Pure Global AI
Brazil flag

Brazil medical device regulations

Official sources linked

ANVISA rules and guidance for medical device market access, registration, and lifecycle compliance. Each code opens a metadata page with the official source and readable HTML when available.

37 documents8 categories100% linked to official sourcesauthority ANVISA37 readable HTML
CodeRegulationCategoryEffectiveProvenance
RDC 903/2024
RDC 903/2024 — transfers and company-data changes
Complete eight-page official Espírito Santo health-secretariat hosted expression of ANVISA RDC 903/2024. It addresses corporate/commercial operations with unchanged technical-sanitary conditions; Article3 excludes unrelated corporate-name changes. The federal DOU publication controls. This source does not establish one route for every device/IVD change or later currentness.
RegistrationSeptember 9, 2024Official
RDC 857/2024
RDC 857/2024 — sanitary-surveillance fee collection procedures
Complete ANVISA Legis native HTML expression, including every operative paragraph and native table row/cell/span in source order. The served page declares UTF-8 but appends a Latin1-encoded nonoperative editorial disclaimer; its three replacement characters are preserved as publisher artifacts, not silently repaired. Operative legal text is intact. The controlling publication is the federal DOU; scope and later currentness require separate verification. Source explicitly identifies DOU publication May8,2024 and corrected republication May9,2024; selected expression retains the republication note.
RegistrationJune 3, 2024Official
RDC 830/2023
In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Medical Devices
Regulation for IVD medical devices including classification (Class I-IV), registration pathways, self-testing requirements, and companion diagnostics. Replaced RDC 36/2015.
RegistrationJune 1, 2024Official
RDC 743/2022
RDC 743/2022 — risk classifications and decision-period annexes
Complete ANVISA Legis native HTML expression, including every operative paragraph and native table row/cell/span in source order. The served page declares UTF-8 but appends a Latin1-encoded nonoperative editorial disclaimer; its three replacement characters are preserved as publisher artifacts, not silently repaired. Operative legal text is intact. The controlling publication is the federal DOU; scope and later currentness require separate verification.
RegistrationSeptember 1, 2022Official
IN 74/2020
Instrução Normativa No. 74/2020 — change-control annexes
Complete ANVISA Legis native HTML expression of IN 74/2020, including both change-control annexes for scoped medical-device and IVD subjects. The publisher states that its text does not replace the official Gazette publication. Later amendments/currentness and subject-specific applicability require separate verification.
RegistrationSeptember 18, 2020Official
8007
Documentos de Instrução — 8007 - IVD – Alteração de registro – Implementação imediata – Nome comercial de produto
Complete official public checklist legal form, preserving its title, blank Área label, exact subject, all document requirements, legal basis, electronic-signature/IFU instructions and warning text in source order. Two presentation tables are explicitly unwrapped; only the independently captured and viewed warning-symbol icon and two final navigation rows are omitted. No publication/effectiveness date is stated. Subject-specific immediate-implementation checklist for an IVD product trade-name change; no universal route inferred for other changes.
Registration—Official
80074
Documentos de Instrução — 80074 - IVD - Transferência de titularidade de registro de produto
Complete official public checklist legal form, preserving its title, blank Área label, exact subject, all document requirements, legal basis, electronic-signature/IFU instructions and warning text in source order. Two presentation tables are explicitly unwrapped; only the independently captured and viewed warning-symbol icon and two final navigation rows are omitted. No publication/effectiveness date is stated. Product-registration holder-transfer checklist under RDC903/2024; corporate/commercial-operation and authorization evidence remain subject-specific.
Registration—Official
80078
Documentos de Instrução — 80078 - IVD - Transferência de titularidade de registro de família de produtos
Complete official public checklist legal form, preserving its title, blank Área label, exact subject, all document requirements, legal basis, electronic-signature/IFU instructions and warning text in source order. Two presentation tables are explicitly unwrapped; only the independently captured and viewed warning-symbol icon and two final navigation rows are omitted. No publication/effectiveness date is stated. Product-family-registration holder-transfer checklist under RDC903/2024; do not treat family grouping as a universal combined-change procedure.
Registration—Official
8011
Documentos de Instrução — 8011 - IVD – Alteração de registro – Implementação imediata – Fabricante legal do produto, sem alteração no processo fabril.
Complete official public checklist legal form, preserving its title, blank Área label, exact subject, all document requirements, legal basis, electronic-signature/IFU instructions and warning text in source order. Two presentation tables are explicitly unwrapped; only the independently captured and viewed warning-symbol icon and two final navigation rows are omitted. No publication/effectiveness date is stated. Legal-manufacturer change without manufacturing-process change. Preserve the additional prior-approval manufacturing-site filing where the replacement manufacturer is also the manufacturing unit.
Registration—Official
80198
Documentos de Instrução — 80198 - IVD – Alteração de notificação – Implementação imediata.
Complete official public checklist legal form, preserving its title, blank Área label, exact subject, all document requirements, legal basis, electronic-signature/IFU instructions and warning text in source order. Two presentation tables are explicitly unwrapped; only the independently captured and viewed warning-symbol icon and two final navigation rows are omitted. No publication/effectiveness date is stated. IVD notification change subject; preserve risk-class-II applicability of the impacted technical-dossier item and every not-applicable-document condition.
Registration—Official
8020
Documentos de Instrução — 8020 - IVD – Alteração de registro – Implementação imediata – Razão social da empresa estrangeira fabricante legal ou unidade fabril
Complete official public checklist legal form, preserving its title, blank Área label, exact subject, all document requirements, legal basis, electronic-signature/IFU instructions and warning text in source order. Two presentation tables are explicitly unwrapped; only the independently captured and viewed warning-symbol icon and two final navigation rows are omitted. No publication/effectiveness date is stated. Only the social/legal name of the foreign legal manufacturer or manufacturing unit changes; the source expressly excludes address/process changes and corporate operations from this subject.
Registration—Official
RDC 830/2023 — official SESA-hosted reprint
Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada - RDC nº 830, de 06/12/2023 — SESA-hosted expression
Complete 20-page Portuguese RDC 830/2023 expression hosted by the Espírito Santo government health secretariat, preserving the actual Anvisalegis print header dated 28 May 2025, all operative text and complete final dossier-table note. ANVISA is the instrument issuer; SESA is the official hosting authority. This is another source expression of the already catalogued RDC 830 instrument, not a new law or an alias of the older 391905-byte held PDF. The print date is not an enactment, publication, effective or consolidated-through date. All tables, footers, amendment-context wording and original layout remain authoritative in the mandatory images. Source-only/currentness unverified; no fact, fee, clock, binding or answer-status upgrade.
Registration—Official
ANVISA RDC 830/2023 Q&A — edition 2
Perguntas & Respostas — RDC nº 830, de 6 de dezembro de 2023, 2ª edição
Complete 29-page official ANVISA IVD Q&A, second edition. The cover prints Brasília, 10 January 2025, while the edition-history table and official download filename identify 14 January 2025; both source dates are preserved without choosing a publication or effective date. The guide is explanatory and non-binding. All questions, answers, coloured source additions, edition history and institutional credits are retained as original page images with qualified native search text. Source-only; no certification of current 2026 law, no new fact, fee, timeline, binding or question-status promotion.
Registration—Official
Exports carry source + retrieval date

