Pure Global AI
Ecuador flag

Ecuador medical device regulations

Official sources linked

ARCSA rules and guidance for medical device market access, registration, and lifecycle compliance. Each code opens a metadata page with the official source and readable HTML when available.

21 documents4 categories100% linked to official sourcesauthority ARCSA21 readable HTML
CodeRegulationCategoryEffectiveProvenance
ARCSA-DE-2026-001A-DASP
Importer and distributor inclusion: transitional and continuing registration regime
Signed ARCSA original establishing the importer/distributor inclusion regime linked to COMEX017-2025. Eight physical scan pages: all seven nonblank pages fully visually transcribed and full-page figures preserved; final page blank. Article2 separates transition-per-application treatment from10% per additional importer after transition. Identifier independently established from the exact ARCSA-linked official filename, not from a visible scan-body heading. Signing/effectiveness6January2026 is visible onpage7.
RegistrationJanuary 6, 2026Official
Resolución COMEX No.017-2025
COMEX amendment requiring ARCSA authorization for use or transfer of sanitary registrations
Seven-page signed COMEX original directly linked by ARCSA. Adopted3December2025, effective9December2025. Prohibits endorsements/cessions/transfers lacking ARCSA authorization; does not prohibit every authorized transfer. Article1 and transitional provisions are onpp6–7.
RegistrationDecember 9, 2025Official
ARCSA-DE-004-2017-CFMR
Device primary-package labeling amendment — complete ARCSA instrument within original Gazette964
Complete original ARCSA-DE-004-2017-CFMR amendment on physical and printed pages26–28 of the 48-page Registro Oficial No.964 of16March2017. The ARCSA instrument begins on page26 right column and closes on page28 right column before the separate BCE decision. Complete full-page source images retain adjacent INEN/BCE publication context, which is not a medical-device rule. Raw wholeGazette48pages retained. This historical amendment concerns primary-package labeling under the026/2016framework and is not a current consolidated law or a universal IVD-label rule. No source-only archiving claim promotes currentness, fees, clocks or completed questions.
Labeling—Official
ARCSA-DE-026-2016-YMIH
Device registration regulation — complete ARCSA instrument within original Gazette921
Complete ARCSA-DE-026-2016-YMIH instrument within physical and printed pages 1–15 of the original 32-page Suplemento del Registro Oficial No.921 of 12 January 2017, retained from government Corte Constitucional storage. ARCSA begins in the right column of page1 and concludes in the left column of page15; the adjacent postal Resolution058 on the final right column is retained as page-image context and is not a medical-device rule. The entire32page raw Gazette is archived, but unrelated postal/telephone instruments beyond the ARCSA boundary are excluded from the public projection. This original government publication is distinct from the agency-hosted 15page digitized excerpt bearing a LEXIS panel and digitization warning. Complete original page images govern; exact native text is qualified page search support including adjacent column context. No present-day consolidated/currentness, fee or completed-question claim.
Registration—Official
ARCSA-DE-030-2018-JCGO
2018 Medical Device Registration Amendment — Complete Signed Agency Original
Complete 12-page scanned signed agency original of ARCSA-DE-030-2018-JCGO, published through the exact matching row/file link in the February2019 official LOTAIP index. Includes Articles1–16, the complete original MD/IVD table, transitory, repeal and final provisions, and the visible signature/date20December2018. All PDF bytes and all12 original page images are retained. No native text exists; the reader has original image-authoritative pages with an honestly empty native search layer. Private derived OCR is not source text or citation proof. This is neither draft0XX-2018 nor033-2017 signed/Gazette156, and is not Gazette416. No current applicability, absolute effective date or question coverage is established.
Registration—Official
ARCSA-DE-033-2017-FMRH
Device registration framework amendment — complete signed agency PDF
Complete five-page official agency PDF expression of ARCSA-DE-033-2017-FMRH. Pages1–4 have native text; page5 is a scanned closing and handwritten signature dated26December2017, whose visible text is not available in the native search layer. Every original page image is preserved and governs. The agency URL filename includes socializacion; the actual signed closing page is retained with that provenance rather than inferring draft or final status from the filename. This agency expression is distinct from the separately identified Gazette156 publication of9January2018, whose full government original has not been obtained in this collection. It is a historical amendment of the026/2016device framework; no present consolidated law, currentness, fee, reviewclock or completed-question claim.
Registration—Official
ARCSA-DE-2023-001-VSVZ
Device registration framework amendment — complete agency-hosted Gazette252 instrument excerpt
Complete ARCSA-DE-2023-001-VSVZ amendment within an agency-hosted12physicalpage Gazette252 excerpt: cover plus printedpages10–20, with the complete instrument projected on physical2–12. The full Gazette issue is49pages and is not held by this excerpt. Original held GET receipt and bytes are reused; source retrieval limitations remain explicit. This is the published2023amendment to the026/2016device framework, not the different ARCSA-DE-2023-001-AKRG establishment-permit instrument, and not a current consolidation. No present-day applicability, source-only legal-date inference, fees, clocks or completed-question promotion.
Registration—Official
ARCSA-DE-2023-016-AKRG
National Technovigilance System — complete ARCSA instrument within original Gazette334
