Pure Global AI
Norwegian Medical Products Agency · structured requirements

🇳🇴 Norway IVD regulatory data

Explore the IVD requirements currently available for Norway, organized by topic and linked to official sources.

33 facts17 dimensions24 official sourceslatest verification 2026-10-21

Changes after registration in Norway

Source-linked rules for common changes to a registered IVD. Read the scope and conditions with each rule; unverified details are listed separately.

Does changing a device brand name or logo require an update?

A change to the registered brand name and a change to logo artwork can follow different rules. The legal manufacturer, device design and intended purpose remain the same.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Norway uses the EEA device regime, with national duties

Fact-level verified

Norway implements MDR and IVDR through Medical Devices Act section 1 and the national medical-device regulation. Ordinary devices do not receive a national DMP marketing authorisation: the manufacturer remains legally responsible and a notified body assesses conformity where required. Identity changes must therefore be assessed under the actual conformity, actor, UDI and device-registration rules, alongside Norwegian national language and local duties, rather than assumed to be a national marketing-authorisation variation.

Conditions
  • The actual MD/IVD conformity and legacy status still governs. The actual manufacturer and certificate facts remain necessary.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Official UDI/listing surface

Fact-level verified
Submission Surface

EUDAMED

Details

Device registration (with UDI data) takes place in EUDAMED; devices placed on the market before 28 May 2026 must be registered by 28 November 2026.

Conditions
  • Applies to devices subject to EUDAMED registration under MDR/IVDR.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD name/model changes and catalogue REF are distinct

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, a new UDI-DI is required for a change that could cause misidentification or traceability ambiguity, including a device name/trade-name or version/model change. An actual catalogue/REF change is not automatically the same thing: assess its effect on identity and traceability. A change to an existing UDI database element that does not require a new UDI-DI must be updated within 30 days. Cosmetic artwork alone is not listed as an automatic new-UDI trigger.

Conditions
  • Only as incorporated by the relevant current national law; custom-made, legacy and special-device identifier rules require their own scope assessment.
  • 30 days is an applicant data-update deadline, not an authority review period.
  • Labels and identifiers

Norwegian language for labels and IFU

Fact-level verified

Information on the label and in the instructions for use of a device must be given in Norwegian; the CA confirms the requirement applies both to devices for professional use and for general use.

Conditions
  • Applies to devices made available on the Norwegian market.
  • No general carve-out for professional-only devices.

CA guidance page: 'There are requirements for the Norwegian language for medical devices in Norway, both for professional use and for general use'.

  • Supporting documents

Identify the new responsible manufacturer and the separate AR role

Fact-level verified

A manufacturer is a natural or legal person who manufactures or fully refurbishes a device, or has it designed, manufactured or fully refurbished, and markets it under its name or trademark; that manufacturer must meet the applicable manufacturer duties. A true change to that legal person is not established by editing the old actor name, by a local importer change or by an AR handover alone. Establish the new responsible manufacturer’s conformity evidence, registration, UDI/device data and representative mandate before its affected devices are placed on the market. For an AR-only change, Article 12 requires an agreement covering mandate dates, outgoing-representative indication, document transfer and complaint forwarding.

Conditions
  • Manufacturer, original contract manufacturer, AR, importer and distributor are separate roles.
  • A merger where the certified legal person survives differs from transferring devices to another manufacturer; continuity must be established for the actual case.
  • For own-brand distributor/importer arrangements, assess the MDR/IVDR Article 16(1)(a) exception where the original manufacturer remains identified on the label and responsible; the trade name alone does not resolve the legal role.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Use the applicable Norwegian export-certificate evidence

Fact-level verified

DMP issues FSCs to Norwegian manufacturers and authorised representatives for relevant exports outside the EU/EEA. Use the MDR/IVDR template for current-law devices and the directives template for qualifying legacy devices. Provide the correctly completed identity/product data, requested copies (maximum 10), declaration of conformity and applicable notified-body evidence covering every listed product; the stated MD and IVD class branches require a certificate copy. Legacy applications also need the stated notified-body confirmation. The published normal issue period is one month, not an ordinary change-review SLA.

Conditions
  • The FSC page/templates still mention the former national device register, while current DMP guidance uses EUDAMED. Resolve that application-data reference against the current actor/device records; do not instruct a new filing in the retired register.
  • A new FSC is not established as mandatory for every ordinary variation; confirm the destination and changed certificate content.
  • Supporting documents

IVD notified-body change gates

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, where Annex IX conformity assessment applies, notify the body that approved the QMS of planned substantial QMS or covered device-range changes; it assesses the proposal and any necessary audits. Under Annex IX 4.11, a change to an approved device that could affect safety, performance or prescribed conditions of use needs the issuing body’s approval. The body decides whether a new conformity assessment or a certificate supplement is required. An identity-data edit does not settle that decision.

Conditions
  • Applies only where the relevant notified/designated-body certificate and change trigger exist. A cosmetic logo, same-person office change or REF-only edit is not automatically a substantial change.
  • No universal authority or notified-body review duration or fee is established by these clauses.
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD label identity after a change

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, the label identifies the device name/trade name and the manufacturer’s name, registered trade name or trademark and registered-place-of-business address, plus the representative where required and the applicable UDI carrier. Keep the actual post-change device/manufacturer identities consistent with the conformity and registration records. This label-content rule is not an old-stock grace or a permission to use another company’s certificate.

Conditions
  • Apply the national language and representative particulars, including the actual device and use conditions.
  • Existing stock and transition

IVD legacy stock requires lawful placement

Fact-level verified

Qualifying devices lawfully placed on the market under the former rules or the applicable transition may continue to be made available or put into service under the stated provisions. This is a lawful-placement condition for the actual units; it does not authorise newly changed or non-conforming devices, or automatically extend an old manufacturer/brand label after a transfer. Establish placement date, conformity/legacy status, batch identity and whether the proposed alteration changes that basis.

Conditions
  • Manufacturer-held inventory is not automatically already placed on the market. No general manufacturer-name, brand, REF or successor sell-through period is established.

How do I update a manufacturer's name without changing the legal entity?

The same legal manufacturer changes its name, potentially alongside the device brand. A transfer to another legal entity is a separate question; permission to combine filings needs its own evidence.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Norway uses the EEA device regime, with national duties

Fact-level verified

Norway implements MDR and IVDR through Medical Devices Act section 1 and the national medical-device regulation. Ordinary devices do not receive a national DMP marketing authorisation: the manufacturer remains legally responsible and a notified body assesses conformity where required. Identity changes must therefore be assessed under the actual conformity, actor, UDI and device-registration rules, alongside Norwegian national language and local duties, rather than assumed to be a national marketing-authorisation variation.

Conditions
  • The actual MD/IVD conformity and legacy status still governs. The actual manufacturer and certificate facts remain necessary.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Update the existing EUDAMED actor for the same person

Fact-level verified

The current DMP guidance requires economic-operator and device registration in EUDAMED. For the same legal person, changes to the registered actor information must be updated within one week under MDR 31(4) or IVDR 28(4). A Local Actor Administrator creates and registers a new actor-data version. Tax/trade-ID changes use a distinct authority-validated request; pending such a request blocks other actor-detail changes. These technical edits do not establish transfer of a manufacturer to another legal person.

Conditions
  • One week is the operator update deadline, not a DMP review SLA. Do not open or use a second actor record merely to bypass a pending request.
  • Filing route and prior approval

IVD legacy administrative changes need the actual certificate basis

Fact-level verified

MDCG 2022-6 distinguishes administrative manufacturer name/address/legal-form changes, including its merger/acquisition example, from significant design/intended-purpose changes for legacy IVDs. This design-change guidance does not itself establish a transfer of conformity responsibility or a universal certificate-succession procedure. Observe the actual certificate conditions and agreed notified-body change procedure; current transition dates must come from amended law, not the old dates printed in this 2022 guide.

Conditions
  • Legacy-device scope only, with all actual current transition conditions satisfied.
  • This is not permission for every true new-legal-manufacturer combination or a current transition deadline.

Conditions for this question

  • Legacy conformity branch only; the fact is not a universal new-manufacturer transfer procedure.
  • Supporting documents

Identify the new responsible manufacturer and the separate AR role

Fact-level verified

A manufacturer is a natural or legal person who manufactures or fully refurbishes a device, or has it designed, manufactured or fully refurbished, and markets it under its name or trademark; that manufacturer must meet the applicable manufacturer duties. A true change to that legal person is not established by editing the old actor name, by a local importer change or by an AR handover alone. Establish the new responsible manufacturer’s conformity evidence, registration, UDI/device data and representative mandate before its affected devices are placed on the market. For an AR-only change, Article 12 requires an agreement covering mandate dates, outgoing-representative indication, document transfer and complaint forwarding.