Changes after registration in Brazil

Source-linked rules for common changes to a registered IVD. Read the scope and conditions with each rule; unverified details are listed separately.

Does changing a device brand name or logo require an update?

A change to the registered brand name and a change to logo artwork can follow different rules. The legal manufacturer, device design and intended purpose remain the same.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Immediate subjects distinguish names from identifiers

Fact-level verified

IN 74 Annex II lists commercial-name changes and foreign legal-manufacturer or factory corporate-name changes as immediate subjects. For equipment and materials it also expressly lists commercial-model name/code changes. The IVD rows separately list commercial name, commercial presentation and legal manufacturer without a manufacturing-process change; the equipment model/code wording must not be applied automatically to an IVD orderable REF.

Conditions
  • Use the actual product sector and its petition subject; an internal order code is not automatically the commercial model or registered presentation.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Classify an ordinary alteration before implementation

Fact-level verified

Changes to notification or registration are approval-required, immediate, or non-reportable. Classes I/II use immediate implementation except non-reportable changes. Minor non-technical images, layout, symbols or text without added risk, and contact/postal-address updates, can be non-reportable when they do not change the design; control them in the holder’s quality system and incorporate them into later petitions. A trade-name change is not automatically a logo-artwork exemption.

Conditions
  • Device identity, intended purpose, manufacturing process and legal person must be established. A new factory or legal manufacturer must be assessed separately.
  • Change-specific government fees

TFVS depends on the alteration subject and company size

Fact-level verified

RDC 857 Annex I7.9.1 sets product-registration alteration/inclusion factor 738 DV2 at BRL3514.32,2987.17,2460.02,1405.73,351.43 or175.72 by company-size column. The separate label/IFU alteration item7.9.2 factor 742 DV0 is exempt. Map the actual petition subject to its factor; a commercial-name or manufacturer change is not automatically a label-only exempt petition.

Conditions
  • Company size, subject code and any statutory exemption determine the actual GRU. This is not a portfolio-wide single fee.
  • Change-specific review time

Listed alteration decision periods are not all implementation dates

Fact-level verified

RDC 743’s Annex lists 30 days for the enumerated immediate device/IVD alteration subjects and 150 days for approval-required subjects; the latter rows exclude tacit approval. These are printed as days, not expressly working days. MD Art. 22 as replaced by RDC 777, and IVD RDC 830 Art. 22, provide publication independently of documentary review without printing the old 30-day publication phrase. Do not treat the table as a guaranteed pre-implementation wait or as approval for any combined transfer.

