Pure Global AI
Rwanda FDA · structured requirements

🇷🇼 Rwanda medical device regulatory data

Explore the medical device requirements currently available for Rwanda, organized by topic and linked to official sources.

29 facts24 dimensions10 official sourceslatest verification 2026-09-16

Advertising, claims & promotion

Which claims, audiences, channels, approvals, and restrictions apply?

Compare countries

Prior authorisation for promotion and advertising of medical devices, with claim content rules and claim substantiation

advertising.promotion-approval-claims-control-and-substantiation
Fact-level verified

Rwanda FDA's promotion regulations apply to medical devices by definition: 'Regulated product' means processed foods, pharmaceutical products, vaccines, human and veterinary processed foods and other biological products used in clinical as drugs, food supplements, food fortificant, fortified foods, poisonous substances, herbal medicines, medicated cosmetics, 'medical devices', tobacco and tobacco products. Article 5 prohibits advertising, promoting or marketing any regulated product unless it is registered by the Authority, prohibits advertising or promoting any regulated product unless the advertisement or promotion has the clearance and approval issued by the Authority, prohibits carrying out a regulated product launch without prior written approval or clearance, prohibits promotion or advertisement that is directly or by implication misleading or calculated to mislead the population, requires packaging and labelling information consistent with the product information approved at registration, and requires all promotional materials to carry a disclaimer owning all claims stated in them as well as disowning third-party claims. Article 6 requires promotional advertisements to be accurate, unbiased, complete, clear and designed to promote credibility and trust by the general public and healthcare providers, to be consistent with the approved product information and in line with the conditions or illnesses for which the product was registered, and provides that promotional material shall not contain misleading or unverifiable statements or omissions regarding quality, safety and efficacy or value which likely induce product use or give rise to undue risks; promotion must not state or imply that a product is 'safe', is '100% safe', has 'no side effects' or that its 'use will not cause harm'. Article 7 prohibits promotion before written approval, restricts promotion to the public in open markets, bus stands and moving vehicles, treats posters in public places as promotional material targeting the general public requiring approval, and prohibits advertising words such as 'Number one product' or 'the best product'. Article 8 makes it an offence to promote, advertise or market any regulated product in a manner that is false, misleading or deceptive or likely to create an erroneous impression as to its character, value, quantity, composition, merit, safety or efficacy, and treats imitation of another company's advertisement layout, slogans or visual presentation in a misleading way as false and misleading. Article 11 requires the final version of the advertisement in whatsoever form to be submitted for vetting before final publication; acceptable advertisements are communicated in writing with the unique reference number issued by the Authority for each advertisement, unacceptable ones with written clarification, and alteration of the format without express written permission renders the approval null and void. Article 18 gives the Authority power to issue the guidelines, SOPs and forms necessary for implementation. The official application requirements require, among nine documents, 'Tangible or scientific proof or facts to back up claims made by the applicant (where applicable)', samples of all promotional materials in final versions, the product registration certificates for the products to be promoted and the degree of the responsible personnel who approved the message; and the official application form for approval of promotional materials (FDISM/PVSM/FOM/010) carries 'Medical Device [ ]' as one of its product-category options. Registration can be suspended where a registered device 'has been advertised in a manner which is false or misleading or does not comply with the provisions of the laws and regulations currently enforced by the Authority' (TRG/002 art. 24).

Conditions
  • The regulations govern promotion, advertisement and marketing of 'regulated products', a defined term that expressly includes medical devices; the device-specific registration consequence is the suspension ground in art. 24 of TRG/002.
  • Promotion and advertising authorisation is granted through the Authority's promotion application route (application letter to the Director-General, the FOM/010 promotional-material approval form, samples and claim substantiation); the tariff for that authorisation sits in the separate fees regulations.
  • The Regulations reference a companion guideline on promotion and advertisement of regulated products in art. 10; the guideline PDFs published under the Authority's promotion pages returned the site's HTML error page at the time of research, so the operative detail relied on here is the regulations themselves, the official application requirements and the official form.

Effective from 2020-12-31

Source is English; the passages are quoted verbatim below. The device applicability of the regulations rests on the definition of 'Regulated product' in art. 4(13); the claim-substantiation requirement and the medical-device option on the approval form come from the supporting official documents.

Approval validity & renewal

What expires, what is retained periodically, and when must renewal start?

Compare countries

Full registration valid 5 years, notification 3 years, conditional registration up to 3 years, with annual retention

validity.five-year-registration-three-year-notification
Fact-level verified

A certificate of full registration is valid for five years from issuance and may thereafter be renewed, subject to payment of prescribed annual retention fees. A certificate of notification is valid for three years. A certificate of conditional registration is valid for the period specified in the certificate, which may not exceed three years. Retention on the register is annual: an application for retention must be submitted one month before the due date, and the device is removed from the register if the application and fee are not effected. An application for renewal must be made at least 90 calendar days before expiry, with a grace period extending to 90 days after the expiry date; failure to renew within the grace period means the application is treated as new.

Conditions
  • Renewal must be filed at least 90 calendar days before expiry.
  • The grace period is 90 days after the specified expiry date.
  • Annual retention fees apply in addition to the renewal fee.
  • Renewal applications must include current artworks or mock-ups, the technical file, samples where applicable, and payment of renewal fees.

Effective from 2020-04-20

Verbatim (Article 19): 'A certificate of full registration issued under article 13 shall, unless earlier suspended or revoked, and subject to payment of prescribed annual retention fees, be valid for a period of five (5) years from the date of issuance and may thereafter be renewed. The certificate of notification, however, will be valid for a period of 3 years.' Verbatim (Article 23): 'Application for renewal of registration or notification shall be made to the Authority at least ninety (90) calendar days before its expiry. A grace period for renewal shall extend to ninety (90) days after the specified expiry date.'

Authority & regime

Which authority and binding regime govern this product, task, and date?

Compare countries

Rwanda FDA is the competent authority for medical devices and IVDs

authority.competent-authority-rwanda-fda
Fact-level verified

The Rwanda Food and Drugs Authority (Rwanda FDA) is a regulatory body established by Law No 003/2018 of 09/02/2018. One of its functions is to regulate matters related to the quality, safety and performance of medical devices including in vitro diagnostics in order to protect public health by increasing their access and availability. The law's Article 9 is the enabling provision for the technical regulations and guidelines, and Article 8 paragraph 15 gives the Authority the mission to build cooperation and partnership for harmonisation of practices with regional and international bodies.

Effective from 2018-02-09

Verbatim: 'Rwanda Food and Drugs Authority (Rwanda FDA) is a regulatory body established by the Law N° 003/2018 of 09/02/2018. One of the functions of Rwanda FDA is to regulate matters related to quality, safety and performance of medical devices including In vitro Diagnostics in order to protect public health by increasing their access and availability.' The registered regulator label 'Rwanda FDA' is correct and needs no change.

Change control

Does the event require internal documentation, notice, prior approval, transfer, or a new application?

Compare countries

Any variation must be notified in writing, with major and minor variations distinguished and separately fee'd

change.variation-major-minor
Fact-level verified

Any variation to a registered medical device or IVD's information must be notified in writing to the Authority through an application in the approved format, as per the variation guidelines in force at the time of submission. A distinction is made between major and minor variations in accordance with those guidelines, with a difference in the applicable fees. An application for change on a registered or notified medical device is one of the submission types on the standard application form. Under the fee regulations, minor variations and annual retention are fee-waived, while a major variation of a registered product is charged at 50 per cent of the initial registration fee.

Conditions
  • The variation guidelines themselves were not retrieved in this round; the major/minor classification criteria are set out there.
  • Failure to notify a variation is a ground on which registration can be suspended.

Effective from 2020-04-20

Verbatim: 'Any variation to a registered medical device or in vitro diagnostic information shall be notified in writing to the Authority through an application in the approved format. ... A distinction shall be made between major and minor variations in accordance with the relevant guidelines for variation of registered medical devices including in vitro diagnostics and there shall be a distinction in the payment of applicable fees.'

Classification rules

What local class follows from which rules and decisive product facts?

Compare countries

Medical devices are classified into four classes A to D by risk to the end user and intended purpose

classification.four-classes-a-to-d
Fact-level verified

Medical devices are classified into four classes (A, B, C, D) based on the level of risk to the end user and their intended purpose. Class A is the lowest risk (examination gloves, tongue depressors) and Class D the highest (cardiac pacemakers, implants, IUDs); Class B is low-to-moderate (electronic thermometers, blood transfusion tubes, hypodermic needles) and Class C moderate-to-high (lung ventilators, condoms, infusion pumps). Where a device can be classified into more than one class the higher-risk class applies. Where one device is intended to be used together with a different device a separate submission must be made and conformity assessed separately. The manufacturer has the primary responsibility to classify its devices, but the Authority may challenge the classification and has the final say. The guideline also sets out detailed classification rules modelled on the IMDRF rules, covering non-invasive, invasive, active and special devices.

Conditions
  • IVDs are classified in a parallel scheme under the separate IVD guidance.
  • Class A devices that are non-sterile, non-active and without a measuring function are eligible for notification rather than registration.
  • Class C and Class D devices require a QMS audit.

Effective from 2025-11-01

Verbatim: 'Medical devices are classified into four (4) classes (A, B, C, D) based on the level of risk to the end user and their intended purpose. Class A represents the group with the lowest risk and Class D represents the group with the highest risk.'

Clinical investigation & performance

Which clinical or IVD performance evidence or study is required and accepted?