Complete ARCSA-DE-2023-016-AKRG instrument on physical and printed pages 2–32 of the original 99-page Suplemento del Registro Oficial No.334 of 19 June 2023. Full raw Gazette bytes, government storage URL and cover are retained; unrelated disaster-management and banking instruments beginning on page 33 are excluded from the medical-device projection. This is the government-published original expression, distinct from the agency-hosted 15-page LEXIS edited text under the legacy metadata URL. Complete original page images govern; native text is qualified search support. No currentness, absolute effective-date or question-answer promotion.
Vigilance—Official
ARCSA-DE-2023-033-AKRG
Amendment to the human-use medical-device sanitary-registration regulation
Complete twenty-three-page official ARCSA resolution amending the sanitary-registration regulation for human-use medical devices and the establishments in which they are manufactured. The government-branded source, full amendment text and original layouts are retained. It is not a present-day consolidation; printed wider health-law context does not extend drug-specific provisions to medical devices or IVD. Complete original page images govern; any native text remains a qualified, potentially incomplete search layer. No current-law, whole-country or completed-question determination.
Registration—Official
ARCSA-DE-2024-048-DASP
Advertising and promotion regulation — complete agency-hosted Gazette727 excerpt
Complete 27-physical-page agency-hosted PDF excerpt containing the Gazette727 cover and printed pages 24–49, with the complete ARCSA-DE-2024-048-DASP advertising and promotion instrument. The whole Gazette issue contains 82 pages and is not held by this excerpt. The Gazette cover and final printed-page header establish publication on 22 January 2025; the resolution closing records adoption on 13 December 2024. This source expression does not compute an effective date or promote current applicability, device-specific change routes or question completeness.
Labeling—Official
ARCSA-DE-2026-003-DASP
Substitute device registration regulation — complete signed agency PDF
Complete 48-page signed agency PDF expression of ARCSA-DE-2026-003-DASP. All original page images and raw PDF bytes are retained, including the NDM017 two-cell table and visible electronic signature. This is a separate complete source expression; the historical reader projection under ecuador-arcsa-2026-003-transition and its 96 citation anchors remain unchanged. Legacy ellipsis punctuation, table reading order and signature differences are not characterized as whitespace or byte equality. Adoption is printed as 28 April 2026. This source capture does not independently establish publication, absolute effective date or present legal applicability.
General—Official
ARCSA-DE-2026-026-DASP
2026 Natural Medicinal Products Amendment with Express Medical Device Repeals — Complete Instrument in Gazette347 Excerpt
Complete38-page agency-hosted Gazette347 excerpt: original cover/sumario printed1–2 and the entire ARCSA-DE-2026-026-DASP instrument printed24–59(physical3–38). Cover identifies a71-page issue; this file is not the whole Gazette. The principal instrument amends natural medicinal products rules. Only express repeal provisions at physical37/printed58 identify medical-device ARCSA-DE-2026-003-DASP Article29(e) and Article51(a); natural-product provisions are not represented as MD/IVD requirements. Complete native text and all38 original page images, including the dated signature physical38/printed59, are retained. Adoption28July2026/publication14August2026 remain source evidence; no absolute effective date, current status, filing route, fee or question conclusion is inferred.
Registration—Official
ARCSA fee schedule 2026
Current ARCSA2026 fee schedule: medical devices and relevant common services
Official2026ARCSAtariff; complete12-page raw original archived. Corpus selects physical1,2,3,9,10 including the MD/IVDestablishmenttable continuation onpage3, registrationbasefees andcommonmodificationrules. All5selectedpages independentlyread andactuallyviewed; fulloriginaltables preserved asmandatorypagefigures. This is a selectedpageprojection, notfull12pagetext.
Registration—Official
ARCSA-DE-2023-005-AKRG
Notification directives for human-use medical-device registrations — complete ARCSA resolution within Gazette272
Complete ARCSA-DE-2023-005-AKRG resolution and its Annex1 as officially published on physical pages 2–14 of the fifty-page Suplemento del Registro Oficial No.272 of 20 March 2023. The original full Gazette bytes are retained; the separate real-estate resolution on pages 15–50 is excluded from the public medical-device projection. This is the original published expression, not an amended present-day consolidation or the commercially edited copy. Complete selected original page images govern; native text is a qualified potentially incomplete search layer. No current-law, fee, universally applicable change route or completed-question determination.
Registration—Official
IE-B.3.2.1-DM-02, Version 2.0
Medical-device registration notification procedure and supporting documents
Notification routes NDM01–NDM016, mixed filing limits, documents, correction and payment steps. Source has11physical pages, with cover then printed pages3–12; literal code spacing/leading zero varies in the original.
Registration—Official
IE-B.3.2.1-DM-01, Version 6.0
Medical-device registration, renewal and modification requirements, including Annex4
Full47-page official instruction including all four annexes. Annex4 physicalpp34–47 (printed1–14) specifies brand/name/address/model, product-owner and applicant changes. Office-only address events must be mapped to actual legal role before selecting notification vs modification.
Registration—Official
ARCSA-004-12-02
Official medical-device and IVD registration modification service instructions
Full13-page signed government service export, body explicitly says information updated12July2024. Includes16notification categories, filing steps, per-modification fee and zero-fee notifications. Export filename timestamp is not a legal date.
Registration—Official
Exports carry source + retrieval date