Conditions
  • Manufacturer, original contract manufacturer, AR, importer and distributor are separate roles.
  • A merger where the certified legal person survives differs from transferring devices to another manufacturer; continuity must be established for the actual case.
  • For own-brand distributor/importer arrangements, assess the MDR/IVDR Article 16(1)(a) exception where the original manufacturer remains identified on the label and responsible; the trade name alone does not resolve the legal role.
  • Labels and identifiers

Norwegian language for labels and IFU

Fact-level verified

Information on the label and in the instructions for use of a device must be given in Norwegian; the CA confirms the requirement applies both to devices for professional use and for general use.

Conditions
  • Applies to devices made available on the Norwegian market.
  • No general carve-out for professional-only devices.

CA guidance page: 'There are requirements for the Norwegian language for medical devices in Norway, both for professional use and for general use'.

  • Free sale certificate impact

Use the applicable Norwegian export-certificate evidence

Fact-level verified

DMP issues FSCs to Norwegian manufacturers and authorised representatives for relevant exports outside the EU/EEA. Use the MDR/IVDR template for current-law devices and the directives template for qualifying legacy devices. Provide the correctly completed identity/product data, requested copies (maximum 10), declaration of conformity and applicable notified-body evidence covering every listed product; the stated MD and IVD class branches require a certificate copy. Legacy applications also need the stated notified-body confirmation. The published normal issue period is one month, not an ordinary change-review SLA.

Conditions
  • The FSC page/templates still mention the former national device register, while current DMP guidance uses EUDAMED. Resolve that application-data reference against the current actor/device records; do not instruct a new filing in the retired register.
  • A new FSC is not established as mandatory for every ordinary variation; confirm the destination and changed certificate content.
  • Supporting documents

IVD notified-body change gates

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, where Annex IX conformity assessment applies, notify the body that approved the QMS of planned substantial QMS or covered device-range changes; it assesses the proposal and any necessary audits. Under Annex IX 4.11, a change to an approved device that could affect safety, performance or prescribed conditions of use needs the issuing body’s approval. The body decides whether a new conformity assessment or a certificate supplement is required. An identity-data edit does not settle that decision.

Conditions
  • Applies only where the relevant notified/designated-body certificate and change trigger exist. A cosmetic logo, same-person office change or REF-only edit is not automatically a substantial change.
  • No universal authority or notified-body review duration or fee is established by these clauses.
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD label identity after a change

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, the label identifies the device name/trade name and the manufacturer’s name, registered trade name or trademark and registered-place-of-business address, plus the representative where required and the applicable UDI carrier. Keep the actual post-change device/manufacturer identities consistent with the conformity and registration records. This label-content rule is not an old-stock grace or a permission to use another company’s certificate.

Conditions
  • Apply the national language and representative particulars, including the actual device and use conditions.
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD name/model changes and catalogue REF are distinct

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, a new UDI-DI is required for a change that could cause misidentification or traceability ambiguity, including a device name/trade-name or version/model change. An actual catalogue/REF change is not automatically the same thing: assess its effect on identity and traceability. A change to an existing UDI database element that does not require a new UDI-DI must be updated within 30 days. Cosmetic artwork alone is not listed as an automatic new-UDI trigger.

Conditions
  • Only as incorporated by the relevant current national law; custom-made, legacy and special-device identifier rules require their own scope assessment.
  • 30 days is an applicant data-update deadline, not an authority review period.
  • Existing stock and transition

IVD legacy stock requires lawful placement

Fact-level verified

Qualifying devices lawfully placed on the market under the former rules or the applicable transition may continue to be made available or put into service under the stated provisions. This is a lawful-placement condition for the actual units; it does not authorise newly changed or non-conforming devices, or automatically extend an old manufacturer/brand label after a transfer. Establish placement date, conformity/legacy status, batch identity and whether the proposed alteration changes that basis.

Conditions
  • Manufacturer-held inventory is not automatically already placed on the market. No general manufacturer-name, brand, REF or successor sell-through period is established.

What changes when the manufacturer's office address changes?

An office address change for the same legal entity, potentially alongside name and brand changes. This does not cover moving a factory or manufacturing site, and a combined filing cannot be assumed.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Norway uses the EEA device regime, with national duties

Fact-level verified

Norway implements MDR and IVDR through Medical Devices Act section 1 and the national medical-device regulation. Ordinary devices do not receive a national DMP marketing authorisation: the manufacturer remains legally responsible and a notified body assesses conformity where required. Identity changes must therefore be assessed under the actual conformity, actor, UDI and device-registration rules, alongside Norwegian national language and local duties, rather than assumed to be a national marketing-authorisation variation.

Conditions
  • The actual MD/IVD conformity and legacy status still governs. The actual manufacturer and certificate facts remain necessary.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Update the existing EUDAMED actor for the same person

Fact-level verified

The current DMP guidance requires economic-operator and device registration in EUDAMED. For the same legal person, changes to the registered actor information must be updated within one week under MDR 31(4) or IVDR 28(4). A Local Actor Administrator creates and registers a new actor-data version. Tax/trade-ID changes use a distinct authority-validated request; pending such a request blocks other actor-detail changes. These technical edits do not establish transfer of a manufacturer to another legal person.

Conditions
  • One week is the operator update deadline, not a DMP review SLA. Do not open or use a second actor record merely to bypass a pending request.
  • Filing route and prior approval

IVD legacy administrative changes need the actual certificate basis

Fact-level verified

MDCG 2022-6 distinguishes administrative manufacturer name/address/legal-form changes, including its merger/acquisition example, from significant design/intended-purpose changes for legacy IVDs. This design-change guidance does not itself establish a transfer of conformity responsibility or a universal certificate-succession procedure. Observe the actual certificate conditions and agreed notified-body change procedure; current transition dates must come from amended law, not the old dates printed in this 2022 guide.

Conditions
  • Legacy-device scope only, with all actual current transition conditions satisfied.
  • This is not permission for every true new-legal-manufacturer combination or a current transition deadline.

Conditions for this question

  • Legacy conformity branch only; the fact is not a universal new-manufacturer transfer procedure.
  • Supporting documents

Identify the new responsible manufacturer and the separate AR role

Fact-level verified

A manufacturer is a natural or legal person who manufactures or fully refurbishes a device, or has it designed, manufactured or fully refurbished, and markets it under its name or trademark; that manufacturer must meet the applicable manufacturer duties. A true change to that legal person is not established by editing the old actor name, by a local importer change or by an AR handover alone. Establish the new responsible manufacturer’s conformity evidence, registration, UDI/device data and representative mandate before its affected devices are placed on the market. For an AR-only change, Article 12 requires an agreement covering mandate dates, outgoing-representative indication, document transfer and complaint forwarding.

Conditions
  • Manufacturer, original contract manufacturer, AR, importer and distributor are separate roles.
  • A merger where the certified legal person survives differs from transferring devices to another manufacturer; continuity must be established for the actual case.
  • For own-brand distributor/importer arrangements, assess the MDR/IVDR Article 16(1)(a) exception where the original manufacturer remains identified on the label and responsible; the trade name alone does not resolve the legal role.
  • Labels and identifiers

Norwegian language for labels and IFU

Fact-level verified

Information on the label and in the instructions for use of a device must be given in Norwegian; the CA confirms the requirement applies both to devices for professional use and for general use.

Conditions
  • Applies to devices made available on the Norwegian market.
  • No general carve-out for professional-only devices.

CA guidance page: 'There are requirements for the Norwegian language for medical devices in Norway, both for professional use and for general use'.

  • Free sale certificate impact

Use the applicable Norwegian export-certificate evidence

Fact-level verified

DMP issues FSCs to Norwegian manufacturers and authorised representatives for relevant exports outside the EU/EEA. Use the MDR/IVDR template for current-law devices and the directives template for qualifying legacy devices. Provide the correctly completed identity/product data, requested copies (maximum 10), declaration of conformity and applicable notified-body evidence covering every listed product; the stated MD and IVD class branches require a certificate copy. Legacy applications also need the stated notified-body confirmation. The published normal issue period is one month, not an ordinary change-review SLA.

Conditions
  • The FSC page/templates still mention the former national device register, while current DMP guidance uses EUDAMED. Resolve that application-data reference against the current actor/device records; do not instruct a new filing in the retired register.
  • A new FSC is not established as mandatory for every ordinary variation; confirm the destination and changed certificate content.
  • Supporting documents

IVD notified-body change gates

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, where Annex IX conformity assessment applies, notify the body that approved the QMS of planned substantial QMS or covered device-range changes; it assesses the proposal and any necessary audits. Under Annex IX 4.11, a change to an approved device that could affect safety, performance or prescribed conditions of use needs the issuing body’s approval. The body decides whether a new conformity assessment or a certificate supplement is required. An identity-data edit does not settle that decision.

Conditions
  • Applies only where the relevant notified/designated-body certificate and change trigger exist. A cosmetic logo, same-person office change or REF-only edit is not automatically a substantial change.
  • No universal authority or notified-body review duration or fee is established by these clauses.
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD label identity after a change

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, the label identifies the device name/trade name and the manufacturer’s name, registered trade name or trademark and registered-place-of-business address, plus the representative where required and the applicable UDI carrier. Keep the actual post-change device/manufacturer identities consistent with the conformity and registration records. This label-content rule is not an old-stock grace or a permission to use another company’s certificate.