Compare countries

Clinical evaluation report, device-specific clinical trials and post-market study plans in the registration dossier

clinical.clinical-evidence-and-investigation-requirements
Fact-level verified

Registration of a medical device in Rwanda requires an overall clinical-evidence submission. ToC section 4.02 ('Overall Clinical Evidence Summary') requires a brief one-to-two page summary of the available clinical evidence presented in support of the submission, listing the evidence presented and its characteristics (RCT, case study, literature review, post-market data from another jurisdiction or from a marketed device) with a discussion of how it is considered sufficient to support the marketing request for the requested indications; a tabular listing of clinical studies may be included; where any study device differs from the device to be marketed, including a competitor's device, the applicant must describe those differences and their impact on the validity of the evidence, which may include a detailed comparison of the clinical, technical and biological characteristics of the two devices; and human factors testing that includes patients is filed here. Section 4.02.01 ('Clinical Evaluation Report') requires a clinical evaluation report reviewed and signed by an expert in the relevant field containing an objective critical evaluation of all clinical data submitted in relation to the device, together with a complete curriculum vitae or similar documentation justifying the manufacturer's choice of clinical expert. Section 4.02.02 ('Device Specific Clinical Trials') requires clinical-trial information grouped by trial, beginning with trial description, protocol number and date of initiation, followed by a clinical-trial summary and clinical trial report; raw data may be requested by the Authority (4.02.02.01.03). Section 2.07 ('Post-Market Study Plans') requires the applicant to provide post-market study plans, which may include clinical or non-clinical study plans, on study objectives, study design, subjects and sites, endpoints (primary and secondary), summary of the data-analysis plan, and length and frequency of follow-up, excluding final reports and analysis. Investigations on human subjects are regulated through the separate clinical-trial framework: art. 35 of TRG/002 provides that 'these regulations shall not apply to devices intended to be used in research and development studies, without prejudice to the provisions of the regulations on clinical trials in force', and the import/export guideline allows a special import authorisation for unregistered devices to be used in a clinical trial, on production of a clinical-trial approval certificate or ethical-committee approval/certificate (or, for veterinary research, approval from government institutions), with an application form FDISM/FDIEC/FOM/003.

Conditions
  • The clinical-evaluation and clinical-trial requirements above are dossier content requirements; the guideline does not set a separate clinical-investigation authorisation for devices — that runs through the clinical-trial regulations referenced by art. 35 of TRG/002 and, for importation of the investigational device, through the special import authorisation.
  • The clinical evaluation report requirement is expressed as a short summary supported by the underlying evidence; the guideline indicates the Authority may require the underlying material through the general assessment powers in art. 11 of TRG/002.

Effective from 2025-11-01

Source is English; the passages are quoted verbatim below. The exemption in art. 35 of TRG/002 is drafted as an exemption from registration for research-and-development devices, not as a device clinical-trial authorisation; the operative clinical-trial rules are the separate regulations in force that it saves.

Device definition & scope

Is the product a device, IVD, accessory, software, or borderline product locally?

Compare countries

The regulations cover all human and veterinary medical devices including IVDs submitted for marketing authorisation

scope.regulation-scope-and-language
Fact-level verified

The registration regulations apply to all regulated human and veterinary medical devices including in vitro diagnostics submitted for marketing authorisation, and they cover the full device groupings used by the Authority (single device, in vitro diagnostic, medical device group, medical device family, medical device group family and medical device system). All applications and supporting documents must be submitted in English, French or Kinyarwanda; where documents are in another language the applicant must submit translated copies to expedite review.

Conditions
  • Revision 2 (22 August 2022) added IVDs as regulated products.
  • Translation is an applicant obligation where the original document is in another language.

Effective from 2022-08-22

Verbatim (Article 8): 'All applications and supporting documents shall be submitted in English, French or Kinyarwanda language. Where some documents are submitted in a language other than English, French or Kinyarwanda, the applicant shall submit translated copies to expedite the review'. The licence-holder sentence is taken from the parallel rule stated in the device guideline section on multiple applicants; it is reproduced here only as context and is not the passage supporting this fact.

Dossier requirements

Which evidence, local deltas, formats, and signatures are required?

Compare countries

Registration dossier uses a Table of Contents format with a declaration of conformity and an essential-principles checklist

dossier.toc-format-and-declaration-of-conformity
Fact-level verified

A registration application (as opposed to a notification) comprises a cover letter to the Director General, the registration application form, a technical documentation / technical file in Table of Contents (ToC) format, a declaration of conformity signed and dated by the manufacturer, copies of referenced literature and supporting documents, two commercial samples with a certificate of conformity where applicable, and a Rwanda FDA QMS audit certificate or proof of QMS audit application for Class C and Class D devices. The technical documentation must demonstrate conformity with the Essential Principles through a manufacturer-controlled EP checklist that identifies each applicable principle, the chosen method of demonstrating conformity and the reference of the controlling document. Submissions may be in any of the official languages. The declaration of conformity must state the manufacturer's information, the authorised representative where applicable, device information, risk classification, and a statement of conformity including applicable regulations or standards.

Conditions
  • For Class A notification the file is lighter: cover letter, notification application form, a valid ISO 13485 certificate or equivalent, declaration of conformity, instructions for use where applicable, artworks or mock-ups, and one commercial pack sample where applicable.
  • Where samples cannot be provided, a letter explaining the reason plus real-life 3D pictures must be included.
  • Additional samples may be requested during assessment.

Effective from 2025-11-01

Verbatim (1.5.2): 'Other medical devices not eligible for notification shall apply (online) for registration and their applications shall include the following: 1. Signed and dated copy of the cover letter addressed to the DG of Rwanda FDA ... 3. Technical documentation/Technical file (Table of Content (ToC)) 4. Declaration of Conformity (DoC) ... 7. Rwanda FDA QMS audit certificate or Proof of QMS audit application (for class C and class D medical devices).'

Economic-operator roles

Which manufacturer, representative, holder, applicant, importer, and distributor roles apply?

Compare countries

Applications may be filed by the applicant, the manufacturer or a Local Technical Representative registered in Rwanda

operators.local-technical-representative
Fact-level verified

An application for registration or notification of a medical device or IVD is made to the Authority in writing by the applicant, the manufacturer or a Local Technical Representative. A Local Technical Representative (LTR) is any corporate body registered in Rwanda and authorised by Rwanda FDA to deal with medical devices and IVDs that has received a mandate from the applicant to act on its behalf in matters pertaining to registration. The submission must include a letter of authorization from the manufacturer authorising the LTR to submit the application, clearly highlighting the LTR's responsibility. The LTR is published against the registration in the register and on the Authority's website listing of registered devices.

Conditions
  • The LTR must be a corporate body registered in Rwanda and authorised by Rwanda FDA.
  • The manufacturer's letter of authorization must state the LTR's responsibilities.
  • The register entry published by the Authority includes the local technical representative, the name and country of the marketing authorisation holder and the name and country of the original manufacturer.

Effective from 2022-08-22

Verbatim (Article 6): 'An application for registration or notification of medical devices including in vitro diagnostics shall be made to the Authority in writing by the applicant, the manufacturer or a local technical representative.' Verbatim (definition 14): '"Local Technical Representative (LTR)" means any corporate body registered in Rwanda and authorized by the Rwanda FDA to deal with medical devices and in vitro diagnostics that has received a mandate from the applicant to act on his/her behalf with regard to matters pertaining to the registration of medical devices including IVDs.'

Establishment, import & distribution

Which establishment licences, importer permissions, and distribution controls apply?

Compare countries

Importation reserved to licensed importers or exhaustively listed eligible importer categories

establishment.importer-licensing-and-authorised-importer-categories
Fact-level verified

Rwanda FDA guidelines reserve the importation of medical devices/IVDs to importers whose premises are licensed by the Authority or who fall within an eligible-importer category, and the eligible categories are exhaustively listed in section 1.1.2: (a) licensed manufacturers and wholesale companies of pharmaceutical and medical devices/IVDs; (b) licensed retail of pharmaceutical and medical devices/IVDs, only on medical prescription, where the product is not available on the market; (c) public and private health facilities; (d) hatcheries; (e) the beneficiary of a donation; (f) non-governmental organisations with a Memorandum of Understanding with the Ministry of Health or the Government of Rwanda; (g) government institutions and embassies; (h) UN organisations intervening in the health sector; (i) clinical-trial sponsors and principal investigators; (j) a tourist, a visitor in the country, or any other person for justified reasons. Section 1.1.1 adds the transactional conditions: all devices to be imported must be registered or granted special approval by the Authority; every import application passes through two mandatory phases, Visa then Licence; importation of a pharmaceutical product labelled for sale in a specified country is prohibited in Rwanda except where Rwanda is one of the specified countries; all applications for import authorisation must be submitted using a platform defined by the Authority; all consignments must pass through the approved port of entry and are subject to physical inspection at the port of entry or at the importer's premises (where released under seal) before being used. The underlying prohibition is in the registration regulations: art. 34 of DFAR/HMDAR/TRG/002 Rev_2 provides that 'No person shall manufacture, prepare, store, export, sell, dispense, distribute or import Medical Devices or In Vitro Diagnostics Devices unless the person must hold the appropriate certificate of registration or notification issued by the Authority.'

Conditions
  • The eligible-importer list in section 1.1.2 is a single closed list; there is no general importer licence class outside it and outside premises licensed by the Authority.
  • Section 1.1.2 governs eligibility to hold an import authorisation; the establishment-side licensing of the importer's premises is referenced ('importers whose premises are licensed by Rwanda FDA') but the licensing instrument itself is not this guideline.

Effective from 2022-11-30

Source is English; the passages are quoted verbatim below. The import/export guideline is the operative instrument for who may import; the registration regulations supply the underlying statutory prohibition cited as supporting source.

Fees

What regulator fee applies to this class, route, event, and date?

Compare countries

Imported device registration fee USD 100/400/600 by origin; domestic manufacturing licence FRW 100,000; notification fee-waived

fees.registration-and-licence-tariff
Fact-level verified

Under the Rwanda FDA tariff regulations (ODDG/RES/TRG/001 Version 5), registration and marketing authorisation of an imported machinery, medical equipment and device is charged at USD 100 where imported from the East African Community, USD 400 where imported from an SRA or WHO Listed Authority, and USD 600 where imported from other sources; the fee covers a five-year registration and includes a GMP inspection. A licence for a domestic manufacturing facility for medical equipment and devices is FRW 100,000 and includes the GMP certificate, manufacturing licence and registration/marketing authorisation. Notification of the registration of machinery, medical equipment and devices is fee-waived for both domestic and imported products. Annual retention and minor variations are also fee-waived. Foreign-manufacturer GMP inspections cover up to five production lines at one site, with additional lines charged at USD 400 each.

Conditions
  • Fees are prepaid and non-refundable and may be paid in Rwandan francs or US dollars.
  • Registration of an imported device includes a GMP inspection within the same fee.
  • The medical device fee row covers 'machinery, medical equipment and devices'; separate rows apply to pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and laboratory reagents.