Changes after registration in Ecuador

Source-linked rules for common changes to a registered IVD. Read the scope and conditions with each rule; unverified details are listed separately.

Does changing a device brand name or logo require an update?

A change to the registered brand name and a change to logo artwork can follow different rules. The legal manufacturer, device design and intended purpose remain the same.

  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

Modification filing framework and document formalities

Fact-level verified

DM01 Annex 4 requires the sanitary-registration holder to seek ARCSA authorization immediately with technical justification, electronically through VUE/ECUAPASS. Applicant data must match the operating permit and relevant activity. Technical documents are in Spanish or English and listed in an electronically signed letter from the Ecuador technical responsible person. Foreign legal documents require the stated apostille/consular formalities unless electronically issued and verifiable on the issuer website; other languages require the specified qualified translation. Listed modification cases do not themselves create a new registration number.

Conditions
  • This is the February 2024 instruction under the 2016 norm as amended in 2023, not the norm taking effect in 2027.
  • The quoted 2018-based 10% sentence is not used here as a universal 2026 fee; see the separately sourced 2026 tariff.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-36 — Annex 4 sections 2 and 4; also pdf-page-37. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Actual commercial-name/brand or substantive label modification under the applicable Annex 4 case.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers
  • Free sale certificate impact

Brand and commercial-name modification evidence

Fact-level verified

Annex 4 section 4.1 treats commercial-name changes separately from section 4.18 brand change/inclusion/exclusion. Commercial-name evidence includes updated Spanish labeling (with the biomedical-equipment marking exception), owner certification of the name change and unchanged quality/specifications, the specified domestic/foreign legal evidence, updated insert/manual/technical sheet, and legalized CLV bearing the new name. Brand evidence includes updated label, a justification letter issued by the titular or manufacturer, and, for foreign products when applicable, competent-authority CLV/equivalent declaring the new brand with the stated legalization.

Conditions
  • The commercial-name and brand requirements must be applied to the actual change; neither is reduced to cosmetic NDM06 merely because the underlying device is unchanged.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-37 — Annex 4 sections 4.1 and 4.18; also pdf-page-38, pdf-page-43. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Distinguish product commercial name from brand; retain foreign/domestic, CLV-when-applicable and biomedical marking conditions.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers

NDM06 cosmetic label/IFU notification

Fact-level verified

DM02 NDM06 covers label/insert/manual updates that do not modify approved information content and concern form only, except updates requested by ARCSA as stated in the table. For insert/manual and label changes, supply a detailed justification, a current/proposed comparison and the proposed insert/manual or label respectively. This source does not convert changed brand/manufacturer/model content into a cosmetic notification.

