 13485 certificate where the goods are made outside the reference states or the listed documents cannot be produced. No examination period is shortened by it.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

LebanonIMDRF member authorities

Prior approval / evidence record

Free sale certificate / certificate for foreign government from an IMDRF member country is a mandatory registration document

reliance.imdrf-free-sale-certificate-mandatory
Fact-level verified
Statement

In addition to the documents required by Article Six of Decision No. 455/1 of 16 April 2013, a registration application must be accompanied by a free sale certificate or a certificate for foreign government issued by one of the countries belonging to the IMDRF (International Medical Devices Regulators Forum) — that is, proof that the device is sold in one of those countries, whatever its origin. This is a separate and mandatory documentary condition, not a route to a shortened review. (Decision No. 1506/1 of 1 September 2014, Article Four.)

Source Approval

Free sale certificate or certificate for foreign government issued by an IMDRF member country (the decision names the IMDRF group rather than individual authorities)

Edge Type

Origin Country Evidence

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Mandatory whatever the origin of the device: the decision states the device must be sold in one of these countries regardless of where it is manufactured.
  • This is a documentary requirement and does not itself shorten the Lebanese assessment; it is filed alongside the conformity certificate menu.
  • Decision 1506/1 Annex 2 (form DMI-02) lists the accepted certificates as FDA 510K/PMA, the CE certificate types (FullQAS, TypEC, VerifEC, ProdtnQAS, ProdctQAS, DesEC, DeclEC), Canada CMDCAS, Japan JIS, Australia TGA, Brazil ANVISA, free sale certificate, certificate for foreign government and the IRI certificate.

Effective from 2014-02-18

Source language Arabic; the PDF is a scan with no text layer and the text was recovered by OCR (pdftoppm -r 300 -png + tesseract -l ara+eng), so the wording is an OCR reading and Arabic-Indic digits are unreliable — hence source-backed-partial. OCR original: "إضافة الى المستندات المطلوبة في المادة السادسة من القرار رقم 1/455 تاريخ 2013/4/16، يرفق بطلب التسجيل شهادة بيع حر Free sale certificate أو certificate for foreign government صادرة عن احدى الدول المنتمية الى مجموعة IMDRF (International Medical Devices Regulators Forum) اي انها تباع في واحدة من هذه الدول مهما كان منشؤها." Translation: "In addition to the documents required under Article Six of Decision No. 455/1 of 16/4/2013, the registration application shall be accompanied by a free sale certificate or a certificate for foreign government issued by one of the countries belonging to the IMDRF (International Medical Devices Regulators Forum); that is, that it is sold in one of these countries, whatever its origin." The article number (المادة الرابعة, Article Four) is legible in the OCR.

LebanonUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Swissmedic · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

US FDA (510(k)/PMA approval or approval letter), European Union (conformity certificate issued by the manufacturer and by EU-notified bodies), Swiss, Australian, Canadian or Japanese competent health authorities (conformity certificate)

Authority

US FDA (510(k)/PMA approval or approval letter), European Union (conformity certificate issued by the manufacturer and by EU-notified bodies), Swiss, Australian, Canadian or Japanese competent health authorities (conformity certificate)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Accepted and in practice required for an implantable device: Decision 455/1 Art. Six lists them as the conformity documents that go into the registration file — a European-standards certificate from the manufacturer and EU-notified bodies, an FDA marketing approval or approval letter, or a conformity certificate from the health authorities of Switzerland, Australia, Canada or Japan — and Decision 1506/1 Art. Four requires a GHTF/IMDRF free-sale certificate on top. The Ministry's service records for sterile instruments and laboratory reagents require FDA evidence for US-origin goods and CE evidence for European ones. The benefit is documentary, not a shortened clock: none of the instruments publishes an abbreviated examination period, and the registration certificate is still issued on the Health Technology Unit's advice to the Minister.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

MalaysiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Singapore HSA

Regulatory reference

Approvals excluded from the verification route

reliance.verification-excluded-schemes
Fact-level verified

Special-access-type authorisations are not eligible for the verification route, including US FDA EUA / Expanded Access / HDE, EU exceptional use authorisations, UK MHRA exceptional use, Health Canada SAP / Interim Orders, Japan compassionate use and emergency regulatory pathway, TGA SAS / Authorised Prescriber / emergency exemptions, HSA Special Access Routes, and Thai FDA section 27 non-commercial exemptions.

MalaysiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Singapore HSA · TFDA (jurisdiction not specified in this entry)

Prior approval / evidence record

Class B

Id

class-b

Class Name

Class B

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

30

Max

30

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

MDA/GD/0070 — registration submission guide, cl. 6.4 turnaround

Url

https://www.mda.gov.my/index.php/documents/ukk/3766-final-medical-device-registration-submission-guide-for-conformity-assessment-by-way-of-verification-process-and-submission-of-application-in-medc-st-second-edition

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

3

Max

6

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

3

Max

6

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • MHLW
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • FDA
  • MHRA
  • HSA
  • TFDA
Notes
  • MDA/GD/0070 cl. 6.4: Class B registration turn-around 30 working days from complete documents and cleared payment
  • ASEAN harmonization applies
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MalaysiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Singapore HSA · TFDA (jurisdiction not specified in this entry)

Prior approval / evidence record

Class C

Id

class-c

Class Name

Class C

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

30

Max

30

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

MDA/GD/0070 — registration submission guide, cl. 6.4 turnaround

Url

https://www.mda.gov.my/index.php/documents/ukk/3766-final-medical-device-registration-submission-guide-for-conformity-assessment-by-way-of-verification-process-and-submission-of-application-in-medc-st-second-edition

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

3

Max

6

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

3

Max

6

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • MHLW
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • FDA
  • MHRA
  • HSA
  • TFDA
Notes
  • MDA/GD/0070 cl. 6.4: Class C registration turn-around 30 working days from complete documents and cleared payment
  • Clinical data may be required
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MalaysiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Singapore HSA · Thailand

Regulatory reference

Recognised foreign approvals for the verification route

reliance.verification-route-authorities
Fact-level verified

Devices holding at least one qualifying approval from MDA-recognised authorities may use CAB conformity assessment by way of verification instead of full assessment: EU Notified Bodies (specified MDR/IVDR and legacy directive certificates), Japan MHLW (Ninsho/Shonin), Australia TGA (ARTG), Health Canada (licence), US FDA (510(k)/PMA), UK MHRA (UKCA for GB; EC/UKNI certificates for Northern Ireland), Singapore HSA (SMDR registration), Thailand FDA (Class 2-3 notified / Class 4 licensed device certificates).

Conditions
  • Eligibility: device approved at least one year in the reference jurisdiction; same design and intended purpose as approved; no reported deaths, serious deteriorations or open field safety corrective actions in the last year; not rejected/withdrawn by a recognised authority; special/emergency access-type approvals excluded.

Replaces the list formerly in MDA Circular Letter No. 1/2025 Annex 1; Second Edition (13 October 2025) added HSA and Thai FDA.

MalaysiaAustralia TGA

Regulatory reference

Australia TGA/ARTG market authorization evidence — verification route

reliance.reliance-edge-reference-approvals-to-malaysia-approval-au-tga-malaysia
Fact-level verified

ARTG Registration Certificate from Australia TGA qualifies a Class B/C/D device for CAB conformity assessment by way of verification.

Conditions
  • Approval held at least one year; no safety issues in the last year; SAS/Authorised Prescriber/emergency approvals excluded.
MalaysiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Singapore HSA · TFDA (jurisdiction not specified in this entry)

Prior approval / evidence record

Class D

Id

class-d

Class Name

Class D

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Full Registration

Official Timeline
Min

30

Max

30

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

MDA/GD/0070 — registration submission guide, cl. 6.4 turnaround

Url

https://www.mda.gov.my/index.php/documents/ukk/3766-final-medical-device-registration-submission-guide-for-conformity-assessment-by-way-of-verification-process-and-submission-of-application-in-medc-st-second-edition

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

3

Max

6

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

3

Max

6

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • MHLW
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • FDA
  • MHRA
  • HSA
  • TFDA
Notes
  • MDA/GD/0070 cl. 6.4: Class D registration turn-around 30 working days from complete documents and cleared payment
  • Clinical evidence required
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MexicoNMPA · US FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Swissmedic · South Korea MFDS · Singapore HSA · Brazil ANVISA · IMDRF member authorities · MDSAP · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

Vía regulatoria abreviada — ARR equivalence (COFEPRIS-04-050)

Name

Vía regulatoria abreviada — ARR equivalence (COFEPRIS-04-050)

Description

The single reliance route since the DOF Acuerdo of 18 July 2025, which took effect 30 working days after publication and abrogated every individual equivalence agreement issued between 2012 and June 2025 — the separate FDA, Swissmedic, European Commission, Health Canada, TGA and WHO prequalification acuerdos no longer exist. COFEPRIS now recognises the decision of any Reference Regulatory Authority from a country sitting on the IMDRF Management Committee, and MDSAP full membership for GMP certificates. The dossier drops to an administrative-legal section plus technical information under RIS Art. 31.