Effective from 2024-12-31

Verbatim (waivers): 'Rwanda FDA waives fees for the following services: I. REGISTRATION AND MARKETING AUTHORIZATION ... 3. Notification of the registration of Machinery, medical equipment and devices, applicable to domestic and imported products.' Verbatim (Annex III note 6): 'GMP Inspection for foreign manufacturers of food products, pharmaceuticals, health products, machinery, medical equipment, and devices covers up to five production lines at one site. Additional production lines will incur a charge of USD 400 each.'

Label, IFU & language

Which label and IFU elements, languages, symbols, and translation controls apply?

Compare countries

Devices must be labelled in at least one of the official languages used in Rwanda

label.official-language-requirement
Fact-level verified

All medical devices including in vitro diagnostics intended to be marketed in Rwanda must be labelled in at least one of the official languages used in Rwanda; further detailed labelling requirements are set by the relevant guidelines. The device registration guideline's submission requirements include legible copies of the primary and secondary packaging labels, the package insert or instructions for use where required, e-labelling details where applicable (including the form of e-labelling, risk management, and how users are told in relevant languages where the IFU and further information can be found), healthcare-professional labelling and patient labelling. All information may be submitted in any of the official languages of Rwanda.

Conditions
  • The instrument says 'at least one of the official languages used in Rwanda' without enumerating them; TRG/002 art. 8 accepts applications in English, French or Kinyarwanda, and Swahili has also been an official language of Rwanda since 2017, so the enumeration should not be limited to three on the strength of this source.
  • Shipping labels are excluded from the label submission requirement (DHT/GDL/024 ToC item 5.02).
  • e-labelling submissions must describe how the e-labelling requirements for the website have been met, and how IFU availability is signalled in relevant languages (ToC item 5.04).

Effective from 2020-04-20

Verbatim: 'All Medical Devices including In Vitro Diagnostics intended to be marketed in Rwanda shall be labelled in at least one of the official languages used in Rwanda. other detailed information for labelling will be determined by relevant guidelines.'

Manufacturer PMS

Which PMS plan, report, PMCF or PMPF, trend, and lifecycle-update duties apply?

Compare countries

Manufacturer risk management across the whole lifecycle linked to post-marketing surveillance, with periodic PSM reporting

pms.manufacturer-lifecycle-risk-management-and-post-market-obligations
Fact-level verified

Rwanda FDA imposes an explicit manufacturer-side post-market obligation chain. Section 5.5 of the safety and vigilance guideline provides that 'Manufacturers shall manage risks of their product throughout the entire lifecycle to monitor whether the risks continue to remain acceptable and whether any new hazards or risks of illness or injury associated with the use of the device for its intended uses and conditions of use are discovered. The risk management procedures shall be directly linked to the manufacturer's post-marketing surveillance procedures and shall focus on controlling and mitigating risks.', with the detail of risk-management activities as described in ISO 14971:2007. The same section requires manufacturers to plan and perform internal quality audits to verify that risk-management activities and results comply with planned and established procedures and to ensure the continued effectiveness of the risk-management system, requires risk-management activities to begin as early as possible in design and development, requires re-examination of the risk analysis and appropriate action whenever a risk is determined unacceptable, and requires that after release of the device to market 'risk management activities should be linked to quality management processes, for example, production and process controls, corrective and preventive actions (CAPA), servicing and customer feedback'. Section 5.5.1 requires a risk-management plan spanning the entire lifecycle of the device, containing scope of the plan, device and life-cycle phases, the design-development process, risk-management activities and methods, a verification plan for risk control measures, reviews, allocation of responsibilities and criteria for risk acceptability, together with the risk-management activities, the risk-analysis methods and the named analytical tools to be used. The registration regulations make failure to report a suspensive ground: 'The Authority may suspend registered devices if it is satisfied that: […] The marketing authorization holder has failed to submit periodic post-marketing surveillance reports; The marketing authorization holder, intentionally and without justifiable reasons has failed to submit reports on adverse effects, and the renewal of registration has defaulted beyond the specified grace period' (TRG/002 art. 24). The registration dossier must contain post-market study plans where applicable (DHT/GDL/024 Version 2, section 2.07).

Conditions
  • The instrument imposes risk management throughout the lifecycle, a written risk-management plan, internal audits and a link to post-marketing surveillance procedures; it does not prescribe a fixed PSUR/PSMF submission calendar in this guideline, the periodic-reporting obligation being enforced through the suspension grounds in art. 24 of TRG/002 and through the PSMF referenced in the appeal provision (section 13.5).
  • The lifecycle risk-management duties are expressed in section 5.5 under the chapter on medical devices within a guideline that covers medical products and health technologies generally; the medical-device chapter is the operative part for devices.

Effective from 2023-03-28

Source is English; the passages are quoted verbatim below. The lifecycle risk-management duty and its express linkage to the manufacturer's post-marketing surveillance procedures are the core of this fact; the enforcement hook is the suspension ground in the registration regulations.

Official forms & portals

Which current form, portal, account, and submission package must be used?

Compare countries

Applications are received only through the Rwanda FDA online portal

portals.rwanda-fda-online-portal
Fact-level verified

An application for registration or notification of a medical device is received only through the Rwanda FDA online portal; applications and queries are handled there, and a reference number is assigned on receipt and used in all subsequent correspondence. Where samples are required, they are delivered to Rwanda FDA headquarters reception with the cover letter and a printed email notification bearing the application reference number generated at submission. The application forms are the appendices to guideline DHT/GDL/024: Appendix 1 cover letter, Appendix 2 notification application form, and Appendix 3 device registration application form.

Conditions
  • An application is considered complete only when all necessary information has been received and the prescribed notification or registration fee has been paid.

Effective from 2025-11-01

Verbatim: 'An application for registration/ notification of a medical device is only received via the online platform and is considered complete by the Authority upon receiving all necessary information and the payment of prescribed notification/registration fees has been effected.'

QMS, audit & inspection

Which QMS, audit, inspection, and certificate scope is accepted or required?

Compare countries

QMS audit is part of registration; mandatory for Class C and D, desk review for abridged, fee included in the registration fee

qms.audit-required-class-c-and-d
Fact-level verified

The QMS audit is part of the medical device registration process. All Class C and Class D devices must apply and pay the relevant QMS audit fees, and the Authority must inspect the manufacturing facility or use other means to verify QMS compliance before the device is registered, unless the device is under the abridged assessment procedure, in which case QMS compliance of the manufacturing site is confirmed through desk review. The Authority reserves the right to conduct a QMS audit for other classes where regulatory review or technical assessment indicates the necessity, and may conduct an on-site inspection of an abridged-assessment device if deemed necessary. Registration applications for Class C and Class D must include a Rwanda FDA QMS audit certificate or proof of a QMS audit application; for notification, a valid ISO 13485 certificate or equivalent is required. Under the fee regulations the registration fee for an imported device includes a GMP inspection covering up to five production lines at one site.

Conditions
  • The abridged route replaces the on-site inspection with a desk review of QMS compliance.
  • The Authority may escalate to an on-site inspection at its discretion.
  • Additional production lines beyond five at one site are charged USD 400 each.

Effective from 2025-11-01

Verbatim: 'All devices under classes C and D shall apply and pay relevant QMS audit fees. The Authority should conduct an inspection of the manufacturing facility or use other means to verify whether the manufacturing site complies with QMS before the Medical Device is registered. ... QMS audit compliance of the manufacturing site of devices under the abridged assessment procedure shall be confirmed through desk review; however, if deemed necessary the Authority may conduct an onsite inspection.'

Recall, FSCA & market surveillance

Which recall, FSCA, notice, and authority-coordination duties apply?

Compare countries

Mandatory FSN/FSCA reporting, regulatory withdrawal, and classified recall timelines with post-recall notification

recall.fsca-reporting-regulatory-withdrawal-and-recall-timelines
Fact-level verified

Rwanda FDA treats field safety corrective action and recall as reportable and enforceable post-market events. The safety and vigilance guideline requires that 'Field Safety Notices (FSN) and Field Safety Corrective Actions (FSCA) including those based on incidents occurring outside Rwanda must be reported to Rwanda FDA' and that 'manufacturers must report field safety corrective actions for marketed products'; the status of any FSCA or FSN must also be included in periodic summary reports. The Authority's regulatory actions are listed in section 13.1 and expressly include urgent safety restriction, variation, suspension and revocation of the marketing authorisation and, at item i, 'Product recalls'; where a product is seriously or persistently non-compliant the Authority may also inspect, issue a formal warning letter and publish a list of non-compliant stakeholders. Section 13.3 governs withdrawal: after a risk-benefit evaluation shows the risks outweigh the benefits and the proposed risk-minimisation measures are considered inadequate to redress the balance, the medical product should be withdrawn from the market and healthcare professionals and patients/the public informed as appropriate; where the MAH withdraws the product due to safety concerns it is obliged to report immediately to Rwanda FDA. The dedicated recall guideline supplies the operative mechanics and expressly covers devices at the level of its definitions: 'Regulated product' means … 'human and veterinary medical devices', and 'Statutory recall' refers to when the Authority requests or orders a product recall due to non-compliance to regulatory requirements. Recall classification drives depth: Class I recalls are executed to wholesale/distributor, retail and consumer levels with public announcements via print/electronic media, newspapers, television and radio, Class II to wholesale and retail levels, and Class III to wholesale level. The timelines table applies to the initiation and stopping of sale/distribution of the defective product: Class I 24 hours initiation and 72 hours physical recall, Class II 48 hours and up to 10 days, Class III 72 hours and up to 30 days. Section 3.15 requires that after recall the recalling entity, immediately on becoming aware of the problem, notify the Authority in writing with defined recall information including the product identification, batch numbers, manufacturing and expiry dates, total quantity imported or manufactured and the quantity originally in the recalling company's possession.

Conditions
  • The recall guideline's operative scope section 1.1 is drafted for 'pharmaceutical products' ('These Guidelines apply to all manufacturers, importers, exporters, distributors, CROs and clinical trial sites and retailers of pharmaceutical products that are found to be unfit…'), while its definitions of 'Regulated product' and 'Statutory recall' expressly reach human and veterinary medical devices; the timelines are therefore cited here as the Authority's recall framework text, and the device-specific reporting duties are taken from the safety and vigilance guideline, whose medical-device sections are unambiguously in scope.
  • The recall guideline is published under the title 'Guidelines on Recall, Treatment and Disposal of Unfit Pharmaceutical Products'; no separate device-specific recall guideline was located on the Authority's site.