Conditions
  • Apply the national language and representative particulars, including the actual device and use conditions.
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD name/model changes and catalogue REF are distinct

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, a new UDI-DI is required for a change that could cause misidentification or traceability ambiguity, including a device name/trade-name or version/model change. An actual catalogue/REF change is not automatically the same thing: assess its effect on identity and traceability. A change to an existing UDI database element that does not require a new UDI-DI must be updated within 30 days. Cosmetic artwork alone is not listed as an automatic new-UDI trigger.

Conditions
  • Only as incorporated by the relevant current national law; custom-made, legacy and special-device identifier rules require their own scope assessment.
  • 30 days is an applicant data-update deadline, not an authority review period.
  • Existing stock and transition

IVD legacy stock requires lawful placement

Fact-level verified

Qualifying devices lawfully placed on the market under the former rules or the applicable transition may continue to be made available or put into service under the stated provisions. This is a lawful-placement condition for the actual units; it does not authorise newly changed or non-conforming devices, or automatically extend an old manufacturer/brand label after a transfer. Establish placement date, conformity/legacy status, batch identity and whether the proposed alteration changes that basis.

Conditions
  • Manufacturer-held inventory is not automatically already placed on the market. No general manufacturer-name, brand, REF or successor sell-through period is established.

Does a catalogue or reference code change affect registration or UDI?

Check which identifier actually changes. A commercial catalogue, REF or order code is not automatically a device model, registered identifier, GTIN or UDI-DI. Rules for one identifier do not establish the route for another.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Norway uses the EEA device regime, with national duties

Fact-level verified

Norway implements MDR and IVDR through Medical Devices Act section 1 and the national medical-device regulation. Ordinary devices do not receive a national DMP marketing authorisation: the manufacturer remains legally responsible and a notified body assesses conformity where required. Identity changes must therefore be assessed under the actual conformity, actor, UDI and device-registration rules, alongside Norwegian national language and local duties, rather than assumed to be a national marketing-authorisation variation.

Conditions
  • The actual MD/IVD conformity and legacy status still governs. The actual manufacturer and certificate facts remain necessary.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Official UDI/listing surface

Fact-level verified
Submission Surface

EUDAMED

Details

Device registration (with UDI data) takes place in EUDAMED; devices placed on the market before 28 May 2026 must be registered by 28 November 2026.

Conditions
  • Applies to devices subject to EUDAMED registration under MDR/IVDR.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD name/model changes and catalogue REF are distinct

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, a new UDI-DI is required for a change that could cause misidentification or traceability ambiguity, including a device name/trade-name or version/model change. An actual catalogue/REF change is not automatically the same thing: assess its effect on identity and traceability. A change to an existing UDI database element that does not require a new UDI-DI must be updated within 30 days. Cosmetic artwork alone is not listed as an automatic new-UDI trigger.

Conditions
  • Only as incorporated by the relevant current national law; custom-made, legacy and special-device identifier rules require their own scope assessment.
  • 30 days is an applicant data-update deadline, not an authority review period.
  • Supporting documents

Identify the new responsible manufacturer and the separate AR role

Fact-level verified

A manufacturer is a natural or legal person who manufactures or fully refurbishes a device, or has it designed, manufactured or fully refurbished, and markets it under its name or trademark; that manufacturer must meet the applicable manufacturer duties. A true change to that legal person is not established by editing the old actor name, by a local importer change or by an AR handover alone. Establish the new responsible manufacturer’s conformity evidence, registration, UDI/device data and representative mandate before its affected devices are placed on the market. For an AR-only change, Article 12 requires an agreement covering mandate dates, outgoing-representative indication, document transfer and complaint forwarding.

Conditions
  • Manufacturer, original contract manufacturer, AR, importer and distributor are separate roles.
  • A merger where the certified legal person survives differs from transferring devices to another manufacturer; continuity must be established for the actual case.
  • For own-brand distributor/importer arrangements, assess the MDR/IVDR Article 16(1)(a) exception where the original manufacturer remains identified on the label and responsible; the trade name alone does not resolve the legal role.
  • Labels and identifiers

Norwegian language for labels and IFU

Fact-level verified

Information on the label and in the instructions for use of a device must be given in Norwegian; the CA confirms the requirement applies both to devices for professional use and for general use.

Conditions
  • Applies to devices made available on the Norwegian market.
  • No general carve-out for professional-only devices.

CA guidance page: 'There are requirements for the Norwegian language for medical devices in Norway, both for professional use and for general use'.

  • Free sale certificate impact

Use the applicable Norwegian export-certificate evidence

Fact-level verified

DMP issues FSCs to Norwegian manufacturers and authorised representatives for relevant exports outside the EU/EEA. Use the MDR/IVDR template for current-law devices and the directives template for qualifying legacy devices. Provide the correctly completed identity/product data, requested copies (maximum 10), declaration of conformity and applicable notified-body evidence covering every listed product; the stated MD and IVD class branches require a certificate copy. Legacy applications also need the stated notified-body confirmation. The published normal issue period is one month, not an ordinary change-review SLA.

Conditions
  • The FSC page/templates still mention the former national device register, while current DMP guidance uses EUDAMED. Resolve that application-data reference against the current actor/device records; do not instruct a new filing in the retired register.
  • A new FSC is not established as mandatory for every ordinary variation; confirm the destination and changed certificate content.
  • Supporting documents

IVD notified-body change gates

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, where Annex IX conformity assessment applies, notify the body that approved the QMS of planned substantial QMS or covered device-range changes; it assesses the proposal and any necessary audits. Under Annex IX 4.11, a change to an approved device that could affect safety, performance or prescribed conditions of use needs the issuing body’s approval. The body decides whether a new conformity assessment or a certificate supplement is required. An identity-data edit does not settle that decision.

Conditions
  • Applies only where the relevant notified/designated-body certificate and change trigger exist. A cosmetic logo, same-person office change or REF-only edit is not automatically a substantial change.
  • No universal authority or notified-body review duration or fee is established by these clauses.
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD label identity after a change

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, the label identifies the device name/trade name and the manufacturer’s name, registered trade name or trademark and registered-place-of-business address, plus the representative where required and the applicable UDI carrier. Keep the actual post-change device/manufacturer identities consistent with the conformity and registration records. This label-content rule is not an old-stock grace or a permission to use another company’s certificate.

Conditions
  • Apply the national language and representative particulars, including the actual device and use conditions.
  • Existing stock and transition

IVD legacy stock requires lawful placement

Fact-level verified

Qualifying devices lawfully placed on the market under the former rules or the applicable transition may continue to be made available or put into service under the stated provisions. This is a lawful-placement condition for the actual units; it does not authorise newly changed or non-conforming devices, or automatically extend an old manufacturer/brand label after a transfer. Establish placement date, conformity/legacy status, batch identity and whether the proposed alteration changes that basis.

Conditions
  • Manufacturer-held inventory is not automatically already placed on the market. No general manufacturer-name, brand, REF or successor sell-through period is established.

Can several changes be filed together?

Changes to brand, manufacturer name, office address and reference codes may occur together, including with a real transfer to another legal manufacturer, registration holder or owner. Assess transfer with each single change, and transfer with brand plus reference, manufacturer name plus reference, or office address plus reference changes: seven transfer combinations in total. Evidence must establish the exact combination and the order of filings and approvals. These combinations and their sequence are not all verified by the rules below; a rule for one change does not prove that a single application, fee or review period covers the combination.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Norway uses the EEA device regime, with national duties

Fact-level verified

Norway implements MDR and IVDR through Medical Devices Act section 1 and the national medical-device regulation. Ordinary devices do not receive a national DMP marketing authorisation: the manufacturer remains legally responsible and a notified body assesses conformity where required. Identity changes must therefore be assessed under the actual conformity, actor, UDI and device-registration rules, alongside Norwegian national language and local duties, rather than assumed to be a national marketing-authorisation variation.

Conditions
  • The actual MD/IVD conformity and legacy status still governs. The actual manufacturer and certificate facts remain necessary.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Official UDI/listing surface

Fact-level verified
Submission Surface

EUDAMED

Details

Device registration (with UDI data) takes place in EUDAMED; devices placed on the market before 28 May 2026 must be registered by 28 November 2026.

Conditions
  • Applies to devices subject to EUDAMED registration under MDR/IVDR.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD name/model changes and catalogue REF are distinct

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, a new UDI-DI is required for a change that could cause misidentification or traceability ambiguity, including a device name/trade-name or version/model change. An actual catalogue/REF change is not automatically the same thing: assess its effect on identity and traceability. A change to an existing UDI database element that does not require a new UDI-DI must be updated within 30 days. Cosmetic artwork alone is not listed as an automatic new-UDI trigger.