Timeline Reduction

Resolution within a maximum of 30 working days

Eligibility
  • Prior authorisation by a Reference Regulatory Authority in one of the twelve IMDRF Management Committee jurisdictions: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the United States
  • MDSAP full members are recognised for the good-manufacturing-practice certificate
  • Filed under homoclave COFEPRIS-04-050 rather than the ordinary COFEPRIS-04-060 registration
  • Post-market surveillance or technovigilance evidence from the reference market, translated into Spanish under RIS Art. 153

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MexicoUS FDA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · IMDRF member authorities · MDSAP

Prior approval / evidence record

Class II

Id

class-ii

Class Name

Class II

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Registration or Equivalency

Official Timeline
Min

35

Max

35

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

RIS Art. 179 — statutory resolution periods by class (COFEPRIS)

Url

https://salud.gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/compi/ris.html

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

15

Max

31

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

8

Max

16

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA 510(k)
  • Health Canada
  • Japan PMDA
  • IMDRF Committee Members
  • MDSAP
Notes
  • RIS Art. 179: Clase II resolved within 35 calendar days (15 days with a favourable Tercero Autorizado dictamen)
  • ARR equivalence route (COFEPRIS-04-050, Lineamientos DOF 18-07-2025): maximum 30 working days
  • Equivalency route much faster if FDA approved
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MexicoUS FDA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · IMDRF member authorities · MDSAP

Prior approval / evidence record

Class III

Id

class-iii

Class Name

Class III

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Registration or Equivalency

Official Timeline
Min

60

Max

60

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

RIS Art. 179 — statutory resolution periods by class (COFEPRIS)

Url

https://salud.gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/compi/ris.html

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

15

Max

31

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

8

Max

16

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA 510(k)/PMA
  • Health Canada
  • Japan PMDA
  • IMDRF Committee Members
  • MDSAP
Notes
  • RIS Art. 179: Clase III resolved within 60 calendar days (15 days with a favourable Tercero Autorizado dictamen)
  • ARR equivalence route (COFEPRIS-04-050): maximum 30 working days
  • Equivalency pathway best option with FDA
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MexicoIMDRF member authorities · MDSAP

Regulatory reference

Reference regulators for the abreviada route

reliance.arr-definition-devices
Fact-level verified

For medical devices, COFEPRIS recognizes as Autoridades Regulatorias de Referencia (ARR): countries that are members of the IMDRF Management Committee, and full members of the Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) for Good Manufacturing Practice certificates. Device registrations can be obtained through equivalence with prior ARR approvals via trámite COFEPRIS-04-050.

Conditions
  • Device and approval must fall within the current Lineamientos scope; local application and decision retained by COFEPRIS.

Effective from 2025-07-19

Effective date assumed day after DOF publication (18-07-2025) per standard transitorio wording of this type of Acuerdo; the mechanism is also described on the COFEPRIS reliance page.

OmanEU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Regulatory reference

Classification follows origin jurisdiction

reliance.origin-jurisdiction-classification
Fact-level verified

The device's risk classification should be according to the jurisdiction of the country of origin; the application must state the regulatory jurisdiction the device follows: KSA (MDMA), USA, EU, Canada, Australia, Japan, or Others.

Conditions
  • Applies to all device and IVD registration applications.

Presentation slide states 'Risk Classification ( It should be according to the country of origin jurisdiction)'.

PakistanAustralia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Swissmedic · US FDA · Austria · Belgium · Denmark · France · Germany · Ireland · Italy · Netherlands · Norway · Spain · Sweden · WHO · EU conformity assessment

Regulatory reference

Rule 67 lists reliance reference countries plus WHO prequalification and CE marking

reliance-reference-countries
Fact-level verified

Rule 67 names the reference countries and schemes whose market authorisations DRAP relies on: USA, Japan, Australia, Canada, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom, or devices pre-qualified by the World Health Organization, or CE marked by conformity assessment bodies (CABs) notified in the NANDO database under the relevant European directive for medical devices, subject to evidence and supporting documents.

Conditions
  • Reliance subject to evidence and supporting documents

Effective from 2018-01-16

ParaguayBrazil ANVISA · US FDA · Health Canada · Austria · Belgium · Denmark · Finland · France · Germany · Hungary · Ireland · Italy · Netherlands · New Zealand · Norway · Spain · Sweden · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Swissmedic · Australia TGA · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

IVD Annex I reference-country list drives the 30/45/120-business-day clocks

reliance.ivd-anexo-i-reference-country-list
Fact-level verified
Statement

For IVDs, DINAVISA decides within 30 business days for products manufactured nationally or in a country of Annex I, within 45 business days for products manufactured outside Annex I but registered and commercialised in an Annex I country (which must additionally file the foreign registration certificate and free-sale certificate), and within 120 business days for other imports. Annex I names high-surveillance and adequate-surveillance authorities and the full MERCOSUR members; the United States and Japan are on it and Korea is not.

Source Approval

Sanitary registration and free-sale certificate in force in an Annex I country — high-surveillance authorities (Germany, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Spain, United States, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Sweden, Switzerland) or adequate-surveillance authorities (Australia, Chile, Cuba, Finland, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Mexico, Norway, New Zealand); Annex I also lists full MERCOSUR members (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay) and PAHO/WHO reference authorities

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The Annex I list derives from Ley N° 3283/2007 Art. 11 (high and adequate sanitary surveillance).
  • A product made outside Annex I is admitted on a 45-day clock only if it is registered and commercialised in an Annex I country.
  • Korea (MFDS) does not appear in Annex I, so a Korean-only IVD authorisation does not by itself reach the 30/45-day clocks.
  • A Paraguayan sanitary registration is still required in every case.

Source language: Spanish. Translation of the quoted Annex I heading and entries: 'Countries with High and Adequate Sanitary Surveillance Authorities (Law 3283/07 Article 11)' / 'Countries with high sanitary surveillance regulatory authorities: Germany, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Spain, United States, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Sweden and Switzerland.' / 'Full MERCOSUR members: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay.' The excerpt is taken from the resolution's own Annex I; Art. 6 supplies the 30- and 45-business-day clocks.

ParaguayWHO · IMDRF member authorities

Prior approval / evidence record

PAHO/WHO reference authority or IMDRF Management Committee member authority

Authority

PAHO/WHO reference authority or IMDRF Management Committee member authority

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Operative for class II, III and IV IVDs, which enter the Proceso Simplificado de Registro Sanitario under Resolución DINAVISA N° 44/2024 with a 15-business-day validation and approval by positive silence.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

ParaguayBrazil ANVISA · EU conformity assessment · US FDA · Health Canada · Singapore HSA · IMDRF member authorities · Portugal · Spain · South Korea MFDS · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · NMPA · Taiwan TFDA · Australia TGA · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

IVD simplified registration (PSR) for products authorised by PAHO/WHO, IMDRF or bilateral-partner authorities

reliance.ivd-psr-reference-authorities
Fact-level verified
Statement

Class II, III and IV in-vitro diagnostic products already authorised and commercialised in countries regulated by PAHO/WHO reference regulatory authorities, by authorities of IMDRF Management Committee member countries, or by authorities with bilateral agreements with DINAVISA enter the Proceso Simplificado de Registro Sanitario (PSR). DINAVISA has 15 business days to validate and decide, and approval follows by positive silence if no report is issued.

Source Approval

PAHO/WHO reference regulatory authorities; authorities of IMDRF Management Committee member countries (the IMDRF committee includes US FDA, EU, Japan PMDA/MHLW, Health Canada, TGA, ANVISA, China NMPA, Korea MFDS, Singapore HSA and UK MHRA); authorities with bilateral agreements with DINAVISA

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Applies to class II, III and IV IVDs (Res. 44/2024 Art. 7: 'Clases II, III y IV'); class I IVDs are registered automatically under Res. 266/2022 Art. 14.
  • The IVD must actually be commercialised in one of those countries and the foreign registration must correspond specifically to the same product being registered.
  • 15 business days to validate; approval by positive silence.
  • Objections may be answered only once (Art. 3), with 30 business days to rectify.
  • Not applicable to the cases in Arts. 13 and 16 of Res. DINAVISA N° 266/2022 (Art. 11).

Effective from 2024-01-30

Source language: Spanish. Translation of the operative part of Art. 2: 'Applications for sanitary registration of In Vitro Diagnostic Products ... that are authorised and commercialised in countries regulated by: PAHO/WHO Reference Regulatory Authorities; Regulatory Authorities of member countries of the Committee of the International Medical Device Regulators Forum - IMDRF; Regulatory Authorities with which bilateral agreements with DINAVISA exist, shall be subject to the Simplified Sanitary Registration Process (PSR).' and 'DINAVISA shall have a term of 15 (fifteen) business days to validate the required documentation and decide thereon. Once the term has elapsed with no report from DINAVISA, the application shall be approved.' Article numbering confirmed by reading the page image of the official PDF.

ParaguayWHO · IMDRF member authorities

Prior approval / evidence record

Proceso simplificado de Registro Sanitario (PSR) para productos para diagnóstico de uso in vitro

Name

Proceso simplificado de Registro Sanitario (PSR) para productos para diagnóstico de uso in vitro

Description

Class II, III and IV IVDs (Res. 44/2024 Art. 7) already authorised and commercialised by a recognised reference authority are validated in 15 business days with approval by positive silence, instead of the 30, 45 or 120 business days of the ordinary IVD route.

Timeline Reduction

From 30-120 business days down to 15 business days

Eligibility
  • Product classified as class II, III or IV under Resolución DINAVISA N° 266/2022 Art. 9
  • Current authorisation and commercialisation in a country regulated by a PAHO/WHO reference regulatory authority, by an IMDRF Management Committee member authority, or by an authority with a bilateral agreement with DINAVISA
  • The foreign registration must correspond specifically to the same product being registered in Paraguay

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

PeruAustralia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Swissmedic · US FDA · UK MHRA · France · Netherlands · Germany · Spain · Denmark · Italy · Norway · Belgium · Sweden

Regulatory reference

High-vigilance countries list for evidence

reliance.free-sale-high-vigilance-countries
Fact-level verified

For free-sale certificate and related evidence purposes, the high-vigilance countries are France, Netherlands, UK, USA, Canada, Japan, Switzerland, Germany, Spain, Australia, Denmark, Italy, Norway, Belgium and Sweden.

Conditions
  • List per Art. 9 D.S. 016-2011-SA.

D.S. 018-2019-SA subsequently added Austria to this list (as shown on DIGEMID's normas-legales repository).

PeruUS FDA · UK MHRA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Australia TGA · Swissmedic · South Korea MFDS · Germany · France · Netherlands · Spain · Italy · Belgium · Portugal · Ireland · Austria · Hungary · Denmark · Norway · Sweden

Prior approval / evidence record

País de Alta Vigilancia Sanitaria (art. 9 D.S. 016-2011-SA): United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, Switzerland, South Korea, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Hungary, Denmark, Norway, Sweden

Authority

País de Alta Vigilancia Sanitaria (art. 9 D.S. 016-2011-SA): United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, Switzerland, South Korea, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Hungary, Denmark, Norway, Sweden

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

The Peruvian route to relying on a foreign approval is documentary, not procedural. A certificate of free sale or a GMP certificate issued by a high-surveillance authority is accepted directly, and if the issuing authority appears on the Resolución Directoral 169-2014-DIGEMID list the document does not need an apostille. Everything else still goes through DIGEMID certification.

