Pure Global AI
AEMPS · structured requirements

🇪🇸 Spain IVD regulatory data

Explore the IVD requirements currently available for Spain, organized by topic and linked to official sources.

28 facts14 dimensions15 official sourceslatest verification 2026-10-21

Changes after registration in Spain

Source-linked rules for common changes to a registered IVD. Read the scope and conditions with each rule; unverified details are listed separately.

Does changing a device brand name or logo require an update?

A change to the registered brand name and a change to logo artwork can follow different rules. The legal manufacturer, device design and intended purpose remain the same.

  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Existing stock and transition

Retain the exact legacy-change and lawful-stock conditions

Fact-level verified

For eligible legacy IVDs, organisational/name/address/legal-form or AR changes are generally not significant design/intended-purpose changes under MDCG 2022-6. Apply amended Article 110 rather than the guidance’s obsolete2025 calendar: certificated and Class D branches end 31 December 2027, ClassC31 December 2028, and Class B/Class A sterile31 December 2029. Continued directive compliance, no significant design/intended-purpose change or unacceptable risk and a QMS by 26 May 2025 are required. The notified-body application/written-agreement deadlines are26 May/26 September 2025 for certificated/Class D,2026 for Class C and2027 for Class B/A sterile. Lawfully placed devices may continue to be made available or put into service under Article 110(4). This does not establish automatic certification inheritance by a different manufacturer or permission for all changed-label stock.

Conditions
  • Confirm directive status, certificate validity, class, original placement date, design/intended purpose, QMS and applicable notified-body milestones for each stock batch.
  • Continued lawful supply is conditional on ongoing compliance; this is not an unrestricted old-label sell-through authorisation.

Conditions for this question

  • Only an eligible legacy device and the actual certified entity/stock-placement facts.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Check the notified-body change approval before implementation

Fact-level verified

For the Annex IX route, inform the notified body that approved the quality system of planned substantial quality-system or device-range changes; it assesses the change and may require an additional audit. Changes to the approved device that could affect safety, performance or prescribed conditions of use need approval from the body that issued the technical-documentation assessment certificate. That body determines whether a new conformity assessment or a certificate supplement is needed. A name, logo or office-address edit is not automatically a substantial technical change.

Conditions
  • Only where the device uses the stated notified-body conformity-assessment route and the planned change meets its trigger.
  • A notified-body assessment is distinct from national operator registration; no universal review clock or commercial audit price is established here.

Conditions for this question

  • Only the specified notified-body assessment route and a change meeting its substantial/approved-device trigger.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Distinguish a new manufacturer from an unchanged legal person

Fact-level verified

The manufacturer is the natural or legal person that manufactures or has a device designed/manufactured and markets it under its own name or trademark. A distributor, importer or other person making a device available under its own name/trademark generally assumes manufacturer obligations, except where an agreement leaves the identified manufacturer responsible on the label. Translation/repackaging under Article 16(2)–(4) is a separate conditional route. A change of local representative or importer is not, by itself, evidence that another legal manufacturer inherits the device certificate.

Conditions
  • Identify the outgoing and incoming legal persons, whether the certified entity survives, who places the device under its name, and the actual role being transferred.
  • This establishes responsibility and the own-name trigger; it is not a universal certificate-transfer procedure.

Conditions for this question

  • Actual own-name/new-person event; a pure logo artwork change with unchanged responsible manufacturer does not automatically satisfy Article 16(1)(a).
  • Filing route and prior approval

Update the IVD licence conditions and Spanish commercialisation record separately

Fact-level verified

A change to the conditions of a Spanish operating licence requires prior authorisation from the granting body under RD 942/2025 Article 7(8). Under Article 15, the economic operator’s commercialisation record identifies the operator, product trade name, UDI-DI, label/IFU and Spanish start date; communicate changes to those data and cessation. RECOPS is the current electronic system for non-custom-made MDs and IVDs, and it uses manufacturer/product/certificate information from EUDAMED. Earlier CCPS/RPS communications through 27 May 2026 are available for consultation only.

Conditions
  • Only the actual Spanish licensed operator/establishment conditions and marketed-product records; a foreign manufacturer’s office rename is not automatically a Spanish factory/licence modification.
  • Labels and identifiers

Spanish-language requirement for IVDs

Fact-level verified

IVDs placed into service in Spain must bear the information required by section 20 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2017/746 at least in Spanish; the RD 942/2025 linguistic regime also requires notified-body-related documents and genetic-test consent forms to be provided at least in Spanish.

Conditions
  • Applies to IVDs marketed in Spain.
  • RD 942/2025 arts. 13.2, 14.1 and 11.7 extend the Spanish-language rule to designation documents and written genetic-test consent.

Effective from 2025-10-24

  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers

Keep the responsible manufacturer and device identity consistent

Fact-level verified

The label identifies the device name or trade name, the manufacturer’s name, registered trade name or trademark and registered business address, and the EU authorised representative where applicable. Keep the EU declaration of conformity continuously updated: it identifies the responsible manufacturer, device/product or trade name, traceable product code or catalogue reference and Basic UDI-DI. A logo-only artwork change is not automatically a change of registered trade name or legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • The actual changed label/DoC field must be identified; this fact concerns devices using an EU declaration of conformity under the IVDR.
  • This is an ongoing conformity-document obligation, not by itself a national variation application checklist.

Conditions for this question

  • Ongoing label/DoC conformity records; not a universal national application dossier.
  • Labels and identifiers

Map the actual reference, model and UDI change

Fact-level verified

A commercial REF, order number or catalogue code must first be mapped to the actual device identifier. Annex VI requires a new UDI-DI when a change could cause misidentification or ambiguity in traceability, including a device name/trade name or version/model change and the other listed triggers. A database element that does not require a new UDI-DI is updated within 30 days. Annex IV distinguishes product code/catalogue identification from Basic UDI-DI; a commercial-code edit is not automatically a model or UDI change.

Conditions
  • Check the changed field, issuing-entity rules, device/packaging level and existing registration before deciding whether a new identifier is needed.
  • The 30-day database duty is an operator update deadline, not an authority review period.

Conditions for this question

  • Only when the actual changed field meets the stated UDI/database trigger.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Check the export certificate against the new identity

Fact-level verified

For export, the Member State where the manufacturer or authorised representative has its registered place of business shall issue a free-sale certificate upon a qualifying request under MDR Article 60 or IVDR Article 55. It states that the properly CE-marked device may be marketed in the Union and identifies the Basic UDI-DI and relevant notified-body certificate where applicable. This export-certificate route does not by itself require a new certificate for every ordinary name, label, address or reference change.

Conditions
  • Select the actual issuing state, applicant role, device legal regime and destination-country certificate requirements.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Use the current CERTPS certificate data and conditional supporting documents

Fact-level verified

The current CERTPS manual uses the legal manufacturer as stated in the DoC, notified-body certificate and label/IFU. A request has at most 100 product lines; references/models must be covered by the DoC but those fields are optional unless needed by the destination. Basic UDI-DI applies to Regulation-based certificates. Upload the signed DoC and applicable notified-body certificate/transition proof; an AR supplies its mandate, and a distributor supplies its regional activity communication and traceability records. Supply RECOPS proof where applicable, or justify the stated transition/non-availability condition. A same-company user-account transfer in CERTPS is not a transfer to another legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • Fresh export/free-sale-certificate request only; device regime, applicant role and destination determine required evidence.
  • Do not treat optional reference/model or owned-plant fields as universally mandatory variation materials.

Conditions for this question

  • Only if a fresh Spanish export/free-sale certificate is needed.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate CERTPS payment and service windows from variation review

Fact-level verified

A new export/free-sale certificate is charged under tariff 4.1, EUR 153.79. CERTPS issues a separate certificate and charges a separate fee for each destination country even where a request lists several countries. Send the application within one month of payment. The quality commitment is 10 working days for a complete request; the period restarts after the requested correction/information is supplied, and in-depth classification or market-surveillance review is excluded. The payment window is the applicant’s deadline and the 10-day commitment concerns certificates, not general device changes.

Conditions
  • Only a new Spanish export certificate requested through CERTPS; no existing exact canonical typed certificate row was available for this transaction.

Conditions for this question

  • New certificate transaction only; not a variation fee/review-time facet.

How do I update a manufacturer's name without changing the legal entity?

The same legal manufacturer changes its name, potentially alongside the device brand. A transfer to another legal entity is a separate question; permission to combine filings needs its own evidence.

  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Existing stock and transition

Retain the exact legacy-change and lawful-stock conditions

Fact-level verified

For eligible legacy IVDs, organisational/name/address/legal-form or AR changes are generally not significant design/intended-purpose changes under MDCG 2022-6. Apply amended Article 110 rather than the guidance’s obsolete2025 calendar: certificated and Class D branches end 31 December 2027, ClassC31 December 2028, and Class B/Class A sterile31 December 2029. Continued directive compliance, no significant design/intended-purpose change or unacceptable risk and a QMS by 26 May 2025 are required. The notified-body application/written-agreement deadlines are26 May/26 September 2025 for certificated/Class D,2026 for Class C and2027 for Class B/A sterile. Lawfully placed devices may continue to be made available or put into service under Article 110(4). This does not establish automatic certification inheritance by a different manufacturer or permission for all changed-label stock.

Conditions
  • Confirm directive status, certificate validity, class, original placement date, design/intended purpose, QMS and applicable notified-body milestones for each stock batch.
  • Continued lawful supply is conditional on ongoing compliance; this is not an unrestricted old-label sell-through authorisation.

Conditions for this question

  • Only an eligible legacy device and the actual certified entity/stock-placement facts.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Check the notified-body change approval before implementation

Fact-level verified

For the Annex IX route, inform the notified body that approved the quality system of planned substantial quality-system or device-range changes; it assesses the change and may require an additional audit. Changes to the approved device that could affect safety, performance or prescribed conditions of use need approval from the body that issued the technical-documentation assessment certificate. That body determines whether a new conformity assessment or a certificate supplement is needed. A name, logo or office-address edit is not automatically a substantial technical change.