Conditions
  • The Annex retains historical RDC 340 cross-references. The actual listed subject, full instruction and express authority deadline govern.
  • Change-specific review time

Approval clocks depend on a complete instruction

Fact-level verified

Under Decree 10178 Arts. 10–15, the approval period starts when all necessary instruction elements are submitted; the authority must state the deadline. A documentary-complement request can suspend the clock, with the stated new-fact exception. These provisions do not create a universal 60-day or 90-day device alteration period.

  • Labels and identifiers

Commercial-name UDI rules do not identify an internal REF

Fact-level verified

RDC 591 Annex II2.9 as amended by RDC 884 requires a new UDI-DI where a change could create identification ambiguity, and expressly for trade/commercial-model name changes. Under2.12 a label change solely to add UDI is not itself a regularization-change petition. A customer’s internal REF is not automatically a commercial model or UDI-DI; establish what registered and issued identifiers actually change.

Conditions
  • Apply the class/product implementation stage and current SIUD suspension list; operation of SIUD is not a universal mandatory reporting date.
  • Supporting documents
  • Supporting documents

Registered IVD commercial-name checklist

Fact-level verified

Registered IVD commercial-name change subject 8007 requires updated primary/secondary label images, updated IFU/manual, a digitally signed technical-responsible declaration listing the changes, and affected portions of the technical dossier.

  • Supporting documents

Notified IVD alteration materials

Fact-level verified

For subject 80198, submit primary/secondary labels and an updated IFU highlighting changes, or justified no-impact documents, plus the technical-responsible signed change declaration. Affected technical-dossier portions are required by this list for class II. A change of notification holder is governed separately by the new-notification rule.

  • Labels and identifiers
  • Existing stock and transition

Finished stock and unused label stock have different limits

Fact-level verified

For an ordinary alteration, old and new finished-device versions may be imported and sold until expiry or the end of useful life. Unused packaging, labels and IFUs may be exhausted for 120 days from publication of the alteration. Changes made to resolve safety or performance problems are excluded from both permissions. The publication trigger does not create an implementation-date clock for an unpublished non-reportable artwork change.

Conditions
  • These are ordinary alteration rules. Holder transfers follow RDC 903 instead.

How do I update a manufacturer's name without changing the legal entity?

The same legal manufacturer changes its name, potentially alongside the device brand. A transfer to another legal entity is a separate question; permission to combine filings needs its own evidence.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Immediate subjects distinguish names from identifiers

Fact-level verified

IN 74 Annex II lists commercial-name changes and foreign legal-manufacturer or factory corporate-name changes as immediate subjects. For equipment and materials it also expressly lists commercial-model name/code changes. The IVD rows separately list commercial name, commercial presentation and legal manufacturer without a manufacturing-process change; the equipment model/code wording must not be applied automatically to an IVD orderable REF.

Conditions
  • Use the actual product sector and its petition subject; an internal order code is not automatically the commercial model or registered presentation.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Classify an ordinary alteration before implementation

Fact-level verified

Changes to notification or registration are approval-required, immediate, or non-reportable. Classes I/II use immediate implementation except non-reportable changes. Minor non-technical images, layout, symbols or text without added risk, and contact/postal-address updates, can be non-reportable when they do not change the design; control them in the holder’s quality system and incorporate them into later petitions. A trade-name change is not automatically a logo-artwork exemption.

Conditions
  • Device identity, intended purpose, manufacturing process and legal person must be established. A new factory or legal manufacturer must be assessed separately.
  • Change-specific government fees

TFVS depends on the alteration subject and company size

Fact-level verified

RDC 857 Annex I7.9.1 sets product-registration alteration/inclusion factor 738 DV2 at BRL3514.32,2987.17,2460.02,1405.73,351.43 or175.72 by company-size column. The separate label/IFU alteration item7.9.2 factor 742 DV0 is exempt. Map the actual petition subject to its factor; a commercial-name or manufacturer change is not automatically a label-only exempt petition.

Conditions
  • Company size, subject code and any statutory exemption determine the actual GRU. This is not a portfolio-wide single fee.
  • Change-specific review time

Listed alteration decision periods are not all implementation dates

Fact-level verified

RDC 743’s Annex lists 30 days for the enumerated immediate device/IVD alteration subjects and 150 days for approval-required subjects; the latter rows exclude tacit approval. These are printed as days, not expressly working days. MD Art. 22 as replaced by RDC 777, and IVD RDC 830 Art. 22, provide publication independently of documentary review without printing the old 30-day publication phrase. Do not treat the table as a guaranteed pre-implementation wait or as approval for any combined transfer.