Timeline Savings

None published — the TUPA period is set by class, not by origin

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

SingaporeUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class C

Id

class-c

Class Name

Class C

Risk Level

high

Pathway

IBR/Expedited/Full Route

Official Timeline
Min

0

Max

220

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

HSA fees and turnaround time for medical devices

Url

https://www.hsa.gov.sg/medical-devices/fees/

Effective Date

2026-03-26

Accessed Date

2026-08-13

Realistic Timeline
Min

6

Max

12

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

0.03

Max

0.03

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • MHLW
  • FDA
  • EU NB
Notes
  • Five Class C routes: an immediate route confined to standalone medical mobile applications, expedited (ECR) at 120 working days, abridged at 160, full at 220, and full under the Priority Review Scheme at 143
  • ECR-1 needs one reference approval plus three years of marketing there; ECR-2 needs two reference approvals. Both require no prior rejection or withdrawal by HSA or a reference agency
  • Hip, knee and shoulder joint replacement non-bioactive implants are barred from ECR and must go full or abridged
  • HSA turnaround times exclude applicant stop-clock time
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

SingaporeUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class B

Id

class-b

Class Name

Class B

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

IBR/Expedited/Full Route

Official Timeline
Min

0

Max

160

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

HSA fees and turnaround time for medical devices

Url

https://www.hsa.gov.sg/medical-devices/fees/

Effective Date

2026-03-26

Accessed Date

2026-08-13

Realistic Timeline
Min

3

Max

9

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

0.03

Max

0.03

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • MHLW
  • FDA
  • EU NB
Notes
  • Four Class B routes, and which one applies is decided by how many reference approvals the device already holds rather than by choice: Immediate Class B Registration is granted on submission, abridged takes 100 working days, full takes 160, and full under the Priority Review Scheme takes 104
  • IBR needs either one reference approval plus three years of marketing in that jurisdiction, or two reference approvals, and in both cases no global safety issue and no prior rejection or withdrawal. A standalone medical mobile application qualifies for an immediate route on one reference approval with no marketing history
  • Abridged needs at least one reference approval; a device with none must go full route
  • HSA turnaround times exclude applicant stop-clock time
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

SingaporeUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Two reference approvals (any two of US FDA, EU Notified Body, Health Canada, Australia TGA, Japan MHLW)

Authority

Two reference approvals (any two of US FDA, EU Notified Body, Health Canada, Australia TGA, Japan MHLW)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

At Class B this is the IBR trigger and registration is granted on submission. At Class C and D it is the ECR-2 or EDR trigger.

Timeline Savings

Class B immediate against 160 working days; Class C 120 against 220; Class D 180 against 310

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

SingaporeAustralia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Health Canada, Australia TGA, Japan MHLW

Authority

Health Canada, Australia TGA, Japan MHLW

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

A Canadian or Australian device registration licence, or a Japanese Ninsho certification or Shonin approval, counts as a reference approval on the same terms as the US and EU.

Timeline Savings

Same as the abridged route figures above; two of them together trigger IBR, ECR-2 or EDR

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

SingaporeAustralia TGA

Regulatory reference

Australia TGA reference approval

reliance.edge-au-tga
Fact-level verified

TGA (Australia) is one of HSA's overseas reference regulatory agencies; its prior approval qualifies a device for Abridged, and with marketing history or a second approval for Expedited/Immediate registration routes.

Conditions
  • same labelled use
  • one qualifying approval for the Abridged route
  • three years' safe marketing for one-approval expedited/immediate routes
  • two approvals can unlock other expedited/immediate routes
  • route exclusions apply to specified high-risk products

Confirms baseline reliance edge; route eligibility from the registration overview page.

SingaporeUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class D

Id

class-d

Class Name

Class D

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

IBR/Expedited/Full Route

Official Timeline
Min

180

Max

310

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

HSA fees and turnaround time for medical devices

Url

https://www.hsa.gov.sg/medical-devices/fees/

Effective Date

2026-03-26

Accessed Date

2026-08-13

Realistic Timeline
Min

9

Max

18

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

6

Max

12

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • MHLW
  • FDA
  • EU NB
Notes
  • Four Class D routes: expedited (EDR) at 180 working days, abridged at 220, full at 310, and full under the Priority Review Scheme at 202. There is no immediate route at Class D
  • EDR needs two reference approvals and no prior rejection or withdrawal. Active implantables, devices contacting the central circulatory or central nervous system, bioactive joint replacements, devices with a registrable drug in a secondary role, and HIV or donor-compatibility IVD assays are barred from EDR
  • A Class D device with a registrable drug in a secondary role has only abridged at 220 and full at 310, and is excluded from the Priority Review Scheme
  • HSA turnaround times exclude applicant stop-clock time
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

South AfricaAustralia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Brazil ANVISA · WHO

Regulatory reference

Recognised reference jurisdictions

reliance.recognised-jurisdictions
Fact-level verified

SAHPRA recognises six reference jurisdictions for reliance purposes: Australia, Brazil, Health Canada, Europe, Japan and USFDA, plus WHO prequalification of IVDs. For Class C and D devices listed in Certificate of Free Sale applications, evidence of pre-market approval/registration or emergency use authorisation from at least one of the six jurisdictions (or WHO PQ) is required.

Conditions
  • Used for Class C and Class D medical devices and IVDs.
  • SAHPRA retains the final decision based on South African regulations.

The SAHPRA Medical Devices page confirms reliance pathways will use registrations in these recognised jurisdictions or WHO PQ.

Sri LankaEU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Swissmedic · Singapore HSA · US FDA · UK MHRA · Norway

Regulatory reference

Reliance pathway reference countries

reliance.reference-countries
Fact-level verified

For general medical devices, registrations from USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Japan, Norway, Switzerland and all EU member countries are considered under the reliance pathway; for IVD medical devices the same list applies plus Singapore.

Conditions
  • IVD list: 'USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Japan, Norway, Switzerland, Singapore & All European Union (EU) member countries'.
  • Reference NRA evidence: product registration certificate or free sale certificate issued by the reference authority.
ThailandAustralia TGA

Prior approval / evidence record

Australia TGA/ARTG market authorization evidence — abridged review

reliance.reliance-edge-big5-to-thailand-abridged-approval-au-tga-thailand
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:tha

Source Approval

Australia TGA/ARTG market authorization evidence

Edge Type

Abridged Review

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Marketing History Months

12

Conditions
  • medical devices and IVDs subject to route-specific scope
  • at least one year registration or approval history in a Big 5 reference jurisdiction

Page states the history condition verbatim: อย่างน้อย 1 ปีขึ้นไป.

ThailandUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

Class 3

Id

class-3

Class Name

Class 3

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

250

Max

250

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Thailand Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2563 — statutory review clocks (ข้อ ๕-๖)

Url

https://medical.fda.moph.go.th/media.php?id=478924090456023040&name=กฏกระทรวงการแจ้งรายการละเอียดและการการออกใบรับแจ้งรายการละเอียดผลิตหรือนำเข้าเครื่องมือแพทย์ พ.ศ. 2563.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA
  • EU CE Mark
  • Japan
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • WHO (for IVD)
Notes
  • Statutory cap: class-3 registration decided within 250 days (Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2563 ข้อ ๖)
  • Fee payment due within 60 days of the invoice; submission receipt issued within 7 days of a complete file
  • Clinical data may be required
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ThailandUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

Class 2

Id

class-2

Class Name

Class 2

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

250

Max

250

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Thailand Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2563 — statutory review clocks (ข้อ ๕-๖)

Url

https://medical.fda.moph.go.th/media.php?id=478924090456023040&name=กฏกระทรวงการแจ้งรายการละเอียดและการการออกใบรับแจ้งรายการละเอียดผลิตหรือนำเข้าเครื่องมือแพทย์ พ.ศ. 2563.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA
  • EU CE Mark
  • Japan
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • WHO (for IVD)
Notes
  • Statutory cap: class-2 registration decided within 250 days (Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2563 ข้อ ๖)
  • Fee payment due within 60 days of the invoice; submission receipt issued within 7 days of a complete file
  • ASEAN harmonization applies
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ThailandUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

Class 4

Id

class-4

Class Name

Class 4

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Full Registration

Official Timeline
Min

300

Max

300

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Thailand Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2563 — statutory review clocks (ข้อ ๕-๖)

Url

https://medical.fda.moph.go.th/media.php?id=478924090456023040&name=กฏกระทรวงการแจ้งรายการละเอียดและการการออกใบรับแจ้งรายการละเอียดผลิตหรือนำเข้าเครื่องมือแพทย์ พ.ศ. 2563.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA
  • EU CE Mark
  • Japan
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • WHO (for IVD)
Notes
  • Statutory cap: class-4 registration decided within 300 days (Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2563 ข้อ ๖)
  • Fee payment due within 60 days of the invoice; submission receipt issued within 7 days of a complete file
  • Clinical evidence required
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

United Arab EmiratesAustralia TGA · Health Canada

Prior approval / evidence record

Health Canada or Australia TGA

Authority

Health Canada or Australia TGA

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

A Canadian or Australian registration can serve as the free sale or registration certificate from the country of origin, but EDE names EC, 510(k) and PMA as the conformity certificate types.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

UgandaWHO · IMDRF member authorities · ISO

Prior approval / evidence record

WHO Prequalification, or quality-system certification from a certification body accredited by a regulatory authority in an IMDRF founding-member country, or any other international organisation recognised by NDA

Authority

WHO Prequalification, or quality-system certification from a certification body accredited by a regulatory authority in an IMDRF founding-member country, or any other international organisation recognised by NDA

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Track 2: accepted as a documentary substitution for an IMDRF-country licence under DAR/GDL/028 §4.12.2 — the foreign element that unlocks the route is the quality-system certification and its accreditation rather than a product approval, and no shortened period is published for it.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

UgandaWHO · IMDRF member authorities · ISO

Prior approval / evidence record

Track 2: WHO Prequalification or QMS certification from an IMDRF-accredited body substitutes for an IMDRF-country licence

reliance.track-2-who-prequalification-or-imdrf-accredited-qms
Fact-level verified
Statement

A product that is not licensed in an IMDRF founding-member country can still enter Track 2 by producing documented evidence of conformity to an accepted quality system standard from a certification body accredited by a regulatory authority in one of the IMDRF founding member countries, or WHO Prequalification, or any other international organisation recognised by NDA. This is a documentary substitution: the foreign element that unlocks the route is the quality-system certification and its accreditation, not a product approval. NDA's Medical Devices page states the same route for products 'prequalified by WHO or registered in SRA countries'.