Conditions
  • Only as incorporated by the relevant current national law; custom-made, legacy and special-device identifier rules require their own scope assessment.
  • 30 days is an applicant data-update deadline, not an authority review period.
  • Supporting documents

Identify the new responsible manufacturer and the separate AR role

Fact-level verified

A manufacturer is a natural or legal person who manufactures or fully refurbishes a device, or has it designed, manufactured or fully refurbished, and markets it under its name or trademark; that manufacturer must meet the applicable manufacturer duties. A true change to that legal person is not established by editing the old actor name, by a local importer change or by an AR handover alone. Establish the new responsible manufacturer’s conformity evidence, registration, UDI/device data and representative mandate before its affected devices are placed on the market. For an AR-only change, Article 12 requires an agreement covering mandate dates, outgoing-representative indication, document transfer and complaint forwarding.

Conditions
  • Manufacturer, original contract manufacturer, AR, importer and distributor are separate roles.
  • A merger where the certified legal person survives differs from transferring devices to another manufacturer; continuity must be established for the actual case.
  • For own-brand distributor/importer arrangements, assess the MDR/IVDR Article 16(1)(a) exception where the original manufacturer remains identified on the label and responsible; the trade name alone does not resolve the legal role.
  • Labels and identifiers

Norwegian language for labels and IFU

Fact-level verified

Information on the label and in the instructions for use of a device must be given in Norwegian; the CA confirms the requirement applies both to devices for professional use and for general use.

Conditions
  • Applies to devices made available on the Norwegian market.
  • No general carve-out for professional-only devices.

CA guidance page: 'There are requirements for the Norwegian language for medical devices in Norway, both for professional use and for general use'.

  • Free sale certificate impact

Use the applicable Norwegian export-certificate evidence

Fact-level verified

DMP issues FSCs to Norwegian manufacturers and authorised representatives for relevant exports outside the EU/EEA. Use the MDR/IVDR template for current-law devices and the directives template for qualifying legacy devices. Provide the correctly completed identity/product data, requested copies (maximum 10), declaration of conformity and applicable notified-body evidence covering every listed product; the stated MD and IVD class branches require a certificate copy. Legacy applications also need the stated notified-body confirmation. The published normal issue period is one month, not an ordinary change-review SLA.

Conditions
  • The FSC page/templates still mention the former national device register, while current DMP guidance uses EUDAMED. Resolve that application-data reference against the current actor/device records; do not instruct a new filing in the retired register.
  • A new FSC is not established as mandatory for every ordinary variation; confirm the destination and changed certificate content.
  • Supporting documents

IVD notified-body change gates

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, where Annex IX conformity assessment applies, notify the body that approved the QMS of planned substantial QMS or covered device-range changes; it assesses the proposal and any necessary audits. Under Annex IX 4.11, a change to an approved device that could affect safety, performance or prescribed conditions of use needs the issuing body’s approval. The body decides whether a new conformity assessment or a certificate supplement is required. An identity-data edit does not settle that decision.

Conditions
  • Applies only where the relevant notified/designated-body certificate and change trigger exist. A cosmetic logo, same-person office change or REF-only edit is not automatically a substantial change.
  • No universal authority or notified-body review duration or fee is established by these clauses.
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD label identity after a change

Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, the label identifies the device name/trade name and the manufacturer’s name, registered trade name or trademark and registered-place-of-business address, plus the representative where required and the applicable UDI carrier. Keep the actual post-change device/manufacturer identities consistent with the conformity and registration records. This label-content rule is not an old-stock grace or a permission to use another company’s certificate.

Conditions
  • Apply the national language and representative particulars, including the actual device and use conditions.
  • Existing stock and transition

IVD legacy stock requires lawful placement

Fact-level verified

Qualifying devices lawfully placed on the market under the former rules or the applicable transition may continue to be made available or put into service under the stated provisions. This is a lawful-placement condition for the actual units; it does not authorise newly changed or non-conforming devices, or automatically extend an old manufacturer/brand label after a transfer. Establish placement date, conformity/legacy status, batch identity and whether the proposed alteration changes that basis.

Conditions
  • Manufacturer-held inventory is not automatically already placed on the market. No general manufacturer-name, brand, REF or successor sell-through period is established.

Authority & regime

Which authority and binding regime govern this product, task, and date?

Compare countries

Competent authority

authority.competent-authority
Fact-level verified

Direktoratet for medisinske produkter (English: Norwegian Medical Products Agency, NoMA/DMP; website dmp.no; formerly Statens legemiddelverk) is the competent authority for medical devices and IVDs in Norway and supervises economic operators and notified bodies.

Conditions
  • Applies to all device classes and IVDs.

Agency renamed from Statens legemiddelverk to Direktoratet for medisinske produkter; English name Norwegian Medical Products Agency. CA website also states: 'The Norwegian Medical Products Agency is the competent authority for medical devices in Norway'.

National penalties for breaches

regime.penalties
Fact-level verified

Wilful or negligent breach of the national regulation's provisions (including listed MDR/IVDR articles) is punishable by fines or imprisonment; aggravated violations carry up to 2 years' imprisonment. The Directorate may also impose infringement fines (overtredelsesgebyr).

Conditions
  • Aggravation weighed against death or serious health harm caused or threatened.

Ordinary violations: fines or imprisonment up to 3 months per § 19 first paragraph.

Change control

Does the event require internal documentation, notice, prior approval, transfer, or a new application?

Compare countries

Notified-body certificate reporting to CA

change.certificate-reporting
Fact-level verified

Notified bodies must inform Direktoratet for medisinske produkter about all certificates issued, amended, extended, suspended, withdrawn or refused (and inform other notified bodies about suspended/withdrawn/refused certificates).

Conditions
  • Duty on notified bodies designated under the device directives/regulations.

Norway uses the EEA device regime, with national duties

eea.conformity.and.national.registration.route
Fact-level verified

Norway implements MDR and IVDR through Medical Devices Act section 1 and the national medical-device regulation. Ordinary devices do not receive a national DMP marketing authorisation: the manufacturer remains legally responsible and a notified body assesses conformity where required. Identity changes must therefore be assessed under the actual conformity, actor, UDI and device-registration rules, alongside Norwegian national language and local duties, rather than assumed to be a national marketing-authorisation variation.

Conditions
  • The actual MD/IVD conformity and legacy status still governs. The actual manufacturer and certificate facts remain necessary.

IVD notified-body change gates

ivd.conformity.change.and.certificate.gates
Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, where Annex IX conformity assessment applies, notify the body that approved the QMS of planned substantial QMS or covered device-range changes; it assesses the proposal and any necessary audits. Under Annex IX 4.11, a change to an approved device that could affect safety, performance or prescribed conditions of use needs the issuing body’s approval. The body decides whether a new conformity assessment or a certificate supplement is required. An identity-data edit does not settle that decision.

Conditions
  • Applies only where the relevant notified/designated-body certificate and change trigger exist. A cosmetic logo, same-person office change or REF-only edit is not automatically a substantial change.
  • No universal authority or notified-body review duration or fee is established by these clauses.

IVD legacy stock requires lawful placement

ivd.lawfully.placed.legacy.stock.boundary
Fact-level verified

Qualifying devices lawfully placed on the market under the former rules or the applicable transition may continue to be made available or put into service under the stated provisions. This is a lawful-placement condition for the actual units; it does not authorise newly changed or non-conforming devices, or automatically extend an old manufacturer/brand label after a transfer. Establish placement date, conformity/legacy status, batch identity and whether the proposed alteration changes that basis.

Conditions
  • Manufacturer-held inventory is not automatically already placed on the market. No general manufacturer-name, brand, REF or successor sell-through period is established.

IVD legacy administrative changes need the actual certificate basis

ivd.legacy.administrative.change.scope
Fact-level verified

MDCG 2022-6 distinguishes administrative manufacturer name/address/legal-form changes, including its merger/acquisition example, from significant design/intended-purpose changes for legacy IVDs. This design-change guidance does not itself establish a transfer of conformity responsibility or a universal certificate-succession procedure. Observe the actual certificate conditions and agreed notified-body change procedure; current transition dates must come from amended law, not the old dates printed in this 2022 guide.

Conditions
  • Legacy-device scope only, with all actual current transition conditions satisfied.
  • This is not permission for every true new-legal-manufacturer combination or a current transition deadline.

Clinical investigation & performance

Which clinical or IVD performance evidence or study is required and accepted?

Compare countries

IVD performance study application/notification route

clinical.ivd-performance-study-route
Fact-level verified

Performance studies of IVDs covered by IVDR Article 58 or 70 require an application or notification to the Norwegian Medical Products Agency (NOMA); performance studies may also require an application to the Norwegian ethics committees (REK KULMU).

Conditions
  • Applies generally to studies involving risks to subjects.
  • Companion-diagnostic studies with left-over samples only are notified, not applied for.

Safety reporting in performance studies: form by email to kki@noma.no per the CA safety-reporting page.

Device definition & scope

Is the product a device, IVD, accessory, software, or borderline product locally?

