Pure Global AI
Australia flag

Australia medical device regulations

Official sources linked

TGA rules and guidance for medical device market access, registration, and lifecycle compliance. Each code opens a metadata page with the official source and readable HTML when available.

10 documents3 categories100% linked to official sourcesauthority TGA2 readable HTML
0
No results
Try a broader term, or search by regulation code, agency, or jurisdiction instead.

Changes after registration in Australia

Source-linked rules for common changes to a registered IVD. Read the scope and conditions with each rule; unverified details are listed separately.

Does changing a device brand name or logo require an update?

A change to the registered brand name and a change to logo artwork can follow different rules. The legal manufacturer, device design and intended purpose remain the same.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Same kind and unchanged manufacturer responsibility

Fact-level verified

An ARTG variation must preserve the same kind of device: sponsor, manufacturer, GMDN, class and the applicable prescribed characteristics/UPI. For manufacturer name or address changes, TGA checks whether responsibility for design, production, packaging and labelling and the QMS remain the same. A same-entity office/name update with unchanged QMS can be accepted; changed control or QMS can require a new inclusion. A sponsor transfer is a different legal event.

Conditions
  • Map a brand or REF to actual public and dossier-held information; do not equate a commercial order code with UPI, model or UDI.
  • Retain the actual class and UPI criteria; the guidance allows selected UPI variations but does not remove the statutory same-kind test.
  • Unchanged QMS alone does not establish that a different responsible legal manufacturer is the same manufacturer for the statutory kind test. If that same-manufacturer criterion is no longer met, an ARTG variation cannot be used to bypass a new inclusion.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

IVD variation versus DCR

Fact-level verified

For Class 1-3 IVDs, adding a device of the kind that meets the notification criteria uses the IVD Variation form and the manufacturer Australian DoC. Existing ARTG information/performance or intended-purpose updates use DCR; the specified combined additional-device/intended-purpose case includes the replacement-purpose document. Do not delete an active IVD unless supply has ceased. Class 4 IVDs have a single UPI and do not use that IVD variation form. Wait for approval before implementing a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific review time

Variation evaluation has no general legislated clock

Fact-level verified

The current-linked TGA variation guide expressly says there is no legislated timeframe for evaluating an ARTG variation. Its 3-5-business-day target applies only to the stated Class III programming-software variation after the new hardware is approved. The reasonable information-request response period of at least ten working days is an applicant deadline, not a general evaluation SLA.

Conditions
  • Do not substitute initial ARTG inclusion or conformity-assessment timelines for a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

Brand/model UDI changes are distinct from an order REF

Fact-level verified

For a UDI medical device, Essential Principle 13C.2 treats the listed brand-name, model/version and packaging changes as a different type of model, with corresponding database identifiers. Changes made in the same production change are treated together; the pre-change device remains its prior type. Database timing depends on the applicable general start day and supply event. A commercial REF must first be mapped to these fields; UDI consequences do not themselves determine ARTG new-kind or variation classification.

Conditions
  • Select the actual UDI scope, class, start-day and supply dates; do not apply all future stages as current.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate optional export certificate after ARTG accuracy

Fact-level verified

If the importing country needs a certificate, the sponsor/authorised agent may seek CFS for current Australian-supply ARTG devices or Export Certificate for export-only entries. Correct ARTG details before applying; the exports team does not amend them. The form needs sponsor/client and ARTG/GMDN details, declaration and the applicable payment; one form/one optional schedule per certificate. More than five devices need a schedule, not automatic rejection. TGA aims for ten working days; this is a separate export service, not ordinary change approval or automatic certificate reissue.

Conditions
  • The current webpage and January 2026 form differ on payment method/details; use the current operational instructions before submitting.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific government fees

IVD variation fees by class and narrow exception

Fact-level verified

Current Schedule 9 item 2A (d) sets AUD 1982 for Class 3/4 IVD variation and (e) AUD 1133 for other IVD variation, each excluding the (g) case and data evaluation. Item (g) statutorily covers a medical device meeting all three EU-transition/sole-evidence-update/same-evidence conditions at AUD 215 per ten entries or part. The summary table describes (g) as non-IVD; preserve that discrepancy rather than impose the summary exclusion over the statute.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD manufacturer and sponsor label identity

Fact-level verified

The shared medical-device provisions expressly cover IVDs: Essential Principle 13 requires the applicable manufacturer name/trading name, address, device identity, lot/date and English information. Regulation 10.2 also requires readily identifiable sponsor name/address; added sponsor labels must not adulterate the device or obscure manufacturer information. These are information/location requirements, not a general old-label stock grace.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.