Conditions
  • Only where the device uses the stated notified-body conformity-assessment route and the planned change meets its trigger.
  • A notified-body assessment is distinct from national operator registration; no universal review clock or commercial audit price is established here.

Conditions for this question

  • Only the specified notified-body assessment route and a change meeting its substantial/approved-device trigger.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Update the actual economic operator and current EUDAMED records

Fact-level verified

Manufacturers, authorised representatives and importers register their own actor identity in EUDAMED and obtain an SRN where required. Changes to Annex VI Part A actor information are updated within one week. Actor confirmation is due after one year and then every second year. The first four modules became mandatory from 28 May 2026 under the functionality notice and amended rollout provisions; device backfill has its own transitional schedule. An existing actor’s rename is different from a new legal person or a different role.

Conditions
  • The directly applicable EU actor provisions and functionality notice determine the start date; national registration roles remain separate.
  • The one-week duty and annual/biennial confirmations are not variation-review service standards.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Update the IVD licence conditions and Spanish commercialisation record separately

Fact-level verified

A change to the conditions of a Spanish operating licence requires prior authorisation from the granting body under RD 942/2025 Article 7(8). Under Article 15, the economic operator’s commercialisation record identifies the operator, product trade name, UDI-DI, label/IFU and Spanish start date; communicate changes to those data and cessation. RECOPS is the current electronic system for non-custom-made MDs and IVDs, and it uses manufacturer/product/certificate information from EUDAMED. Earlier CCPS/RPS communications through 27 May 2026 are available for consultation only.

Conditions
  • Only the actual Spanish licensed operator/establishment conditions and marketed-product records; a foreign manufacturer’s office rename is not automatically a Spanish factory/licence modification.
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers

Keep the responsible manufacturer and device identity consistent

Fact-level verified

The label identifies the device name or trade name, the manufacturer’s name, registered trade name or trademark and registered business address, and the EU authorised representative where applicable. Keep the EU declaration of conformity continuously updated: it identifies the responsible manufacturer, device/product or trade name, traceable product code or catalogue reference and Basic UDI-DI. A logo-only artwork change is not automatically a change of registered trade name or legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • The actual changed label/DoC field must be identified; this fact concerns devices using an EU declaration of conformity under the IVDR.
  • This is an ongoing conformity-document obligation, not by itself a national variation application checklist.

Conditions for this question

  • Ongoing label/DoC conformity records; not a universal national application dossier.
  • Labels and identifiers

Map the actual reference, model and UDI change

Fact-level verified

A commercial REF, order number or catalogue code must first be mapped to the actual device identifier. Annex VI requires a new UDI-DI when a change could cause misidentification or ambiguity in traceability, including a device name/trade name or version/model change and the other listed triggers. A database element that does not require a new UDI-DI is updated within 30 days. Annex IV distinguishes product code/catalogue identification from Basic UDI-DI; a commercial-code edit is not automatically a model or UDI change.

Conditions
  • Check the changed field, issuing-entity rules, device/packaging level and existing registration before deciding whether a new identifier is needed.
  • The 30-day database duty is an operator update deadline, not an authority review period.

Conditions for this question

  • Only when the actual changed field meets the stated UDI/database trigger.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Check the export certificate against the new identity

Fact-level verified

For export, the Member State where the manufacturer or authorised representative has its registered place of business shall issue a free-sale certificate upon a qualifying request under MDR Article 60 or IVDR Article 55. It states that the properly CE-marked device may be marketed in the Union and identifies the Basic UDI-DI and relevant notified-body certificate where applicable. This export-certificate route does not by itself require a new certificate for every ordinary name, label, address or reference change.

Conditions
  • Select the actual issuing state, applicant role, device legal regime and destination-country certificate requirements.
  • Labels and identifiers

Spanish-language requirement for IVDs

Fact-level verified

IVDs placed into service in Spain must bear the information required by section 20 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2017/746 at least in Spanish; the RD 942/2025 linguistic regime also requires notified-body-related documents and genetic-test consent forms to be provided at least in Spanish.

Conditions
  • Applies to IVDs marketed in Spain.
  • RD 942/2025 arts. 13.2, 14.1 and 11.7 extend the Spanish-language rule to designation documents and written genetic-test consent.

Effective from 2025-10-24

Conditions for this question

  • Admission depends on the separately proposed §20 correction.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Use the current CERTPS certificate data and conditional supporting documents

Fact-level verified

The current CERTPS manual uses the legal manufacturer as stated in the DoC, notified-body certificate and label/IFU. A request has at most 100 product lines; references/models must be covered by the DoC but those fields are optional unless needed by the destination. Basic UDI-DI applies to Regulation-based certificates. Upload the signed DoC and applicable notified-body certificate/transition proof; an AR supplies its mandate, and a distributor supplies its regional activity communication and traceability records. Supply RECOPS proof where applicable, or justify the stated transition/non-availability condition. A same-company user-account transfer in CERTPS is not a transfer to another legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • Fresh export/free-sale-certificate request only; device regime, applicant role and destination determine required evidence.
  • Do not treat optional reference/model or owned-plant fields as universally mandatory variation materials.

Conditions for this question

  • Only if a fresh Spanish export/free-sale certificate is needed.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate CERTPS payment and service windows from variation review

Fact-level verified

A new export/free-sale certificate is charged under tariff 4.1, EUR 153.79. CERTPS issues a separate certificate and charges a separate fee for each destination country even where a request lists several countries. Send the application within one month of payment. The quality commitment is 10 working days for a complete request; the period restarts after the requested correction/information is supplied, and in-depth classification or market-surveillance review is excluded. The payment window is the applicant’s deadline and the 10-day commitment concerns certificates, not general device changes.

Conditions
  • Only a new Spanish export certificate requested through CERTPS; no existing exact canonical typed certificate row was available for this transaction.

Conditions for this question

  • New certificate transaction only; not a variation fee/review-time facet.
  • Change-specific government fees

Conditions for this question

  • A modification/revalidation of an actual Spanish manufacturing/sterilisation/reprocessing establishment licence under tariff 5.19.
  • The foreign manufacturer’s identity change alone does not establish that this Spanish licence transaction is required.
  • Change-specific government fees

Conditions for this question

  • A modification/revalidation of an actual Spanish import/grouping licence under tariff 5.20; grouping applies only to its lawful product scope.
  • The foreign manufacturer’s identity change alone does not establish that this Spanish licence transaction is required.
  • Change-specific government fees

Conditions for this question

  • AEMPS classifies the actual Spanish operating-licence modification under tariff 5.21 as minor; a rename/logo/office edit is not automatically classified as minor.
  • The foreign manufacturer’s identity change alone does not establish that this Spanish licence transaction is required.

What changes when the manufacturer's office address changes?

An office address change for the same legal entity, potentially alongside name and brand changes. This does not cover moving a factory or manufacturing site, and a combined filing cannot be assumed.

  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Existing stock and transition

Retain the exact legacy-change and lawful-stock conditions

Fact-level verified

For eligible legacy IVDs, organisational/name/address/legal-form or AR changes are generally not significant design/intended-purpose changes under MDCG 2022-6. Apply amended Article 110 rather than the guidance’s obsolete2025 calendar: certificated and Class D branches end 31 December 2027, ClassC31 December 2028, and Class B/Class A sterile31 December 2029. Continued directive compliance, no significant design/intended-purpose change or unacceptable risk and a QMS by 26 May 2025 are required. The notified-body application/written-agreement deadlines are26 May/26 September 2025 for certificated/Class D,2026 for Class C and2027 for Class B/A sterile. Lawfully placed devices may continue to be made available or put into service under Article 110(4). This does not establish automatic certification inheritance by a different manufacturer or permission for all changed-label stock.

Conditions
  • Confirm directive status, certificate validity, class, original placement date, design/intended purpose, QMS and applicable notified-body milestones for each stock batch.
  • Continued lawful supply is conditional on ongoing compliance; this is not an unrestricted old-label sell-through authorisation.

Conditions for this question

  • Only an eligible legacy device and the actual certified entity/stock-placement facts.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Check the notified-body change approval before implementation

Fact-level verified

For the Annex IX route, inform the notified body that approved the quality system of planned substantial quality-system or device-range changes; it assesses the change and may require an additional audit. Changes to the approved device that could affect safety, performance or prescribed conditions of use need approval from the body that issued the technical-documentation assessment certificate. That body determines whether a new conformity assessment or a certificate supplement is needed. A name, logo or office-address edit is not automatically a substantial technical change.

Conditions
  • Only where the device uses the stated notified-body conformity-assessment route and the planned change meets its trigger.
  • A notified-body assessment is distinct from national operator registration; no universal review clock or commercial audit price is established here.

Conditions for this question

  • Only the specified notified-body assessment route and a change meeting its substantial/approved-device trigger.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Update the actual economic operator and current EUDAMED records

Fact-level verified

Manufacturers, authorised representatives and importers register their own actor identity in EUDAMED and obtain an SRN where required. Changes to Annex VI Part A actor information are updated within one week. Actor confirmation is due after one year and then every second year. The first four modules became mandatory from 28 May 2026 under the functionality notice and amended rollout provisions; device backfill has its own transitional schedule. An existing actor’s rename is different from a new legal person or a different role.

Conditions
  • The directly applicable EU actor provisions and functionality notice determine the start date; national registration roles remain separate.
  • The one-week duty and annual/biennial confirmations are not variation-review service standards.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Update the IVD licence conditions and Spanish commercialisation record separately

Fact-level verified

A change to the conditions of a Spanish operating licence requires prior authorisation from the granting body under RD 942/2025 Article 7(8). Under Article 15, the economic operator’s commercialisation record identifies the operator, product trade name, UDI-DI, label/IFU and Spanish start date; communicate changes to those data and cessation. RECOPS is the current electronic system for non-custom-made MDs and IVDs, and it uses manufacturer/product/certificate information from EUDAMED. Earlier CCPS/RPS communications through 27 May 2026 are available for consultation only.