Effective from 2023-03-28

Source is English; the passages are quoted verbatim below. The FSCA/FSN reporting duty and the withdrawal duty come from the vigilance guideline; the recall classification, timelines and post-recall notification come from the recall guideline, whose device coverage rests on its definition of 'Regulated product' rather than on its scope section.

Registration pathways

Which registration, notification, listing, reliance, or conformity route applies?

Compare countries

Three device routes: notification (Class A), abridged assessment, full assessment

pathways.notification-abridged-full
Fact-level verified

Rwanda FDA processes medical device applications through three routes. Notification applies to Class A devices that are non-sterile, non-active and without a measuring function, and results in a certificate of notification. Registration applies to all other devices and is assessed either through the abridged assessment procedure, where prior assessment and inspection outcomes from WHO prequalification or a competent NRA are taken into account, or through full assessment, which is a two-assessor scientific and regulatory review of quality, safety and performance. Applications are submitted through the Rwanda FDA online portal. Priority assessment may be granted where the device is intended for diagnosis, treatment or alleviation of rare disease conditions, or in an emergency situation.

Conditions
  • The three routes are mutually exclusive: devices eligible for notification do not go to registration, and devices ineligible for notification must register.
  • Under DHT/GDL/024 section 1.11 each submitted application shall contain only one of: a single medical device, one medical device family, one medical device system, or one medical device group.
  • Samples may be analysed in the Quality Control Laboratory on a risk basis to guide the final decision.

Effective from 2025-11-01

Verbatim (1.5.1): 'Medical Devices falling under class A which are in a non-sterile state, a non-active and with non-measuring function (List to be provided for guidance) shall apply for notification to the Authority.' Verbatim (1.7.2): 'Priority assessment may be granted where the device is intended for diagnosis, treatment or alleviation of rare disease conditions or in the case of an emergency situation.'

Reliance & recognition

Which foreign decisions or evidence can be reused, with what effect and conditions?

Compare countries

Existing records include acceptance, restrictions and evidence reuse. The applicable product scope and conditions are preserved below; a reference does not by itself confer market access.

Rwanda approvals and evidence in other markets (0 records)

No linked record is currently maintained. This does not establish that a pathway is unavailable.

Prior approvals and evidence for Rwanda (11 records)

RwandaNMPA

Prior approval / evidence record

China NMPA registration certificate

Authority

China NMPA registration certificate

Accepted

No

Benefit

Not a reliance trigger: NMPA is named nowhere in the Rwandan framework and is not a WHO Listed Authority, so an NMPA certificate serves as global market-history evidence rather than as the basis of an abridged assessment.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

Prior approval / evidence record

WHO Prequalification (including the WHO PQ collaborative registration procedure)

Authority

WHO Prequalification (including the WHO PQ collaborative registration procedure)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Opens the abridged assessment procedure (60 working days) and the expedited review documentation section of the registration guideline; the applicant must state that the case falls under the WHO-prequalified case.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

RwandaSource authority not specified

Prior approval / evidence record

Expedited review for devices registered in countries that have signed a memorandum of understanding with Rwanda FDA

reliance.expedited-review-mou-countries
Fact-level verified
Statement

The same 'Expedited Review Documentation' section of the device registration guideline applies to devices registered in countries with which Rwanda FDA has signed a memorandum of understanding. The applicant must state whether the application falls under that case. The MoU is therefore a route trigger and not merely a cooperation statement, but the guideline does not name the countries covered, so the benefit is only available where a signed MoU exists.

Source Approval

A marketing authorisation or registration held in a country with which Rwanda FDA has signed a memorandum of understanding

Edge Type

Cooperation Mou

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The guideline does not list the countries with which Rwanda FDA has signed an MoU; the MoU must be confirmed with the Authority for the specific reference country.
  • Separately, the reliance guideline extends reliance to products registered by ML3 functioning regulatory authorities that have an MoU with Rwanda FDA (section 5.1(e)).
  • The expedited section does not itself set a distinct numeric timeline.

Effective from 2025-11-01

Verbatim: 'This section applies for applications of WHO prequalified devices, and devices registered in countries with which Rwanda FDA has signed Memorandum of understanding.' The route is explicitly tied to an existing signed MoU, so the MoU is a real route trigger rather than a bare cooperation instrument.

RwandaSource authority not specified

Prior approval / evidence record

East African Community joint dossier assessment and EAC registration

Authority

East African Community joint dossier assessment and EAC registration

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Named among the reliance triggers in the reliance guideline and the abridged-route confirmation on the application form, and EAC origin carries the lowest registration fee row at USD 100. No EAC mutual recognition instrument that would replace Rwandan registration was retrieved.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

RwandaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Japan MHLW / PMDA · South Korea MFDS · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

Abridged assessment route taking account of prior assessment and inspection outcomes from WHO prequalification or a competent NRA, on a sameness declaration with SRA / WHO PQ / EAC registration

reliance.abridged-assessment-sra-who-pq-eac
Fact-level verified
Statement

Rwanda FDA operates an abridged assessment procedure for medical device registration. Abridged assessment is defined as a limited independent assessment of specific parts of the dossier, taking into account prior assessment (dossier review and/or independent performance evaluation) and inspection outcomes from WHO prequalification or any National Regulatory Authority the Authority deems competent. The cover letter template for an abridged application (Appendix 1 of DHT/GDL/024) requires the applicant to confirm that the product dossier submitted is the same in all aspects as the product registered with the relevant SRA, WHO PQ and EAC. The statutory basis is Article 16 of the device registration regulations, which allows the Authority to rely on regulatory decisions of regional, international and other stringent regulatory authorities for product market authorisation. For devices under abridged assessment, QMS compliance of the manufacturing site is confirmed by desk review rather than an on-site inspection, although the Authority may still conduct an on-site inspection if necessary.

Source Approval

US FDA; EU CE marking under MDR 2017/745 / IVDR 2017/746 or the predecessor directives; Japan PMDA/MHLW; Korea MFDS; and any other authority the Rwanda FDA deems competent under the SRA concept, where the product is registered with that authority as an SRA; WHO Prequalification; EAC registration

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The applicant must declare sameness of the dossier with the product registered with the relevant SRA, WHO PQ and EAC; the declaration is a tick-box on the Appendix 1 cover letter marked 'Only for Abridged Applications' (p. 67).
  • The abridged procedure is assessed within 60 working days, against 180 working days for full assessment.
  • QMS audit compliance for abridged devices is confirmed by desk review; the Authority may nevertheless conduct an on-site inspection where necessary.
  • Neither DHT/GDL/024 nor the reliance guideline names US FDA, the EU, Japan or Korea as SRAs; the SRA concept is incorporated by reference and eligibility of a specific authority is determined by the Authority.
  • Class C and Class D devices under the ordinary route must file a Rwanda FDA QMS audit certificate or proof of QMS audit application.

Effective from 2025-11-01

Verbatim (Glossary 2): "'Abridged assessment' a limited independent assessment of specific parts of the dossier, or regulatory submission of data for suitability of use under local conditions and regulatory requirements, taking into account prior assessment (including dossier review and/or independent performance evaluation) and inspection outcomes from WHO prequalification or any National Regulatory Authority (NRA) deemed by the Authority as competent to inform the latter in its decision." Verbatim (application form): 'I confirm that the Product Dossier information submitted is the same in all aspects as the product registered with the relevant SRA, WHO PQ and EAC (Only for Abridged Applications)'.

Prior approval / evidence record

Expedited review documentation section for WHO-prequalified devices

reliance.expedited-review-who-prequalified
Fact-level verified
Statement

The device registration guideline has a dedicated 'Expedited Review Documentation' section that applies to applications for WHO-prequalified devices. The applicant must state in that section whether the submitted application falls under the WHO-prequalified case.

Source Approval

WHO Prequalification

Edge Type

International Listing

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The same section covers a second case, devices registered in countries with which Rwanda FDA has signed a memorandum of understanding; the two triggers are recorded as separate facts.
  • The guideline does not state a separate numeric timeline for expedited review; the applicable assessment timelines remain those of the notification (20 working days), abridged (60 working days) and full (180 working days) procedures.

Effective from 2025-11-01

Verbatim: 'This section applies for applications of WHO prequalified devices, and devices registered in countries with which Rwanda FDA has signed Memorandum of understanding. Under this section, the applicant should state whether the submitted application falls under one of the two cases above'.

Prior approval / evidence record

Stringent Regulatory Authorities and WHO Listed Authorities

Authority

Stringent Regulatory Authorities and WHO Listed Authorities

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Named reliance triggers in the Guidelines on Reliance for Regulatory Decision-Making, with a stated 90-working-day reliance pathway for marketing authorisation excluding clock stops; an SRA or WLA origin also carries the USD 400 fee row instead of USD 600.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

RwandaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Japan MHLW / PMDA · South Korea MFDS

Prior approval / evidence record

FDA 510(k) / PMA, EU CE marking, Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS

Authority

FDA 510(k) / PMA, EU CE marking, Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Handled through the SRA concept rather than by a substitute approval; the Rwandan registration and certificate are still issued by Rwanda FDA and the reliance decision is discretionary.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

RwandaSource authority not specified

Prior approval / evidence record

Registration fee is USD 400 for devices imported from an SRA or WLA and USD 600 from other sources

reliance.fee-differential-sra-wla-origin
Fact-level verified
Statement

The Rwanda FDA fee regulations set the registration and marketing authorisation fee for imported machinery, medical equipment and devices by origin: USD 100 for products imported from the East African Community, USD 400 for products imported from SRAs or WHO Listed Authorities, and USD 600 for products imported from other sources. The fee covers a five-year registration and includes a GMP inspection. This is a fee preference tied to the origin/reference status of the approval, not a review shortcut.

Source Approval

Devices imported from a Stringent Regulatory Authority or WHO Listed Authority jurisdiction (USD 400) versus other sources (USD 600); EAC-origin devices (USD 100)

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

fees

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The fee row is 'Machinery, medical equipment and devices' under Part I 'Registration and marketing authorization of imported regulated products (5 years)'.
  • The differential is expressed by origin of import ('To be imported SRAs, WLAs' / 'To be imported from other sources' / 'To be imported from EAC'), so a device manufactured in a non-SRA country but holding an SRA approval is not obviously within the USD 400 row on the face of the table.
  • Notification of registration of machinery, medical equipment and devices is fee-waived for both domestic and imported products.
  • 'SRAs' = Stringent Regulatory Authorities and 'WLAs' = WHO Listed Authorities per Annex III note 10 of the same regulations.