Source Approval

WHO Prequalification, or ISO 13485/ISO 13488 (or the country-equivalent QS) certification issued by a certification body accredited by a regulatory authority in an IMDRF founding-member country; more broadly, registration in a country NDA treats as a stringent regulatory authority

Edge Type

Qms Audit Reliance

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Track 2 requires documented evidence of conformity from a certification body accredited by a regulatory authority in one of the IMDRF founding member countries, OR WHO Prequalification, OR any other international organisation recognised by NDA.
  • A Certificate of Analysis confirming compliance to a quality system standard in Table 3 must also be filed.
  • The accepted standards in DAR/GDL/028 Table 3 are ISO 13485 or ISO 13488 (Australia, Canada, European Union), GMP QS Standard for medical appliances #1128 (Japan) and QS 21 CFR part 820 (United States).
  • Track 2 still requires evidence of repeat sales in the country of manufacture and a completed submission checklist, and NDA retains the registration decision.

Effective from 2020-08-14

edgeType 'qms_audit_reliance' is reused from the existing vocabulary (4 prior uses): the mechanism is reliance on a third party's quality-system certification rather than on a product approval. NDA's page wording for this route ('Track 2 for Products prequalified by WHO or registered in SRA countries') is carried by the supporting source. The guideline does not define 'SRA'; the page's SRA language and the guideline's 'accredited by a regulatory authority in one of the IMDRF founding member countries' are not identical, and the fact is bounded to what the guideline says.

UgandaAustralia TGA · Health Canada · EU conformity assessment · Japan MHLW / PMDA · US FDA · IMDRF member authorities

Prior approval / evidence record

Track 1: an IMDRF founding-member licence opens an abridged evaluation (Australia, Canada, EU, Japan, USA)

reliance.imdrf-reference-country-licence-track-1
Fact-level verified
Statement

A device already licensed in one of the IMDRF founding-member countries goes into Track 1, which NDA describes as an expedited review with shortened registration timelines whose evaluation process is abridged by the foreign approval. The applicant does not re-submit the full technical dossier: Track 1 requires a covering attestation, abbreviated product and manufacturer details, a notarized copy of the IMDRF-country licence, a Certificate of Analysis confirming compliance to an accepted quality system standard, evidence of repeat sales in the country of manufacture, product samples where practicable, and a completed submission checklist. The approval recognised is the one listed for the country in DAR/GDL/028 Table 2.

Source Approval

Australia: TGA GMPALS licence or CE mark; Canada: appliance licence; European Union: CE mark; Japan: MHLW appliance licence; United States: FDA 510(k) letter

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The recognised approval is country-specific: DAR/GDL/028 Table 2 names GMPALS licence or CE mark for Australia, an appliance licence for Canada, CE mark for the European Union, an appliance licence for Japan, and a 510K appliance letter for the United States.
  • Track 1 still requires a national application on Form 7 and NDA retains the registration decision; the foreign licence abridges the evaluation, it does not replace the registration.
  • Track 1 additionally requires a Certificate of Analysis confirming compliance to a quality system standard from DAR/GDL/028 Table 3 (ISO 13485 or ISO 13488 for Australia, Canada and the EU; GMP QS Standard for medical appliances #1128 for Japan; QS 21 CFR part 820 for the United States) and evidence of repeat sales in the country of manufacture.
  • CE-marked products enter track 1 via the European Union founding-member entry; there is no separate CE-only track.

Effective from 2020-08-14

Excerpt joins the s. 4.12.1 heading with items (d) and (e) of the same list and with Table 2 verbatim, separated by [...]. NDA's Medical Devices page restates the same mechanism in its own words for the customer question: 'Foreign manufacturers entering the Ugandan market can leverage their existing approvals in recognized reference markets (Australia, Canada, European Union countries, Japan, and the United States) with expedited reviews and shortened registration timelines.' That page sentence is the supporting source's contribution and is why this is not marked source-backed-partial.

UgandaAustralia TGA · Health Canada · EU conformity assessment · Japan MHLW / PMDA · US FDA · IMDRF member authorities

Prior approval / evidence record

Licence or approval from an IMDRF founding-member country — Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, the United States

Authority

Licence or approval from an IMDRF founding-member country — Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, the United States

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Track 1: an abridged evaluation in which the foreign approval carries the technical assessment, with a much smaller submission (attestation, abbreviated product and manufacturer details, notarized copy of the licence, Certificate of Analysis to an accepted quality-system standard, evidence of repeat sales and product samples where practicable). It is an expedited review with shortened registration timelines, but NDA publishes no number for the shortening and the final decision remains NDA's.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

United KingdomUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · UK MHRA

Prior approval / evidence record

International Reliance (draft legislation, not in force)

Name

International Reliance (draft legislation, not in force)

Description

Stand-alone route giving a Certificate of International Reliance to devices already authorised by the FDA, Health Canada or the TGA, without UKCA marking; the EU is deliberately excluded pending the separate CE-recognition decision

Timeline Reduction

Not quantified — the draft fixes no review period

Eligibility
  • Draft Medical Devices (Amendment) Regulations 2026, WTO-notified 8 May 2026
  • Route 1 lowest-risk: self-declaration and registration only
  • Routes 2 and 3: certificate from a UK approved body first
  • Anticipated in force mid-2028

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

United StatesAustralia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Brazil ANVISA · MDSAP

Regulatory reference

MDSAP qms audit reliance

reliance.reliance-edge-mdsap-network-qms-reuse-program-mdsap-united-states-of-america
Fact-level verified

FDA (with TGA Australia, ANVISA Brazil, Health Canada, and MHLW/PMDA Japan) participates in the Medical Device Single Audit Program and may accept MDSAP audit reports as a substitute for routine Agency inspections; firms with Electronic Product Radiation Control (EPRC) activities remain subject to direct FDA inspection for those activities.

MDSAP official documents moved to the TGA-managed MDSAP website (FDA update of 2025-12-18).

VietnamNMPA · US FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Swissmedic · South Korea MFDS

Prior approval / evidence record

Class C

Id

class-c

Class Name

Class C

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Circulation number registration (Ministry of Health)

Official Timeline
Min

45

Max

45

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Nghị định 98/2021/NĐ-CP on the management of medical devices (as amended by Decrees 07/2023, 96/2023, 04/2025) — Art. 28 declaration for Class A/B and Art. 32 appraisal periods for Class C/D

Url

https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=204442

Effective Date

2022-01-01

Accessed Date

2026-08-29

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

5

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

10

Max

10

Unit

working-days

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA
  • TGA
  • MHLW
  • EU
  • MHRA
  • Swissmedic
  • NMPA
  • MFDS
Notes
  • Decree 98/2021 Art. 32(5): the Minister of Health must appraise and grant the circulation number within 45 days of a complete and valid dossier, counted only once the appraisal fee receipt is in, and must issue any request for supplementation within 40 days
  • Art. 32(2) shortens this to 30 days, with a 25-day supplementation notice, where a corresponding national technical regulation (QCVN) exists for the device, and the same 30 days applies to measuring instruments that need pattern approval
  • Art. 32(3): the fast track for devices already authorised in a reference country, or previously import-licensed, is decided in 10 working days with a 10-working-day supplementation notice — here the Ministry appraises only the legal documents and verifies the rest after the number is granted
  • Art. 32(4): the emergency route is also 10 working days, with an 8-working-day supplementation notice
  • The clock does not simply run out in the applicant favour: if the dossier is not corrected within 90 days of a request, or fails after five rounds of supplementation, the procedure restarts from the beginning
  • Art. 32(6): the granted number and the dossier are published on the medical device portal within 1 working day
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

VietnamNMPA · US FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Swissmedic · South Korea MFDS

Prior approval / evidence record

Class D

Id

class-d

Class Name

Class D

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Circulation number registration (Ministry of Health)

Official Timeline
Min

45

Max

45

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Nghị định 98/2021/NĐ-CP on the management of medical devices (as amended by Decrees 07/2023, 96/2023, 04/2025) — Art. 28 declaration for Class A/B and Art. 32 appraisal periods for Class C/D

Url

https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=204442

Effective Date

2022-01-01

Accessed Date

2026-08-29

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

5

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

10

Max

10

Unit

working-days

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA
  • TGA
  • MHLW
  • EU
  • MHRA
  • Swissmedic
  • NMPA
  • MFDS
Notes
  • Decree 98/2021 Art. 32(5): the Minister of Health must appraise and grant the circulation number within 45 days of a complete and valid dossier, counted only once the appraisal fee receipt is in, and must issue any request for supplementation within 40 days
  • Art. 32(2) shortens this to 30 days, with a 25-day supplementation notice, where a corresponding national technical regulation (QCVN) exists for the device, and the same 30 days applies to measuring instruments that need pattern approval
  • Art. 32(3): the fast track for devices already authorised in a reference country, or previously import-licensed, is decided in 10 working days with a 10-working-day supplementation notice — here the Ministry appraises only the legal documents and verifies the rest after the number is granted
  • Art. 32(4): the emergency route is also 10 working days, with an 8-working-day supplementation notice
  • The clock does not simply run out in the applicant favour: if the dossier is not corrected within 90 days of a request, or fails after five rounds of supplementation, the procedure restarts from the beginning
  • Art. 32(6): the granted number and the dossier are published on the medical device portal within 1 working day
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

ZambiaWHO · US FDA · EU conformity assessment · IMDRF member authorities

Prior approval / evidence record

Foreign approval (WHO PQ, US FDA, CE mark, IMDRF member state, SADC registration) is disclosed on the application form but opens no stated route

reliance.foreign-approval-disclosure-no-stated-route
Fact-level verified
Edge Type

Origin Country Evidence

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Source Approval

Disclosure of marketing approval in a SADC state, WHO Prequalification, US FDA approval, CE marking, or approval in any IMDRF member state

Statement

ZAMRA's device application form requires the applicant to disclose its foreign approvals: it must list the SADC states where the medical device has obtained marketing approval, attaching documentation, and state whether the device is WHO prequalified, US FDA approved, CE marked or approved in any IMDRF member state, attaching valid documentation. A separate dossier item requires documentary proof of registration of the product in other countries, specifically those in the SADC region. None of these approvals, however, gives a shortened or substitute route in the guidelines: the non-IVD guideline states only that an application 'shall be evaluated on a first come first serve basis unless expedited evaluation has been authorised by the Authority', and neither the non-IVD nor the IVD guideline provides that a WHO, FDA, CE or IMDRF approval triggers that authorisation or replaces any part of ZAMRA's assessment. An FDA or CE holder therefore still files the full ZAMRA dossier and obtains a Zambian marketing authorisation on ZAMRA's own evaluation. This is disclosure and evidence, not reliance.