Conditions
  • Only the actual Spanish licensed operator/establishment conditions and marketed-product records; a foreign manufacturer’s office rename is not automatically a Spanish factory/licence modification.
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers

Keep the responsible manufacturer and device identity consistent

Fact-level verified

The label identifies the device name or trade name, the manufacturer’s name, registered trade name or trademark and registered business address, and the EU authorised representative where applicable. Keep the EU declaration of conformity continuously updated: it identifies the responsible manufacturer, device/product or trade name, traceable product code or catalogue reference and Basic UDI-DI. A logo-only artwork change is not automatically a change of registered trade name or legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • The actual changed label/DoC field must be identified; this fact concerns devices using an EU declaration of conformity under the IVDR.
  • This is an ongoing conformity-document obligation, not by itself a national variation application checklist.

Conditions for this question

  • Ongoing label/DoC conformity records; not a universal national application dossier.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Check the export certificate against the new identity

Fact-level verified

For export, the Member State where the manufacturer or authorised representative has its registered place of business shall issue a free-sale certificate upon a qualifying request under MDR Article 60 or IVDR Article 55. It states that the properly CE-marked device may be marketed in the Union and identifies the Basic UDI-DI and relevant notified-body certificate where applicable. This export-certificate route does not by itself require a new certificate for every ordinary name, label, address or reference change.

Conditions
  • Select the actual issuing state, applicant role, device legal regime and destination-country certificate requirements.
  • Labels and identifiers

Spanish-language requirement for IVDs

Fact-level verified

IVDs placed into service in Spain must bear the information required by section 20 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2017/746 at least in Spanish; the RD 942/2025 linguistic regime also requires notified-body-related documents and genetic-test consent forms to be provided at least in Spanish.

Conditions
  • Applies to IVDs marketed in Spain.
  • RD 942/2025 arts. 13.2, 14.1 and 11.7 extend the Spanish-language rule to designation documents and written genetic-test consent.

Effective from 2025-10-24

Conditions for this question

  • Admission depends on the separately proposed §20 correction.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Use the current CERTPS certificate data and conditional supporting documents

Fact-level verified

The current CERTPS manual uses the legal manufacturer as stated in the DoC, notified-body certificate and label/IFU. A request has at most 100 product lines; references/models must be covered by the DoC but those fields are optional unless needed by the destination. Basic UDI-DI applies to Regulation-based certificates. Upload the signed DoC and applicable notified-body certificate/transition proof; an AR supplies its mandate, and a distributor supplies its regional activity communication and traceability records. Supply RECOPS proof where applicable, or justify the stated transition/non-availability condition. A same-company user-account transfer in CERTPS is not a transfer to another legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • Fresh export/free-sale-certificate request only; device regime, applicant role and destination determine required evidence.
  • Do not treat optional reference/model or owned-plant fields as universally mandatory variation materials.

Conditions for this question

  • Only if a fresh Spanish export/free-sale certificate is needed.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate CERTPS payment and service windows from variation review

Fact-level verified

A new export/free-sale certificate is charged under tariff 4.1, EUR 153.79. CERTPS issues a separate certificate and charges a separate fee for each destination country even where a request lists several countries. Send the application within one month of payment. The quality commitment is 10 working days for a complete request; the period restarts after the requested correction/information is supplied, and in-depth classification or market-surveillance review is excluded. The payment window is the applicant’s deadline and the 10-day commitment concerns certificates, not general device changes.

Conditions
  • Only a new Spanish export certificate requested through CERTPS; no existing exact canonical typed certificate row was available for this transaction.

Conditions for this question

  • New certificate transaction only; not a variation fee/review-time facet.
  • Change-specific government fees

Conditions for this question

  • A modification/revalidation of an actual Spanish manufacturing/sterilisation/reprocessing establishment licence under tariff 5.19.
  • The foreign manufacturer’s identity change alone does not establish that this Spanish licence transaction is required.
  • Change-specific government fees

Conditions for this question

  • A modification/revalidation of an actual Spanish import/grouping licence under tariff 5.20; grouping applies only to its lawful product scope.
  • The foreign manufacturer’s identity change alone does not establish that this Spanish licence transaction is required.
  • Change-specific government fees

Conditions for this question

  • AEMPS classifies the actual Spanish operating-licence modification under tariff 5.21 as minor; a rename/logo/office edit is not automatically classified as minor.
  • The foreign manufacturer’s identity change alone does not establish that this Spanish licence transaction is required.

Does a catalogue or reference code change affect registration or UDI?

Check which identifier actually changes. A commercial catalogue, REF or order code is not automatically a device model, registered identifier, GTIN or UDI-DI. Rules for one identifier do not establish the route for another.

  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Existing stock and transition

Retain the exact legacy-change and lawful-stock conditions

Fact-level verified

For eligible legacy IVDs, organisational/name/address/legal-form or AR changes are generally not significant design/intended-purpose changes under MDCG 2022-6. Apply amended Article 110 rather than the guidance’s obsolete2025 calendar: certificated and Class D branches end 31 December 2027, ClassC31 December 2028, and Class B/Class A sterile31 December 2029. Continued directive compliance, no significant design/intended-purpose change or unacceptable risk and a QMS by 26 May 2025 are required. The notified-body application/written-agreement deadlines are26 May/26 September 2025 for certificated/Class D,2026 for Class C and2027 for Class B/A sterile. Lawfully placed devices may continue to be made available or put into service under Article 110(4). This does not establish automatic certification inheritance by a different manufacturer or permission for all changed-label stock.

Conditions
  • Confirm directive status, certificate validity, class, original placement date, design/intended purpose, QMS and applicable notified-body milestones for each stock batch.
  • Continued lawful supply is conditional on ongoing compliance; this is not an unrestricted old-label sell-through authorisation.

Conditions for this question

  • Only an eligible legacy device and the actual certified entity/stock-placement facts.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Check the notified-body change approval before implementation

Fact-level verified

For the Annex IX route, inform the notified body that approved the quality system of planned substantial quality-system or device-range changes; it assesses the change and may require an additional audit. Changes to the approved device that could affect safety, performance or prescribed conditions of use need approval from the body that issued the technical-documentation assessment certificate. That body determines whether a new conformity assessment or a certificate supplement is needed. A name, logo or office-address edit is not automatically a substantial technical change.

Conditions
  • Only where the device uses the stated notified-body conformity-assessment route and the planned change meets its trigger.
  • A notified-body assessment is distinct from national operator registration; no universal review clock or commercial audit price is established here.

Conditions for this question

  • Only the specified notified-body assessment route and a change meeting its substantial/approved-device trigger.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Update the IVD licence conditions and Spanish commercialisation record separately

Fact-level verified

A change to the conditions of a Spanish operating licence requires prior authorisation from the granting body under RD 942/2025 Article 7(8). Under Article 15, the economic operator’s commercialisation record identifies the operator, product trade name, UDI-DI, label/IFU and Spanish start date; communicate changes to those data and cessation. RECOPS is the current electronic system for non-custom-made MDs and IVDs, and it uses manufacturer/product/certificate information from EUDAMED. Earlier CCPS/RPS communications through 27 May 2026 are available for consultation only.

Conditions
  • Only the actual Spanish licensed operator/establishment conditions and marketed-product records; a foreign manufacturer’s office rename is not automatically a Spanish factory/licence modification.
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers

Keep the responsible manufacturer and device identity consistent

Fact-level verified

The label identifies the device name or trade name, the manufacturer’s name, registered trade name or trademark and registered business address, and the EU authorised representative where applicable. Keep the EU declaration of conformity continuously updated: it identifies the responsible manufacturer, device/product or trade name, traceable product code or catalogue reference and Basic UDI-DI. A logo-only artwork change is not automatically a change of registered trade name or legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • The actual changed label/DoC field must be identified; this fact concerns devices using an EU declaration of conformity under the IVDR.
  • This is an ongoing conformity-document obligation, not by itself a national variation application checklist.

Conditions for this question

  • Ongoing label/DoC conformity records; not a universal national application dossier.
  • Labels and identifiers

Map the actual reference, model and UDI change

Fact-level verified

A commercial REF, order number or catalogue code must first be mapped to the actual device identifier. Annex VI requires a new UDI-DI when a change could cause misidentification or ambiguity in traceability, including a device name/trade name or version/model change and the other listed triggers. A database element that does not require a new UDI-DI is updated within 30 days. Annex IV distinguishes product code/catalogue identification from Basic UDI-DI; a commercial-code edit is not automatically a model or UDI change.

Conditions
  • Check the changed field, issuing-entity rules, device/packaging level and existing registration before deciding whether a new identifier is needed.
  • The 30-day database duty is an operator update deadline, not an authority review period.

Conditions for this question

  • Only when the actual changed field meets the stated UDI/database trigger.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Check the export certificate against the new identity

Fact-level verified

For export, the Member State where the manufacturer or authorised representative has its registered place of business shall issue a free-sale certificate upon a qualifying request under MDR Article 60 or IVDR Article 55. It states that the properly CE-marked device may be marketed in the Union and identifies the Basic UDI-DI and relevant notified-body certificate where applicable. This export-certificate route does not by itself require a new certificate for every ordinary name, label, address or reference change.

Conditions
  • Select the actual issuing state, applicant role, device legal regime and destination-country certificate requirements.
  • Labels and identifiers

Spanish-language requirement for IVDs

Fact-level verified

IVDs placed into service in Spain must bear the information required by section 20 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2017/746 at least in Spanish; the RD 942/2025 linguistic regime also requires notified-body-related documents and genetic-test consent forms to be provided at least in Spanish.

Conditions
  • Applies to IVDs marketed in Spain.
  • RD 942/2025 arts. 13.2, 14.1 and 11.7 extend the Spanish-language rule to designation documents and written genetic-test consent.