Compare countries

Borderline qualification decision

device-definition.borderline-authority
Fact-level verified

In cases of doubt, Direktoratet for medisinske produkter decides whether a product is to be regarded as a medical device (national rule; device definition itself follows MDR/IVDR Article 2 via the EEA Agreement).

Conditions
  • Applies where qualification as a device is doubtful.

Dossier requirements

Which evidence, local deltas, formats, and signatures are required?

Compare countries

Documentation language on authority request

dossier.documentation-language-ca-request
Fact-level verified

On request from Direktoratet for medisinske produkter, the manufacturer and the authorised representative must present all information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the device's conformity, in Norwegian or English.

Conditions
  • Applies on CA request under market surveillance/supervision powers.

Use the applicable Norwegian export-certificate evidence

export.certificate.identity.and.conformity.evidence
Fact-level verified

DMP issues FSCs to Norwegian manufacturers and authorised representatives for relevant exports outside the EU/EEA. Use the MDR/IVDR template for current-law devices and the directives template for qualifying legacy devices. Provide the correctly completed identity/product data, requested copies (maximum 10), declaration of conformity and applicable notified-body evidence covering every listed product; the stated MD and IVD class branches require a certificate copy. Legacy applications also need the stated notified-body confirmation. The published normal issue period is one month, not an ordinary change-review SLA.

Conditions
  • The FSC page/templates still mention the former national device register, while current DMP guidance uses EUDAMED. Resolve that application-data reference against the current actor/device records; do not instruct a new filing in the retired register.
  • A new FSC is not established as mandatory for every ordinary variation; confirm the destination and changed certificate content.

Economic-operator roles

Which manufacturer, representative, holder, applicant, importer, and distributor roles apply?

Compare countries

Identify the new responsible manufacturer and the separate AR role

new.manufacturer.and.separate.ar.handover
Fact-level verified

A manufacturer is a natural or legal person who manufactures or fully refurbishes a device, or has it designed, manufactured or fully refurbished, and markets it under its name or trademark; that manufacturer must meet the applicable manufacturer duties. A true change to that legal person is not established by editing the old actor name, by a local importer change or by an AR handover alone. Establish the new responsible manufacturer’s conformity evidence, registration, UDI/device data and representative mandate before its affected devices are placed on the market. For an AR-only change, Article 12 requires an agreement covering mandate dates, outgoing-representative indication, document transfer and complaint forwarding.

Conditions
  • Manufacturer, original contract manufacturer, AR, importer and distributor are separate roles.
  • A merger where the certified legal person survives differs from transferring devices to another manufacturer; continuity must be established for the actual case.
  • For own-brand distributor/importer arrangements, assess the MDR/IVDR Article 16(1)(a) exception where the original manufacturer remains identified on the label and responsible; the trade name alone does not resolve the legal role.

EUDAMED actor registration and SRN

roles.eudamed-actor-registration
Fact-level verified

Manufacturers, authorised representatives, importers and system/procedure-pack assemblers must register in the EUDAMED actor registration module and receive a Single Registration Number (SRN); distributors are not required to register in EUDAMED.

Conditions
  • Applies to those economic operator roles; distributor registration is voluntary in Norway.

No fee is mentioned on the CA actor-registration page.

Fees

What regulator fee applies to this class, route, event, and date?

Compare countries

No fee for IVD performance study applications

fees.no-fee-performance-studies
Fact-level verified

There are no fees for applications and notifications of performance studies of IVD medical devices at the Norwegian Medical Products Agency.

Conditions
  • Applies to IVDR Article 58/70 applications and notifications.

Statutory fee/cost authority

fees.statutory-authority
Fact-level verified

The Medical Devices Act allows market actors and technical control bodies to be ordered to cover costs of supervision and control, and empowers the ministry to prescribe fees for processing clinical investigation and performance-evaluation applications; no such application fees are currently charged.

Conditions
  • Enabling provision; current CA practice charges no CI/performance-study fees.

Late payment interest per the Interest on Late Payments Act; fees are enforceable attachment grounds.

Label, IFU & language

Which label and IFU elements, languages, symbols, and translation controls apply?

Compare countries

IVD label identity after a change

ivd.changed.label.manufacturer.and.device.identity
Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, the label identifies the device name/trade name and the manufacturer’s name, registered trade name or trademark and registered-place-of-business address, plus the representative where required and the applicable UDI carrier. Keep the actual post-change device/manufacturer identities consistent with the conformity and registration records. This label-content rule is not an old-stock grace or a permission to use another company’s certificate.

Conditions
  • Apply the national language and representative particulars, including the actual device and use conditions.

Exemption from Norwegian language requirement

label-ifu.language-exemption
Fact-level verified

Direktoratet for medisinske produkter may exempt a device from the Norwegian-language requirement for labels/IFU where safe and correct use is ensured; exemptions are not granted on a general basis or for an unlimited period.

Conditions
  • Case-by-case application to the Directorate; safe and correct use must be secured.

CA guidance: 'It is possible to apply for an exemption from the language requirement, cf. regulation on medical devices § 15' and 'Exemptions are not granted on a general basis, nor for an unlimited period of time.'

Norwegian language for labels and IFU

label-ifu.norwegian-required
Fact-level verified

Information on the label and in the instructions for use of a device must be given in Norwegian; the CA confirms the requirement applies both to devices for professional use and for general use.

Conditions
  • Applies to devices made available on the Norwegian market.
  • No general carve-out for professional-only devices.

CA guidance page: 'There are requirements for the Norwegian language for medical devices in Norway, both for professional use and for general use'.

Official forms & portals

Which current form, portal, account, and submission package must be used?

Compare countries

Read current EUDAMED guidance alongside the national text

eudamed.current.guidance.and.national.text.boundary
Fact-level verified

DMP’s current actor/device pages state that the first EUDAMED modules are mandatory and that devices placed before 28 May 2026 have the stated 28 November 2026 device-registration deadline. The captured national compilation still contains sections 24–25. The July 2026 consultation proposes repealing those sections; the 14 October 2026 amendment changes incorporated MDR references and is not that repeal. A consultation is not a final repeal, and the ordinary identity-change answer should use the current EUDAMED operational guidance without claiming those sections have already been removed.

Conditions
  • This is a precisely identified currentness/interpretation boundary, not proof that a mandatory final original is globally unavailable.

Update the existing EUDAMED actor for the same person

same.actor.eudamed.name.address.update
Fact-level verified

The current DMP guidance requires economic-operator and device registration in EUDAMED. For the same legal person, changes to the registered actor information must be updated within one week under MDR 31(4) or IVDR 28(4). A Local Actor Administrator creates and registers a new actor-data version. Tax/trade-ID changes use a distinct authority-validated request; pending such a request blocks other actor-detail changes. These technical edits do not establish transfer of a manufacturer to another legal person.

Conditions
  • One week is the operator update deadline, not a DMP review SLA. Do not open or use a second actor record merely to bypass a pending request.

Official form or portal surface

submission.official-form-or-portal-surface
Fact-level verified
Submission Surface

EUDAMED

Details

Actor and device registration in Norway takes place in EUDAMED; the CA (dmp.no) publishes the registration pages. Clinical investigation submissions use a separate national channel (email kki@dmp.no) until EUDAMED is available.

Conditions
  • Applies to device/actor registration.

QMS, audit & inspection

Which QMS, audit, inspection, and certificate scope is accepted or required?

Compare countries

Norwegian notified body

qms.norwegian-notified-body
Fact-level verified

DNV Product Assurance AS has been designated by the Norwegian Medical Products Agency as a notified body under the MDR and, as the first Norwegian notified body for IVDs, under the IVDR.

Conditions
  • Certification capacity fact; manufacturers may use any EEA-designated notified body.

Notified-body designation and oversight authority

qms.notified-body-authority
Fact-level verified

Direktoratet for medisinske produkter designates and supervises notified bodies in Norway (per MDR Article 35 and IVDR Article 31, read with the Act on technical control bodies).

Conditions
  • Applies to conformity assessment bodies seeking/holding Norwegian notification.

Recall, FSCA & market surveillance

Which recall, FSCA, notice, and authority-coordination duties apply?

Compare countries

FSCA reporting channel

recall.fsca-channel
Fact-level verified

Reports on field safety corrective actions and the field safety notice for devices on the Norwegian market or from Norwegian manufacturers shall be sent to the Norwegian Medical Products Agency (NOMA) by email to MSOD@dmp.no; NOMA responds with a case number that must be stated in all subsequent communications.

Conditions
  • Applies to FSCAs concerning devices on the Norwegian market or from Norwegian manufacturers.
  • Reports must also go to authorities of all affected EU/EEA countries (EU-level rule).

Report content must include e.g. UDI/identification, SRN, manufacturer's reference number, risk profile, reason and user instructions.

Field safety notice language

recall.fsnotice-language
Fact-level verified

Safety communications from manufacturers to users of devices must be given in Norwegian; in special cases they may be given in English until a Norwegian translation is available, and the Norwegian translation must follow without undue delay.