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The approval information is a mandatory field on the Annex I application form, so withholding it is not an option; but the guidelines attach no procedural consequence to holding or not holding it.
  • 'Expedited evaluation' is defined in the non-IVD guideline as 'the express evaluation of a product application within a 90 - day period'; the Authority authorises it and the guideline states no criteria, so reliance on a foreign approval as the trigger is aspirational rather than an operating rule.
  • ZAMRA's published fee schedule carries a 'Fast track fees' head at 'Double the applicable MA applicable fee', confirming that a fast track exists commercially but again without stating a foreign-approval trigger.
  • The same absence holds for IVDs: the IVD guideline (ZAMRA/MA/GUD/0003) has no recognition or abridged procedure based on a foreign marketing authorisation, although it defines a 'Fast Track process' as 'the authorised expedited evaluation or assessment of an application submitted for the purpose of grant of Marketing Authorisation'.

Effective from 2024-06-21

Verbatim from Annex I: 'List the SADC states where the medical device has obtained marketing approval (Attach documentation)' and 'Is the device WHO prequalified, US FDA approved, CE Marked or approved in any IMDRF member state? If so attach valid documentation'. Non-IVD guideline section 1(i): 'An application shall be evaluated on a first come first serve basis unless expedited evaluation has been authorised by the Authority.' Definition: '“expedited evaluation” means the express evaluation of a product application within a 90 – day period'.

ZambiaIMDRF member authorities · WHO · US FDA · EU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

WHO Prequalification; US FDA approval; EU CE marking; approval in any IMDRF member state

Authority

WHO Prequalification; US FDA approval; EU CE marking; approval in any IMDRF member state

Accepted

No

Benefit

Disclosure only. The Annex I application form requires the applicant to state whether the device is WHO prequalified, US FDA approved, CE marked or approved in any IMDRF member state and to attach valid documentation, but neither the non-IVD nor the IVD guideline attaches any procedural consequence — no shortened clock, no abridged dossier and no substitute for ZAMRA's own evaluation.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

Prior approvals and evidence for Australia (15 records)

Prior approval / evidence record

MDSAP

Authority

MDSAP

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Eliminates separate QMS audits

Timeline Savings

2-3 months

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

Prior approval / evidence record

Medical Device Single Audit Program — qms audit reliance

reliance.reliance-edge-mdsap-to-australia-qms-program-mdsap-australia
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:aus

Source Approval

Medical Device Single Audit Program

Edge Type

Qms Audit Reliance

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

Qms Audit

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • TGA is a participating MDSAP member and considers audit results from other comparable overseas regulators
  • MDSAP evidence does not replace product marketing authorisation (ARTG inclusion still required)
  • Further assessment including on-site audit may occur if QMS compliance cannot be determined from the evidence
AustraliaUK MHRA

Prior approval / evidence record

Great Britain UKCA — evidence reuse

reliance.reliance-edge-reference-approvals-to-australia-approval-ukca-australia
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:aus

Source Approval

Great Britain UKCA

Edge Type

Evidence Reuse

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Evidence accepted for ARTG inclusion applications and as basis for abridged TGA conformity assessment
  • UK approved bodies are included in TGA's comparable-regulator arrangements per the market authorisation evidence guidance
  • Australian sponsor and Australian requirements remain
AustraliaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · MDSAP

Prior approval / evidence record

Class III — ARTG inclusion

Id

class-iii

Class Name

Class III — ARTG inclusion

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Inclusion in the ARTG on overseas or TGA conformity assessment evidence

Official Timeline
Min

20

Max

20

Unit

working-days

Realistic Timeline
Min

6

Max

9

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

3

Max

5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark (30-50% faster)
  • FDA 510(k)
  • MDSAP
Notes
  • The inclusion decision itself still carries the 20-working-day statutory clock. What makes Class III slow is what sits either side of it: an application audit, which has no legislated timeframe, and where TGA conformity assessment is required, a separate certificate that must be obtained first
  • Non-IVD Level 2 application audits: TGA expects the first round of specialist assessment within 100 working days, and will explain a revised timeframe if it cannot meet that
  • Sponsor responses to a s41JA notice or a Proposal to Refuse are due within 20-40 business days depending on complexity, and that time does not count against TGA targets
  • The published targets replaced an older blanket 60-working-day audit target that TGA says was arbitrary and not consistently met
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

TGA — processing your application for inclusion of a medical device: the decision is notified within 20 working days after the day the application fee was paid

Url

https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/application-and-market-authorisation/supply-medical-device/medical-device-inclusion-process/processing-your-application-inclusion-medical-device

Accessed Date

2026-08-30

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

Regulatory reference

China NMPA approval: not reference

reliance.china-nmpa-not-reference
Pending verification
Statement

TGA accepts market-authorisation evidence only from its designated comparable overseas regulators and assessment bodies: EU notified bodies (MDD/AIMDD/IVDD, MDR, IVDR), US FDA (PMA and 510(k)), Health Canada, Japan MHLW/PMDA, Singapore HSA, and UK approved bodies designated by MHRA, with MDSAP certificates as manufacturer evidence. China's NMPA is not a comparable overseas regulator, so an NMPA registration certificate cannot be used as manufacturer evidence or product-assessment evidence for ARTG inclusion or to abridge a TGA conformity assessment.

Source Jurisdiction Id

china

Source Authority Id

nmpa

Source Approval

China NMPA medical device registration certificate (Class II/III) or Class I filing record

Target Jurisdiction Id

australia

China Classes In Scope

All classes; ARTG inclusion applications and abridgement of TGA conformity assessment

Edge Type

No Reliance Route

Market Access Strength

none

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Evidence must come from the listed regulators/bodies and be for the same device and manufacturer
  • Australian sponsor and Australian requirements remain
  • Independent verification is incomplete. Treat this record as a research lead, not a confirmed benefit or exclusion; see the 2026-09-15 independent review.

Effective from 2018-10-01

Source passage: Premarket approval and 510K decisions of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) • Approvals and medical device licences issued by Health Canada • Pre-market approvals or certification from Japan (issued by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) • Registrations or approvals of the Singapore Health Sciences Authority (HSA)

AustraliaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE under MDR/IVDR — evidence reuse

reliance.reliance-edge-reference-approvals-to-australia-approval-eu-ce-mdr-ivdr-australia
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:aus

Source Approval

EU CE under MDR/IVDR

Edge Type

Evidence Reuse

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Product Marking

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Evidence accepted for ARTG inclusion applications and as basis for abridged TGA conformity assessment
  • Australian sponsor and Australian requirements remain
  • MRA-issued certificates may no longer be acceptable for some higher-risk devices including Class III and AIMDs
AustraliaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · MDSAP

Prior approval / evidence record

Class IIb — ARTG inclusion

Id

class-iib

Class Name

Class IIb — ARTG inclusion

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Inclusion in the ARTG on overseas or TGA conformity assessment evidence

Official Timeline
Min

20

Max

20

Unit

working-days

Realistic Timeline
Min

1.5

Max

2

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

1

Max

1.5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • FDA 510(k)
  • MDSAP
Notes
  • Same 20-working-day statutory inclusion clock; audit selection is more likely at this class and suspends any published limit
  • Level 1 compulsory audits ran to a median of 14 and a mean of 27 TGA days in the published snapshot, and Level 2 compulsory audits to a median of 161 and a mean of 174
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

TGA — processing your application for inclusion of a medical device: the decision is notified within 20 working days after the day the application fee was paid

Url

https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/application-and-market-authorisation/supply-medical-device/medical-device-inclusion-process/processing-your-application-inclusion-medical-device

Accessed Date

2026-08-30

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

AustraliaHealth Canada

Prior approval / evidence record

Health Canada medical-device licence — evidence reuse

reliance.reliance-edge-reference-approvals-to-australia-approval-health-canada-australia
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:aus

Source Approval

Health Canada medical-device licence

Edge Type

Evidence Reuse

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Evidence accepted for ARTG inclusion applications and as basis for abridged TGA conformity assessment
  • Australian sponsor and Australian requirements remain
AustraliaUS FDA

Prior approval / evidence record

FDA 510(k)

Authority

FDA 510(k)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Accepted for Class IIa/IIb

Timeline Savings

20-30%

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

AustraliaJapan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Japan MHLW/PMDA Ninsho or Shonin — evidence reuse

reliance.reliance-edge-reference-approvals-to-australia-approval-japan-mhlw-pmda-australia
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:aus

Source Approval

Japan MHLW/PMDA Ninsho or Shonin

Edge Type

Evidence Reuse

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Evidence accepted for ARTG inclusion applications and as basis for abridged TGA conformity assessment
  • Australian sponsor and Australian requirements remain
AustraliaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · MDSAP

Prior approval / evidence record

Class IIa — ARTG inclusion

Id

class-iia

Class Name

Class IIa — ARTG inclusion

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Inclusion in the ARTG on overseas or TGA conformity assessment evidence

Official Timeline
Min

20

Max

20

Unit

working-days

Realistic Timeline
Min

1

Max

1.5

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

0.75

Max

1

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • FDA 510(k)
  • MDSAP
Notes
  • The 20-working-day statutory clock runs to the inclusion decision, not to the end of an audit: if the application is selected for audit there is no legislated limit on what follows
  • Non-Class I applications completed without audit took a median of 9 and a mean of 10 TGA days in the published snapshot
  • Australia is unusual in splitting conformity assessment from market authorisation, which is what allows overseas certification to be used in place of a TGA assessment at this class
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

TGA — processing your application for inclusion of a medical device: the decision is notified within 20 working days after the day the application fee was paid

Url

https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/application-and-market-authorisation/supply-medical-device/medical-device-inclusion-process/processing-your-application-inclusion-medical-device

Accessed Date

2026-08-30

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

AustraliaSource authority not specified

Prior approval / evidence record

Priority Review Pathway

Name

Priority Review Pathway

Description

Front-of-queue placement for novel devices addressing unmet needs

Timeline Reduction

30-50% faster

Eligibility
  • Novel device
  • Addresses unmet clinical need
  • No marketed alternatives

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

AustraliaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Abridged assessment route - major timeline reduction

Timeline Savings

30-50%

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

AustraliaUS FDA

Prior approval / evidence record

US FDA 510(k), De Novo, or PMA — evidence reuse

reliance.reliance-edge-reference-approvals-to-australia-approval-us-fda-marketing-authorization-australia
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:aus

Source Approval

US FDA 510(k), De Novo, or PMA

Edge Type

Evidence Reuse

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Evidence accepted for ARTG inclusion applications and as basis for abridged TGA conformity assessment
  • Australian sponsor and Australian requirements remain
AustraliaSingapore HSA

Prior approval / evidence record

Singapore HSA product registration — evidence reuse

reliance.reliance-edge-reference-approvals-to-australia-approval-singapore-hsa-australia
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:aus

Source Approval

Singapore HSA product registration

Edge Type

Evidence Reuse

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Evidence accepted for ARTG inclusion applications and as basis for abridged TGA conformity assessment
  • Singapore HSA is listed among comparable regulators in TGA's market authorisation evidence guidance
  • Australian sponsor and Australian requirements remain

Review clocks

What review, validation, and applicant stop-clock rules apply?