Conditions
  • The no-impact notification definition and conditions in DM02 sections 2-5 apply.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-9 — Table 1, NDM06. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Only form-only changes with unchanged approved content; consider the explicit ARCSA-requested-update exception.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Notification deadline and applicant cure period

Fact-level verified

DM02 requires listed notification events to be notified within sixty working days after they occur; “término” is defined as working days. An unfavorable notification-document review is returned once for applicant correction within five working days, otherwise the application is cancelled; a second unfavorable review also requires abandonment/re-filing as specified. Mixed-filing review depends on complexity, risk and device type. These are notification filing/cure rules, not an empirical best/expected/worst approval duration or a fixed authority review promise.

Conditions
  • Only qualifying DM02 notifications and their stated review steps; not a deadline to authorize substantive modifications.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-4 — Sections 3(b),(g), 4 and 5.1(g)-(i); also pdf-page-5, pdf-page-6. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Only an eligible NDM06 cosmetic notification; no claim about substantive brand-modification approval time.
  • Applicant notification/cure deadlines are not an authority approval duration; review-time remains unanswered by this evidence.
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers

Label/insert modification and unchanged remainder

Fact-level verified

Annex 4 allows only the label/insert changes corresponding to the modification requested; the rest must match prior approval, otherwise file the corresponding label/insert update. Section 4.15 requires changed insert/manual, an explanatory letter and current/proposed comparison. Section 4.16 requires new label artwork, explanatory letter (with the stated biomedical-equipment exception/marking requirements) and current/proposed comparison. Cosmetic-only NDM06 is a separate narrow notification branch.

Conditions
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-37 — Annex 4 section 2, sections 4.15-4.16; also pdf-page-42, pdf-page-43. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Where this actual change entails label/insert updates, retain unrelated approved information; separately file substantive additional updates.
  • Change-specific government fees

2026 modification fee classification

Fact-level verified

The 2026 tariff page 10 distinguishes specified modifications requiring technical analysis at 20% of the applicable registration amount from enumerated non-analytical modifications at 10%; its 10% list includes product-name and manufacturer/applicant company-name changes. The residual provision charges modifications not listed in Ministerial Agreement 112 at 10%, subject to the express exceptions, including sanitary-registration notifications governed by the applicable product rules. The listed brand-inclusion row expressly concerns foods/cosmetics and is not a device-brand fee rule. Page 9 lists different registration bases: national medical devices USD 678.25, foreign medical devices USD 904.34 and biochemical reagents USD 678.25; it does not establish that every IVD is a biochemical reagent.

Conditions
  • Classify the actual change and applicable product/registration base before calculating; do not assume every modification is 10% or every combined filing has one fee.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-10 — Modification groups 3-4; residual rule; registration base rows; also pdf-page-9. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Product-name changes are listed at 10%; device-brand changes require the applicable residual/analysis classification rather than the food/cosmetic brand row.
  • Supporting documents
  • Existing stock and transition

Stock notification after previously approved changes

Fact-level verified

DM02 NDM09 concerns stock exhaustion for changes previously approved. The table requires a justification letter describing the reason and the requirements established by the applicable current rule. This passage proves a conditional notification channel after change approval; it does not establish an automatic stock sell-through grace period, the permitted duration, or permission to implement an unapproved change.

Conditions
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-9 — Table 1, NDM09; also pdf-page-10. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • The relevant change must already have been approved; stock duration and eligibility require the separate applicable rule.

How do I update a manufacturer's name without changing the legal entity?

The same legal manufacturer changes its name, potentially alongside the device brand. A transfer to another legal entity is a separate question; permission to combine filings needs its own evidence.

  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

Modification filing framework and document formalities

Fact-level verified

DM01 Annex 4 requires the sanitary-registration holder to seek ARCSA authorization immediately with technical justification, electronically through VUE/ECUAPASS. Applicant data must match the operating permit and relevant activity. Technical documents are in Spanish or English and listed in an electronically signed letter from the Ecuador technical responsible person. Foreign legal documents require the stated apostille/consular formalities unless electronically issued and verifiable on the issuer website; other languages require the specified qualified translation. Listed modification cases do not themselves create a new registration number.