How do I update a manufacturer's name without changing the legal entity?

The same legal manufacturer changes its name, potentially alongside the device brand. A transfer to another legal entity is a separate question; permission to combine filings needs its own evidence.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Same kind and unchanged manufacturer responsibility

Fact-level verified

An ARTG variation must preserve the same kind of device: sponsor, manufacturer, GMDN, class and the applicable prescribed characteristics/UPI. For manufacturer name or address changes, TGA checks whether responsibility for design, production, packaging and labelling and the QMS remain the same. A same-entity office/name update with unchanged QMS can be accepted; changed control or QMS can require a new inclusion. A sponsor transfer is a different legal event.

Conditions
  • Map a brand or REF to actual public and dossier-held information; do not equate a commercial order code with UPI, model or UDI.
  • Retain the actual class and UPI criteria; the guidance allows selected UPI variations but does not remove the statutory same-kind test.
  • Unchanged QMS alone does not establish that a different responsible legal manufacturer is the same manufacturer for the statutory kind test. If that same-manufacturer criterion is no longer met, an ARTG variation cannot be used to bypass a new inclusion.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval

DCR batching is limited to the same request

Fact-level verified

One DCR may cover up to ten ARTG entries only where the requested change is the same for each entry. This is distinct from listing additional entries in a sponsor-transfer form and from the conditional 215-dollar evidence-update tariff. Separate approval prerequisites still apply; these provisions do not establish every transfer-plus-name/brand/REF event as one filing.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

IVD variation versus DCR

Fact-level verified

For Class 1-3 IVDs, adding a device of the kind that meets the notification criteria uses the IVD Variation form and the manufacturer Australian DoC. Existing ARTG information/performance or intended-purpose updates use DCR; the specified combined additional-device/intended-purpose case includes the replacement-purpose document. Do not delete an active IVD unless supply has ceased. Class 4 IVDs have a single UPI and do not use that IVD variation form. Wait for approval before implementing a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific review time

Variation evaluation has no general legislated clock

Fact-level verified

The current-linked TGA variation guide expressly says there is no legislated timeframe for evaluating an ARTG variation. Its 3-5-business-day target applies only to the stated Class III programming-software variation after the new hardware is approved. The reasonable information-request response period of at least ten working days is an applicant deadline, not a general evaluation SLA.

Conditions
  • Do not substitute initial ARTG inclusion or conformity-assessment timelines for a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

Brand/model UDI changes are distinct from an order REF

Fact-level verified

For a UDI medical device, Essential Principle 13C.2 treats the listed brand-name, model/version and packaging changes as a different type of model, with corresponding database identifiers. Changes made in the same production change are treated together; the pre-change device remains its prior type. Database timing depends on the applicable general start day and supply event. A commercial REF must first be mapped to these fields; UDI consequences do not themselves determine ARTG new-kind or variation classification.

Conditions
  • Select the actual UDI scope, class, start-day and supply dates; do not apply all future stages as current.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate optional export certificate after ARTG accuracy

Fact-level verified

If the importing country needs a certificate, the sponsor/authorised agent may seek CFS for current Australian-supply ARTG devices or Export Certificate for export-only entries. Correct ARTG details before applying; the exports team does not amend them. The form needs sponsor/client and ARTG/GMDN details, declaration and the applicable payment; one form/one optional schedule per certificate. More than five devices need a schedule, not automatic rejection. TGA aims for ten working days; this is a separate export service, not ordinary change approval or automatic certificate reissue.