Effective from 2024-12-31

Reproduced from Part I row 2 exactly as printed: 'Machinery, medical equipment and devices | To be imported from EAC | USD | 100'; 'To be imported SRAs, WLAs | USD | 400'; 'To be imported from other sources | USD | 600'. Annex III note 10: '"SRAs" stands for Stringent Regulatory Authorities, "WLAs" stands for WHO Listed Authorities. "EAC" stands for East African Community.'

RwandaWHO · EU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Reliance guideline recognises WHO PQ/CRP, SRAs, WHO Listed Authorities and transitional WLA category B, EMA/EAC joint assessments and ML3 authorities with an MoU

reliance.reference-authority-categories
Fact-level verified
Statement

Rwanda FDA's Guidelines on Reliance for Regulatory Decision-Making (ODG/RAHC/GDL/001 Rev 3) apply to all types of medical products and to registration, marketing authorisation, GMP/GCP inspections, clinical trials, vigilance, post-marketing surveillance and laboratory testing. For marketing authorisation the Authority may apply reliance where the product has been evaluated and listed as a WHO Prequalified Product (including the WHO PQ collaborative registration procedure), approved by stringent regulatory authorities, registered by WHO Listed Authorities (WLAs) or WHO transitional Listed Authorities (category B), recommended by continental or regional harmonisation initiatives such as EMA and the East African Community through joint dossier assessments, or registered by an ML3 functioning regulatory authority holding a memorandum of understanding with Rwanda FDA. The reliance pathway for marketing authorisation is stated to take 90 working days excluding clock stops.

Source Approval

WHO Prequalification and the WHO PQ Collaborative Registration Procedure; Stringent Regulatory Authorities; WHO Listed Authorities and WHO transitional Listed Authorities (category B); EMA and EAC joint dossier assessments; ML3 authorities holding an MoU with Rwanda FDA

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The guideline defines 'Reference Regulatory Authority' as a national, regional or international authority or trusted institution such as WHO prequalification and WHO transitional Listed Authorities whose decisions or work products are relied upon.
  • Reliance is stated to be a sovereign decision: 'The Authority decides when and how to use reliance and in which circumstances.'
  • The guideline does not publish an enumerated annex of named SRAs; it adopts the WHO categories.
  • Reliance requires verification of sameness between the product submitted to Rwanda FDA and the product assessed by the reference authority.

Effective from 2024-02-14

Verbatim (5.1): 'The Authority may apply reliance procedures for granting Marketing Authorization in the following situations: a) The product should have been evaluated and listed as a WHO Prequalified Product including the WHO PQ collaborative registration procedure between WHO and the Authority. b) The product should have been approved by Stringent regulatory authorities. c) The product should have been registered by a WHO listed Authorities (WLAs) and WHO transitional Listed Authorities (B category). d) The product should have been recommended by Continental and Regional regulatory harmonization initiatives and networks such as EMA and EAC, through the Joint Dossier Assessments e) The product should have been registered by ML3 functioning regulatory Authorities having Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Rwanda FDA.' Verbatim (Scope): 'These Guidelines cover reliance activities regarding all types of medical products and regulatory activities using reliance approaches.'

RwandaSource authority not specified

Prior approval / evidence record

Statutory power to rely on regional, international and stringent regulatory authority decisions

reliance.statutory-reliance-power
Fact-level verified
Statement

Article 16 of the Regulations Governing the Registration of Medical Devices including In Vitro Diagnostics (DFAR/HMDAR/TRG/002 Rev 2) provides that the Authority may rely on regulatory decisions from regional, international and other stringent regulatory authorities' decisions regarding product market authorization when deemed necessary. The article was introduced by Revision 1 of the regulations (8 June 2021). It is the legal basis on which the abridged assessment and expedited review procedures in the registration guidelines rest, and it leaves the decision on when to rely to the Authority.

Source Approval

none

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The article confers a discretionary power ('when deemed necessary') rather than a self-executing entitlement; the operative procedures are in the registration and reliance guidelines.
  • Revision 1 of the regulation (08/06/2021) records: 'The article on reliance is included.'

Effective from 2021-06-08

Verbatim: 'The Authority may rely on regulatory decisions from regional, international and other stringent regulatory authorities' decisions regarding product market authorization when deemed necessary.'

Review clocks

What review, validation, and applicant stop-clock rules apply?

Compare countries

Statutory processing targets: 20 working days notification, 60 abridged, 180 full assessment

timelines.20-60-180-working-days
Fact-level verified

Rwanda FDA commits to processing applications within 20 working days for the notification procedure, 60 working days for the abridged assessment procedure, and 180 working days for the full assessment procedure. Additional data must be submitted within 10 working days for notification, 20 working days for abridged assessment, and 60 working days for full assessment. Dossiers are scheduled for assessment on a first-in-first-out basis. The reliance pathway for marketing authorisation under the reliance guideline is stated to take 90 working days excluding clock stops. For lower-risk medical devices the registration timeline may be significantly shortened.

Conditions
  • Clock stops apply: the assessment stops until the Authority receives a response to raised queries.
  • Failure to respond within the specified period is treated as withdrawal of the application.
  • Screening outcomes are communicated within 20 working days where a dossier is incomplete.

Effective from 2025-11-01

Verbatim: 'An application for registration/notification shall be processed within: Twenty (20) working days for the notification procedure / Sixty (60) working days for the abridged assessment procedure / One hundred eighty (180) working days for the full assessment procedure'.

Special access & derogation

Is an emergency, compassionate, custom, humanitarian, or other exceptional path available?

Compare countries

Emergency use authorisation during a declared national public health emergency

emergency.authorization-for-emergency-use
Fact-level verified

The Authority may issue an authorisation for emergency use when a national public health emergency has been declared and the device meets one of the listed requirements: it is listed as prequalified or has been granted emergency use authorisation by the World Health Organization or the World Organisation for Animal Health; it is registered or has been granted emergency use authorisation by Stringent Regulatory Authorities; it is registered or granted emergency use authorisation by countries having collaborative agreements with the Authority; or the normal device registration process is ongoing and the Authority decides to grant emergency use authorisation based on the severity of the declared public health emergency. The emergency authorisation is issued following approval of the registration of the device under Article 17 as a certificate of emergency registration. A parallel article permits emergency use of an unregistered medicinal product or an unapproved use of a registered medicinal product.

Conditions
  • A national public health emergency must first be declared by the Ministry of Health.
  • The provision lists four alternative qualifying routes, of which the SRA and WHO/OIE routes are reliance-based.
  • The certificate issued is a certificate of emergency registration under Article 17.

Effective from 2021-06-08

Verbatim: 'The Authority may issue the authorization for emergency use when a national public health emergency has been declared and the device fulfils one of the following requirements: a. Listed as prequalified or granted authorization for emergency use by the World Health Organization (WHO) or world organisation for animal health (OIE), b. Registered or granted authorization for emergency use by Stringent Regulatory Authorities, c. Registered or granted authorization for emergency use by countries having d. Collaborative agreements with the Authority, and e. The normal device registration process is ongoing and the Authority decides to grant f. Authorization for emergency use based on the severity of the declared public health emergency.' The sub-item lettering in the source PDF is garbled across the page break; items a, b and the collaborative-agreement and ongoing-registration cases are legible.

Submission communications & appeal

How are deficiencies answered, clocks handled, and decisions escalated or appealed?

Compare countries

Statutory appeal and review rights against registration decisions, with the deficiency and refusal communications that precede them

appeal.decision-review-recourse-and-submission-communications
Fact-level verified

Rwanda gives an express, timed appeal against a decision of the Authority. Article 37 of the registration regulations provides: 'Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Authority may appeal to the Authority for review of the decision showing grounds for dissatisfaction within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of notice. The Authority shall, within forty-five (45) calendar days from the date of receiving the application, review, reject or uphold its own decision according to applicable laws, and regulations. The applicant shall not be barred from appealing to the minister/ board of directors without applying to the Authority for review. If a person is dissatisfied with the decision after review, he/she may appeal to the supervising Authority whose decision shall be final.' The communications that precede an appeal are also codified. During assessment the Authority may request additional samples, documents, information, data or clarification; processing does not proceed until they are provided; failure to provide them within ninety (90) days of the date of request makes the application considered withdrawn; the applicant may request an extension of time in writing with reasons; and a fourth failure to provide satisfactory responses leads to rejection (art. 11). Where the Authority refuses to issue or amend a certificate of registration or notification it must notify the applicant in writing of the reasons for the refusal (art. 30), and any suspension must be effected on written notice setting out the reason for the proposed suspension, any corrective action required and the time within which it must be taken, and requiring the holder to show reasons in writing with evidence as to why the suspension should not be effected (art. 25). A holder may apply in writing to have a cancellation or suspension uplifted, and the Authority may review its decision within thirty (30) days of receiving the application (art. 27). The promotion regulations give a parallel route: an aggrieved person may apply to the Authority for review showing grounds for dissatisfaction within thirty (30) working days from the date of notice, the Authority must within fifteen (15) working days review, reject or vary its own decision, and if it still rejects the application the applicant shall appeal to the Board of Directors (CBD/TRG/017 Rev_1 art. 21). The vigilance guideline gives MAHs a written appeal against suspension or cancellation of a marketing authorisation within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the Authority's notification; the grounds must be based on the information already submitted in the product's dossier and PSMF, additional or new information not earlier submitted will not be accepted, and the Authority may review or uphold its earlier decision (section 13.5).

Conditions
  • The appeal in art. 37 runs first to the Authority itself (30 calendar days to file, 45 calendar days for the Authority to decide), may be taken directly to the minister/board of directors without applying to the Authority for review, and after review lies to the supervising Authority whose decision is final.
  • The vigilance appeal in section 13.5 is narrower than the registration appeal: it is limited to grounds based on information already submitted in the dossier and PSMF.
  • The promotion appeal in art. 21 of CBD/TRG/017 Rev_1 runs on working days (30 to apply, 15 to decide) and escalates to the Board of Directors.

Effective from 2020-04-20

Source is English; the passages are quoted verbatim below. The registration regulations supply the principal appeal and the submission-communication rules; the promotion regulations and the vigilance guideline supply the two sector-specific variants.