Conditions
  • The Annex retains historical RDC 340 cross-references. The actual listed subject, full instruction and express authority deadline govern.
  • Change-specific review time

Approval clocks depend on a complete instruction

Fact-level verified

Under Decree 10178 Arts. 10–15, the approval period starts when all necessary instruction elements are submitted; the authority must state the deadline. A documentary-complement request can suspend the clock, with the stated new-fact exception. These provisions do not create a universal 60-day or 90-day device alteration period.

  • Labels and identifiers

Commercial-name UDI rules do not identify an internal REF

Fact-level verified

RDC 591 Annex II2.9 as amended by RDC 884 requires a new UDI-DI where a change could create identification ambiguity, and expressly for trade/commercial-model name changes. Under2.12 a label change solely to add UDI is not itself a regularization-change petition. A customer’s internal REF is not automatically a commercial model or UDI-DI; establish what registered and issued identifiers actually change.

Conditions
  • Apply the class/product implementation stage and current SIUD suspension list; operation of SIUD is not a universal mandatory reporting date.
  • Combined filing

Registered change petitions do not absorb unrequested subjects

Fact-level verified

The official registered-device alteration FAQ says that a petition permits only its requested alteration item and other inserted alterations are disregarded. This must be read with the legal rule requiring an interdependent immediate change to accompany the approval-required change. It does not authorize combining every name/address/REF/holder change into one fee or decision.

  • Supporting documents
  • Supporting documents

Foreign IVD corporate-name change is a narrow subject

Fact-level verified

Subject8020 is exclusively a foreign legal-manufacturer or manufacturing-unit corporate-name change. Supply label/IFU updates or justified no-impact statements, the manufacturer’s reason document, the imported legal-manufacturer authorization where its name changes, the updated Anvisa GMP certificate or protocol where the plant name changes, and affected dossier sections. Address/process changes use their pertinent subjects; corporate purchase, sale, merger or division is a manufacturer/site change, not this name-only subject.

  • Supporting documents

Notified IVD alteration materials

Fact-level verified

For subject 80198, submit primary/secondary labels and an updated IFU highlighting changes, or justified no-impact documents, plus the technical-responsible signed change declaration. Affected technical-dossier portions are required by this list for class II. A change of notification holder is governed separately by the new-notification rule.

  • Labels and identifiers
  • Existing stock and transition

Finished stock and unused label stock have different limits

Fact-level verified

For an ordinary alteration, old and new finished-device versions may be imported and sold until expiry or the end of useful life. Unused packaging, labels and IFUs may be exhausted for 120 days from publication of the alteration. Changes made to resolve safety or performance problems are excluded from both permissions. The publication trigger does not create an implementation-date clock for an unpublished non-reportable artwork change.

Conditions
  • These are ordinary alteration rules. Holder transfers follow RDC 903 instead.
  • Combined filing

Interdependent alterations follow the approval-required petition

Fact-level verified

An immediate alteration that is interdependent with an approval-required alteration must be filed jointly with it and incorporated into that petition. Approval-required changes take effect only after the final decision is published in the Diário Oficial da União.

What changes when the manufacturer's office address changes?

An office address change for the same legal entity, potentially alongside name and brand changes. This does not cover moving a factory or manufacturing site, and a combined filing cannot be assumed.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Immediate subjects distinguish names from identifiers

Fact-level verified

IN 74 Annex II lists commercial-name changes and foreign legal-manufacturer or factory corporate-name changes as immediate subjects. For equipment and materials it also expressly lists commercial-model name/code changes. The IVD rows separately list commercial name, commercial presentation and legal manufacturer without a manufacturing-process change; the equipment model/code wording must not be applied automatically to an IVD orderable REF.

Conditions
  • Use the actual product sector and its petition subject; an internal order code is not automatically the commercial model or registered presentation.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Classify an ordinary alteration before implementation

Fact-level verified

Changes to notification or registration are approval-required, immediate, or non-reportable. Classes I/II use immediate implementation except non-reportable changes. Minor non-technical images, layout, symbols or text without added risk, and contact/postal-address updates, can be non-reportable when they do not change the design; control them in the holder’s quality system and incorporate them into later petitions. A trade-name change is not automatically a logo-artwork exemption.

Conditions
  • Device identity, intended purpose, manufacturing process and legal person must be established. A new factory or legal manufacturer must be assessed separately.
  • Change-specific government fees

TFVS depends on the alteration subject and company size

Fact-level verified

RDC 857 Annex I7.9.1 sets product-registration alteration/inclusion factor 738 DV2 at BRL3514.32,2987.17,2460.02,1405.73,351.43 or175.72 by company-size column. The separate label/IFU alteration item7.9.2 factor 742 DV0 is exempt. Map the actual petition subject to its factor; a commercial-name or manufacturer change is not automatically a label-only exempt petition.