Conditions
  • The current webpage and January 2026 form differ on payment method/details; use the current operational instructions before submitting.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific government fees

IVD variation fees by class and narrow exception

Fact-level verified

Current Schedule 9 item 2A (d) sets AUD 1982 for Class 3/4 IVD variation and (e) AUD 1133 for other IVD variation, each excluding the (g) case and data evaluation. Item (g) statutorily covers a medical device meeting all three EU-transition/sole-evidence-update/same-evidence conditions at AUD 215 per ten entries or part. The summary table describes (g) as non-IVD; preserve that discrepancy rather than impose the summary exclusion over the statute.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD manufacturer and sponsor label identity

Fact-level verified

The shared medical-device provisions expressly cover IVDs: Essential Principle 13 requires the applicable manufacturer name/trading name, address, device identity, lot/date and English information. Regulation 10.2 also requires readily identifiable sponsor name/address; added sponsor labels must not adulterate the device or obscure manufacturer information. These are information/location requirements, not a general old-label stock grace.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.

What changes when the manufacturer's office address changes?

An office address change for the same legal entity, potentially alongside name and brand changes. This does not cover moving a factory or manufacturing site, and a combined filing cannot be assumed.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Same kind and unchanged manufacturer responsibility

Fact-level verified

An ARTG variation must preserve the same kind of device: sponsor, manufacturer, GMDN, class and the applicable prescribed characteristics/UPI. For manufacturer name or address changes, TGA checks whether responsibility for design, production, packaging and labelling and the QMS remain the same. A same-entity office/name update with unchanged QMS can be accepted; changed control or QMS can require a new inclusion. A sponsor transfer is a different legal event.

Conditions
  • Map a brand or REF to actual public and dossier-held information; do not equate a commercial order code with UPI, model or UDI.
  • Retain the actual class and UPI criteria; the guidance allows selected UPI variations but does not remove the statutory same-kind test.
  • Unchanged QMS alone does not establish that a different responsible legal manufacturer is the same manufacturer for the statutory kind test. If that same-manufacturer criterion is no longer met, an ARTG variation cannot be used to bypass a new inclusion.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval

DCR batching is limited to the same request

Fact-level verified

One DCR may cover up to ten ARTG entries only where the requested change is the same for each entry. This is distinct from listing additional entries in a sponsor-transfer form and from the conditional 215-dollar evidence-update tariff. Separate approval prerequisites still apply; these provisions do not establish every transfer-plus-name/brand/REF event as one filing.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

IVD variation versus DCR

Fact-level verified

For Class 1-3 IVDs, adding a device of the kind that meets the notification criteria uses the IVD Variation form and the manufacturer Australian DoC. Existing ARTG information/performance or intended-purpose updates use DCR; the specified combined additional-device/intended-purpose case includes the replacement-purpose document. Do not delete an active IVD unless supply has ceased. Class 4 IVDs have a single UPI and do not use that IVD variation form. Wait for approval before implementing a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific review time

Variation evaluation has no general legislated clock

Fact-level verified

The current-linked TGA variation guide expressly says there is no legislated timeframe for evaluating an ARTG variation. Its 3-5-business-day target applies only to the stated Class III programming-software variation after the new hardware is approved. The reasonable information-request response period of at least ten working days is an applicant deadline, not a general evaluation SLA.

Conditions
  • Do not substitute initial ARTG inclusion or conformity-assessment timelines for a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

Brand/model UDI changes are distinct from an order REF

Fact-level verified

For a UDI medical device, Essential Principle 13C.2 treats the listed brand-name, model/version and packaging changes as a different type of model, with corresponding database identifiers. Changes made in the same production change are treated together; the pre-change device remains its prior type. Database timing depends on the applicable general start day and supply event. A commercial REF must first be mapped to these fields; UDI consequences do not themselves determine ARTG new-kind or variation classification.

Conditions
  • Select the actual UDI scope, class, start-day and supply dates; do not apply all future stages as current.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate optional export certificate after ARTG accuracy

Fact-level verified

If the importing country needs a certificate, the sponsor/authorised agent may seek CFS for current Australian-supply ARTG devices or Export Certificate for export-only entries. Correct ARTG details before applying; the exports team does not amend them. The form needs sponsor/client and ARTG/GMDN details, declaration and the applicable payment; one form/one optional schedule per certificate. More than five devices need a schedule, not automatic rejection. TGA aims for ten working days; this is a separate export service, not ordinary change approval or automatic certificate reissue.