UDI, listing & traceability

Which UDI, device listing, database, and traceability duties apply?

Compare countries

Device listing identifier in the registration dossier, registration identifiers in the public register, and lifecycle traceability

traceability.device-listing-identifier-and-registration-identification
Fact-level verified

Three linked devices exist. First, the registration dossier must carry a 'Listing of Device(s)': 'Where applicable, a table listing each variant/model/configuration/component/accessory that is the subject of the submission and the following information for each variant/model: a) the identifier (e.g. bar code, catalogue, model or part number, UDI) b) a statement of its name/description that provides (e.g. Trade name, size, material)' (DHT/GDL/024 Version 2, section 1.05). The guideline thus requires a UDI-or-equivalent identifier as the listing key but does not mandate a UDI carrier or a UDI database. Second, approval is a registration event: on approval the Authority must enter in the register the prescribed particulars of the device, allocate a registration number and issue a certificate of full, conditional or emergency registration or of notification (TRG/002 art. 17), and must publish a list of registered devices on its website including the brand/generic name and model, the registration number, the intended purpose, the marketing authorisation holder and its country, the original manufacturer and its country, the registration date and status, the class of the device, the device nomenclature code allocated to the device, the local technical representative, and the expiry date of the certificate (TRG/002 art. 18) — so the registration number and the nomenclature code are the public device identifiers. Third, post-market traceability is risk-driven: the manufacturer must use its risk-management data to define which devices, components, materials and work-environment conditions require traceability and to establish the traceability criteria, the points to be considered being origin of components and materials, processing history, distribution and location of the device after delivery (to the first consignee), intended use (life sustaining, life supporting or implantable), probability of failure, need for safety-related updates (recalls, advisory notices, field updates) and consequence of the failure for patients, users or other persons; the traceability records must cover all such devices, components, materials and work-environment conditions that could cause the device not to satisfy its specified requirements including its safety requirements (FDISM/PVSM/GDL/002 Rev 02, section 5.5.4).

Conditions
  • Rwanda FDA does not operate a UDI-issuing-agency scheme in these instruments: the identifier is required in the dossier listing as 'the identifier (e.g. bar code, catalogue, model or part number, UDI)', and the public identifiers are the allocated registration number and the device nomenclature code.
  • The section 1.05 listing requirement applies 'where applicable' and is a dossier content requirement, not a standalone pre-market listing submission distinct from registration.

Effective from 2025-11-01

Source is English; the passages are quoted verbatim below. The effective date given is that of the Version 2 medical-device registration guideline cited as primary source; the supporting instruments have their own dates (TRG/002 was in force from 20 April 2020 and the vigilance guideline from 28 March 2023).

Vigilance & incident reporting

What is reportable, by whom, where, in what format, and by what deadline?

Compare countries

Affirmative duty to report medical-device incidents, field safety corrective actions and trends, with fixed timelines and a prescribed form

vigilance.pms-and-adverse-effect-reporting-obligation
Fact-level verified

Rwanda FDA's safety and vigilance guideline imposes the incident-reporting duty affirmatively and in terms: 'In addition, anybody can report incidents; however, healthcare professionals and manufacturers as well as MAHs, distributors and importers of medical devices are obliged to report incidents. Moreover, manufacturers must report field safety corrective actions for marketed products.' The reportable event is defined: an event or incident including a malfunction or deterioration in the characteristics or performance due to a medical device must be reported if it meets stated criteria (for IVDs, false positive or false negative results where an erroneous result would lead to an imminent life-threatening situation or cause death or severe disability to the individual tested, the foetus or the individual's offspring, and for other IVDs false positives or negatives falling outside the declared performance of the test), with named event categories (unexpected adverse reaction or side effect; interactions with other substances or products; degradation or destruction of the device; inappropriate therapy; inaccuracy in labelling, instructions for use and/or promotional materials, including omissions and deficiencies; and the device being considered a contributing cause of the incident) and named outcomes (death of patient, user or another person; serious deterioration in state of health including life-threatening disease or illness, permanent damage or impairment of a body function, necessary medical or surgical treatment to prevent life-threatening illness or permanent injury, indirect harm from incorrect diagnostic or IVD test results or from IVF/ART equipment used per the IFU, and foetal death, foetal injury or congenital abnormalities). Any incident, whether the fault lies in technical faults or defects in the equipment, instruction manual, marking, use or maintenance, must be reported, and events due to the intervention of healthcare professionals must be reported regardless of serious outcome. A trend duty sits on top: on identifying a significant increase or trend of events usually excluded from individual reporting, the manufacturer or the MAH must report to the Authority, and the manufacturer should have suitable systems for proactive scrutiny of trends in complaints and incidents. Field Safety Notices and Field Safety Corrective Actions, including those based on incidents occurring outside Rwanda, must be reported to Rwanda FDA. The timelines for incidents occurring in Rwanda are: serious public health threat — immediately, and not later than 24 hours after awareness; death or unanticipated serious deterioration in state of health — immediately after the manufacturer has established a link between device and event, and not later than 10 elapsed calendar days following awareness; others — immediately after the manufacturer has established that link, and not later than 30 elapsed calendar days following awareness. Six conditions where reporting is not required are specified, and periodic summary reports must include the full details of vigilance issues including the status of any FSCA or FSN. All adverse events related to medical devices must be reported to Rwanda FDA using the suspected adverse event/incidence reaction reporting form No. FDISM/PVSM/FOM/015.

Conditions
  • The duty runs on manufacturers, MAHs, distributors and importers of medical devices, with healthcare professionals also obliged; anyone may report.
  • The timelines are stated for incidents that have occurred in Rwanda; FSN/FSCA reporting is required regardless of where the underlying incident occurred.
  • Round 204 recorded this fact as source-backed-partial because the specific reporting formats and deadlines were not retrieved in that round. They are set out above and quoted verbatim from the instrument, so the limitation no longer applies.

Effective from 2023-03-28

Source is English; the passage is quoted verbatim below. This row refreshes the existing fact regulatory-fact:rwanda:vigilance-incident-reporting:vigilance-pms-and-adverse-effect-reporting-obligation in place, keeping its key and id: round 204 evidenced the duty from the suspension grounds in TRG/002 art. 24 and expressly recorded that 'the specific reporting formats and deadlines sit in separate Rwanda FDA pharmacovigilance guidance that was not retrieved in this round'. That guidance has now been retrieved and read in full, so the duty is evidenced from an affirmative reporting article with its criteria, timelines and form, and the row is raised from source-backed-partial to official-source-verified. The conditions list is supplied in full because the importer refreshes in place and does not clear fields that are omitted.

Related structured datasets

Classification systems · 1 record
Open Rwanda FDA Classes A, B, C and D
Id

rwanda:medical-device

Jurisdiction Id

rwanda

Domains
  • medical-device
Name

Rwanda FDA Classes A, B, C and D

Description

Rwanda's own four-class device axis, from Class A (lowest risk) to Class D (highest risk), with the higher class prevailing where a device could fall into more than one, and a separate submission required for each device in a combination.

Classes
  • Id

    a

    Label

    Class A

    Normalized Risk Level

    low

  • Id

    b

    Label

    Class B

    Normalized Risk Level

    medium

  • Id

    c

    Label

    Class C

    Normalized Risk Level

    high

  • Id

    d

    Label

    Class D

    Normalized Risk Level

    highest

Regulator

Rwanda FDA

Official Domains
  • rwandafda.gov.rw
Source Status

official-source-verified

Reference Sources
  • Title

    DHT/GDL/024 Version 2 - scope note excluding in vitro diagnostic devices

    Url

    https://rwandafda.gov.rw/monitoring-tool/documents-management/uploads/1/Guidelines/1767694148_Guidelines%20for%20Registration%20of%20Medical%20Devices_December%202025.pdf

    Reviewed On

    2026-09-16

    Supports

    The guideline states its own scope as medical devices and expressly excludes in vitro diagnostic devices, so no separate IVD class axis is published here: the A-D axis above is the guideline's axis and applies to devices, while an IVD is notified or registered under the regulations and the IVD sections of the same dossier structure without a published national IVD class table.

  • Title

    Regulations Governing the Registration of Medical Devices including In Vitro Diagnostics, DFAR/HMDAR/TRG/002 Rev 2

    Url

    https://rwandafda.gov.rw/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Regulations%20Governing%20Registration%20of%20Medical%20Devices%20including%20In%20Vitro%20diagnostics.pdf

    Reviewed On

    2026-09-16

    Supports

    The regulations describe the risk bands the register is organised by - low risk, low to moderate risk, moderate to high risk and high risk (Article 4) - and Article 6 makes registration the precondition of placing a device on the market, with Article 16 giving the Authority its reliance power. They do not restate the letter classes, which is why the class axis is cited to the guideline.