Effective from 2025-10-24

Conditions for this question

  • Admission depends on the separately proposed §20 correction.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Use the current CERTPS certificate data and conditional supporting documents

Fact-level verified

The current CERTPS manual uses the legal manufacturer as stated in the DoC, notified-body certificate and label/IFU. A request has at most 100 product lines; references/models must be covered by the DoC but those fields are optional unless needed by the destination. Basic UDI-DI applies to Regulation-based certificates. Upload the signed DoC and applicable notified-body certificate/transition proof; an AR supplies its mandate, and a distributor supplies its regional activity communication and traceability records. Supply RECOPS proof where applicable, or justify the stated transition/non-availability condition. A same-company user-account transfer in CERTPS is not a transfer to another legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • Fresh export/free-sale-certificate request only; device regime, applicant role and destination determine required evidence.
  • Do not treat optional reference/model or owned-plant fields as universally mandatory variation materials.

Conditions for this question

  • Only if a fresh Spanish export/free-sale certificate is needed.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate CERTPS payment and service windows from variation review

Fact-level verified

A new export/free-sale certificate is charged under tariff 4.1, EUR 153.79. CERTPS issues a separate certificate and charges a separate fee for each destination country even where a request lists several countries. Send the application within one month of payment. The quality commitment is 10 working days for a complete request; the period restarts after the requested correction/information is supplied, and in-depth classification or market-surveillance review is excluded. The payment window is the applicant’s deadline and the 10-day commitment concerns certificates, not general device changes.

Conditions
  • Only a new Spanish export certificate requested through CERTPS; no existing exact canonical typed certificate row was available for this transaction.

Conditions for this question

  • New certificate transaction only; not a variation fee/review-time facet.

Can several changes be filed together?

Changes to brand, manufacturer name, office address and reference codes may occur together, including with a real transfer to another legal manufacturer, registration holder or owner. Assess transfer with each single change, and transfer with brand plus reference, manufacturer name plus reference, or office address plus reference changes: seven transfer combinations in total. Evidence must establish the exact combination and the order of filings and approvals. These combinations and their sequence are not all verified by the rules below; a rule for one change does not prove that a single application, fee or review period covers the combination.

  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Existing stock and transition

Retain the exact legacy-change and lawful-stock conditions

Fact-level verified

For eligible legacy IVDs, organisational/name/address/legal-form or AR changes are generally not significant design/intended-purpose changes under MDCG 2022-6. Apply amended Article 110 rather than the guidance’s obsolete2025 calendar: certificated and Class D branches end 31 December 2027, ClassC31 December 2028, and Class B/Class A sterile31 December 2029. Continued directive compliance, no significant design/intended-purpose change or unacceptable risk and a QMS by 26 May 2025 are required. The notified-body application/written-agreement deadlines are26 May/26 September 2025 for certificated/Class D,2026 for Class C and2027 for Class B/A sterile. Lawfully placed devices may continue to be made available or put into service under Article 110(4). This does not establish automatic certification inheritance by a different manufacturer or permission for all changed-label stock.

Conditions
  • Confirm directive status, certificate validity, class, original placement date, design/intended purpose, QMS and applicable notified-body milestones for each stock batch.
  • Continued lawful supply is conditional on ongoing compliance; this is not an unrestricted old-label sell-through authorisation.

Conditions for this question

  • Only an eligible legacy device and the actual certified entity/stock-placement facts.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Check the notified-body change approval before implementation

Fact-level verified

For the Annex IX route, inform the notified body that approved the quality system of planned substantial quality-system or device-range changes; it assesses the change and may require an additional audit. Changes to the approved device that could affect safety, performance or prescribed conditions of use need approval from the body that issued the technical-documentation assessment certificate. That body determines whether a new conformity assessment or a certificate supplement is needed. A name, logo or office-address edit is not automatically a substantial technical change.

Conditions
  • Only where the device uses the stated notified-body conformity-assessment route and the planned change meets its trigger.
  • A notified-body assessment is distinct from national operator registration; no universal review clock or commercial audit price is established here.

Conditions for this question

  • Only the specified notified-body assessment route and a change meeting its substantial/approved-device trigger.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Update the actual economic operator and current EUDAMED records

Fact-level verified

Manufacturers, authorised representatives and importers register their own actor identity in EUDAMED and obtain an SRN where required. Changes to Annex VI Part A actor information are updated within one week. Actor confirmation is due after one year and then every second year. The first four modules became mandatory from 28 May 2026 under the functionality notice and amended rollout provisions; device backfill has its own transitional schedule. An existing actor’s rename is different from a new legal person or a different role.

Conditions
  • The directly applicable EU actor provisions and functionality notice determine the start date; national registration roles remain separate.
  • The one-week duty and annual/biennial confirmations are not variation-review service standards.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Distinguish a new manufacturer from an unchanged legal person

Fact-level verified

The manufacturer is the natural or legal person that manufactures or has a device designed/manufactured and markets it under its own name or trademark. A distributor, importer or other person making a device available under its own name/trademark generally assumes manufacturer obligations, except where an agreement leaves the identified manufacturer responsible on the label. Translation/repackaging under Article 16(2)–(4) is a separate conditional route. A change of local representative or importer is not, by itself, evidence that another legal manufacturer inherits the device certificate.

Conditions
  • Identify the outgoing and incoming legal persons, whether the certified entity survives, who places the device under its name, and the actual role being transferred.
  • This establishes responsibility and the own-name trigger; it is not a universal certificate-transfer procedure.

Conditions for this question

  • Actual own-name/new-person event; a pure logo artwork change with unchanged responsible manufacturer does not automatically satisfy Article 16(1)(a).
  • Filing route and prior approval
  • Supporting documents

Document an authorised-representative switch separately

Fact-level verified

An authorised-representative change must be addressed in an agreement between the manufacturer and, where practicable, outgoing and incoming representatives. It covers termination and start dates, the date until which the old representative may be shown in manufacturer information, transfer of documents including confidentiality/property rights, and forwarding of complaints or incident reports received after termination. These express sequence requirements concern an AR switch, not a change of legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • Only if the EU authorised representative actually changes.
  • Do not substitute an AR agreement for evidence of a manufacturer/registration-holder transfer.

Conditions for this question

  • Only if an EU authorised representative also changes; not proof of a legal-manufacturer transfer.
  • Filing route and prior approval

Update the IVD licence conditions and Spanish commercialisation record separately

Fact-level verified

A change to the conditions of a Spanish operating licence requires prior authorisation from the granting body under RD 942/2025 Article 7(8). Under Article 15, the economic operator’s commercialisation record identifies the operator, product trade name, UDI-DI, label/IFU and Spanish start date; communicate changes to those data and cessation. RECOPS is the current electronic system for non-custom-made MDs and IVDs, and it uses manufacturer/product/certificate information from EUDAMED. Earlier CCPS/RPS communications through 27 May 2026 are available for consultation only.

Conditions
  • Only the actual Spanish licensed operator/establishment conditions and marketed-product records; a foreign manufacturer’s office rename is not automatically a Spanish factory/licence modification.
  • Supporting documents
  • Labels and identifiers

Keep the responsible manufacturer and device identity consistent

Fact-level verified

The label identifies the device name or trade name, the manufacturer’s name, registered trade name or trademark and registered business address, and the EU authorised representative where applicable. Keep the EU declaration of conformity continuously updated: it identifies the responsible manufacturer, device/product or trade name, traceable product code or catalogue reference and Basic UDI-DI. A logo-only artwork change is not automatically a change of registered trade name or legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • The actual changed label/DoC field must be identified; this fact concerns devices using an EU declaration of conformity under the IVDR.
  • This is an ongoing conformity-document obligation, not by itself a national variation application checklist.

Conditions for this question

  • Ongoing label/DoC conformity records; not a universal national application dossier.
  • Labels and identifiers

Map the actual reference, model and UDI change

Fact-level verified

A commercial REF, order number or catalogue code must first be mapped to the actual device identifier. Annex VI requires a new UDI-DI when a change could cause misidentification or ambiguity in traceability, including a device name/trade name or version/model change and the other listed triggers. A database element that does not require a new UDI-DI is updated within 30 days. Annex IV distinguishes product code/catalogue identification from Basic UDI-DI; a commercial-code edit is not automatically a model or UDI change.

Conditions
  • Check the changed field, issuing-entity rules, device/packaging level and existing registration before deciding whether a new identifier is needed.
  • The 30-day database duty is an operator update deadline, not an authority review period.

Conditions for this question

  • Only when the actual changed field meets the stated UDI/database trigger.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Check the export certificate against the new identity

Fact-level verified

For export, the Member State where the manufacturer or authorised representative has its registered place of business shall issue a free-sale certificate upon a qualifying request under MDR Article 60 or IVDR Article 55. It states that the properly CE-marked device may be marketed in the Union and identifies the Basic UDI-DI and relevant notified-body certificate where applicable. This export-certificate route does not by itself require a new certificate for every ordinary name, label, address or reference change.

Conditions
  • Select the actual issuing state, applicant role, device legal regime and destination-country certificate requirements.
  • Labels and identifiers

Spanish-language requirement for IVDs

Fact-level verified

IVDs placed into service in Spain must bear the information required by section 20 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2017/746 at least in Spanish; the RD 942/2025 linguistic regime also requires notified-body-related documents and genetic-test consent forms to be provided at least in Spanish.

Conditions
  • Applies to IVDs marketed in Spain.
  • RD 942/2025 arts. 13.2, 14.1 and 11.7 extend the Spanish-language rule to designation documents and written genetic-test consent.