Conditions
  • The current webpage and January 2026 form differ on payment method/details; use the current operational instructions before submitting.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific government fees

IVD variation fees by class and narrow exception

Fact-level verified

Current Schedule 9 item 2A (d) sets AUD 1982 for Class 3/4 IVD variation and (e) AUD 1133 for other IVD variation, each excluding the (g) case and data evaluation. Item (g) statutorily covers a medical device meeting all three EU-transition/sole-evidence-update/same-evidence conditions at AUD 215 per ten entries or part. The summary table describes (g) as non-IVD; preserve that discrepancy rather than impose the summary exclusion over the statute.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD manufacturer and sponsor label identity

Fact-level verified

The shared medical-device provisions expressly cover IVDs: Essential Principle 13 requires the applicable manufacturer name/trading name, address, device identity, lot/date and English information. Regulation 10.2 also requires readily identifiable sponsor name/address; added sponsor labels must not adulterate the device or obscure manufacturer information. These are information/location requirements, not a general old-label stock grace.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.

Does a catalogue or reference code change affect registration or UDI?

Check which identifier actually changes. A commercial catalogue, REF or order code is not automatically a device model, registered identifier, GTIN or UDI-DI. Rules for one identifier do not establish the route for another.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Same kind and unchanged manufacturer responsibility

Fact-level verified

An ARTG variation must preserve the same kind of device: sponsor, manufacturer, GMDN, class and the applicable prescribed characteristics/UPI. For manufacturer name or address changes, TGA checks whether responsibility for design, production, packaging and labelling and the QMS remain the same. A same-entity office/name update with unchanged QMS can be accepted; changed control or QMS can require a new inclusion. A sponsor transfer is a different legal event.

Conditions
  • Map a brand or REF to actual public and dossier-held information; do not equate a commercial order code with UPI, model or UDI.
  • Retain the actual class and UPI criteria; the guidance allows selected UPI variations but does not remove the statutory same-kind test.
  • Unchanged QMS alone does not establish that a different responsible legal manufacturer is the same manufacturer for the statutory kind test. If that same-manufacturer criterion is no longer met, an ARTG variation cannot be used to bypass a new inclusion.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval

DCR batching is limited to the same request

Fact-level verified

One DCR may cover up to ten ARTG entries only where the requested change is the same for each entry. This is distinct from listing additional entries in a sponsor-transfer form and from the conditional 215-dollar evidence-update tariff. Separate approval prerequisites still apply; these provisions do not establish every transfer-plus-name/brand/REF event as one filing.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

IVD variation versus DCR

Fact-level verified

For Class 1-3 IVDs, adding a device of the kind that meets the notification criteria uses the IVD Variation form and the manufacturer Australian DoC. Existing ARTG information/performance or intended-purpose updates use DCR; the specified combined additional-device/intended-purpose case includes the replacement-purpose document. Do not delete an active IVD unless supply has ceased. Class 4 IVDs have a single UPI and do not use that IVD variation form. Wait for approval before implementing a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific review time

Variation evaluation has no general legislated clock

Fact-level verified

The current-linked TGA variation guide expressly says there is no legislated timeframe for evaluating an ARTG variation. Its 3-5-business-day target applies only to the stated Class III programming-software variation after the new hardware is approved. The reasonable information-request response period of at least ten working days is an applicant deadline, not a general evaluation SLA.

Conditions
  • Do not substitute initial ARTG inclusion or conformity-assessment timelines for a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

Brand/model UDI changes are distinct from an order REF

Fact-level verified

For a UDI medical device, Essential Principle 13C.2 treats the listed brand-name, model/version and packaging changes as a different type of model, with corresponding database identifiers. Changes made in the same production change are treated together; the pre-change device remains its prior type. Database timing depends on the applicable general start day and supply event. A commercial REF must first be mapped to these fields; UDI consequences do not themselves determine ARTG new-kind or variation classification.

Conditions
  • Select the actual UDI scope, class, start-day and supply dates; do not apply all future stages as current.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate optional export certificate after ARTG accuracy

Fact-level verified

If the importing country needs a certificate, the sponsor/authorised agent may seek CFS for current Australian-supply ARTG devices or Export Certificate for export-only entries. Correct ARTG details before applying; the exports team does not amend them. The form needs sponsor/client and ARTG/GMDN details, declaration and the applicable payment; one form/one optional schedule per certificate. More than five devices need a schedule, not automatic rejection. TGA aims for ten working days; this is a separate export service, not ordinary change approval or automatic certificate reissue.