Conditions
  • This is the February 2024 instruction under the 2016 norm as amended in 2023, not the norm taking effect in 2027.
  • The quoted 2018-based 10% sentence is not used here as a universal 2026 fee; see the separately sourced 2026 tariff.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-36 — Annex 4 sections 2 and 4; also pdf-page-37. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Manufacturer company-name modification under section 4.6; distinguish an actual manufacturer replacement.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers
  • Free sale certificate impact

Manufacturer company-name evidence

Fact-level verified

Annex 4 section 4.6 requires updated manufacturer-name labels (subject to the biomedical marking exception), foreign competent-authority CLV/equivalent certifying the company-name change with legalization or domestic chamber/mercantile evidence, a manufacturing contract bearing the new name when applicable, and the specified BPM/ISO 13485 evidence. The supporting quality certificate must justify the company-name change without change to the facilities’ address. This is distinct from replacing the principal manufacturer under section 4.3.

Conditions
  • Actor is the manufacturer; do not substitute product-owner or registration-holder company-name requirements.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-39 — Annex 4 section 4.6; also pdf-page-40. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Company-name change with no facility-address change; actual manufacturer replacement is a separate case.
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers

Label/insert modification and unchanged remainder

Fact-level verified

Annex 4 allows only the label/insert changes corresponding to the modification requested; the rest must match prior approval, otherwise file the corresponding label/insert update. Section 4.15 requires changed insert/manual, an explanatory letter and current/proposed comparison. Section 4.16 requires new label artwork, explanatory letter (with the stated biomedical-equipment exception/marking requirements) and current/proposed comparison. Cosmetic-only NDM06 is a separate narrow notification branch.

Conditions
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-37 — Annex 4 section 2, sections 4.15-4.16; also pdf-page-42, pdf-page-43. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Where this actual change entails label/insert updates, retain unrelated approved information; separately file substantive additional updates.
  • Change-specific government fees

2026 modification fee classification

Fact-level verified

The 2026 tariff page 10 distinguishes specified modifications requiring technical analysis at 20% of the applicable registration amount from enumerated non-analytical modifications at 10%; its 10% list includes product-name and manufacturer/applicant company-name changes. The residual provision charges modifications not listed in Ministerial Agreement 112 at 10%, subject to the express exceptions, including sanitary-registration notifications governed by the applicable product rules. The listed brand-inclusion row expressly concerns foods/cosmetics and is not a device-brand fee rule. Page 9 lists different registration bases: national medical devices USD 678.25, foreign medical devices USD 904.34 and biochemical reagents USD 678.25; it does not establish that every IVD is a biochemical reagent.

Conditions
  • Classify the actual change and applicable product/registration base before calculating; do not assume every modification is 10% or every combined filing has one fee.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-10 — Modification groups 3-4; residual rule; registration base rows; also pdf-page-9. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Manufacturer company-name change is listed in the non-analytical 10% group; not actual manufacturer replacement.

What changes when the manufacturer's office address changes?

An office address change for the same legal entity, potentially alongside name and brand changes. This does not cover moving a factory or manufacturing site, and a combined filing cannot be assumed.

  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

Modification filing framework and document formalities

Fact-level verified

DM01 Annex 4 requires the sanitary-registration holder to seek ARCSA authorization immediately with technical justification, electronically through VUE/ECUAPASS. Applicant data must match the operating permit and relevant activity. Technical documents are in Spanish or English and listed in an electronically signed letter from the Ecuador technical responsible person. Foreign legal documents require the stated apostille/consular formalities unless electronically issued and verifiable on the issuer website; other languages require the specified qualified translation. Listed modification cases do not themselves create a new registration number.