Conditions
  • Company size, subject code and any statutory exemption determine the actual GRU. This is not a portfolio-wide single fee.
  • Change-specific review time

Listed alteration decision periods are not all implementation dates

Fact-level verified

RDC 743’s Annex lists 30 days for the enumerated immediate device/IVD alteration subjects and 150 days for approval-required subjects; the latter rows exclude tacit approval. These are printed as days, not expressly working days. MD Art. 22 as replaced by RDC 777, and IVD RDC 830 Art. 22, provide publication independently of documentary review without printing the old 30-day publication phrase. Do not treat the table as a guaranteed pre-implementation wait or as approval for any combined transfer.

Conditions
  • The Annex retains historical RDC 340 cross-references. The actual listed subject, full instruction and express authority deadline govern.
  • Change-specific review time

Approval clocks depend on a complete instruction

Fact-level verified

Under Decree 10178 Arts. 10–15, the approval period starts when all necessary instruction elements are submitted; the authority must state the deadline. A documentary-complement request can suspend the clock, with the stated new-fact exception. These provisions do not create a universal 60-day or 90-day device alteration period.

  • Labels and identifiers

Commercial-name UDI rules do not identify an internal REF

Fact-level verified

RDC 591 Annex II2.9 as amended by RDC 884 requires a new UDI-DI where a change could create identification ambiguity, and expressly for trade/commercial-model name changes. Under2.12 a label change solely to add UDI is not itself a regularization-change petition. A customer’s internal REF is not automatically a commercial model or UDI-DI; establish what registered and issued identifiers actually change.

Conditions
  • Apply the class/product implementation stage and current SIUD suspension list; operation of SIUD is not a universal mandatory reporting date.
  • Combined filing

Registered change petitions do not absorb unrequested subjects

Fact-level verified

The official registered-device alteration FAQ says that a petition permits only its requested alteration item and other inserted alterations are disregarded. This must be read with the legal rule requiring an interdependent immediate change to accompany the approval-required change. It does not authorize combining every name/address/REF/holder change into one fee or decision.

  • Supporting documents
  • Supporting documents

Foreign IVD corporate-name change is a narrow subject

Fact-level verified

Subject8020 is exclusively a foreign legal-manufacturer or manufacturing-unit corporate-name change. Supply label/IFU updates or justified no-impact statements, the manufacturer’s reason document, the imported legal-manufacturer authorization where its name changes, the updated Anvisa GMP certificate or protocol where the plant name changes, and affected dossier sections. Address/process changes use their pertinent subjects; corporate purchase, sale, merger or division is a manufacturer/site change, not this name-only subject.

  • Supporting documents

Notified IVD alteration materials

Fact-level verified

For subject 80198, submit primary/secondary labels and an updated IFU highlighting changes, or justified no-impact documents, plus the technical-responsible signed change declaration. Affected technical-dossier portions are required by this list for class II. A change of notification holder is governed separately by the new-notification rule.

  • Labels and identifiers
  • Existing stock and transition

Finished stock and unused label stock have different limits

Fact-level verified

For an ordinary alteration, old and new finished-device versions may be imported and sold until expiry or the end of useful life. Unused packaging, labels and IFUs may be exhausted for 120 days from publication of the alteration. Changes made to resolve safety or performance problems are excluded from both permissions. The publication trigger does not create an implementation-date clock for an unpublished non-reportable artwork change.

Conditions
  • These are ordinary alteration rules. Holder transfers follow RDC 903 instead.
  • Combined filing

Interdependent alterations follow the approval-required petition

Fact-level verified

An immediate alteration that is interdependent with an approval-required alteration must be filed jointly with it and incorporated into that petition. Approval-required changes take effect only after the final decision is published in the Diário Oficial da União.

Does a catalogue or reference code change affect registration or UDI?

Check which identifier actually changes. A commercial catalogue, REF or order code is not automatically a device model, registered identifier, GTIN or UDI-DI. Rules for one identifier do not establish the route for another.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Immediate subjects distinguish names from identifiers

Fact-level verified

IN 74 Annex II lists commercial-name changes and foreign legal-manufacturer or factory corporate-name changes as immediate subjects. For equipment and materials it also expressly lists commercial-model name/code changes. The IVD rows separately list commercial name, commercial presentation and legal manufacturer without a manufacturing-process change; the equipment model/code wording must not be applied automatically to an IVD orderable REF.

Conditions
  • Use the actual product sector and its petition subject; an internal order code is not automatically the commercial model or registered presentation.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Classify an ordinary alteration before implementation

Fact-level verified

Changes to notification or registration are approval-required, immediate, or non-reportable. Classes I/II use immediate implementation except non-reportable changes. Minor non-technical images, layout, symbols or text without added risk, and contact/postal-address updates, can be non-reportable when they do not change the design; control them in the holder’s quality system and incorporate them into later petitions. A trade-name change is not automatically a logo-artwork exemption.