Compare countries

Stop-clock rule

clocks.stop-clock-applicant-response
Fact-level verified

Statutory assessment timeframes exclude any time the TGA is waiting for the applicant to respond to a notice, letter or request for information, or to pay assessment fees; audit work cannot begin until fees are paid.

Conditions
  • Applies to inclusion application assessment and conformity assessment processing clocks.

Special access & derogation

Is an emergency, compassionate, custom, humanitarian, or other exceptional path available?

Compare countries

Special Access Scheme for unapproved devices

special-access.sas-categories-devices
Fact-level verified

Unapproved medical devices may be supplied for individual patients under the Special Access Scheme: Category A (notification by a medical practitioner for seriously ill patients), Category B (prior TGA approval; processed in about 2-5 days; generally inappropriate for reusable multi-patient devices), and Category C (established-history device lists, notification); the Authorised Prescriber scheme and clinical trial schemes are alternatives.

Conditions
  • Category A devices: patient seriously ill with a condition reasonably likely to lead to death within less than a year, or premature death without early treatment
  • Prescriber must hold AHPRA registration
  • SAS supply does not create ARTG inclusion; suspected adverse events or defects must be reported within 15 days

Submission communications & appeal

How are deficiencies answered, clocks handled, and decisions escalated or appealed?

Compare countries

AAT replaced by ART

appeal.aat-replaced-by-art
Fact-level verified

External merits review is now conducted by the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART), which replaced the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT); all cases before the AAT immediately prior to 14 October 2024 were automatically transferred to the ART.

Conditions
  • Applies to reviews of Therapeutic Goods decisions on or after 14 October 2024.

Effective from 2024-10-14

External merits review deadline

appeal.art-review-28-days
Fact-level verified

A person dissatisfied with a Ministerial reconsideration decision may apply to the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) for merits review; the application must be made in writing within 28 days after the day notice of the reconsideration decision is given, subject to the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024.

Conditions
  • Applies after a s 60 / reg 48 / reg 10.7 reconsideration decision.

Ministerial reconsideration

appeal.s60-ministerial-reconsideration
Fact-level verified

A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable initial decision may request the Minister for Health to reconsider it under s 60 of the Act (or reg 48 TG Regs 1990 / reg 10.7 MD Regs 2002); requests incur no fee and must generally be made within 90 calendar days of notice; if no decision issues within 60 days the initial decision is taken to be confirmed. Preliminary-assessment refusals and s 41FH audit-selection or s 41JA information-request decisions are not reviewable.

Conditions
  • Only 'initial decisions' listed in s 60 / reg 48 / reg 10.7 are reviewable.

UDI, listing & traceability

Which UDI, device listing, database, and traceability duties apply?

Compare countries

UDI mandatory for high-risk devices

udi.mandatory-high-risk-from-2026-07-01
Fact-level verified

TGA states that Unique Device Identification (UDI) requirements became mandatory for high-risk medical devices from 1 July 2026 under the Therapeutic Goods (Medical Devices) Regulations 2002.

Conditions
  • High-risk devices first from 1 July 2026
  • Applies to sponsors and manufacturers of devices in scope of the UDI requirements

Effective from 2026-07-01

The cited Consent to Supply page establishes the high-risk commencement date; it does not specify the complete class-by-class schedule or database submission rules.

Vigilance & incident reporting

What is reportable, by whom, where, in what format, and by what deadline?

Compare countries

Automatic vigilance reporting condition

vigilance.reg5-7-automatic-condition
Fact-level verified

It is an automatic condition of ARTG inclusion (cl 5.7, Part 5 Div 5.2 of the MD Regulations) that sponsors report adverse events and near adverse events to the TGA via IRIS; all adverse events for devices supplied in Australia are required to be reported.

Conditions
  • Applies to sponsors of all included devices.

Adverse event reporting deadlines

vigilance.reporting-deadlines
Fact-level verified
Initial

48 hours for a serious threat to public health; 10 days for death or a serious deterioration; 30 days where an event might have led to death or serious deterioration

Final

final report within 120 calendar days of the initial report

Follow Up

follow-up information at least every 30 calendar days

Channel

MDIR application in TGA Business Services; only Australian events are reportable, overseas remedial actions go to the TGA recalls team

Conditions
  • Deadlines run from sponsor awareness; exemptions exist for events already reported by another party or outside the exemptions list.

Related structured datasets

Classification systems · 2 records
Open Australia IVD risk classification →
Id

australia:ivd

Jurisdiction Id

australia

Domains
  • ivd
Name

Australia IVD risk classification

Classes
  • Id

    1

    Label

    IVD Class 1

    Normalized Risk Level

    low

  • Id

    2

    Label

    IVD Class 2

    Normalized Risk Level

    medium

  • Id

    3

    Label

    IVD Class 3

    Normalized Risk Level

    high

  • Id

    4

    Label

    IVD Class 4

    Normalized Risk Level

    highest

Regulator

TGA

Official Domains
  • tga.gov.au
Source Status

official-source-verified

Source Title

TGA overview of medical devices and IVD regulation

Source Url

https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/overview/overview-medical-devices-and-ivd-regulation

Verified On

2026-08-13

Source Supports
  • ivd-class-axis
  • ivd-classification-rules
Open General-device classes I, Is, Im, IIa, IIb, III and AIMD. →
Id

australia:medical-device

Jurisdiction Id

australia

Domains
  • medical-device
Name

General-device classes I, Is, Im, IIa, IIb, III and AIMD.

Classes
  • Id

    i

    Label

    Class I

    Normalized Risk Level

    low

  • Id

    is

    Label

    Class Is

    Normalized Risk Level

    low

  • Id

    im

    Label

    Class Im

    Normalized Risk Level

    low

  • Id

    iia

    Label

    Class IIa

    Normalized Risk Level

    medium

  • Id

    iib

    Label

    Class IIb

    Normalized Risk Level

    high

  • Id

    iii

    Label

    Class III

    Normalized Risk Level

    highest

  • Id

    aimd

    Label

    AIMD

    Normalized Risk Level

    highest

Regulator

TGA

Official Domains
  • tga.gov.au
Source Status

official-source-verified

Source Title

TGA overview of medical devices and IVD regulation — classification of medical devices

Source Url

https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/overview/overview-medical-devices-and-ivd-regulation

Verified On

2026-08-25

Source Supports
  • class-axis
  • classification-rules
Notes
  • TGA enumerates Class I (incl. sterile Is and measuring Im), IIa, IIb, III and AIMD; there is no Class Ir in the Australian scheme (Ir is an EU MDR class). Classification rules are in Schedule 2 of the Medical Device Regulations 2002 (Schedule 2A for IVDs). Where more than one rule applies, the device is classified at the highest applicable classification.
Registration pathways, prior approvals and planning · 1 record
Open Australia registration →
Country

Australia

Jurisdiction Id

australia

Country Code

AU

Flag

🇦🇺

Regulator

Therapeutic Goods Administration

Regulator Abbrev

TGA

Region

asia-pacific

Tier

1

Risk Classification

5-class (I, IIa, IIb, III, AIMD)

Classes
  • Id

    class-i

    Class Name

    Class I — ARTG inclusion

    Risk Level

    low

    Pathway

    Inclusion in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods

    Official Timeline
    Min

    20

    Max

    20

    Unit

    working-days

    Realistic Timeline
    Min

    0.5

    Max

    1

    Unit

    months

    Notes
    • TGA notifies the inclusion decision within 20 working days after the day the application fee was paid, the same statutory clock that applies to every class
    • Since October 2020 Class I applications have run through the same assessment and audit-selection process as every other class, so "notification only" no longer describes the route
    • In the published half-yearly snapshot, Class I applications completed without audit took a median of 1 and a mean of 3 TGA days; those selected for audit took a median of 11 and a mean of 31
    Clinical Trial Required

    No

    Local Testing Required

    No

    Gmp Required

    No

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Official Source
    Title

    TGA — processing your application for inclusion of a medical device: the decision is notified within 20 working days after the day the application fee was paid

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/application-and-market-authorisation/supply-medical-device/medical-device-inclusion-process/processing-your-application-inclusion-medical-device

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-30

  • Id

    class-iia

    Class Name

    Class IIa — ARTG inclusion

    Risk Level

    medium

    Pathway

    Inclusion in the ARTG on overseas or TGA conformity assessment evidence

    Official Timeline
    Min

    20

    Max

    20

    Unit

    working-days

    Realistic Timeline
    Min

    1

    Max

    1.5

    Unit

    months

    With Prior Approval
    Min

    0.75

    Max

    1

    Unit

    months

    Prior Approval Benefits
    • EU CE Mark
    • FDA 510(k)
    • MDSAP
    Notes
    • The 20-working-day statutory clock runs to the inclusion decision, not to the end of an audit: if the application is selected for audit there is no legislated limit on what follows
    • Non-Class I applications completed without audit took a median of 9 and a mean of 10 TGA days in the published snapshot
    • Australia is unusual in splitting conformity assessment from market authorisation, which is what allows overseas certification to be used in place of a TGA assessment at this class
    Clinical Trial Required