Conditions
  • This is the February 2024 instruction under the 2016 norm as amended in 2023, not the norm taking effect in 2027.
  • The quoted 2018-based 10% sentence is not used here as a universal 2026 fee; see the separately sourced 2026 tariff.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-36 — Annex 4 sections 2 and 4; also pdf-page-37. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Manufacturer/site address modification under the applicable actor-specific case; office-only cases may instead qualify for DM02 notification.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers
  • Free sale certificate impact

Manufacturer-address modification evidence

Fact-level verified

Annex 4 section 4.9 requires foreign competent-authority CLV/equivalent certifying the address change with legalization, ISO/BPM showing the new address, updated internal/external labels (biomedical marking exception), a manufacturer-address notification letter, and a domestic operating permit showing the new address for national manufacture. If the event also changes manufacturing process, the holder must file a process-update modification. Section 4.8 separately governs a product owner’s address when that owner is the principal manufacturer/site.

Conditions
  • Do not equate a legal-office address change, physical factory relocation and new manufacturing-site inclusion. Resolve the actual actor and facility facts before selecting a case.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-40 — Annex 4 sections 4.8-4.9. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Apply manufacturer-address section 4.9 or product-owner/manufacturer section 4.8 to the actual actor; process changes need the additional process branch.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents
  • Free sale certificate impact

Office-address notifications depend on actor

Fact-level verified

DM02 NDM05 covers a product-owner address change only when that owner is not the principal manufacturer or manufacturing site. Domestic evidence includes explanatory letter and operating permit at the new address; foreign evidence includes explanatory letter, competent-authority CLV/equivalent when applicable with the stated legalization/verifiable-electronic exception, and a power stating the new address and the holder’s powers. NDM07 covers a domestic registration-holder/applicant address only when it is not the principal manufacturer/site, with notification letter and updated operating permit. The corresponding manufacturer/site address cases are modifications under DM01.

Conditions
  • An “office address” description alone does not establish notification eligibility. Resolve product owner versus holder/applicant versus actual manufacturer/site.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-8 — Table 1, NDM05 and NDM07; also pdf-page-9. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Only a qualifying owner or domestic holder/applicant office-address event; not the actual principal manufacturer/site.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Notification deadline and applicant cure period

Fact-level verified

DM02 requires listed notification events to be notified within sixty working days after they occur; “término” is defined as working days. An unfavorable notification-document review is returned once for applicant correction within five working days, otherwise the application is cancelled; a second unfavorable review also requires abandonment/re-filing as specified. Mixed-filing review depends on complexity, risk and device type. These are notification filing/cure rules, not an empirical best/expected/worst approval duration or a fixed authority review promise.

Conditions
  • Only qualifying DM02 notifications and their stated review steps; not a deadline to authorize substantive modifications.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-4 — Sections 3(b),(g), 4 and 5.1(g)-(i); also pdf-page-5, pdf-page-6. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Only an eligible NDM05/NDM07 actor-specific office-address notification.
  • Applicant notification/cure deadlines are not an authority approval duration; review-time remains unanswered by this evidence.
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers

Label/insert modification and unchanged remainder

Fact-level verified

Annex 4 allows only the label/insert changes corresponding to the modification requested; the rest must match prior approval, otherwise file the corresponding label/insert update. Section 4.15 requires changed insert/manual, an explanatory letter and current/proposed comparison. Section 4.16 requires new label artwork, explanatory letter (with the stated biomedical-equipment exception/marking requirements) and current/proposed comparison. Cosmetic-only NDM06 is a separate narrow notification branch.

Conditions
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-37 — Annex 4 section 2, sections 4.15-4.16; also pdf-page-42, pdf-page-43. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Where this actual change entails label/insert updates, retain unrelated approved information; separately file substantive additional updates.
  • Change-specific government fees

2026 modification fee classification

Fact-level verified

The 2026 tariff page 10 distinguishes specified modifications requiring technical analysis at 20% of the applicable registration amount from enumerated non-analytical modifications at 10%; its 10% list includes product-name and manufacturer/applicant company-name changes. The residual provision charges modifications not listed in Ministerial Agreement 112 at 10%, subject to the express exceptions, including sanitary-registration notifications governed by the applicable product rules. The listed brand-inclusion row expressly concerns foods/cosmetics and is not a device-brand fee rule. Page 9 lists different registration bases: national medical devices USD 678.25, foreign medical devices USD 904.34 and biochemical reagents USD 678.25; it does not establish that every IVD is a biochemical reagent.