Conditions
  • Device identity, intended purpose, manufacturing process and legal person must be established. A new factory or legal manufacturer must be assessed separately.
  • Change-specific government fees

TFVS depends on the alteration subject and company size

Fact-level verified

RDC 857 Annex I7.9.1 sets product-registration alteration/inclusion factor 738 DV2 at BRL3514.32,2987.17,2460.02,1405.73,351.43 or175.72 by company-size column. The separate label/IFU alteration item7.9.2 factor 742 DV0 is exempt. Map the actual petition subject to its factor; a commercial-name or manufacturer change is not automatically a label-only exempt petition.

Conditions
  • Company size, subject code and any statutory exemption determine the actual GRU. This is not a portfolio-wide single fee.
  • Change-specific review time

Listed alteration decision periods are not all implementation dates

Fact-level verified

RDC 743’s Annex lists 30 days for the enumerated immediate device/IVD alteration subjects and 150 days for approval-required subjects; the latter rows exclude tacit approval. These are printed as days, not expressly working days. MD Art. 22 as replaced by RDC 777, and IVD RDC 830 Art. 22, provide publication independently of documentary review without printing the old 30-day publication phrase. Do not treat the table as a guaranteed pre-implementation wait or as approval for any combined transfer.

Conditions
  • The Annex retains historical RDC 340 cross-references. The actual listed subject, full instruction and express authority deadline govern.
  • Change-specific review time

Approval clocks depend on a complete instruction

Fact-level verified

Under Decree 10178 Arts. 10–15, the approval period starts when all necessary instruction elements are submitted; the authority must state the deadline. A documentary-complement request can suspend the clock, with the stated new-fact exception. These provisions do not create a universal 60-day or 90-day device alteration period.

  • Labels and identifiers

Commercial-name UDI rules do not identify an internal REF

Fact-level verified

RDC 591 Annex II2.9 as amended by RDC 884 requires a new UDI-DI where a change could create identification ambiguity, and expressly for trade/commercial-model name changes. Under2.12 a label change solely to add UDI is not itself a regularization-change petition. A customer’s internal REF is not automatically a commercial model or UDI-DI; establish what registered and issued identifiers actually change.

Conditions
  • Apply the class/product implementation stage and current SIUD suspension list; operation of SIUD is not a universal mandatory reporting date.
  • Combined filing

Registered change petitions do not absorb unrequested subjects

Fact-level verified

The official registered-device alteration FAQ says that a petition permits only its requested alteration item and other inserted alterations are disregarded. This must be read with the legal rule requiring an interdependent immediate change to accompany the approval-required change. It does not authorize combining every name/address/REF/holder change into one fee or decision.

  • Supporting documents
  • Supporting documents

Notified IVD alteration materials

Fact-level verified

For subject 80198, submit primary/secondary labels and an updated IFU highlighting changes, or justified no-impact documents, plus the technical-responsible signed change declaration. Affected technical-dossier portions are required by this list for class II. A change of notification holder is governed separately by the new-notification rule.

  • Labels and identifiers
  • Existing stock and transition

Finished stock and unused label stock have different limits

Fact-level verified

For an ordinary alteration, old and new finished-device versions may be imported and sold until expiry or the end of useful life. Unused packaging, labels and IFUs may be exhausted for 120 days from publication of the alteration. Changes made to resolve safety or performance problems are excluded from both permissions. The publication trigger does not create an implementation-date clock for an unpublished non-reportable artwork change.

Conditions
  • These are ordinary alteration rules. Holder transfers follow RDC 903 instead.
  • Combined filing

Interdependent alterations follow the approval-required petition

Fact-level verified

An immediate alteration that is interdependent with an approval-required alteration must be filed jointly with it and incorporated into that petition. Approval-required changes take effect only after the final decision is published in the Diário Oficial da União.

Can several changes be filed together?

Changes to brand, manufacturer name, office address and reference codes may occur together, including with a real transfer to another legal manufacturer, registration holder or owner. Assess transfer with each single change, and transfer with brand plus reference, manufacturer name plus reference, or office address plus reference changes: seven transfer combinations in total. Evidence must establish the exact combination and the order of filings and approvals. These combinations and their sequence are not all verified by the rules below; a rule for one change does not prove that a single application, fee or review period covers the combination.

  • Filing route and prior approval

Immediate subjects distinguish names from identifiers

Fact-level verified

IN 74 Annex II lists commercial-name changes and foreign legal-manufacturer or factory corporate-name changes as immediate subjects. For equipment and materials it also expressly lists commercial-model name/code changes. The IVD rows separately list commercial name, commercial presentation and legal manufacturer without a manufacturing-process change; the equipment model/code wording must not be applied automatically to an IVD orderable REF.