    No

    Local Testing Required

    No

    Gmp Required

    Yes

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Official Source
    Title

    TGA — processing your application for inclusion of a medical device: the decision is notified within 20 working days after the day the application fee was paid

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/application-and-market-authorisation/supply-medical-device/medical-device-inclusion-process/processing-your-application-inclusion-medical-device

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-30

  • Id

    class-iib

    Class Name

    Class IIb — ARTG inclusion

    Risk Level

    high

    Pathway

    Inclusion in the ARTG on overseas or TGA conformity assessment evidence

    Official Timeline
    Min

    20

    Max

    20

    Unit

    working-days

    Realistic Timeline
    Min

    1.5

    Max

    2

    Unit

    months

    With Prior Approval
    Min

    1

    Max

    1.5

    Unit

    months

    Prior Approval Benefits
    • EU CE Mark
    • FDA 510(k)
    • MDSAP
    Notes
    • Same 20-working-day statutory inclusion clock; audit selection is more likely at this class and suspends any published limit
    • Level 1 compulsory audits ran to a median of 14 and a mean of 27 TGA days in the published snapshot, and Level 2 compulsory audits to a median of 161 and a mean of 174
    Clinical Trial Required

    No

    Local Testing Required

    No

    Gmp Required

    Yes

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Official Source
    Title

    TGA — processing your application for inclusion of a medical device: the decision is notified within 20 working days after the day the application fee was paid

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/application-and-market-authorisation/supply-medical-device/medical-device-inclusion-process/processing-your-application-inclusion-medical-device

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-30

  • Id

    class-iii

    Class Name

    Class III — ARTG inclusion

    Risk Level

    highest

    Pathway

    Inclusion in the ARTG on overseas or TGA conformity assessment evidence

    Official Timeline
    Min

    20

    Max

    20

    Unit

    working-days

    Realistic Timeline
    Min

    6

    Max

    9

    Unit

    months

    With Prior Approval
    Min

    3

    Max

    5

    Unit

    months

    Prior Approval Benefits
    • EU CE Mark (30-50% faster)
    • FDA 510(k)
    • MDSAP
    Notes
    • The inclusion decision itself still carries the 20-working-day statutory clock. What makes Class III slow is what sits either side of it: an application audit, which has no legislated timeframe, and where TGA conformity assessment is required, a separate certificate that must be obtained first
    • Non-IVD Level 2 application audits: TGA expects the first round of specialist assessment within 100 working days, and will explain a revised timeframe if it cannot meet that
    • Sponsor responses to a s41JA notice or a Proposal to Refuse are due within 20-40 business days depending on complexity, and that time does not count against TGA targets
    • The published targets replaced an older blanket 60-working-day audit target that TGA says was arbitrary and not consistently met
    Clinical Trial Required

    No

    Local Testing Required

    No

    Gmp Required

    Yes

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Official Source
    Title

    TGA — processing your application for inclusion of a medical device: the decision is notified within 20 working days after the day the application fee was paid

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/application-and-market-authorisation/supply-medical-device/medical-device-inclusion-process/processing-your-application-inclusion-medical-device

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-30

  • Id

    conformity-assessment-new

    Class Name

    TGA Conformity Assessment certificate — new or substantial change

    Pathway

    TGA-issued conformity assessment certification

    Official Timeline
    Min

    160

    Max

    200

    Unit

    working-days

    Realistic Timeline
    Min

    10

    Max

    15

    Unit

    months

    Notes
    • Regulation 4.3 caps every Conformity Assessment application, including IVDs, at 255 working days. Within that cap TGA publishes a non-legislated target of 160 business days and a maximum of 200, aiming to meet the target in 90% of applications
    • These are TGA days only. TGA estimates 40-100 business days of applicant time on top, for a total of roughly 10-15 months
    • Segments inside the clock: pre-assessment within 30 business days, then all component areas aim to finish round 1 within 100 business days, with 20-40 business days for each applicant response round
    • The application clock stops while the applicant holds the file, and can be stopped by mutual agreement in extenuating circumstances — but not for holidays, missed TGA requests, or time spent translating documents or generating missing information
    • An on-site QMS audit report is issued within 60 days of the audit; MDSAP or EU notified-body audit evidence can substitute a desktop assessment for the on-site audit
    Gmp Required

    Yes

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Official Source
    Title

    TGA — applying for a Conformity Assessment certificate for medical devices: Regulation 4.3 requires processing within 255 working days, with non-legislated targets of 160/200 business days for new or substantial applications, 190/225 where ACMD advice or an on-site audit is needed, and 80/150 for recertification

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/guidance/applying-conformity-assessment-certificate-medical-devices

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-30

  • Id

    conformity-assessment-committee-or-onsite-audit

    Class Name

    TGA Conformity Assessment certificate — ACMD advice or on-site facility audit

    Pathway

    TGA-issued conformity assessment certification with committee referral or on-site audit

    Official Timeline
    Min

    190

    Max

    225

    Unit

    working-days

    Realistic Timeline
    Min

    12

    Max

    16

    Unit

    months

    Notes
    • Applies where the Advisory Committee on Medical Devices is consulted or an on-site TGA audit of manufacturing facilities is required, both of which are most common for high-risk or novel devices
    • Target 190 business days with TGA and a maximum of 225, plus 40-100 business days of applicant time, for roughly 12-16 months in total
    • Still bounded by the same 255-working-day Regulation 4.3 cap
    Gmp Required

    Yes

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Official Source
    Title

    TGA — applying for a Conformity Assessment certificate for medical devices: Regulation 4.3 requires processing within 255 working days, with non-legislated targets of 160/200 business days for new or substantial applications, 190/225 where ACMD advice or an on-site audit is needed, and 80/150 for recertification

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/guidance/applying-conformity-assessment-certificate-medical-devices

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-30

  • Id

    conformity-assessment-recertification

    Class Name

    TGA Conformity Assessment certificate — recertification

    Pathway

    Recertification of an expiring TGA conformity assessment certificate

    Official Timeline
    Min

    80

    Max

    150

    Unit

    working-days

    Realistic Timeline
    Min

    6

    Max

    10

    Unit

    months

    Notes
    • Target 80 business days with TGA and a maximum of 150, plus 40-60 business days of applicant time, for roughly 6-10 months in total
    • Substantial changes to an existing certificate are not recertifications: they run on the new-or-substantial target of 160/200 business days
    Gmp Required

    Yes

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Official Source
    Title

    TGA — applying for a Conformity Assessment certificate for medical devices: Regulation 4.3 requires processing within 255 working days, with non-legislated targets of 160/200 business days for new or substantial applications, 190/225 where ACMD advice or an on-site audit is needed, and 80/150 for recertification

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/guidance/applying-conformity-assessment-certificate-medical-devices

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-30

Expedited Pathways
  • Name

    Priority Review Pathway

    Description

    Front-of-queue placement for novel devices addressing unmet needs

    Timeline Reduction

    30-50% faster

    Eligibility
    • Novel device
    • Addresses unmet clinical need
    • No marketed alternatives
Prior Approvals
  • Authority

    EU CE Mark

    Accepted

    Yes

    Benefit

    Abridged assessment route - major timeline reduction

    Timeline Savings

    30-50%

  • Authority

    FDA 510(k)

    Accepted

    Yes

    Benefit

    Accepted for Class IIa/IIb

    Timeline Savings

    20-30%

  • Authority

    MDSAP

    Accepted

    Yes

    Benefit

    Eliminates separate QMS audits

    Timeline Savings

    2-3 months

Key Requirements
  • Australian Sponsor (for foreign manufacturers)
  • ARTG (Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods) listing
  • Conformity assessment documentation
  • MDSAP or TGA audit
  • Two statutory clocks and nothing else: 20 working days to notify the inclusion decision, and 255 working days to process a Conformity Assessment application under Regulation 4.3. Application audits have no legislated timeframe, and neither does evaluating an application to vary an ARTG entry
  • Failing preliminary assessment is a refusal, not a request for more information, and the application fee is neither refunded nor transferable to a resubmission
  • Audit fees are payable only for mandatory audits, and TGA cannot start the audit until they are paid; non-mandatory audit selection currently carries no fee
  • Software variations that transition a software device to new intended hardware carry their own 3-5 business day target
Local Rep Required

Yes

Local Rep Name

Australian Sponsor

Mdsap Accepted

Yes

Mdsap Benefit

Eliminates separate TGA QMS audits, 5-year certificate validity

Registration Validity

5 years

Last Updated

2026-08-30

Verification Status

official-verified

Reviewed On

2026-08-30

Official Sources
  • Title

    TGA — processing your application for inclusion of a medical device: the decision is notified within 20 working days after the day the application fee was paid

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/application-and-market-authorisation/supply-medical-device/medical-device-inclusion-process/processing-your-application-inclusion-medical-device

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-30

  • Title

    TGA — applying for a Conformity Assessment certificate for medical devices: Regulation 4.3 requires processing within 255 working days, with non-legislated targets of 160/200 business days for new or substantial applications, 190/225 where ACMD advice or an on-site audit is needed, and 80/150 for recertification

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/guidance/applying-conformity-assessment-certificate-medical-devices

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-30

  • Title

    TGA — understanding the medical device application audit process: statutory 20-working-day preliminary assessment, non-IVD Level 2 first-round specialist assessment expected in 100 working days, sponsor responses due in 20-40 business days

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/guidance/understanding-medical-device-application-audit-process

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-30

  • Title

    TGA — understanding processing timeframes for medical device applications: published half-yearly snapshot of actual processing times by application and audit type

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/guidance/understanding-processing-timeframes-medical-device-applications

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-30

  • Title

    TGA — varying your medical device or IVD ARTG entry: software transition variations carry a 3-5 business day target, and section 41JA or section 31 notices allow not less than 10 working days to respond

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/resources/user-guide/varying-your-medical-device-or-ivd-artg-entry

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-30

Process
Template Id

default

Status

planning-template

Usage Rule

Maintained planning steps and estimates, not verified regulator deadlines.

