Protocol, consent, investigator and site amendments are decided within 15 business days (Res. 238/2024, Art. 18 f)
clinical.amendment-decision-fifteen-business-days
Fact-level verified↗DINAVISA must authorise or deny requests for amendments to the research protocol and/or informed consent and assent, and additions or changes of investigator and/or research centres, within no more than fifteen (15) business days, or object, in which case the period is suspended by the evaluation report.
Conditions
- Business days.
- Substantial amendments need DINAVISA authorisation before implementation (Art. 34 h).
English gist: amendment requests (protocol, consent/assent, investigators, sites) are authorised or denied within 15 business days, or objected to with the clock suspended.
DINAVISA must authorise or refuse a clinical-trial application within 60 business days, or object and stop the clock (Res. 238/2024, Art. 18 b)
clinical.authorisation-decision-sixty-business-days
Fact-level verified↗Among DINAVISA's responsibilities, Article 18(b) requires it to authorise or deny clinical-trial applications within no more than sixty (60) business days, or to object, in which case the period is suspended by the issue of the evaluation report. Under Article 18(a) an application is treated as withdrawn if the sponsor does not answer.
Conditions
- Business days (días hábiles).
- The clock is suspended when DINAVISA issues an evaluation report with objections.
English gist: DINAVISA evaluates the application and issues an evaluation report (no sponsor reply = application deemed withdrawn), and must authorise or refuse within 60 business days or object, suspending the clock with the evaluation report.
Clinical trials of medical devices and IVDs with a registration purpose must be authorised by DINAVISA before they start (Res. 238/2024, Art. 3)
clinical.dinavisa-prior-authorisation-device-and-ivd-trials
Fact-level verified↗Resolución DINAVISA N° 238/2024 brings within its scope, and subjects to prior authorisation by DINAVISA, clinical trials for medicines, vaccines, medical devices and in-vitro diagnostic products conducted with a registration purpose in Paraguay, as well as trials on already-registered products studying new indications, routes, concentrations, dosage forms, posologies, combinations or any post-registration change requiring registrable clinical data.
Conditions
- Applies to trials in human beings within the national territory (Art. 2).
- The resolution abrogates Resolución DINAVISA N° 323 of 17 July 2023.
English gist: Article 3 lists the trials within scope that must be authorised in advance by DINAVISA: (a) trials of medicines, vaccines, medical devices and IVDs with a registration purpose in Paraguay; (b) trials on products registered with national regulators that study a new indication, route, concentration, dosage form, posology, combination or any post-registration change needing registrable clinical data. Text transcribed from the scanned official PDF (OCR checked against the page image).
Ethics committees reviewing device or IVD trials need DINAVISA's complementary accreditation in addition to the MSPBS basic accreditation (Res. 238/2024, Art. 4 num. 1)
clinical.ethics-committee-complementary-accreditation-by-dinavisa
Fact-level verified↗The basic accreditation of a research ethics committee (CEIS) is granted by the Ministry of Health and suffices for committees that do not review clinical trials of medicines, vaccines, devices or IVDs; committees that review such trials also need a complementary accreditation granted by DINAVISA and must follow Good Clinical Practice. DINAVISA keeps an updated list of complementary-accredited CEIS on its website (Art. 18 g).
Conditions
- Applies to CEIS reviewing trials within the scope of the resolution.
English gist: two-tier CEIS accreditation; the DINAVISA complementary accreditation is mandatory for committees that review device/IVD clinical trials.
The sponsor must file an ICH E3 clinical study report within 12 months of the end of the trial (Res. 056/2026, Art. 3)
clinical.global-study-report-within-twelve-months
Fact-level verified↗In addition to the final reports required by Resolución 238/2024, the sponsor or its legal representative in Paraguay must submit to DINAVISA the global study reports within no more than twelve (12) months from the end of the clinical trial, structured according to the ICH E3 Clinical Study Reports guideline; non-compliance is sanctionable.
Conditions
- Counted from the end of the clinical trial.
- In force from 16 February 2026.
Effective from 2026-02-16
English gist: global clinical study reports in ICH E3 format are due within 12 months of trial completion, on top of the final reports under Res. 238/2024; breach is sanctionable.
The investigator's brochure must follow ICH E6(R3); non-compliance is a ground for rejecting the trial application (Res. 056/2026, Art. 2)
clinical.investigator-brochure-ich-e6r3-required
Fact-level verified↗Resolución DINAVISA N° 056/2026 supplements Resolución 238/2024: the information requested in the Investigator's Manual must comply with the ICH E6(R3) Good Clinical Practice guideline, including its documentary requirements, and failure to comply is a ground for rejection of the clinical-trial authorisation application.
Conditions
- In force from the date of signature, 16 February 2026 (Art. 4).
- Annexed to Resolución 238/2024 (Art. 5).
Effective from 2026-02-16
English gist: the investigator's brochure must meet ICH E6(R3) GCP, including document requirements; non-compliance causes rejection of the trial application.
Ley 1119/97 Art. 30 requires prior authorisation of all clinical trials by the national health authority, under GCP and the Declaration of Helsinki
clinical.statutory-prior-authorisation-and-helsinki
Fact-level verified↗Article 30 of Ley N° 1119/97 requires all clinical trials to be previously authorised by the national health authority under conditions regulated in line with Good Clinical Practice, to respect fundamental rights and the ethical postulates of the Declaration of Helsinki, allows the authority to restrict complex trials to designated hospitals or research centres, and empowers it to order the precautionary interruption of a trial.
Conditions
- The law's own definition of 'ensayos clínicos' (Art. 5) is drafted around substances or medicines; the device- and IVD-specific implementation is Resolución DINAVISA 238/2024, which cites this article as its legal basis.
English gist: all clinical trials need prior authorisation by the national health authority under GCP-aligned regulation; Helsinki ethics apply; complex trials may be limited to designated centres; the authority may order precautionary interruption.