Conditions
  • Classify the actual change and applicable product/registration base before calculating; do not assume every modification is 10% or every combined filing has one fee.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-10 — Modification groups 3-4; residual rule; registration base rows; also pdf-page-9. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Determine the applicable modification classification or the qualifying free notification branch; no flat fee asserted for all address events.

Does a catalogue or reference code change affect registration or UDI?

Check which identifier actually changes. A commercial catalogue, REF or order code is not automatically a device model, registered identifier, GTIN or UDI-DI. Rules for one identifier do not establish the route for another.

  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

Modification filing framework and document formalities

Fact-level verified

DM01 Annex 4 requires the sanitary-registration holder to seek ARCSA authorization immediately with technical justification, electronically through VUE/ECUAPASS. Applicant data must match the operating permit and relevant activity. Technical documents are in Spanish or English and listed in an electronically signed letter from the Ecuador technical responsible person. Foreign legal documents require the stated apostille/consular formalities unless electronically issued and verifiable on the issuer website; other languages require the specified qualified translation. Listed modification cases do not themselves create a new registration number.

Conditions
  • This is the February 2024 instruction under the 2016 norm as amended in 2023, not the norm taking effect in 2027.
  • The quoted 2018-based 10% sentence is not used here as a universal 2026 fee; see the separately sourced 2026 tariff.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-36 — Annex 4 sections 2 and 4; also pdf-page-37. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Actual model change eligible for modification under section 4.12; not every internal reference/SMN.
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers

Model-change modification boundary

Fact-level verified

Annex 4 section 4.12 permits model-change modification only without affecting risk level, use or approved characteristics. It requires the manufacturer’s technical justification expressly addressing those points, updated internal/external labeling with the biomedical marking exception, and an insert with the new model. Annex 4 section 3 requires a new registration for the specified type/model/intended-use/conditions/composition/energy changes generating a risk-level change and for the stated formulated/drug-combination formula changes. DM02 explicitly defines its “Código de referencia” as an ARCSA service/form code unrelated to manufacturer product codes/references. No pure internal SMN/reference-change route is established by these passages.

Conditions
  • The model must actually change; do not label an internal customer SMN as a model without product/dossier evidence.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-37 — Annex 4 section 3 and section 4.12; also pdf-page-42. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Actual model change only; pure internal SMN/reference change remains unresolved.
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers

Label/insert modification and unchanged remainder

Fact-level verified

Annex 4 allows only the label/insert changes corresponding to the modification requested; the rest must match prior approval, otherwise file the corresponding label/insert update. Section 4.15 requires changed insert/manual, an explanatory letter and current/proposed comparison. Section 4.16 requires new label artwork, explanatory letter (with the stated biomedical-equipment exception/marking requirements) and current/proposed comparison. Cosmetic-only NDM06 is a separate narrow notification branch.

Conditions
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-37 — Annex 4 section 2, sections 4.15-4.16; also pdf-page-42, pdf-page-43. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Where this actual change entails label/insert updates, retain unrelated approved information; separately file substantive additional updates.
  • Change-specific government fees

2026 modification fee classification

Fact-level verified

The 2026 tariff page 10 distinguishes specified modifications requiring technical analysis at 20% of the applicable registration amount from enumerated non-analytical modifications at 10%; its 10% list includes product-name and manufacturer/applicant company-name changes. The residual provision charges modifications not listed in Ministerial Agreement 112 at 10%, subject to the express exceptions, including sanitary-registration notifications governed by the applicable product rules. The listed brand-inclusion row expressly concerns foods/cosmetics and is not a device-brand fee rule. Page 9 lists different registration bases: national medical devices USD 678.25, foreign medical devices USD 904.34 and biochemical reagents USD 678.25; it does not establish that every IVD is a biochemical reagent.

Conditions
  • Classify the actual change and applicable product/registration base before calculating; do not assume every modification is 10% or every combined filing has one fee.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-10 — Modification groups 3-4; residual rule; registration base rows; also pdf-page-9. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Determine the actual model modification classification; pure internal SMN treatment remains unresolved.

Can several changes be filed together?

Changes to brand, manufacturer name, office address and reference codes may occur together, including with a real transfer to another legal manufacturer, registration holder or owner. Assess transfer with each single change, and transfer with brand plus reference, manufacturer name plus reference, or office address plus reference changes: seven transfer combinations in total. Evidence must establish the exact combination and the order of filings and approvals. These combinations and their sequence are not all verified by the rules below; a rule for one change does not prove that a single application, fee or review period covers the combination.