Conditions
  • The current webpage and January 2026 form differ on payment method/details; use the current operational instructions before submitting.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific government fees

IVD variation fees by class and narrow exception

Fact-level verified

Current Schedule 9 item 2A (d) sets AUD 1982 for Class 3/4 IVD variation and (e) AUD 1133 for other IVD variation, each excluding the (g) case and data evaluation. Item (g) statutorily covers a medical device meeting all three EU-transition/sole-evidence-update/same-evidence conditions at AUD 215 per ten entries or part. The summary table describes (g) as non-IVD; preserve that discrepancy rather than impose the summary exclusion over the statute.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD manufacturer and sponsor label identity

Fact-level verified

The shared medical-device provisions expressly cover IVDs: Essential Principle 13 requires the applicable manufacturer name/trading name, address, device identity, lot/date and English information. Regulation 10.2 also requires readily identifiable sponsor name/address; added sponsor labels must not adulterate the device or obscure manufacturer information. These are information/location requirements, not a general old-label stock grace.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.

Can several changes be filed together?

Changes to brand, manufacturer name, office address and reference codes may occur together, including with a real transfer to another legal manufacturer, registration holder or owner. Assess transfer with each single change, and transfer with brand plus reference, manufacturer name plus reference, or office address plus reference changes: seven transfer combinations in total. Evidence must establish the exact combination and the order of filings and approvals. These combinations and their sequence are not all verified by the rules below; a rule for one change does not prove that a single application, fee or review period covers the combination.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Same kind and unchanged manufacturer responsibility

Fact-level verified

An ARTG variation must preserve the same kind of device: sponsor, manufacturer, GMDN, class and the applicable prescribed characteristics/UPI. For manufacturer name or address changes, TGA checks whether responsibility for design, production, packaging and labelling and the QMS remain the same. A same-entity office/name update with unchanged QMS can be accepted; changed control or QMS can require a new inclusion. A sponsor transfer is a different legal event.

Conditions
  • Map a brand or REF to actual public and dossier-held information; do not equate a commercial order code with UPI, model or UDI.
  • Retain the actual class and UPI criteria; the guidance allows selected UPI variations but does not remove the statutory same-kind test.
  • Unchanged QMS alone does not establish that a different responsible legal manufacturer is the same manufacturer for the statutory kind test. If that same-manufacturer criterion is no longer met, an ARTG variation cannot be used to bypass a new inclusion.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Sponsor transfer and same-person name change

Fact-level verified

Under Regulations 10F/10FA, qualifying sponsor succession/assignment and sponsor-name events are notified in the approved manner within three months. An agreed business/interest transfer carries the inclusion to the new sponsor when the event occurs; it is not a discretionary transfer by a foreign manufacturer. A same sponsor with unchanged ABN/ACN uses the name form; changed ABN/ACN requires new organisation identification and the applicable transfer process.

Conditions
  • A true new legal manufacturer is separately assessed under manufacturer/QMS and same-kind rules; do not substitute a local sponsor change for that assessment.

Conditions for this question

  • Only if the local sponsor/registrant/company also changes; this does not substitute for a true foreign legal-manufacturer/product-owner transfer.
  • Filing route and prior approval

DCR batching is limited to the same request

Fact-level verified

One DCR may cover up to ten ARTG entries only where the requested change is the same for each entry. This is distinct from listing additional entries in a sponsor-transfer form and from the conditional 215-dollar evidence-update tariff. Separate approval prerequisites still apply; these provisions do not establish every transfer-plus-name/brand/REF event as one filing.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

IVD variation versus DCR

Fact-level verified

For Class 1-3 IVDs, adding a device of the kind that meets the notification criteria uses the IVD Variation form and the manufacturer Australian DoC. Existing ARTG information/performance or intended-purpose updates use DCR; the specified combined additional-device/intended-purpose case includes the replacement-purpose document. Do not delete an active IVD unless supply has ceased. Class 4 IVDs have a single UPI and do not use that IVD variation form. Wait for approval before implementing a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Combined filing
  • Supporting documents

Transfer documents and manufacturer-evidence sequence

Fact-level verified

The transfer form identifies both sponsors/client IDs, affected ARTG entries, event/date and declarations by authorised representatives; extra entries use an attached list. Submit after the transfer has occurred and identify pending variations. Manufacturer Evidence is not transferred with sponsorship: the new sponsor first obtains accepted evidence, then submits DCR to link it to the ARTG. That order is separate from the legal event transferring sponsorship.