Conditions
  • English only accepted temporarily, in special cases.
  • Applies to safety communications under MDR Art. 89(8)/IVDR Art. 84(8).

CA FSCA page: 'In Norway, field safety notices must be in Norwegian, but an English version may be accepted' temporarily pending translation.

Registration pathways

Which registration, notification, listing, reliance, or conformity route applies?

Compare countries

Market-access registration route

registration.market-access-route
Fact-level verified
Submission Surface

EUDAMED

Obligation

Manufacturers must register their devices in EUDAMED prior to placing the devices on the market in Norway/EU-EEA.

Transition Deadline

Devices placed on the market before 28 May 2026 fall under a six-month transition and must be registered by 28 November 2026.

Conditions
  • Applies to all devices requiring registration under MDR/IVDR.
  • Conformity (CE) route itself is EU-level.

No national pre-market approval: CE-marked devices circulate EEA-wide; national registration duty is discharged in EUDAMED.

Reliance & recognition

Which foreign decisions or evidence can be reused, with what effect and conditions?

Compare countries

Existing records include acceptance, restrictions and evidence reuse. The applicable product scope and conditions are preserved below; a reference does not by itself confer market access.

Norway approvals and evidence in other markets (5 records)

BotswanaEU conformity assessment · US FDA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Swissmedic · Health Canada · Australia TGA · Iceland · Norway

Prior approval / evidence record

Stringent Regulatory Authority approval — ICH members (European Commission, US FDA, Japan MHLW/PMDA), ICH observers (Swissmedic, Health Canada) or an authority associated with an ICH member through a legally binding mutual recognition agreement (including Australia, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway)

Authority

Stringent Regulatory Authority approval — ICH members (European Commission, US FDA, Japan MHLW/PMDA), ICH observers (Swissmedic, Health Canada) or an authority associated with an ICH member through a legally binding mutual recognition agreement (including Australia, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway)

Accepted

No

Benefit

The SRA definition in G01 s.3.1.26 is used for dossier and reference purposes rather than as an automatic grant: an SRA approval does not by itself confer a Botswana registration, and it benefits the applicant only through the abridged pathway's proof-of-reference-agency requirement, which is defined by the separate Reference Regulatory Authority concept.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

Dominican RepublicUS FDA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Australia TGA · EU conformity assessment · Iceland · Norway

Prior approval / evidence record

WHO Strict Authorities — US FDA, Health Canada, Japan NIHS, Australia TGA, EMA, Icelandic Medicines Agency, Norwegian Medicines Agency, Liechtenstein AML

Authority

WHO Strict Authorities — US FDA, Health Canada, Japan NIHS, Australia TGA, EMA, Icelandic Medicines Agency, Norwegian Medicines Agency, Liechtenstein AML

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Eligibility for the simplified registration procedure under Resolución No. 000004 on a Certificate of Free Sale plus a good-manufacturing-practices certificate from that authority, for new registrations and renewals of imported products; the remaining legal requirements still apply and DIGEMAPS retains the decision.

Timeline Savings

No published period: the MSP service listing shows 'Inmediatamente' rather than a number of days.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

IsraelUS FDA · UK MHRA · Germany · France · Italy · Spain · Netherlands · Belgium · Ireland · Denmark · Sweden · Finland · Norway · Iceland · Greece · Portugal · Austria · Swissmedic · Australia TGA · Health Canada · New Zealand

Regulatory reference

Recognized-state registration route

reliance.recognized-country-route
Fact-level verified

A device registered, or approved for marketing and actually marketed, in a 'recognized state' (מדינה מוכרת) is registered in the Israeli register for a period not exceeding the period it may be marketed in that state, capped at 5 years from Israeli registration. Recognized states are listed in the First Addendum to the law — 21 states including the US, UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Ireland, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Iceland, Greece, Portugal, Austria, Switzerland, Australia, Canada and New Zealand (no single 'EU' entry: member states are listed individually).

Conditions
  • Device must be registered or permitted for marketing and actually marketed in the recognized state.

First Addendum list per the official Sefer HaChukim text of the law held from gov.il.

ParaguayBrazil ANVISA · US FDA · Health Canada · Austria · Belgium · Denmark · Finland · France · Germany · Hungary · Ireland · Italy · Netherlands · New Zealand · Norway · Spain · Sweden · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Swissmedic · Australia TGA · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

IVD Annex I reference-country list drives the 30/45/120-business-day clocks

reliance.ivd-anexo-i-reference-country-list
Fact-level verified
Statement

For IVDs, DINAVISA decides within 30 business days for products manufactured nationally or in a country of Annex I, within 45 business days for products manufactured outside Annex I but registered and commercialised in an Annex I country (which must additionally file the foreign registration certificate and free-sale certificate), and within 120 business days for other imports. Annex I names high-surveillance and adequate-surveillance authorities and the full MERCOSUR members; the United States and Japan are on it and Korea is not.

Source Approval

Sanitary registration and free-sale certificate in force in an Annex I country — high-surveillance authorities (Germany, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Spain, United States, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Sweden, Switzerland) or adequate-surveillance authorities (Australia, Chile, Cuba, Finland, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Mexico, Norway, New Zealand); Annex I also lists full MERCOSUR members (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay) and PAHO/WHO reference authorities

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The Annex I list derives from Ley N° 3283/2007 Art. 11 (high and adequate sanitary surveillance).
  • A product made outside Annex I is admitted on a 45-day clock only if it is registered and commercialised in an Annex I country.
  • Korea (MFDS) does not appear in Annex I, so a Korean-only IVD authorisation does not by itself reach the 30/45-day clocks.
  • A Paraguayan sanitary registration is still required in every case.

Source language: Spanish. Translation of the quoted Annex I heading and entries: 'Countries with High and Adequate Sanitary Surveillance Authorities (Law 3283/07 Article 11)' / 'Countries with high sanitary surveillance regulatory authorities: Germany, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Spain, United States, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Sweden and Switzerland.' / 'Full MERCOSUR members: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay.' The excerpt is taken from the resolution's own Annex I; Art. 6 supplies the 30- and 45-business-day clocks.

PeruUS FDA · UK MHRA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Australia TGA · Swissmedic · South Korea MFDS · Germany · France · Netherlands · Spain · Italy · Belgium · Portugal · Ireland · Austria · Hungary · Denmark · Norway · Sweden

Prior approval / evidence record

País de Alta Vigilancia Sanitaria (art. 9 D.S. 016-2011-SA): United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, Switzerland, South Korea, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Hungary, Denmark, Norway, Sweden

Authority

País de Alta Vigilancia Sanitaria (art. 9 D.S. 016-2011-SA): United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, Switzerland, South Korea, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Hungary, Denmark, Norway, Sweden

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

The Peruvian route to relying on a foreign approval is documentary, not procedural. A certificate of free sale or a GMP certificate issued by a high-surveillance authority is accepted directly, and if the issuing authority appears on the Resolución Directoral 169-2014-DIGEMID list the document does not need an apostille. Everything else still goes through DIGEMID certification.

Timeline Savings

None published — the TUPA period is set by class, not by origin

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

Prior approvals and evidence for Norway (3 records)

NorwayEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE under MDR/IVDR — single market validity

reliance.reliance-edge-eu-ce-to-eea30-approval-eu-ce-mdr-ivdr-norway
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:nor

Source Approval

EU CE under MDR/IVDR

Edge Type

Single Market Validity

Market Access Strength

direct

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Same Device Required

Yes

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • medical devices and IVDs subject to route-specific scope
  • valid CE conformity route for the device
  • country language, economic-operator, EUDAMED, and national vigilance obligations still apply

CA treats Norway as part of the single EU/EEA market: registration (not approval) is the national act; MDR/IVDR are Norwegian law via the EEA Agreement (Lov om medisinsk utstyr § 1).

NorwayNMPA

Regulatory reference

NMPA certificate does not replace EU conformity assessment

reliance.china-nmpa-no-recognition-route
Fact-level verified
Statement

For ordinary market placement under MDR/IVDR, a Chinese approval does not replace conformity assessment under MDR Article 52 or IVDR Article 48. The applicable EU class and procedure must be established independently; lower-risk devices may self-declare, while other devices require notified-body assessment. This is a finding about the ordinary conformity route, not a ban on Chinese devices or their technical evidence.

Source Jurisdiction Id

china

Source Authority Id

nmpa

Source Approval

China NMPA medical device registration certificate (Class II/III) or Class I filing record

Target Jurisdiction Id

norway

China Classes In Scope

All NMPA classes (I filing, II, III) -> all EU MDR/IVDR classes

Edge Type

No Reliance Route

Market Access Strength

none

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

null

Target Decision Retained

null

Conditions
  • Determine the local class independently; NMPA Class III is not an automatic EU class assignment.
  • A local regulatory application/decision is not universal: MDR Article 52(7) and IVDR Article 48(10) permit specified self-declaration routes.
  • Clinical, performance and technical evidence must meet the applicable EU requirements; the certificate alone does not replace them.
  • Special-purpose, investigational, custom-made and derogation regimes require separate assessment.