Conditions
  • Use the actual product sector and its petition subject; an internal order code is not automatically the commercial model or registered presentation.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Registered holder succession differs from a notified product

Fact-level verified

For an unchanged registered product, the successor’s holder-transfer petition and predecessor’s cancellation petition must be filed concurrently within 180 days of the registered corporate act or asset-transfer contract, subject to the separate Mercosur trigger. Late petitions are refused. Products subject to notification or exemption are not transferred: the successor makes a new notification or regularization. A simple same-person corporate-name change is excluded from this transaction regime.

Conditions
  • Determine whether the foreign manufacturer, Brazilian holder, or both actually change legal person. A foreign corporate transaction does not by itself transfer the Brazilian registration.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Classify an ordinary alteration before implementation

Fact-level verified

Changes to notification or registration are approval-required, immediate, or non-reportable. Classes I/II use immediate implementation except non-reportable changes. Minor non-technical images, layout, symbols or text without added risk, and contact/postal-address updates, can be non-reportable when they do not change the design; control them in the holder’s quality system and incorporate them into later petitions. A trade-name change is not automatically a logo-artwork exemption.

Conditions
  • Device identity, intended purpose, manufacturing process and legal person must be established. A new factory or legal manufacturer must be assessed separately.
  • Combined filing
  • Filing route and prior approval

Interdependent alterations follow the approval-required petition

Fact-level verified

An immediate alteration that is interdependent with an approval-required alteration must be filed jointly with it and incorporated into that petition. Approval-required changes take effect only after the final decision is published in the Diário Oficial da União.

  • Combined filing
  • Supporting documents

Transfer documents and pending applications

Fact-level verified

Transfer requires the signed petition form, GRU proof of TFVS payment/exemption, Annex I transaction declaration and updated operating/sanitary licence. Pending initial applications are updated by an amendment rather than a transfer of an issued registration. Pending post-registration petitions transfer only when declared in Annex I; unlisted petitions are closed. Holder-only label/IFU updates may be implemented after transfer approval.

  • Supporting documents

Corporate operations can require separate AFE and GMP updates

Fact-level verified

RDC 903 Arts. 7–14 require the applicable company-authorization and GMP/distribution-certificate updates following corporate/commercial operations. A new legal person or unregularized successor needs initial AFE/AE as applicable. For a qualifying unchanged production line, CBPF update preserves certificate validity; an exclusively foreign operation is petitioned by the current certification applicant. Art. 13 lists the form, existing certificate, transaction declaration, applicable updated AFE publication, and successor-country GMP certificate or competent-authority transaction attestation for a foreign operation.

Conditions
  • Actual technical/sanitary characteristics and the entire affected production line must meet Art. 12. These establishment/certification acts are distinct from product-holder transfer and product alterations.
  • Change-specific government fees

TFVS depends on the alteration subject and company size

Fact-level verified

RDC 857 Annex I7.9.1 sets product-registration alteration/inclusion factor 738 DV2 at BRL3514.32,2987.17,2460.02,1405.73,351.43 or175.72 by company-size column. The separate label/IFU alteration item7.9.2 factor 742 DV0 is exempt. Map the actual petition subject to its factor; a commercial-name or manufacturer change is not automatically a label-only exempt petition.

Conditions
  • Company size, subject code and any statutory exemption determine the actual GRU. This is not a portfolio-wide single fee.
  • Change-specific government fees

Transfer TFVS is affected by successor size

Fact-level verified

RDC 857 Art. 10 conditions holder transfer on any positive TFVS difference associated with the successor’s economic size and provides no refund if it is smaller. Simultaneous renewal and later transfer use the specified size-reference dates; a later transfer also triggers the alteration charge. Calculate the actual petition and size difference rather than assuming an ordinary label-only exemption.

  • Change-specific review time

Listed alteration decision periods are not all implementation dates

Fact-level verified

RDC 743’s Annex lists 30 days for the enumerated immediate device/IVD alteration subjects and 150 days for approval-required subjects; the latter rows exclude tacit approval. These are printed as days, not expressly working days. MD Art. 22 as replaced by RDC 777, and IVD RDC 830 Art. 22, provide publication independently of documentary review without printing the old 30-day publication phrase. Do not treat the table as a guaranteed pre-implementation wait or as approval for any combined transfer.

Conditions
  • The Annex retains historical RDC 340 cross-references. The actual listed subject, full instruction and express authority deadline govern.
  • Change-specific review time

Approval clocks depend on a complete instruction

Fact-level verified

Under Decree 10178 Arts. 10–15, the approval period starts when all necessary instruction elements are submitted; the authority must state the deadline. A documentary-complement request can suspend the clock, with the stated new-fact exception. These provisions do not create a universal 60-day or 90-day device alteration period.