Effective from 2025-10-24

Conditions for this question

  • Admission depends on the separately proposed §20 correction.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Use the current CERTPS certificate data and conditional supporting documents

Fact-level verified

The current CERTPS manual uses the legal manufacturer as stated in the DoC, notified-body certificate and label/IFU. A request has at most 100 product lines; references/models must be covered by the DoC but those fields are optional unless needed by the destination. Basic UDI-DI applies to Regulation-based certificates. Upload the signed DoC and applicable notified-body certificate/transition proof; an AR supplies its mandate, and a distributor supplies its regional activity communication and traceability records. Supply RECOPS proof where applicable, or justify the stated transition/non-availability condition. A same-company user-account transfer in CERTPS is not a transfer to another legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • Fresh export/free-sale-certificate request only; device regime, applicant role and destination determine required evidence.
  • Do not treat optional reference/model or owned-plant fields as universally mandatory variation materials.

Conditions for this question

  • Only if a fresh Spanish export/free-sale certificate is needed.
  • Free sale certificate impact

Separate CERTPS payment and service windows from variation review

Fact-level verified

A new export/free-sale certificate is charged under tariff 4.1, EUR 153.79. CERTPS issues a separate certificate and charges a separate fee for each destination country even where a request lists several countries. Send the application within one month of payment. The quality commitment is 10 working days for a complete request; the period restarts after the requested correction/information is supplied, and in-depth classification or market-surveillance review is excluded. The payment window is the applicant’s deadline and the 10-day commitment concerns certificates, not general device changes.

Conditions
  • Only a new Spanish export certificate requested through CERTPS; no existing exact canonical typed certificate row was available for this transaction.

Conditions for this question

  • New certificate transaction only; not a variation fee/review-time facet.
  • Change-specific government fees

Conditions for this question

  • A modification/revalidation of an actual Spanish manufacturing/sterilisation/reprocessing establishment licence under tariff 5.19.
  • The foreign manufacturer’s identity change alone does not establish that this Spanish licence transaction is required.
  • Change-specific government fees

Conditions for this question

  • A modification/revalidation of an actual Spanish import/grouping licence under tariff 5.20; grouping applies only to its lawful product scope.
  • The foreign manufacturer’s identity change alone does not establish that this Spanish licence transaction is required.
  • Change-specific government fees

Conditions for this question

  • AEMPS classifies the actual Spanish operating-licence modification under tariff 5.21 as minor; a rename/logo/office edit is not automatically classified as minor.
  • The foreign manufacturer’s identity change alone does not establish that this Spanish licence transaction is required.

Approval validity & renewal

What expires, what is retained periodically, and when must renewal start?

Compare countries

Retain the exact legacy-change and lawful-stock conditions

answers.central.ivd-legacy-identity-and-stock
Fact-level verified

For eligible legacy IVDs, organisational/name/address/legal-form or AR changes are generally not significant design/intended-purpose changes under MDCG 2022-6. Apply amended Article 110 rather than the guidance’s obsolete2025 calendar: certificated and Class D branches end 31 December 2027, ClassC31 December 2028, and Class B/Class A sterile31 December 2029. Continued directive compliance, no significant design/intended-purpose change or unacceptable risk and a QMS by 26 May 2025 are required. The notified-body application/written-agreement deadlines are26 May/26 September 2025 for certificated/Class D,2026 for Class C and2027 for Class B/A sterile. Lawfully placed devices may continue to be made available or put into service under Article 110(4). This does not establish automatic certification inheritance by a different manufacturer or permission for all changed-label stock.

Conditions
  • Confirm directive status, certificate validity, class, original placement date, design/intended purpose, QMS and applicable notified-body milestones for each stock batch.
  • Continued lawful supply is conditional on ongoing compliance; this is not an unrestricted old-label sell-through authorisation.

Operating-licence validity

validity.licence-max-5-years
Fact-level verified

Operating licences have a validity period not exceeding five years, renewable on request after verification of compliance; any modification of the conditions under which the licence was granted requires prior authorization by the granting body (AEMPS).

Conditions
  • AEMPS-granted licences (manufacture, import, grouping, sterilisation).
  • Same rule for IVD licences in RD 942/2025 art. 7.8.

Effective from 2023-03-23

CE certificates follow the EU rule (MDR art. 56 validity); this national rule covers establishment licences only.

Annual update of the Registro de comercialización

validity.registro-annual-update
Fact-level verified

Economic operators must annually update their communication to the Registro de comercialización stating the products they continue to commercialize; failure to update causes removal (baja) of the products and of the operator from the Register. The IVD registro has the same annual-update rule (RD 942/2025 art. 15.5).

Conditions
  • Non-custom-made devices and IVDs.
  • Any change of communicated data and cessation of commercialization must also be communicated (art. 18.3).

Effective from 2023-03-23

Change control

Does the event require internal documentation, notice, prior approval, transfer, or a new application?

Compare countries

Update the actual economic operator and current EUDAMED records

answers.central.actor-changes-and-rollout
Fact-level verified

Manufacturers, authorised representatives and importers register their own actor identity in EUDAMED and obtain an SRN where required. Changes to Annex VI Part A actor information are updated within one week. Actor confirmation is due after one year and then every second year. The first four modules became mandatory from 28 May 2026 under the functionality notice and amended rollout provisions; device backfill has its own transitional schedule. An existing actor’s rename is different from a new legal person or a different role.

Conditions
  • The directly applicable EU actor provisions and functionality notice determine the start date; national registration roles remain separate.
  • The one-week duty and annual/biennial confirmations are not variation-review service standards.

Document an authorised-representative switch separately

answers.central.authorised-representative-sequence
Fact-level verified

An authorised-representative change must be addressed in an agreement between the manufacturer and, where practicable, outgoing and incoming representatives. It covers termination and start dates, the date until which the old representative may be shown in manufacturer information, transfer of documents including confidentiality/property rights, and forwarding of complaints or incident reports received after termination. These express sequence requirements concern an AR switch, not a change of legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • Only if the EU authorised representative actually changes.
  • Do not substitute an AR agreement for evidence of a manufacturer/registration-holder transfer.

Update the IVD licence conditions and Spanish commercialisation record separately

answers.central.ivd-licence-and-recops
Fact-level verified

A change to the conditions of a Spanish operating licence requires prior authorisation from the granting body under RD 942/2025 Article 7(8). Under Article 15, the economic operator’s commercialisation record identifies the operator, product trade name, UDI-DI, label/IFU and Spanish start date; communicate changes to those data and cessation. RECOPS is the current electronic system for non-custom-made MDs and IVDs, and it uses manufacturer/product/certificate information from EUDAMED. Earlier CCPS/RPS communications through 27 May 2026 are available for consultation only.

Conditions
  • Only the actual Spanish licensed operator/establishment conditions and marketed-product records; a foreign manufacturer’s office rename is not automatically a Spanish factory/licence modification.

Check the notified-body change approval before implementation

answers.central.ivd-notified-body-assessment
Fact-level verified

For the Annex IX route, inform the notified body that approved the quality system of planned substantial quality-system or device-range changes; it assesses the change and may require an additional audit. Changes to the approved device that could affect safety, performance or prescribed conditions of use need approval from the body that issued the technical-documentation assessment certificate. That body determines whether a new conformity assessment or a certificate supplement is needed. A name, logo or office-address edit is not automatically a substantial technical change.

Conditions
  • Only where the device uses the stated notified-body conformity-assessment route and the planned change meets its trigger.
  • A notified-body assessment is distinct from national operator registration; no universal review clock or commercial audit price is established here.

Distinguish a new manufacturer from an unchanged legal person

answers.central.true-person-and-own-brand
Fact-level verified

The manufacturer is the natural or legal person that manufactures or has a device designed/manufactured and markets it under its own name or trademark. A distributor, importer or other person making a device available under its own name/trademark generally assumes manufacturer obligations, except where an agreement leaves the identified manufacturer responsible on the label. Translation/repackaging under Article 16(2)–(4) is a separate conditional route. A change of local representative or importer is not, by itself, evidence that another legal manufacturer inherits the device certificate.

Conditions
  • Identify the outgoing and incoming legal persons, whether the certified entity survives, who places the device under its name, and the actual role being transferred.
  • This establishes responsibility and the own-name trigger; it is not a universal certificate-transfer procedure.

Clinical investigation & performance

Which clinical or IVD performance evidence or study is required and accepted?

Compare countries

Clinical-investigation insurance minimums

ci.insurance-minimums
Fact-level verified

The sponsor of a clinical investigation must take out insurance or a financial guarantee covering the liability of investigators and sponsor; the minimum coverage is EUR 250,000 per subject in the investigation, with a maximum of EUR 2,500,000 per investigation and per year. IVD performance studies carry the same minimums under RD 942/2025 arts. 26-27.

Conditions
  • Applies to sponsors of investigations conducted in Spain.
  • Guarantee must extend to the duration of the investigation and one year after its end.

Effective from 2023-03-23

IVD performance studies: national rules

ivd.performance-study-rules
Fact-level verified

IVD performance-study authorization is requested from AEMPS with timelines per Article 66 of Regulation (EU) 2017/746; the single binding ethics opinion comes from one CEIm in Spain (multicentre studies); study devices must be provided free of charge by the sponsor; and the sponsor needs insurance/guarantee of at least EUR 250,000 per subject (up to EUR 2,500,000 per study and year).

Conditions
  • Performance studies within RD 942/2025 arts. 24-29.
  • Investigational products only made available to investigators with favourable CEIm opinion.

Effective from 2025-10-24

Authorization fee: AEMPS code 5.22 explicitly covers IVD performance-study evaluation (EUR 1,553.51).

Dossier requirements

Which evidence, local deltas, formats, and signatures are required?

Compare countries

Use the current CERTPS certificate data and conditional supporting documents

answers.central.certps-current-identity-documents
Fact-level verified

The current CERTPS manual uses the legal manufacturer as stated in the DoC, notified-body certificate and label/IFU. A request has at most 100 product lines; references/models must be covered by the DoC but those fields are optional unless needed by the destination. Basic UDI-DI applies to Regulation-based certificates. Upload the signed DoC and applicable notified-body certificate/transition proof; an AR supplies its mandate, and a distributor supplies its regional activity communication and traceability records. Supply RECOPS proof where applicable, or justify the stated transition/non-availability condition. A same-company user-account transfer in CERTPS is not a transfer to another legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • Fresh export/free-sale-certificate request only; device regime, applicant role and destination determine required evidence.
  • Do not treat optional reference/model or owned-plant fields as universally mandatory variation materials.