  • Combined filing
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents
  • Change-specific government fees

Combined modification/notification filing

Fact-level verified

DM02 permits modifications and notifications in the same application with each described in “Detalle de la modificación”; for a mixed filing do not enter NDM notification codes in “Código de referencia”, or the application is rejected. Section 5.1(d) limits a mixed filing to four modifications plus three notifications. Notification-only filings may list up to seven NDM codes separated by “/” without spaces. Mixed fees are based on the modifications; the review depends on complexity, risk and device type. Supporting documents remain required for every item.

Conditions
  • This is a same-application limit, not proof that unrelated products, manufacturers or registrations may be combined.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-4 — Sections 3(c)-(g), 5.1(b)-(e); also pdf-page-5, pdf-page-6. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Mixed application: max 4 modifications + 3 notifications, correct VUE fields and each applicable change dossier; not a grouping rule across arbitrary registrations.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Notification deadline and applicant cure period

Fact-level verified

DM02 requires listed notification events to be notified within sixty working days after they occur; “término” is defined as working days. An unfavorable notification-document review is returned once for applicant correction within five working days, otherwise the application is cancelled; a second unfavorable review also requires abandonment/re-filing as specified. Mixed-filing review depends on complexity, risk and device type. These are notification filing/cure rules, not an empirical best/expected/worst approval duration or a fixed authority review promise.

Conditions
  • Only qualifying DM02 notifications and their stated review steps; not a deadline to authorize substantive modifications.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-4 — Sections 3(b),(g), 4 and 5.1(g)-(i); also pdf-page-5, pdf-page-6. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Notification filing/cure rules and risk-dependent mixed assessment; no fixed total review time.
  • Applicant notification/cure deadlines are not an authority approval duration; review-time remains unanswered by this evidence.
  • Change-specific government fees

2026 modification fee classification

Fact-level verified

The 2026 tariff page 10 distinguishes specified modifications requiring technical analysis at 20% of the applicable registration amount from enumerated non-analytical modifications at 10%; its 10% list includes product-name and manufacturer/applicant company-name changes. The residual provision charges modifications not listed in Ministerial Agreement 112 at 10%, subject to the express exceptions, including sanitary-registration notifications governed by the applicable product rules. The listed brand-inclusion row expressly concerns foods/cosmetics and is not a device-brand fee rule. Page 9 lists different registration bases: national medical devices USD 678.25, foreign medical devices USD 904.34 and biochemical reagents USD 678.25; it does not establish that every IVD is a biochemical reagent.

Conditions
  • Classify the actual change and applicable product/registration base before calculating; do not assume every modification is 10% or every combined filing has one fee.
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-10 — Modification groups 3-4; residual rule; registration base rows; also pdf-page-9. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • Classify and charge the actual modification items; DM02 bases mixed fees on modifications, and does not promise one 10% charge for every bundle.
  • Supporting documents
  • Existing stock and transition

Stock notification after previously approved changes

Fact-level verified

DM02 NDM09 concerns stock exhaustion for changes previously approved. The table requires a justification letter describing the reason and the requirements established by the applicable current rule. This passage proves a conditional notification channel after change approval; it does not establish an automatic stock sell-through grace period, the permitted duration, or permission to implement an unapproved change.

Conditions
  • Bounded reading of the cited official original; no claim that every question aspect or later amendment has been exhausted.

Passage context: pdf-page-9 — Table 1, NDM09; also pdf-page-10. See the independently pinned evidence references for every supporting page.

Conditions for this question

  • The relevant change must already have been approved; stock duration and eligibility require the separate applicable rule.
Regulation codes

What these codes are

Each row above represents one regulatory instrument. Its code is the authority’s identifier. A regulation page collects the metadata and official source; when readable HTML is available, article links can open and highlight the exact cited passage.

Use this market context

Continue from regulations into practical research

Keep Ecuador as the target market while you move into registration records, classification, cross-country product research, or pathway planning.

Keep researching this market
View the Ecuador resource hub →
Compare regulations across all countries →
Tracked from official ARCSA publications · row IDs are stable — cite as regulations:ecuador:arcsa-004-2017-gazette964-complete-original