Source Title

Guidelines for Registration of Medical Devices, DHT/GDL/024 Version 2, section 1.11 Table 1

Source Url

https://rwandafda.gov.rw/monitoring-tool/documents-management/uploads/1/Guidelines/1767694148_Guidelines%20for%20Registration%20of%20Medical%20Devices_December%202025.pdf

Verified On

2026-09-16

Source Supports
  • class-axis
  • classification-rules
Registration pathways, prior approvals and planning · 1 record
Open Rwanda registration
Country

Rwanda

Jurisdiction Id

rwanda

Country Code

RW

Flag

🇷🇼

Regulator

Rwanda Food and Drugs Authority

Regulator Abbrev

Rwanda FDA

Region

africa

Tier

3

Risk Classification

4-class (A, B, C, D)

Classes
  • Id

    notification-procedure

    Class Name

    Notification procedure

    Risk Level

    low

    Pathway

    Notification of a medical device under DHT/GDL/024 section 1.10.1

    Official Timeline
    Min

    20

    Max

    20

    Unit

    days

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Official Source
    Title

    Guidelines for Registration of Medical Devices, DHT/GDL/024 Version 2, sections 1.10.1 and 1.10.2

    Url

    https://rwandafda.gov.rw/monitoring-tool/documents-management/uploads/1/Guidelines/1767694148_Guidelines%20for%20Registration%20of%20Medical%20Devices_December%202025.pdf

    Accessed Date

    2026-09-16

    Realistic Timeline
    Min

    20

    Max

    40

    Unit

    days

    Notes
    • DHT/GDL/024 section 1.10.1 states that an application for registration or notification shall be processed within twenty (20) working days for the notification procedure; the registry's unit vocabulary is days, weeks and months, so the figure is recorded as 20 days and the working-day basis is recorded here.
    • Clock stops apply: where the Authority requests additional data, the applicant has ten (10) working days to supply it in the notification procedure, and the assessment resumes from the requested supplement.
    • A notification letter is valid for three (3) years, against five (5) years for a registration certificate.
    • Dossiers are scheduled first in, first out once the requirements are met, so elapsed time depends on the queue as well as the clock.
    Clinical Trial Required

    No

    Local Testing Required

    No

    Gmp Required

    No

  • Id

    abridged-assessment-procedure

    Class Name

    Abridged assessment procedure

    Risk Level

    medium

    Pathway

    Abridged assessment taking account of WHO prequalification or an SRA or EAC registration

    Official Timeline
    Min

    60

    Max

    60

    Unit

    days

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Official Source
    Title

    Guidelines for Registration of Medical Devices, DHT/GDL/024 Version 2, sections 1.10.1 and 1.10.2

    Url

    https://rwandafda.gov.rw/monitoring-tool/documents-management/uploads/1/Guidelines/1767694148_Guidelines%20for%20Registration%20of%20Medical%20Devices_December%202025.pdf

    Accessed Date

    2026-09-16

    Realistic Timeline
    Min

    60

    Max

    90

    Unit

    days

    Notes
    • DHT/GDL/024 section 1.10.1 states sixty (60) working days for the abridged assessment procedure; recorded as 60 days with the working-day basis noted here because the registry's unit vocabulary is days, weeks and months.
    • Where additional data is requested, the applicant has twenty (20) working days to supply it and the clock stops in the meantime.
    • The abridged route rests on the Authority's reliance power in Article 16 of the Regulations Governing the Registration of Medical Devices including In Vitro Diagnostics, and on the Guidelines on Reliance for Regulatory Decision-Making (ODG/RAHC/GDL/001 Rev 3), which state a 90-working-day reliance pathway for marketing authorisation excluding clock stops.
    • For a device assessed on the abridged route, quality-system compliance of the manufacturing site is confirmed by desk review rather than an on-site inspection, although the Authority may still inspect.
    Clinical Trial Required

    No

    Local Testing Required

    No

    Gmp Required

    No

  • Id

    full-assessment-procedure

    Class Name

    Full assessment procedure

    Risk Level

    high

    Pathway

    Full assessment of the complete dossier under DHT/GDL/024 section 1.10.1

    Official Timeline
    Min

    180

    Max

    180

    Unit

    days

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Official Source
    Title

    Guidelines for Registration of Medical Devices, DHT/GDL/024 Version 2, sections 1.10.1 and 1.10.2

    Url

    https://rwandafda.gov.rw/monitoring-tool/documents-management/uploads/1/Guidelines/1767694148_Guidelines%20for%20Registration%20of%20Medical%20Devices_December%202025.pdf

    Accessed Date

    2026-09-16

    Realistic Timeline
    Min

    180

    Max

    240

    Unit

    days

    Notes
    • DHT/GDL/024 section 1.10.1 states one hundred eighty (180) working days for the full assessment procedure; recorded as 180 days with the working-day basis noted here because the registry's unit vocabulary is days, weeks and months.
    • Where additional data is requested, the applicant has sixty (60) working days to supply it and the clock stops in the meantime.
    • A device that holds no WHO prequalification, no SRA approval, no WHO Listed Authority registration and no EAC joint dossier assessment ordinarily runs the full procedure; a China NMPA certificate alone does not open the abridged route.
    • This clock is the Rwanda FDA device assessment clock. It is not the RURA type approval clock, which is a separate procedure, and it is not an import clearance clock.
    Clinical Trial Required

    No

    Local Testing Required

    No

    Gmp Required

    Yes

Prior Approvals
  • Authority

    WHO Prequalification (including the WHO PQ collaborative registration procedure)

    Accepted

    Yes

    Benefit

    Opens the abridged assessment procedure (60 working days) and the expedited review documentation section of the registration guideline; the applicant must state that the case falls under the WHO-prequalified case.

  • Authority

    Stringent Regulatory Authorities and WHO Listed Authorities

    Accepted

    Yes

    Benefit

    Named reliance triggers in the Guidelines on Reliance for Regulatory Decision-Making, with a stated 90-working-day reliance pathway for marketing authorisation excluding clock stops; an SRA or WLA origin also carries the USD 400 fee row instead of USD 600.

  • Authority

    East African Community joint dossier assessment and EAC registration

    Accepted

    Yes

    Benefit

    Named among the reliance triggers in the reliance guideline and the abridged-route confirmation on the application form, and EAC origin carries the lowest registration fee row at USD 100. No EAC mutual recognition instrument that would replace Rwandan registration was retrieved.

  • Authority

    FDA 510(k) / PMA, EU CE marking, Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS

    Accepted

    Yes

    Benefit

    Handled through the SRA concept rather than by a substitute approval; the Rwandan registration and certificate are still issued by Rwanda FDA and the reliance decision is discretionary.

  • Authority

    China NMPA registration certificate

    Accepted

    No

    Benefit

    Not a reliance trigger: NMPA is named nowhere in the Rwandan framework and is not a WHO Listed Authority, so an NMPA certificate serves as global market-history evidence rather than as the basis of an abridged assessment.

Key Requirements
  • Apply through a Local Technical Representative, a company registered in Rwanda, which submits the application to Rwanda FDA on the manufacturer's behalf.
  • Classify the device under DHT/GDL/024 section 1.11; the manufacturer has the primary responsibility to classify and the Authority may challenge the class and has the final say.
  • Submit the full technical documentation in the dossier format of DHT/GDL/024, including the electrical safety and EMC section 3.05.03 and the radiation safety section 3.05.04 where they apply, or a justified statement of non-applicability.
  • Pay the registration and marketing authorisation fee for the origin of import - USD 100 for EAC origin, USD 400 for SRA or WHO Listed Authority origin, USD 600 for other sources - which covers five years and includes a GMP inspection.
  • Where the abridged route is claimed, confirm on the application form that the product dossier is the same in all aspects as the product registered with the relevant SRA, WHO prequalification or EAC registration.
  • Notify or register before placing the device on the market: registration is the precondition for marketing under the Regulations Governing the Registration of Medical Devices including In Vitro Diagnostics.
  • File for renewal at least sixty (60) working days before the marketing authorisation expires; renewal is processed in twenty (20) working days for a notified device and sixty (60) working days for a registered device.
Local Rep Required

Yes

Local Rep Name

Local Technical Representative (LTR)

Mdsap Accepted

No

Registration Validity

5 years for a registration certificate; 3 years for a notification letter

Last Updated

2026-09-16

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Sources
  • Title

    Guidelines for Registration of Medical Devices, DHT/GDL/024 Version 2, sections 1.10.1 and 1.10.2

    Url

    https://rwandafda.gov.rw/monitoring-tool/documents-management/uploads/1/Guidelines/1767694148_Guidelines%20for%20Registration%20of%20Medical%20Devices_December%202025.pdf

    Accessed Date

    2026-09-16

Reviewed On

2026-09-16

Process
Template Id

default

Status

planning-template

Usage Rule

Maintained planning steps and estimates, not verified regulator deadlines.

Steps
  • Step

    1

    Title

    Pre-Submission Preparation

    Description

    Gather technical documentation, quality management system (QMS) records, and clinical data required by Rwanda FDA. Appoint a Local Technical Representative (LTR).

    Duration

    1-3 months

    Icon

    📋

  • Step

    2

    Title

    Application Submission

    Description

    Submit complete registration dossier to Rwanda FDA including device description, risk analysis, and testing reports.

    Duration

    1-2 weeks

    Icon

    📤

  • Step

    3

    Title

    Administrative Review

    Description

    Rwanda FDA reviews application for completeness. May request additional documents or clarifications.

    Duration

    2-4 weeks

    Icon

    🔍

  • Step

    4

    Title

    Technical Evaluation

    Description

    In-depth technical assessment of device safety and performance. Rwanda FDA may issue questions.

    Duration

    20 days

    Icon

    ⚙️

  • Step

    5

    Title

    Registration Approval

    Description

    Upon successful review, Rwanda FDA issues Rwanda market authorization certificate.

    Duration

    1-2 weeks

    Icon

Government fee schedules · 1 record
Open Rwanda fees
Jurisdiction Id

rwanda

Country

Rwanda

Country Code

RW

Authority

Rwanda FDA

Low Risk Local
Min

100

Max

600

Currency

USD

Per Product

No

High Risk Local
Min

100

Max

600

Currency

USD

Per Product

No

Details
  • Id

    registration-imported-eac-origin

    Item

    Registration and marketing authorisation of imported machinery, medical equipment and devices - to be imported from the EAC

    Currency

    USD

    Amount Local

    100

    Amount Local Formatted

    USD 100

    Frequency

    Per product, five-year registration

    Notes

    Part I item 2, row 'Machinery, medical equipment and devices', column 'To be imported from EAC'. The fee covers a five-year registration and includes a GMP inspection.

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://rwandafda.gov.rw/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/eRegulations-Governing-Fees_RFDA_31DECEMBER2024.pdf

    Source Title

    Regulations No ODDG/RES/TRG/001 Version 5 governing tariff/fees on services rendered by Rwanda FDA - Part I item 2, Part III item 10, Part IV item 11, Part VI item 14 and Annex II item I.3

    Source Effective Date

    2024-12-31

    Verified On

    2026-09-16

  • Id

    registration-imported-sra-wla-origin

    Item

    Registration and marketing authorisation of imported machinery, medical equipment and devices - to be imported from SRAs or WHO Listed Authorities

    Currency

    USD

    Amount Local

    400

    Amount Local Formatted

    USD 400

    Frequency

    Per product, five-year registration

    Notes

    Part I item 2, column 'To be imported SRAs, WLAs'. The differential is expressed by origin of import, so a device made in a non-SRA country but holding an SRA approval is not obviously inside this row on the face of the table.