Establishment, import & distribution

Which establishment licences, importer permissions, and distribution controls apply?

Compare countries

AEMPS prior operating licence

establishment.aemps-operating-licence
Fact-level verified

Persons engaged in manufacture, import, grouping (agrupación) or sterilisation of medical devices require a prior operating licence (licencia previa de funcionamiento) granted by AEMPS; the equivalent IVD rule (manufacture, import, sterilisation, full manufacture for third parties) is in RD 942/2025 art. 7.1.

Conditions
  • Licences are resolved within three months, are valid for a maximum of five years (renewable), and any modification requires prior AEMPS authorization (art. 7.3 and 7.8).
  • Custom-made manufacture is licensed by the regional health authority instead (art. 10.1).

Effective from 2023-03-23

Fees: AEMPS fee codes 5.17 (manufacture/sterilisation/reprocessing, EUR 983.85) and 5.18 (import/grouping, EUR 491.92).

Label, IFU & language

Which label and IFU elements, languages, symbols, and translation controls apply?

Compare countries

Keep the responsible manufacturer and device identity consistent

answers.central.ivd-identity-documents
Fact-level verified

The label identifies the device name or trade name, the manufacturer’s name, registered trade name or trademark and registered business address, and the EU authorised representative where applicable. Keep the EU declaration of conformity continuously updated: it identifies the responsible manufacturer, device/product or trade name, traceable product code or catalogue reference and Basic UDI-DI. A logo-only artwork change is not automatically a change of registered trade name or legal manufacturer.

Conditions
  • The actual changed label/DoC field must be identified; this fact concerns devices using an EU declaration of conformity under the IVDR.
  • This is an ongoing conformity-document obligation, not by itself a national variation application checklist.

Spanish-language requirement for IVDs

language.ivd-label-spanish
Fact-level verified

IVDs placed into service in Spain must bear the information required by section 20 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2017/746 at least in Spanish; the RD 942/2025 linguistic regime also requires notified-body-related documents and genetic-test consent forms to be provided at least in Spanish.

Conditions
  • Applies to IVDs marketed in Spain.
  • RD 942/2025 arts. 13.2, 14.1 and 11.7 extend the Spanish-language rule to designation documents and written genetic-test consent.

Effective from 2025-10-24

Official forms & portals

Which current form, portal, account, and submission package must be used?

Compare countries

RECOPS portal and closure of CCPS/RPS

forms.recops-portal
Fact-level verified

RECOPS is the AEMPS electronic application (via AEMPS sede electrónica) for the commercialization registration of devices other than custom-made and of IVDs; from 28 May 2026 no new communications are accepted through the former CCPS and RPS registers (which remain available for consultation only), except communications by custom-made device manufacturers, for whom RPS remains mandatory.

Conditions
  • RECOPS operational from 15 June 2026.
  • Registration must precede commercialization.

Effective from 2026-05-28

RECOPS bases product data on EUDAMED (device must be notified and visible there).

QMS, audit & inspection

Which QMS, audit, inspection, and certificate scope is accepted or required?

Compare countries

Establishment-licence quality requirements

qms.establishment-licence-requirements
Fact-level verified

To obtain the AEMPS operating licence, establishments must have a quality management system able to guarantee product quality, adequate installations/equipment/personnel, and a responsible technical person (titulación universitaria or ciclo formativo de grado superior) under contract with specified working hours; documentation per product must be kept available to authorities for at least ten years (fifteen years for implantables).

Conditions
  • Applies to licensed manufacture, import, grouping and sterilisation establishments (RD 192/2023 art. 8; RD 942/2025 art. 8 mirrors for IVDs).
  • Subcontractors must be declared and meet the quality and means requirements.

Effective from 2023-03-23

Recall, FSCA & market surveillance

Which recall, FSCA, notice, and authority-coordination duties apply?

Compare countries

FSCA prior notice to AEMPS and Spanish safety note

fsca.prior-notice-to-aemps-spanish
Fact-level verified

Manufacturers must inform AEMPS of any field safety corrective action before the action is carried out (per MDR arts. 87.1 and 88), and the safety note must be sent to AEMPS before its diffusion and be provided in Spanish; the identical rule for IVDs is in RD 942/2025 art. 30.6.

Conditions
  • Applies to FSCAs affecting devices placed on the Spanish market.

Effective from 2023-03-23

Market-surveillance inspection basis

market-surveillance.inspection-basis
Fact-level verified

AEMPS and Spanish administrations exercise market surveillance and inspection over devices per Articles 108.2 and 108.3 of the consolidated Law of guarantees and rational use of medicines and medical devices (RDLeg 1/2015), and adopt corrective measures independently of any sanctions; inspectors may request any information needed to verify compliance.

Conditions
  • Products marketed in Spain and products under clinical investigation.
  • For IVDs, RD 942/2025 adds precautionary measures per Law 14/1986 art. 26 and RDL 1/2015 art. 109 for unacceptable-risk products under IVDR art. 90.

Effective from 2023-03-23

Registration pathways

Which registration, notification, listing, reliance, or conformity route applies?

Compare countries

Separate CERTPS payment and service windows from variation review

answers.central.certps-fee-and-service-window
Fact-level verified

A new export/free-sale certificate is charged under tariff 4.1, EUR 153.79. CERTPS issues a separate certificate and charges a separate fee for each destination country even where a request lists several countries. Send the application within one month of payment. The quality commitment is 10 working days for a complete request; the period restarts after the requested correction/information is supplied, and in-depth classification or market-surveillance review is excluded. The payment window is the applicant’s deadline and the 10-day commitment concerns certificates, not general device changes.

Conditions
  • Only a new Spanish export certificate requested through CERTPS; no existing exact canonical typed certificate row was available for this transaction.

Check the export certificate against the new identity

answers.central.free-sale-certificate-scope
Fact-level verified

For export, the Member State where the manufacturer or authorised representative has its registered place of business shall issue a free-sale certificate upon a qualifying request under MDR Article 60 or IVDR Article 55. It states that the properly CE-marked device may be marketed in the Union and identifies the Basic UDI-DI and relevant notified-body certificate where applicable. This export-certificate route does not by itself require a new certificate for every ordinary name, label, address or reference change.

Conditions
  • Select the actual issuing state, applicant role, device legal regime and destination-country certificate requirements.

Market-access route or official registration surface

registration.market-access-route
Fact-level verified
Submission Surface

CE marking under MDR/IVDR plus national RECOPS commercialization registration (AEMPS) from 15 June 2026

Verified Highlights
  • RD 192/2023 art. 18 and RD 942/2025 art. 15 oblige any economic operator commercializing devices (other than custom-made) in Spain to be entered in the Registro de comercialización before commercialization.
  • From 28 May 2026 no new communications are accepted through the former CCPS and RPS registers, except custom-made manufacturers, whose RPS obligation continues.
  • RECOPS requires the product to be notified and visible in EUDAMED; product data are downloaded from EUDAMED.
Conditions
  • Custom-made devices follow the RPS route instead.
  • Pharmacies and exclusively-public points of sale are exempt from the registro obligation (art. 18.4).

Effective from 2026-06-15

Baseline fact confirmed with RD 192/2023 art. 18, RD 942/2025 art. 15 and the AEMPS RECOPS note.

RECOPS deadline after EUDAMED notification

registration.recops-deadline-eudamed
Fact-level verified

Economic operators commercializing products in Spain must make the communication to RECOPS within no more than six months from the product's notification to EUDAMED; the product must be notified and visible in EUDAMED because RECOPS downloads product data from EUDAMED.

Conditions
  • Applies from 15 June 2026.
  • Non-custom-made devices and IVDs.
  • Six-month rule stems from RD 192/2023 disposición transitoria séptima and is operationalized by RECOPS.

Effective from 2026-06-15

RD 192/2023 disposición transitoria séptima contains the same six-month rule for the transition to the Registro de comercialización.

Reliance & recognition

Which foreign decisions or evidence can be reused, with what effect and conditions?

Compare countries

Existing records include acceptance, restrictions and evidence reuse. The applicable product scope and conditions are preserved below; a reference does not by itself confer market access.

Spain approvals and evidence in other markets (157 records)

AlbaniaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Law No. 89/2014 as amended is built on the EU framework, so the CE certificate and the technical documentation behind it are the substance of the ABPM dossier rather than an optional extra. ABPM publishes no shorter period for CE-marked devices.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

AlgeriaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Usable as technical and QMS evidence in the dossier. Algeria requires its own registration decision and publishes no recognition route or origin-based reduction.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ArgentinaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Class II

Id

class-ii

Class Name

Class II

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Declaration of Conformity

Official Timeline
Min

15

Max

15

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Disposición ANMAT 9688/2019 (texto actualizado) — arts. 4–6 registration clocks, arts. 13/15/18 modification and transfer clocks

Url

https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/330000-334999/332646/texact.htm

Effective Date

2019-12-03

Accessed Date

2026-08-29

Realistic Timeline
Min

6

Max

12

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

4

Max

7

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA 510(k)
  • EU CE Mark
Notes
  • Art. 5: the INPM has 15 administrative working days to assess the dossier and rule
  • Since 16 Feb 2026 an imported Class II device authorised in a Decreto 892/2025 Annex I country can instead use the prior-notification route, which takes effect on filing
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

ArgentinaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Recognized for documentation

Timeline Savings

2-4 months

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

ArgentinaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Class IV

Id

class-iv

Class Name

Class IV

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Full Registration

Official Timeline
Min

110

Max

110

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Disposición ANMAT 9688/2019 (texto actualizado) — arts. 4–6 registration clocks, arts. 13/15/18 modification and transfer clocks

Url

https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/330000-334999/332646/texact.htm