Steps
  • Step

    1

    Title

    Pre-Submission Preparation

    Description

    Gather technical documentation, quality management system (QMS) records, and clinical data required by TGA. Appoint a Australian Sponsor.

    Duration

    1-3 months

    Icon

    📋

  • Step

    2

    Title

    Application Submission

    Description

    Submit complete registration dossier to TGA including device description, risk analysis, and testing reports.

    Duration

    1-2 weeks

    Icon

    📤

  • Step

    3

    Title

    Administrative Review

    Description

    TGA reviews application for completeness. May request additional documents or clarifications.

    Duration

    2-4 weeks

    Icon

    🔍

  • Step

    4

    Title

    Technical Evaluation

    Description

    In-depth technical assessment of device safety and performance. TGA may issue questions.

    Duration

    20 working days

    Icon

    ⚙️

  • Step

    5

    Title

    Registration Approval

    Description

    Upon successful review, TGA issues Australia market authorization certificate.

    Duration

    1-2 weeks

    Icon

    ✅

Government fee schedules · 1 record
Open Australia fees →
Country

Australia

Jurisdiction Id

australia

Country Code

AU

Authority

TGA

Low Risk Local
Min

121

Max

879

Currency

AUD

Per Product

Yes

High Risk Local
Min

1244

Max

1662

Currency

AUD

Per Product

Yes

Details
  • Id

    annual-charge-class-i-other

    Item

    Annual Charge - Class I (other)

    Currency

    AUD

    Amount Local

    121

    Amount Local Formatted

    AUD 121

    Frequency

    Annual per ARTG entry

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-06/fees-charges-summary-1-july-2026.pdf

    Source Title

    TGA fees and charges summary from 1 July 2026

    Source Effective Date

    2026-07-01

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

    Amount Status

    exact-current

  • Id

    annual-charge-class-i-measuring-sterile

    Item

    Annual Charge - Class I (measuring/sterile)

    Currency

    AUD

    Amount Local

    879

    Amount Local Formatted

    AUD 879

    Frequency

    Annual per ARTG entry

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-06/fees-charges-summary-1-july-2026.pdf

    Source Title

    TGA fees and charges summary from 1 July 2026

    Source Effective Date

    2026-07-01

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

    Amount Status

    exact-current

  • Id

    annual-charge-class-iia-iib

    Item

    Annual Charge - Class IIa/IIb

    Currency

    AUD

    Amount Local

    1305

    Amount Local Formatted

    AUD 1,305

    Frequency

    Annual per ARTG entry

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-06/fees-charges-summary-1-july-2026.pdf

    Source Title

    TGA fees and charges summary from 1 July 2026

    Source Effective Date

    2026-07-01

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

    Amount Status

    exact-current

  • Id

    annual-charge-class-iii-aimd

    Item

    Annual Charge - Class III/AIMD

    Currency

    AUD

    Amount Local

    1662

    Amount Local Formatted

    AUD 1,662

    Frequency

    Annual per ARTG entry

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-06/fees-charges-summary-1-july-2026.pdf

    Source Title

    TGA fees and charges summary from 1 July 2026

    Source Effective Date

    2026-07-01

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

    Amount Status

    exact-current

  • Id

    application-fee-class-i

    Item

    Application Fee - Class I

    Currency

    AUD

    Amount Local

    651

    Amount Local Formatted

    AUD 651

    Frequency

    Per ARTG inclusion application

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-06/fees-charges-summary-1-july-2026.pdf

    Source Title

    TGA fees and charges summary from 1 July 2026

    Source Effective Date

    2026-07-01

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

    Amount Status

    exact-current

  • Id

    application-fee-class-iia-iib

    Item

    Application Fee - Class IIa/IIb

    Currency

    AUD

    Amount Local

    1244

    Amount Local Formatted

    AUD 1,244

    Frequency

    Per ARTG inclusion application

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-06/fees-charges-summary-1-july-2026.pdf

    Source Title

    TGA fees and charges summary from 1 July 2026

    Source Effective Date

    2026-07-01

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

    Amount Status

    exact-current

  • Id

    application-fee-class-iii

    Item

    Application Fee - Class III

    Currency

    AUD

    Amount Local

    1603

    Amount Local Formatted

    AUD 1,603

    Frequency

    Per ARTG inclusion application

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-06/fees-charges-summary-1-july-2026.pdf

    Source Title

    TGA fees and charges summary from 1 July 2026

    Source Effective Date

    2026-07-01

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

    Amount Status

    exact-current

  • Id

    ivd-annual-charge

    Item

    IVD Annual Charge

    Currency

    AUD

    Amount Local

    948

    Amount Local Formatted

    AUD 948

    Frequency

    Annual per ARTG entry

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-06/fees-charges-summary-1-july-2026.pdf

    Source Title

    TGA fees and charges summary from 1 July 2026

    Source Effective Date

    2026-07-01

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

    Amount Status

    exact-current

  • Id

    ivd-application-fee

    Item

    IVD Application Fee

    Currency

    AUD

    Amount Local

    1244

    Amount Local Formatted

    AUD 1,244

    Frequency

    Per ARTG inclusion application

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-06/fees-charges-summary-1-july-2026.pdf

    Source Title

    TGA fees and charges summary from 1 July 2026

    Source Effective Date

    2026-07-01

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

    Amount Status

    exact-current

  • Id

    udi-consent-to-supply-first-entry

    Item

    UDI Consent to Supply application - first ARTG entry

    Currency

    AUD

    Amount Local

    80

    Amount Local Formatted

    AUD 80

    Frequency

    Per application

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/labelling-and-advertising/unique-device-identification-udi-hub/udi-information-sponsors-and-manufacturers/unique-device-identification-consent-supply-process

    Source Title

    TGA Unique Device Identification Consent to Supply process and application fee

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

  • Id

    udi-consent-to-supply-additional-entry

    Item

    UDI Consent to Supply - each additional ARTG entry in the same application

    Currency

    AUD

    Amount Local

    10

    Amount Local Formatted

    AUD 10

    Frequency

    Per additional entry

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/labelling-and-advertising/unique-device-identification-udi-hub/udi-information-sponsors-and-manufacturers/unique-device-identification-consent-supply-process

    Source Title

    TGA Unique Device Identification Consent to Supply process and application fee

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

Notes
  • Annual charges apply each financial year per ARTG entry
  • Application fees apply per ARTG inclusion application
  • Different fees for Class I subtypes
  • ARTG variation application fees follow Schedule 9, Part 2 Item 2A of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990; notification of a change of sponsorship carries no fee.
  • Annual charges apply to every ARTG entry: invoices issue each July for non-ACE entries, non-payment within 20 working days is a ground for cancellation (s 41GL(f)) or suspension (s 41GA(1)(b)), and the Annual Charge Exemption applies until turnover commences. Current-year amounts sit in TGA’s downloadable fees and charges summaries.
Last Updated

2026-08-25

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Sources
  • Title

    TGA fees and charges summary from 1 July 2026

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-06/fees-charges-summary-1-july-2026.pdf

    Effective Date

    2026-07-01

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-25

  • Title

    TGA Unique Device Identification Consent to Supply process and application fee

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/labelling-and-advertising/unique-device-identification-udi-hub/udi-information-sponsors-and-manufacturers/unique-device-identification-consent-supply-process

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-25

  • Title

    TGA user guide: varying your medical device or IVD ARTG entry

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/resources/user-guide/varying-your-medical-device-or-ivd-artg-entry

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-25

  • Title

    TGA annual charges for therapeutic goods

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/products/regulations-all-products/fees-and-payments/annual-charges/annual-charges-therapeutic-goods

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-25

Reviewed On

2026-08-25

Amount Status

exact-current

Range Available

Yes

Additional certifications and licences · 1 record
Open Australia certifications →
Slug

australia

Market

Australia

Confidence

high

Schemes
  • Id

    tga-electrical-emc-evidence

    Name

    TGA electrical/EMC evidence

    Category

    Medical Electrical Safety

    Status

    Included In Medical Registration

    Object

    Finished Device

    Note

    TGA conformity-assessment audits the manufacturer QMS against regulatory requirements and internationally recognised standards, specifically ISO 13485:2016 (on-site or desktop assessments); microbiology and sterility assessments may reference ISO 11135 (ethylene oxide), the ISO 11137 series (radiation processing) and AAMI TIR 56.

    Source Urls
    • https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/guidance/applying-conformity-assessment-certificate-medical-devices
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    eess

    Name

    EESS

    Category

    General Electrical Components

    Status

    Mandatory If Feature

    Object

    Household Device Or Component

    Note

    Professional/TGA-regulated medical equipment is generally outside scope; household equipment and adapters require a separate scope test.

    Source Urls
    • https://www.eess.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/20-009-General-guidance-Requirements-for-medical-equipment-the-EESS.pdf
    Source Binding

    reviewed

  • Id

    acma-rcm

    Name

    ACMA RCM

    Category

    Radio Spectrum

    Status

    Mandatory If Feature

    Object

    Radio Or Emc Equipment

    Source Urls
    • https://www.acma.gov.au/technical-standards
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    arpansa-state-radiation-licensing

    Name

    ARPANSA/state radiation licensing

    Category

    Ionizing Radiation

    Status

    Mandatory For Use Site

    Object

    Facility Or Commonwealth Entity

    Source Urls
    • https://www.arpansa.gov.au/regulation-and-licensing/licensing
    Source Binding

    candidate

Official Sources
  • Authority

    ACMA

    Topic

    technical standards and RCM

    Url

    https://www.acma.gov.au/technical-standards

  • Authority

    EESS

    Topic

    medical equipment scope guidance

    Url

    https://www.eess.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/20-009-General-guidance-Requirements-for-medical-equipment-the-EESS.pdf

  • Authority

    ARPANSA

    Topic

    radiation regulation and licensing

    Url

    https://www.arpansa.gov.au/regulation-and-licensing/licensing

  • Authority

    TGA

    Topic

    conformity assessment certificate guidance QMS audit and sterility standards

    Url

    https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/guidance/applying-conformity-assessment-certificate-medical-devices

Keep researching this market
View the Australia resource hub →
Compare regulatory data across all countries →
DJ Fang
Need to apply Australia's requirements to a product?
Confirm the current TGA pathway, evidence, and local-role details for the actual device before filing.
Pricing