  • Labels and identifiers
  • Existing stock and transition

Transfer stock has its own effective-date sequence

Fact-level verified

The successor is responsible for remaining finished stock. Finished stock produced before the individual transfer/cancellation resolutions take effect may be imported or sold for at most180 days after that effective date. Outdated packaging cannot be used for new lots produced afterwards. Unless otherwise stated, those individual resolutions take effect90 days after publication. These180/90-day periods are stock/effect rules, not agency review periods.

  • Labels and identifiers

Commercial-name UDI rules do not identify an internal REF

Fact-level verified

RDC 591 Annex II2.9 as amended by RDC 884 requires a new UDI-DI where a change could create identification ambiguity, and expressly for trade/commercial-model name changes. Under2.12 a label change solely to add UDI is not itself a regularization-change petition. A customer’s internal REF is not automatically a commercial model or UDI-DI; establish what registered and issued identifiers actually change.

Conditions
  • Apply the class/product implementation stage and current SIUD suspension list; operation of SIUD is not a universal mandatory reporting date.
  • Labels and identifiers

Product holder transfer precedes SIUD transfer

Fact-level verified

IN 426 Art. 8 requires completion of the formal RDC 903 holder transfer before SIUD data transfer; successor data are transmitted for the new registration numbers within 30 days after the individual transfer/cancellation resolutions take effect. Art. 7§3 separately gives30 calendar days from publication for replacement where the change requires a new UDI-DI. These data deadlines are not agency variation-review periods.

Conditions
  • Actual product/class reporting applicability and any published product-specific suspension must be checked.
  • Combined filing

Registered change petitions do not absorb unrequested subjects

Fact-level verified

The official registered-device alteration FAQ says that a petition permits only its requested alteration item and other inserted alterations are disregarded. This must be read with the legal rule requiring an interdependent immediate change to accompany the approval-required change. It does not authorize combining every name/address/REF/holder change into one fee or decision.

  • Supporting documents
  • Supporting documents

Registered IVD commercial-name checklist

Fact-level verified

Registered IVD commercial-name change subject 8007 requires updated primary/secondary label images, updated IFU/manual, a digitally signed technical-responsible declaration listing the changes, and affected portions of the technical dossier.

  • Supporting documents

Foreign IVD corporate-name change is a narrow subject

Fact-level verified

Subject8020 is exclusively a foreign legal-manufacturer or manufacturing-unit corporate-name change. Supply label/IFU updates or justified no-impact statements, the manufacturer’s reason document, the imported legal-manufacturer authorization where its name changes, the updated Anvisa GMP certificate or protocol where the plant name changes, and affected dossier sections. Address/process changes use their pertinent subjects; corporate purchase, sale, merger or division is a manufacturer/site change, not this name-only subject.

  • Supporting documents

IVD legal-manufacturer replacement without process change

Fact-level verified

Subject8011 requires updated labels and IFU, a technical-responsible signed change declaration identifying the manufacturer, the apostilled/consularized imported-manufacturer authorization and GMP undertaking, and affected dossier sections. Multiple legal manufacturers need same-group proof. If the legal manufacturer is itself the factory, include the updated Anvisa GMP certificate or protocol and also file the approval-required manufacturing-site alteration.

Conditions
  • The manufacturing process must remain unchanged; corporate succession does not dispense with the manufacturer/site branch.
  • Supporting documents

IVD product and family transfer lists

Fact-level verified

IVD transfer subject 80074 (product) and80078 (family) require the RDC 903 Annex I declaration digitally signed by legal and technical responsibles, the updated operating/sanitary licence and an Anvisa GMP certificate in the successor’s name or its application protocol. Parent RDC 903 Art. 30 also requires the petition form and TFVS payment/exemption. The family subject is not proof that an arbitrary collection of products qualifies as a family.

Regulation codes

What these codes are

Each row above represents one regulatory instrument. Its code is the authority’s identifier. A regulation page collects the metadata and official source; when readable HTML is available, article links can open and highlight the exact cited passage.

RDC

Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada

A Collegiate Board Resolution is ANVISA’s primary binding regulation. The number is sequential within the year (RDC 751/2022 is resolution 751 issued in 2022).

IN

Instrução Normativa

A Normative Instruction details how an RDC is applied — procedures, timelines, or documentary requirements. It does not replace the parent RDC.

Use this market context

Continue from regulations into practical research

Keep Brazil as the target market while you move into registration records, classification, cross-country product research, or pathway planning.

Keep researching this market
View the Brazil resource hub →
Compare regulations across all countries →
Tracked from official ANVISA publications · row IDs are stable — cite as regulations:brazil:anvisa-notified-device-change-faq