Effective Date

2019-12-03

Accessed Date

2026-08-29

Realistic Timeline
Min

18

Max

24

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

12

Max

16

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA PMA
  • EU CE Mark Class III
Notes
  • Art. 6: Class IV runs on the same 110 administrative working days as Class III
  • Extensive clinical evidence and an on-site audit are possible, and art. 7 suspends the period during the deficiency response
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

ArgentinaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Class III

Id

class-iii

Class Name

Class III

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Registration with clinical data

Official Timeline
Min

110

Max

110

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Disposición ANMAT 9688/2019 (texto actualizado) — arts. 4–6 registration clocks, arts. 13/15/18 modification and transfer clocks

Url

https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/330000-334999/332646/texact.htm

Effective Date

2019-12-03

Accessed Date

2026-08-29

Realistic Timeline
Min

12

Max

18

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

8

Max

12

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA 510(k)/PMA
  • EU CE Mark
Notes
  • Art. 6: ANMAT has 110 administrative working days to assess the dossier and issue the administrative act
  • Art. 7 suspends that period while the applicant answers the single consolidated deficiency notice, which is why the realistic range is far longer
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

ArmeniaBrazil ANVISA · EU conformity assessment · US FDA · Health Canada · Singapore HSA · UK MHRA · South Korea MFDS · Japan MHLW / PMDA · NMPA · Australia TGA · Türkiye conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Import of an unregistered device requires proof of authorisation in the country of manufacture or in an IMDRF member country

reliance.origin-country-or-imdrf-authorisation-evidence-for-unregistered-import
Fact-level verified
Statement

A device that has no Armenian state registration can still be imported, but the import (conformity) certificate file must contain a document confirming that the device is authorised for use — state registration or free circulation — in its country of manufacture or in an IMDRF member country, or a reasoned reference to such a document, including a Declaration of Conformity with references to the relevant registers. This is the origin-country free-sale certificate requirement: a Turkish, Korean, Chinese or European exporter must produce its home-country registration/free-sale evidence (or an IMDRF-country equivalent) even though the device is not registered in Armenia. The document is mandatory paperwork; the Armenian expert organisation still examines the file and the Ministry of Health still decides.

Source Approval

Registration / free circulation in the country of manufacture, or in any IMDRF member country — US FDA, EU member states (CE), Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS, China NMPA, Canada, Australia, Brazil, Singapore, UK — evidenced by a registration certificate, free-sale certificate or a Declaration of Conformity with register references

Edge Type

Origin Country Evidence

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

Import Control

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The obligation attaches to the import (conformity) certificate for devices without Armenian state registration; for devices that do have Armenian state registration the equivalent item is a copy of the Armenian registration certificate, and the origin-country evidence is not required.
  • One of the ten statutory grounds for refusing the import certificate is that the imported device has no Armenian state registration, except in the cases the Law allows (Article 47.2(7)(8)). The origin/IMDRF evidence does not cure that ground where registration was required; it is the supporting document for the unregistered-device import cases the Law permits.
  • The file also requires, for every batch, a quality conformity certificate or equivalent, and the instructions for use or a reference to their electronic version (Annex 2, para. 2(2)(b), (c)).
  • The document list was extended by Government Decree No. 1731-Ն of 12.10.2023 and No. 1619-Ն of 17.10.2024.

Language: Armenian. Verbatim, Government Decree No. 429-Ն of 30.03.2023, Annex No. 2, para. 2(2)(a): "պետական գրանցում չունեցող բժշկական արտադրատեսակների համար՝ ա. բժշկական արտադրատեսակի արտադրող երկրում կամ Բժշկական արտադրատեսակների կարգավորող մարմինների միջազգային համաժողովի (IMDRF) անդամ երկրներում կիրառման թույլտվությունը (պետական գրանցումը, ազատ կիրառումը) հավաստող փաստաթուղթ կամ դրա վերաբերյալ փաստարկված տեղեկանք, այդ թվում՝ բժշկական արտադրատեսակների համապատասխանության հայտարարագիր (Declaration of Conformity) համապատասխան գրանցամատյանների հղումով". Translation: "for medical devices without state registration: a. a document confirming authorisation for use (state registration, free circulation) in the country of manufacture of the medical device or in member countries of the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF), or a reasoned reference thereto, including a Declaration of Conformity for the medical device with reference to the relevant registers".

ArmeniaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking under MDR/IVDR

Authority

EU CE marking under MDR/IVDR

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

An EU member state is an IMDRF member, so a CE-marked and EU-registered device meets the same simplified-route gate under Article 46(4); the CE certificate is not itself an Armenian marketing authorisation.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

ArmeniaBrazil ANVISA · EU conformity assessment · US FDA · Health Canada · Singapore HSA · UK MHRA · South Korea MFDS · Japan MHLW / PMDA · NMPA · Australia TGA · IMDRF member authorities · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

Simplified national registration for a device registered in an IMDRF member country or prequalified by WHO

reliance.imdrf-member-or-who-prequalified-simplified-registration
Fact-level verified
Statement

Armenia registers medical devices under two national procedures: a general procedure and a simplified procedure. The simplified procedure applies to a device that is registered in a country that is a member of the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) or that is prequalified by the World Health Organization. IMDRF members include the United States (FDA), the EU member states (CE marking), Japan (PMDA), Korea (MFDS), China (NMPA), Canada, Australia, Brazil, Singapore and the United Kingdom, so a US FDA 510(k)/PMA clearance, an EU CE mark, a Japan PMDA approval and a Korea MFDS approval all satisfy the gate. The device is still registered in Armenia by the Armenian authority — the foreign registration opens the shortened procedure, it does not replace the Armenian certificate.

Source Approval

Registration in any IMDRF member country — US FDA 510(k)/PMA, EU CE marking under MDR/IVDR (any EU member state), Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS, China NMPA, Health Canada, Australia TGA, Brazil ANVISA, Singapore HSA, UK MHRA — or WHO prequalification of the device

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The provision is written as an annex to part 3 of the same article: 'under the procedure laid down by part 3 of this article' devices are registered under the general and simplified procedures. Part 3 is itself the Armenia-only route, and a footnote to Article 46 states that part 3 operates only until the end of the transitional period set by Article 11 of the EAEU Agreement of 23 December 2014 (footnote inserted by Article 3(2) of the Law of 5 December 2024 ՀՕ-502-Ն). The transitional period was extended by the Protocol signed in Moscow on 29 December 2025, which replaced '2025' with '2027' in the first paragraph of Article 11 of that Agreement and '2026' with '2028' in the third and fourth paragraphs.
  • Bounded claim: the Law names IMDRF membership and WHO prequalification as the gate for the simplified procedure. It does not name the FDA, the CE mark, the PMDA or the MFDS; those follow from their countries' IMDRF membership, not from the text.
  • The operational content of the 'simplified procedure' (dossier list, clocks, certificate form) sits in the Government procedure that Article 46(3) contemplates; that instrument was not located in this session (see unresolved: registration-pathways).
  • Devices are registered by the Ministry of Health (the լիազոր մարմին / authorised body) with the examination carried out by the expert organisation designated by Government decision (Article 46(2), (5)).

Language: Armenian. Verbatim, Article 46(4): "Սույն հոդվածի 3-րդ մասով սահմանված կարգի համաձայն՝ բժշկական արտադրատեսակները գրանցվում են ընդհանուր և պարզեցված ընթացակարգերով: Պարզեցված ընթացակարգը կիրառվում է բժշկական արտադրատեսակների շրջանառությունը կարգավորող մարմինների միջազգային համաժողովի (IMDRF) անդամ երկրում գրանցված կամ Առողջապահության համաշխարհային կազմակերպության նախաորակավորած բժշկական արտադրատեսակների համար:" Translation: "Under the procedure laid down by part 3 of this article, medical devices are registered under general and simplified procedures. The simplified procedure applies to medical devices registered in a member country of the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) or prequalified by the World Health Organization." Article 46 was amended by the Law of 5 December 2024 ՀՕ-502-Ն; the consolidated expression is the version in force from 31.05.2026.

AustraliaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · MDSAP

Prior approval / evidence record

Class III — ARTG inclusion

Id

class-iii

Class Name

Class III — ARTG inclusion

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Inclusion in the ARTG on overseas or TGA conformity assessment evidence

Official Timeline
Min

20

Max

20

Unit

working-days

Realistic Timeline
Min

6

Max

9

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

3

Max

5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark (30-50% faster)
  • FDA 510(k)
  • MDSAP
Notes
  • The inclusion decision itself still carries the 20-working-day statutory clock. What makes Class III slow is what sits either side of it: an application audit, which has no legislated timeframe, and where TGA conformity assessment is required, a separate certificate that must be obtained first
  • Non-IVD Level 2 application audits: TGA expects the first round of specialist assessment within 100 working days, and will explain a revised timeframe if it cannot meet that
  • Sponsor responses to a s41JA notice or a Proposal to Refuse are due within 20-40 business days depending on complexity, and that time does not count against TGA targets
  • The published targets replaced an older blanket 60-working-day audit target that TGA says was arbitrary and not consistently met
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

TGA — processing your application for inclusion of a medical device: the decision is notified within 20 working days after the day the application fee was paid

Url

https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/application-and-market-authorisation/supply-medical-device/medical-device-inclusion-process/processing-your-application-inclusion-medical-device

Accessed Date

2026-08-30

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

AustraliaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · MDSAP

Prior approval / evidence record

Class IIb — ARTG inclusion

Id

class-iib

Class Name

Class IIb — ARTG inclusion

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Inclusion in the ARTG on overseas or TGA conformity assessment evidence

Official Timeline
Min

20

Max

20

Unit

working-days

Realistic Timeline
Min

1.5

Max

2

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

1

Max

1.5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • FDA 510(k)
  • MDSAP
Notes
  • Same 20-working-day statutory inclusion clock; audit selection is more likely at this class and suspends any published limit
  • Level 1 compulsory audits ran to a median of 14 and a mean of 27 TGA days in the published snapshot, and Level 2 compulsory audits to a median of 161 and a mean of 174
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