Independent review of current EUR-Lex consolidations supports this bounded ordinary-route conclusion. It does not establish the absence of every special route.

NorwayUS FDA

Prior approval / evidence record

FDA 510(k)/PMA

Authority

FDA 510(k)/PMA

Accepted

No

Benefit

No substitute for EU MDR conformity assessment; useful as predicate documentation in the technical file

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

Special access & derogation

Is an emergency, compassionate, custom, humanitarian, or other exceptional path available?

Compare countries

National exemption (dispensation) power

derogation.dispensation-power
Fact-level verified

Direktoratet for medisinske produkter may, in special cases, grant exemptions from provisions laid down in or under the Medical Devices Act, provided this does not conflict with Norway's international obligations, including the EEA Agreement.

Conditions
  • Special cases only; cannot conflict with EEA/international obligations.

Submission communications & appeal

How are deficiencies answered, clocks handled, and decisions escalated or appealed?

Compare countries

Appeal against authority decisions

appeal.administrative-appeal
Fact-level verified

Individual decisions (enkeltvedtak) of Direktoratet for medisinske produkter may be appealed under the Public Administration Act § 28 to the immediately superior administrative organ (for a directorate, the ministry); the CA's clinical-investigation pages expressly state that sponsors may appeal rejections of applications.

Conditions
  • Appeal by a party or others with legal appeal interest.

CA CI page: 'Ved avslag på søknaden kan sponsor klage på avgjørelsen.' forskrift § 17 ties supervision and decisions to the Medical Devices Act.

UDI, listing & traceability

Which UDI, device listing, database, and traceability duties apply?

Compare countries

IVD name/model changes and catalogue REF are distinct

ivd.name.model.udi.and.ref.assessment
Fact-level verified

Under the corresponding MDR/IVDR rules implemented in Norway, a new UDI-DI is required for a change that could cause misidentification or traceability ambiguity, including a device name/trade-name or version/model change. An actual catalogue/REF change is not automatically the same thing: assess its effect on identity and traceability. A change to an existing UDI database element that does not require a new UDI-DI must be updated within 30 days. Cosmetic artwork alone is not listed as an automatic new-UDI trigger.

Conditions
  • Only as incorporated by the relevant current national law; custom-made, legacy and special-device identifier rules require their own scope assessment.
  • 30 days is an applicant data-update deadline, not an authority review period.

Official UDI/listing surface

udi.official-listing-surface
Fact-level verified
Submission Surface

EUDAMED

Details

Device registration (with UDI data) takes place in EUDAMED; devices placed on the market before 28 May 2026 must be registered by 28 November 2026.

Conditions
  • Applies to devices subject to EUDAMED registration under MDR/IVDR.

Related structured datasets

Classification systems · 0 records

No maintained record.

Registration pathways, prior approvals and planning · 1 record

These country-level records can cover multiple product types. Check each item's scope and conditions before applying a fee, pathway or licence to an IVD.

Open Norway registration →
Country

Norway

Jurisdiction Id

norway

Country Code

NO

Flag

🇳🇴

Regulator

Norwegian Medical Products Agency

Regulator Abbrev

Norwegian Medical Products Agency

Region

europe

Tier

3

Risk Classification

4-class (I, IIa, IIb, III) — EU MDR

Classes
  • Id

    class-i

    Class Name

    Class I

    Risk Level

    low

    Pathway

    Self-declaration (no notified body)

    Official Timeline
    Min

    0

    Max

    0

    Unit

    days

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Official Source
    Title

    EUR-Lex Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR)

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-25

    Realistic Timeline
    Min

    6

    Max

    9

    Unit

    months

    Notes
    • MDR Art. 52(7): non-sterile, non-measuring, non-reusable-surgical Class I devices are self-declared, so no authority or notified body reviews the file and there is no review clock
    • Elapsed time is Eudamed actor and device registration, which has no guaranteed processing time, plus any national registration duty
    Clinical Trial Required

    No

    Local Testing Required

    No

    Gmp Required

    Yes

Key Requirements
  • EU/EEA Authorized Representative (for non-EEA manufacturers)
  • Clinical investigation validation: feedback within 15 days of receipt; if invalid, 10 days to comment (+20); final validity within 10 days after resubmission
  • Assessment: decision within 45 days of validation, clock frozen awaiting sponsor information, +20 with experts
  • Transitional MDD rules until EUDAMED is mandatory: notification at least 60 days before start; class III/implantable/long-term invasive IIa/IIb start 60 days after notification unless objected
  • End-of-investigation notification within 15 days; final report within 1 year
Prior Approvals
  • Authority

    FDA 510(k)/PMA

    Accepted

    No

    Benefit

    No substitute for EU MDR conformity assessment; useful as predicate documentation in the technical file

Local Rep Required

Yes

Local Rep Name

EU Authorized Representative

Mdsap Accepted

No

Mdsap Benefit

ISO 13485 accepted as QMS evidence

Registration Validity

5 years (CE certificate)

Last Updated

2026-08-29

Verification Status

partially-verified

Official Sources
  • Title

    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/977, Art. 2 — maximum notified-body conformity assessment timelines (30 + 120/90 parallel + 20 days)

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2026/977/oj

    Effective Date

    2027-02-25

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-29

  • Title

    EUR-Lex Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR)

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-25

  • Title

    EUR-Lex MDR consolidated text — Annex IX §5.1 (expert-panel clinical evaluation consultation: 21/60 days) and §5.2(d) (ancillary medicinal-substance opinion: 210 days)

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02017R0745-20250110

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-29

Reviewed On

2026-08-29

Process
Template Id

default

Status

planning-template

Usage Rule

Maintained planning steps and estimates, not verified regulator deadlines.

Steps
  • Step

    1

    Title

    Pre-Submission Preparation

    Description

    Gather technical documentation, quality management system (QMS) records, and clinical data required by Norwegian Medical Products Agency. Appoint a EU Authorized Representative.

    Duration

    1-3 months

    Icon

    📋

  • Step

    2

    Title

    Application Submission

    Description

    Submit complete registration dossier to Norwegian Medical Products Agency including device description, risk analysis, and testing reports.

    Duration

    1-2 weeks

    Icon

    📤

  • Step

    3

    Title

    Administrative Review

    Description

    Norwegian Medical Products Agency reviews application for completeness. May request additional documents or clarifications.

    Duration

    2-4 weeks

    Icon

    🔍

  • Step

    4

    Title

    Technical Evaluation

    Description

    In-depth technical assessment of device safety and performance. Norwegian Medical Products Agency may issue questions.

    Duration

    0 days

    Icon

    ⚙️

  • Step

    5

    Title

    Registration Approval

    Description

    Upon successful review, Norwegian Medical Products Agency issues Norway market authorization certificate.

    Duration

    1-2 weeks

    Icon

    ✅

Government fee schedules · 1 record

These country-level records can cover multiple product types. Check each item's scope and conditions before applying a fee, pathway or licence to an IVD.

Open Norway fees →
Jurisdiction Id

norway

Country

Norway

Country Code

NO

Authority

Norwegian Medical Products Agency

Low Risk Local
Min

0

Max

0

Currency

NOK

Per Product

Yes

High Risk Local
Min

0

Max

0

Currency

NOK

Per Product

Yes

Details
  • Id

    clinical-investigation-processing

    Item

    Processing of clinical-investigation applications and notifications

    Currency

    NOK

    Amount Local

    0

    Amount Local Formatted

    NOK 0

    Frequency

    Per application

    Notes

    DMP charges no fee for processing applications and notifications of clinical investigations of medical devices.

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.dmp.no/medisinsk-utstyr/klinisk-utproving-av-medisinsk-utstyr/introduksjon-til-klinisk-utprøving-av-medisinsk-utstyr

    Source Title

    Norway DMP: no fee for clinical-investigation applications and notifications

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

Notes
  • DMP and NOMA expressly state that they charge no fee for the cited clinical-investigation and IVD performance-study applications and notifications.
Last Updated

2026-08-25

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Sources
  • Title

    Norway DMP: no fee for clinical-investigation applications and notifications

    Url

    https://www.dmp.no/medisinsk-utstyr/klinisk-utproving-av-medisinsk-utstyr/introduksjon-til-klinisk-utprøving-av-medisinsk-utstyr

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-25

  • Title

    Norway NOMA: no fees for IVD performance-study applications and notifications

    Url

    https://www.dmp.no/en/medical-devices/performance-studies-of-in-vitro-diagnostic-medical-devices/introduction-to-performance-studies-of-ivd-medical-devices

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-25

Reviewed On

2026-08-25

Amount Status

exact-current

Range Available

Yes

Additional certifications and licences · 1 record

These country-level records can cover multiple product types. Check each item's scope and conditions before applying a fee, pathway or licence to an IVD.