Conditions for this question

  • Only if the local sponsor/registrant/company also changes; this does not substitute for a true foreign legal-manufacturer/product-owner transfer.
  • Only the expressly cited sequence or pending-application constraint is supported for the actual local role/process. This does not establish one combined application, total fee or shared approval date for a REF/brand/name/office/manufacturer-transfer tuple.
  • Change-specific government fees
  • Change-specific review time

Sponsor-notification processing target

Fact-level verified

There is no fee for the sponsor transfer/name notification itself. TGA says it normally updates the ARTG within ten working days of a fully completed, signed notification and any required information; the form describes this as an aim. This administrative processing target does not defer legal sponsorship responsibility until the record is updated or price additional ARTG variations.

Conditions for this question

  • Only if the local sponsor/registrant/company also changes; this does not substitute for a true foreign legal-manufacturer/product-owner transfer.
  • Change-specific review time

Variation evaluation has no general legislated clock

Fact-level verified

The current-linked TGA variation guide expressly says there is no legislated timeframe for evaluating an ARTG variation. Its 3-5-business-day target applies only to the stated Class III programming-software variation after the new hardware is approved. The reasonable information-request response period of at least ten working days is an applicant deadline, not a general evaluation SLA.

Conditions
  • Do not substitute initial ARTG inclusion or conformity-assessment timelines for a variation.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

Brand/model UDI changes are distinct from an order REF

Fact-level verified

For a UDI medical device, Essential Principle 13C.2 treats the listed brand-name, model/version and packaging changes as a different type of model, with corresponding database identifiers. Changes made in the same production change are treated together; the pre-change device remains its prior type. Database timing depends on the applicable general start day and supply event. A commercial REF must first be mapped to these fields; UDI consequences do not themselves determine ARTG new-kind or variation classification.

Conditions
  • Select the actual UDI scope, class, start-day and supply dates; do not apply all future stages as current.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate optional export certificate after ARTG accuracy

Fact-level verified

If the importing country needs a certificate, the sponsor/authorised agent may seek CFS for current Australian-supply ARTG devices or Export Certificate for export-only entries. Correct ARTG details before applying; the exports team does not amend them. The form needs sponsor/client and ARTG/GMDN details, declaration and the applicable payment; one form/one optional schedule per certificate. More than five devices need a schedule, not automatic rejection. TGA aims for ten working days; this is a separate export service, not ordinary change approval or automatic certificate reissue.

Conditions
  • The current webpage and January 2026 form differ on payment method/details; use the current operational instructions before submitting.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Change-specific government fees

IVD variation fees by class and narrow exception

Fact-level verified

Current Schedule 9 item 2A (d) sets AUD 1982 for Class 3/4 IVD variation and (e) AUD 1133 for other IVD variation, each excluding the (g) case and data evaluation. Item (g) statutorily covers a medical device meeting all three EU-transition/sole-evidence-update/same-evidence conditions at AUD 215 per ten entries or part. The summary table describes (g) as non-IVD; preserve that discrepancy rather than impose the summary exclusion over the statute.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
  • Labels and identifiers

IVD manufacturer and sponsor label identity

Fact-level verified

The shared medical-device provisions expressly cover IVDs: Essential Principle 13 requires the applicable manufacturer name/trading name, address, device identity, lot/date and English information. Regulation 10.2 also requires readily identifiable sponsor name/address; added sponsor labels must not adulterate the device or obscure manufacturer information. These are information/location requirements, not a general old-label stock grace.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply only the actual change and legal actor described in this fact; the question does not make every potential filing compulsory.
Regulation codes

What these codes are

Each row above represents one regulatory instrument. Its code is the authority’s identifier. A regulation page collects the metadata and official source; when readable HTML is available, article links can open and highlight the exact cited passage.

Use this market context

Continue from regulations into practical research

Keep Australia as the target market while you move into registration records, classification, cross-country product research, or pathway planning.

Keep researching this market
View the Australia resource hub →
Compare regulations across all countries →
Tracked from official TGA publications · row IDs are stable — cite as regulations:australia:au-animal-origin