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://rwandafda.gov.rw/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/eRegulations-Governing-Fees_RFDA_31DECEMBER2024.pdf

    Source Title

    Regulations No ODDG/RES/TRG/001 Version 5 governing tariff/fees on services rendered by Rwanda FDA - Part I item 2, Part III item 10, Part IV item 11, Part VI item 14 and Annex II item I.3

    Source Effective Date

    2024-12-31

    Verified On

    2026-09-16

  • Id

    registration-imported-other-sources

    Item

    Registration and marketing authorisation of imported machinery, medical equipment and devices - to be imported from other sources

    Currency

    USD

    Amount Local

    600

    Amount Local Formatted

    USD 600

    Frequency

    Per product, five-year registration

    Notes

    Part I item 2, column 'To be imported from other sources'. The five-year registration includes a GMP inspection.

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://rwandafda.gov.rw/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/eRegulations-Governing-Fees_RFDA_31DECEMBER2024.pdf

    Source Title

    Regulations No ODDG/RES/TRG/001 Version 5 governing tariff/fees on services rendered by Rwanda FDA - Part I item 2, Part III item 10, Part IV item 11, Part VI item 14 and Annex II item I.3

    Source Effective Date

    2024-12-31

    Verified On

    2026-09-16

  • Id

    notification-of-registration-waived

    Item

    Notification of the registration of machinery, medical equipment and devices

    Currency

    USD

    Amount Local

    0

    Amount Local Formatted

    USD 0

    Frequency

    Per notification

    Notes

    Annex II item I.3 waives the fee for the notification of the registration of machinery, medical equipment and devices, applicable to both domestic and imported products. A verified zero, not a missing value.

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://rwandafda.gov.rw/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/eRegulations-Governing-Fees_RFDA_31DECEMBER2024.pdf

    Source Title

    Regulations No ODDG/RES/TRG/001 Version 5 governing tariff/fees on services rendered by Rwanda FDA - Part I item 2, Part III item 10, Part IV item 11, Part VI item 14 and Annex II item I.3

    Source Effective Date

    2024-12-31

    Verified On

    2026-09-16

Notes
  • The registration fee is set by the origin of import and not by device class, so both published bands carry the same spread: USD 100 for East African Community origin, USD 400 for SRA or WHO Listed Authority origin and USD 600 for other sources. There is no cheaper or dearer class row in the tariff.
  • Every published amount in this record is an exact figure printed in the schedule; the tariff contains no formula rows for these items.
  • Renewal is charged at 100% of the initial fee (Part IV item 11) and a major variation at 50% of the initial fee (Part III item 10). Both are percentages of another fee rather than published amounts, so they are excluded from the details and not converted into figures.
  • The importer and wholesaler licence fee of FRW 100,000 (Part VI item 14) is denominated in Rwandan francs inside an otherwise US-dollar tariff, so it is excluded from this USD record rather than converted.
  • The instrument is signed on 31/12/2024 and Article 10 provides that the regulations come into force on the date of publication in the Official Gazette; the effectiveDate recorded here is the date of the instrument.
  • The fee row for imported devices sits in Part I, which covers registration and marketing authorisation of imported regulated products for five years.
Last Updated

2026-09-16

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Sources
  • Title

    Regulations No ODDG/RES/TRG/001 Version 5 governing tariff/fees on services rendered by Rwanda FDA - Part I item 2, Part III item 10, Part IV item 11, Part VI item 14 and Annex II item I.3

    Url

    https://rwandafda.gov.rw/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/eRegulations-Governing-Fees_RFDA_31DECEMBER2024.pdf

    Effective Date

    2024-12-31

    Accessed Date

    2026-09-16

Reviewed On

2026-09-16

Amount Status

exact-current

Range Available

Yes

Additional certifications and licences · 1 record
Open Rwanda certifications
Slug

rwanda

Market

Rwanda

Confidence

high

Schemes
  • Id

    rwanda-rura-type-approval

    Name

    RURA type approval of electronic communications equipment

    Category

    Radio Spectrum

    Status

    Mandatory Pre Market

    Object

    Radio Equipment

    Note

    Regulations No 012/R/STDICT/RURA/2021 of 14/12/2021 governing importation, supply and type approval of electronic communications equipment, published in the Official Gazette Special of 16/02/2022, define type approval as the process by which equipment is certified as meeting the applicable technical requirements and set two procedural tracks - a simplified regime and a standard regime - on application to the Regulatory Authority. A medical device that contains a radio transmitter or a cellular modem is electronic communications equipment for this purpose, so it needs a RURA type approval certificate in addition to its Rwanda FDA registration. RURA also operates a public type approval device search at licensing.rura.rw.

    Source Urls
    • https://www.rura.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/RURA/Documents/Sectors/ICT/Regulatory_Instruments/ICT_Regulations_and_Guidelines/OFFICIAL_GAZETTE_for__Regulations_Governing_Importation__Supply_and_Type_Approval_of_Electronic_Communications_Equipment.pdf
    Source Binding

    reviewed

  • Id

    rwanda-rura-equipment-import-supply-approval

    Name

    RURA approval for importation and supply of electronic communications equipment

    Category

    Telecom Network Attachment

    Status

    Mandatory At Import

    Object

    Telecom Equipment

    Note

    The same Regulations No 012/R/STDICT/RURA/2021 govern importation and supply as a separate control from type approval: the Official Gazette text makes importation and supply of electronic communications equipment subject to the prior written approval of the Regulatory Authority, and provides for a general authorisation for importation and supply that the Authority may suspend or withdraw. For a network-attached device the practical consequence is that the importer of record needs the RURA authorisation at the border, and the type approval certificate is what the authorisation is keyed to.

    Source Urls
    • https://www.rura.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/RURA/Documents/Sectors/ICT/Regulatory_Instruments/ICT_Regulations_and_Guidelines/OFFICIAL_GAZETTE_for__Regulations_Governing_Importation__Supply_and_Type_Approval_of_Electronic_Communications_Equipment.pdf
    Source Binding

    reviewed

  • Id

    rwanda-radiation-protection-licence

    Name

    Radiation protection authorisation or licence, and radiation safety evidence in the device dossier

    Category

    Ionizing Radiation

    Status

    Mandatory Pre Market

    Object

    Medical Device

    Note

    Two distinct duties sit behind this trigger. First, Article 28 of the Law Governing Radiation Protection in Rwanda (Chapter VI, Licensing Regime, Official Gazette Special of 25/01/2018) prohibits conducting any radiation-related activity unless an authorization or licence is obtained from the Regulatory Authority, and Article 29 leaves the categories of licence and their requirements to be determined by that Authority. Second, the device itself must carry radiation safety evidence: section 3.05.04 of DHT/GDL/024 requires studies supporting radiation safety where the device emits ionizing and/or non-ionizing radiation or is exposed to radiation, submitted inside the registration dossier. The facility that holds or uses an ionizing-radiation source therefore needs the RURA licence, while the product needs the dossier evidence; neither substitutes for the other.

    Source Urls
    • https://www.rura.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/RURA/Documents/Laws_and_Regulations/Law_Governing_Radiation_Protection_In_Rwanda.pdf
    • https://rwandafda.gov.rw/monitoring-tool/documents-management/uploads/1/Guidelines/1767694148_Guidelines%20for%20Registration%20of%20Medical%20Devices_December%202025.pdf
    Source Binding

    reviewed

  • Id

    rwanda-rwanda-fda-electrical-safety

    Name

    Electrical safety evidence in the Rwanda FDA dossier

    Category

    Medical Electrical Safety

    Status

    Included In Medical Registration

    Object

    Medical Device

    Note

    Section 3.05.03 of DHT/GDL/024, headed 'Electrical Systems: Safety, Mechanical and Environmental Protection, and Electromagnetic Compatibility', requires the applicant to provide evidence supporting electrical safety, mechanical and environmental protection and electromagnetic compatibility, made up of a summary of the non-clinical evidence, a discussion of the testing considered and support for its selection or omission, and a justification that the evidence is sufficient - or a statement of why the category does not apply. There is no separate Rwandan electrical-safety certificate; the test reports go into the registration dossier and are assessed by Rwanda FDA.

    Source Urls
    • https://rwandafda.gov.rw/monitoring-tool/documents-management/uploads/1/Guidelines/1767694148_Guidelines%20for%20Registration%20of%20Medical%20Devices_December%202025.pdf
    Source Binding

    reviewed

  • Id

    rwanda-rwanda-fda-emc

    Name

    Electromagnetic compatibility evidence in the Rwanda FDA dossier

    Category

    emc

    Status

    Included In Medical Registration

    Object

    Medical Device

    Note

    EMC is named in the same DHT/GDL/024 section 3.05.03 heading as electrical safety, so on the Rwandan side an EMC obligation on a device is discharged through the registration dossier. A device that also carries a radio or a modem can face the RURA type approval requirement at the same time; the two are cumulative and are recorded as separate schemes.

    Source Urls
    • https://rwandafda.gov.rw/monitoring-tool/documents-management/uploads/1/Guidelines/1767694148_Guidelines%20for%20Registration%20of%20Medical%20Devices_December%202025.pdf
    Source Binding

    reviewed

Official Sources
  • Authority

    Rwanda Utilities Regulatory Authority

    Topic

    Regulations governing importation, supply and type approval of electronic communications equipment (Official Gazette Special of 16/02/2022)

    Url

    https://www.rura.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/RURA/Documents/Sectors/ICT/Regulatory_Instruments/ICT_Regulations_and_Guidelines/OFFICIAL_GAZETTE_for__Regulations_Governing_Importation__Supply_and_Type_Approval_of_Electronic_Communications_Equipment.pdf

  • Authority

    Republic of Rwanda

    Topic

    Law Governing Radiation Protection in Rwanda, Chapter VI licensing regime (Official Gazette Special of 25/01/2018)

    Url

    https://www.rura.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/RURA/Documents/Laws_and_Regulations/Law_Governing_Radiation_Protection_In_Rwanda.pdf

  • Authority

    Rwanda Food and Drugs Authority

    Topic

    Guidelines for Registration of Medical Devices, DHT/GDL/024 Version 2

    Url

    https://rwandafda.gov.rw/monitoring-tool/documents-management/uploads/1/Guidelines/1767694148_Guidelines%20for%20Registration%20of%20Medical%20Devices_December%202025.pdf

Keep researching this market
View the Rwanda resource hub →
DJ Fang
Need to apply Rwanda's requirements to a product?
Confirm the current Rwanda FDA pathway, evidence, and local-role details for the actual device before filing.
Pricing