Open Norway certifications →
Slug

norway

Market

Norway

Confidence

high

Schemes
  • Id

    lvd-medical-exclusion-mdr-electrical-safety

    Name

    MDR electrical safety in place of the Low Voltage Directive

    Category

    Medical Electrical Safety

    Status

    Included In Medical Registration

    Object

    Finished Device

    Note

    Annex II of Directive 2014/35/EU places electrical equipment for radiology and medical purposes outside the Low Voltage Directive, so there is no separate national electrical-safety certificate for a medical device. Electrical safety is assessed inside the MDR conformity assessment against MDR Annex I, with the harmonised IEC/EN 60601 series carrying the presumption of conformity.

    Source Urls
    • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/35/oj
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    emc-directive-disapplied-by-mdr

    Name

    MDR electromagnetic compatibility in place of the EMC Directive

    Category

    emc

    Status

    Included In Medical Registration

    Object

    Finished Device

    Note

    Article 2(3) of Directive 2014/30/EU switches the EMC Directive off where other Union legislation lays the same essential requirements down more specifically, which MDR Annex I sections 18.5 and 18.6 do for medical devices. EMC is therefore dossier evidence inside the CE route and not a separate national EMC conformity step.

    Source Urls
    • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/30/oj
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    forskrift-377-2016-radio-market-access

    Name

    EEA radio equipment forskrift market access

    Category

    Radio Spectrum

    Status

    Mandatory If Feature

    Object

    Radio Equipment

    Note

    Norway implements Directive 2014/53/EU through the EEA Agreement in forskrift 15 April 2016 nr. 377, laid down by Nkom itself. §4 allows radio equipment to be made available on the market when it satisfies the §6 essential requirements and is correctly marked under §28, and to be put into service when it also is correctly installed, maintained and used as intended, with a frequency licence under the ekomlov chapter 11 where one is needed. §33 gives Nasjonal kommunikasjonsmyndighet supervision. The only extra Norwegian element is that spectrum licence, which is a use authorisation rather than a product approval.

    Source Binding

    unresolved

  • Id

    produktforskriften-kap-2a-rohs

    Name

    Produktforskriften chapter 2a substance restriction (RoHS)

    Category

    Environmental And Batteries

    Status

    Evidence Only No Separate Certificate

    Object

    Electrical Electronic Medical Device

    Note

    §2a-3 of the produktforskriften (FOR-2004-06-01-922) prohibits placing on the market and exporting electrical and electronic products where lead, mercury, hexavalent chromium, PBB, PBDE, DEHP, BBP, DBP or DIBP exceed 0.1 % by weight in homogeneous materials, or cadmium exceeds 0.01 %; §7-2 gives Miljødirektoratet supervision. Chapter 2a's vedlegg 2 carries exemptions specific to medisinsk utstyr and to monitoring and control instruments. Directive 2011/65/EU Annex I category 8 covers medical devices, Article 4(3) has bound medical devices since 22 July 2014 and in vitro diagnostic medical devices since 22 July 2016, and Article 2(4)(h) excludes active implantable medical devices.

    Source Urls
    • https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2004-06-01-922/KAPITTEL_3
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    avfallsforskriften-kap-1-returselskap-membership

    Name

    Returselskap membership and the EE register

    Category

    Environmental And Batteries

    Status

    Mandatory If Feature

    Object

    Producer Or Authorised Representative

    Note

    Norway's structure differs from the EU member states and the difference is load-bearing. §1-10 of the avfallsforskriften requires producers to finance collection, sorting and treatment of WEEE through membership of a collectively or individually financed returselskap approved by Miljødirektoratet, and §1-25 has Miljødirektoratet own a register covering all producers of EE products, which the returselskap populate under §1-19. The binding duty is therefore membership rather than direct registration, and chapter 1 contains no prohibition on placing equipment on the market for non-registration. Directive 2012/19/EU Article 2(4)(g) excludes devices expected to be infective before end of life and active implantable devices; other medical devices are in scope, and Article 16 requires each Member State to keep a producer register.

    Source Urls
    • https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2004-06-01-930/KAPITTEL_1
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    batteries-regulation-not-yet-in-norwegian-law

    Name

    Batteries Regulation not yet carried into Norwegian law

    Category

    Environmental And Batteries

    Status

    Transition Not Yet Mandatory

    Object

    Battery Producer Or Authorised Representative

    Note

    No Norwegian instrument implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 is in force and no Article 55 register has been designated. Miljødirektoratet's battery guidance states that the batteriforskrift will implement the Regulation but that the rules do not apply in Norway until the forskrift is adopted, which depends on incorporation of the Regulation into the EEA Agreement. The operative national rules remain avfallsforskriften chapter 3, whose §3-7 requires battery producers to discharge producer responsibility through membership of an approved returselskap, and produktforskriften chapter 2, both implementing the repealed Directive 2006/66/EC — which independently confirms the Regulation has not yet landed. Currency caveat: the guidance page still expects incorporation in spring 2025, so the EEA Joint Committee decisions should be re-checked before relying on the timing.

    Source Urls
    • https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/ansvarsomrader/avfall/for-naringsliv/batteriveilederen/
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    dsa-godkjenning-for-supply-and-medical-use

    Name

    DSA godkjenning for radiation source supply and medical use

    Category

    Ionizing Radiation

    Status

    Mandatory If Feature

    Object

    Radiation Source Sale Rental Or Medical Use

    Note

    Strålevernforskriften (FOR-2016-12-16-1659) § 9 letter r requires approval from the Direktoratet for strålevern og atomsikkerhet for selling and renting out radiation sources, which reaches the supplier rather than only the clinical user. The same section requires approval for acquiring and using radiotherapy equipment (f), healthcare X-ray apparatus including plain radiography, fluoroscopy, angiography and intervention, CT and mammography (g, with simple low-dose apparatus exempt), acquiring and administering radiopharmaceuticals (e), and manufacturing or importing radiopharmaceuticals (i). § 8 requires a written application giving the information DSA needs to set conditions.

    Source Urls
    • https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2016-12-16-1659
    Source Binding

    reviewed

  • Id

    dsa-mri-approval-and-source-notification

    Name

    DSA MRI approval and source notification

    Category

    Non Ionizing Radiation

    Status

    Mandatory If Feature

    Object

    Mri Or Notified Optical Radiation Source

    Note

    Strålevernforskriften § 9 letter s extends the approval duty to acquiring and using magnetic resonance imaging for medical purposes, a non-ionising requirement that has no EU equivalent. § 13 requires notification to DSA by undertakings that acquire, rent out, use or handle X-ray apparatus, accelerators and radioactive sources above the annex exemption limits when they are not approval-liable under § 9 or § 10, and by undertakings that rent out, acquire, use or handle class 4 lasers and intense pulsed light. The sources may not be taken into use until DSA confirms it has received the electronic notification.

    Source Urls
    • https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2016-12-16-1659
    Source Binding

    candidate

Official Sources
  • Authority

    EUR-Lex

    Topic

    Low Voltage Directive 2014/35/EU Annex II — electrical equipment for radiology and medical purposes outside scope

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/35/oj

  • Authority

    EUR-Lex

    Topic

    EMC Directive 2014/30/EU Article 2(3) — more specific Union legislation displaces the directive

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/30/oj

  • Authority

    EUR-Lex

    Topic

    RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Annex I category 8 and Article 4(3) medical-device application dates

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/65/oj

  • Authority

    EUR-Lex

    Topic

    WEEE Directive 2012/19/EU Article 2(4)(g) medical-device exclusions and Article 16 national producer register

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2012/19/oj

  • Authority

    EUR-Lex

    Topic

    Batteries Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 Articles 11 and 55 — medical-device removability derogation and producer register

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1542/oj

  • Authority

    Lovdata

    Topic

    Forskrift 2016-04-15-377 om EØS-krav til radioutstyr §§ 4 and 33

    Url

    https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2016-04-15-377

  • Authority

    Lovdata

    Topic

    Produktforskriften kapittel 2a § 2a-3 — RoHS substance prohibition for EE products

    Url

    https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2004-06-01-922/KAPITTEL_3

  • Authority

    Lovdata

    Topic

    Avfallsforskriften kapittel 1 §§ 1-10, 1-19 and 1-25 — returselskap membership and the EE register

    Url

    https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2004-06-01-930/KAPITTEL_1

  • Authority

    Miljødirektoratet

    Topic

    batteriveilederen — the Batteries Regulation does not apply in Norway until the forskrift is adopted

    Url

    https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/ansvarsomrader/avfall/for-naringsliv/batteriveilederen/

  • Authority

    Lovdata

    Topic

    strålevernforskriften — approval and notification duties for radiation sources and MRI

    Url

    https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2016-12-16-1659

Keep researching this market
View the Norway resource hub →
DJ Fang
Need to apply Norway's requirements to a product?
Confirm the current Norwegian Medical Products Agency pathway, evidence, and local-role details for the actual device before filing.
Pricing