TGA — processing your application for inclusion of a medical device: the decision is notified within 20 working days after the day the application fee was paid

Url

https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/application-and-market-authorisation/supply-medical-device/medical-device-inclusion-process/processing-your-application-inclusion-medical-device

Accessed Date

2026-08-30

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

AustraliaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · MDSAP

Prior approval / evidence record

Class IIa — ARTG inclusion

Id

class-iia

Class Name

Class IIa — ARTG inclusion

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Inclusion in the ARTG on overseas or TGA conformity assessment evidence

Official Timeline
Min

20

Max

20

Unit

working-days

Realistic Timeline
Min

1

Max

1.5

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

0.75

Max

1

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • FDA 510(k)
  • MDSAP
Notes
  • The 20-working-day statutory clock runs to the inclusion decision, not to the end of an audit: if the application is selected for audit there is no legislated limit on what follows
  • Non-Class I applications completed without audit took a median of 9 and a mean of 10 TGA days in the published snapshot
  • Australia is unusual in splitting conformity assessment from market authorisation, which is what allows overseas certification to be used in place of a TGA assessment at this class
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

TGA — processing your application for inclusion of a medical device: the decision is notified within 20 working days after the day the application fee was paid

Url

https://www.tga.gov.au/products/medical-devices/application-and-market-authorisation/supply-medical-device/medical-device-inclusion-process/processing-your-application-inclusion-medical-device

Accessed Date

2026-08-30

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

AustraliaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Abridged assessment route - major timeline reduction

Timeline Savings

30-50%

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

AzerbaijanEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking under MDR/IVDR

Authority

EU CE marking under MDR/IVDR

Accepted

No

Benefit

Same position: the recognition list approved by Cabinet Resolution No. 480 of 26 December 2023 is applied to medicinal products only, so a CE mark does not displace the national dossier and expertise.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

BahrainEU conformity assessment · US FDA

Prior approval / evidence record

CE certificate under the medical-device directives/regulations or FDA Certificate to Foreign Government required as quality assurance certificate

reliance.ce-or-fda-quality-assurance-certificate
Fact-level verified
Statement

Registration of a medical device in Bahrain requires a Quality Assurance Certificate for the legal manufacturer, which is accepted in the form of a CE certificate under Directive 93/42/EEC, Regulation 2017/745, Directive 98/79/EC or Regulation 2017/746, or an FDA Certificate to Foreign Government (CFG), verified on the issuing body's website. The foreign approval is mandatory supporting paperwork for a local review that still runs in full, not a route that shortens it.

Source Approval

EU CE marking under MDD 93/42/EEC, MDR 2017/745, IVDD 98/79/EC or IVDR 2017/746; US FDA Certificate to Foreign Government (CFG)

Edge Type

Origin Country Evidence

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Not applicable for class I non-sterile devices and Class A / other IVDs, for which a Declaration of Conformity may be accepted instead
  • The certificate must be verified on the issuing body's website (Quality Assurance Certificates and Verification Process Guideline)
  • The address on the certificate must match the artwork
  • Applies to the legal manufacturer; a separate ISO 13485 certificate is required for the physical manufacturer

Verbatim source passage: "Quality Assurance Certificate (QAC) - CE directives 93/42/EEC, 2017/745, 98/79/EC, 2017/746 or FDA Certificate to Foreign Government (CFG) for the Legal manufacturer with the address matching the artwork along with verification evidence ... Not applicable for class I non-sterile and Class A/others IVD."

BahrainEU conformity assessment · US FDA

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE certificate under MDD 93/42/EEC, MDR 2017/745, IVDD 98/79/EC or IVDR 2017/746, or US FDA Certificate to Foreign Government

Authority

EU CE certificate under MDD 93/42/EEC, MDR 2017/745, IVDD 98/79/EC or IVDR 2017/746, or US FDA Certificate to Foreign Government

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Mandatory supporting documentation for a local review that still runs in full, not a route that shortens it: the CE certificate or CFG is the Quality Assurance Certificate required for the legal manufacturer, and for class III and class D IVDs the EC Design Examination certificate or CFG is an additional class-specific dossier item.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

BahrainEU conformity assessment · US FDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class III / Class D IVD requires an EC Design Examination certificate or FDA Certificate to Foreign Government

reliance.class-iii-ec-design-examination-or-fda-cfg
Fact-level verified
Statement

For class III medical devices and class D IVDs, Bahrain requires an EC Design Examination certificate or an FDA Certificate to Foreign Government for the legal manufacturer; the same document must be supplied for class IIb devices if available. The named foreign instrument is a mandatory class-specific dossier item, not a shortened review.

Source Approval

EC Design Examination certificate (EU notified body); US FDA Certificate to Foreign Government (CFG)

Edge Type

Origin Country Evidence

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Also required for class IIb medical devices 'if available'
  • Verification evidence for the EC Design Examination certificate must be provided
  • Class mapping: Bahrain classes I, IIa, IIb, III for general devices; classes A-D for IVDs

Verbatim source passage: "For class III medical devices as well as class D IVD's, an EC Design examination certificate or an FDA Certificate to Foreign Government (CFG) for the legal manufacturer is required along with verification evidence ... This document needs to be submitted for class IIB medical devices if available."

BangladeshEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Usable as supporting technical evidence on the same terms, with no recognition route and no published reduction.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

BelarusEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Technical and QMS documentation can be reused, but Belarus runs its own state registration and publishes no recognition route for a CE certificate.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

BoliviaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking

Authority

EU CE marking

Accepted

No

Benefit

No named-approval fast track exists. A CE certificate or ISO 13485 certificate is accepted as the quality-system evidence of numeral 2.3.1 of the device manual, not as an authorisation.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

Bosnia and HerzegovinaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking — EC certificate issued under Directives 90/385/EEC or 93/42/EEC

Authority

EU CE marking — EC certificate issued under Directives 90/385/EEC or 93/42/EEC

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Law čl. 102(3) requires a manufacturer whose conformity is determined by a conformity-assessment body recognised in the EU to affix the CE marking recognised in BiH, and the Agency's Instruction of 6 February 2025 sets out the conditions and documentation for recognising an EC certificate issued under Directive 90/385/EEC or 93/42/EEC that was valid on 26 May 2021 and not withdrawn, including the MDR Annex VII application-and-contract evidence. Recognition is an administrative act of the Agency under čl. 100 and 101 of the Law and čl. 68 of the Pravilnik; it does not replace entry in the Register, which under Pravilnik čl. 65(8) is what confers the right to place the device on the market.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

Bosnia and HerzegovinaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU MDR (Regulation (EU) 2017/745) notified-body certificate

Authority

EU MDR (Regulation (EU) 2017/745) notified-body certificate

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

The Agency's Instruction is expressly framed as the response to the EU's transition from the MDD/AIMD to the MDR and cites MDR Article 120, so an MDR certificate is recognised on the same basis as an EC certificate. Bosnia and Herzegovina is not an EU member and the MDR is not directly applicable; the certificate enters the national procedure as a conformity input.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

Bosnia and HerzegovinaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

In vitro diagnostic devices: EC certificate required except List D, with declaration of conformity

reliance.ivd-ec-certificate-required-except-list-d
Fact-level verified
Statement

For in vitro diagnostic medical devices the registration dossier must contain a certificate of conformity with the directives and regulations of the European Union (CE marking certificate, EC certificate) — except for in vitro diagnostic devices on List D — together with the manufacturer's declaration of conformity against the European directive stating the list to which the device belongs. Class I (other) non-IVD devices are likewise exempt from the EC-certificate limb.

Source Approval

EU in vitro diagnostic certificate (CE marking certificate / EC certificate) under the EU IVD directives or IVDR

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • List D in vitro diagnostic devices are exempt from the EC-certificate limb of Član 69. stav (1) tačka c), but the manufacturer's declaration of conformity under tačka d) is still required.
  • The device must still be entered in the Register of medical devices kept by the Agency.

Original (bs): as quoted. Translation: '(c) a certificate of conformity of the in vitro medical device with the directives and regulations of the European Union (CE marking certificate, EC certificate) or a certificate of conformity of the medical device, original or certified copy in the country of origin, except for in vitro medical devices on List D; (d) a manufacturer's declaration of conformity with the European directive for in vitro medical devices, stating exactly the list to which the device belongs (Declaration of conformity), original or certified copy in the country of origin'. Source bytes are the official gazette text as published in the legacy YUSCII-derived encoding used by „Službeni glasnik BiH“; the excerpt is normalised to standard Latin orthography (č/ć/š/ž/đ) without changing any wording.

BotswanaEU conformity assessment · US FDA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Swissmedic · Health Canada · Australia TGA · Iceland · Norway

Prior approval / evidence record

Stringent Regulatory Authority approval — ICH members (European Commission, US FDA, Japan MHLW/PMDA), ICH observers (Swissmedic, Health Canada) or an authority associated with an ICH member through a legally binding mutual recognition agreement (including Australia, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway)

Authority

Stringent Regulatory Authority approval — ICH members (European Commission, US FDA, Japan MHLW/PMDA), ICH observers (Swissmedic, Health Canada) or an authority associated with an ICH member through a legally binding mutual recognition agreement (including Australia, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway)

Accepted

No

Benefit

The SRA definition in G01 s.3.1.26 is used for dossier and reference purposes rather than as an automatic grant: an SRA approval does not by itself confer a Botswana registration, and it benefits the applicant only through the abridged pathway's proof-of-reference-agency requirement, which is defined by the separate Reference Regulatory Authority concept.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

BrazilEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

No

Benefit

Not an AREE under IN 290/2024 Art. 6

Timeline Savings

None

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

BulgariaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE under MDR/IVDR — single market validity

reliance.reliance-edge-eu-ce-to-eea30-approval-eu-ce-mdr-ivdr-bulgaria
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:bgr

Source Approval

EU CE under MDR/IVDR

Edge Type

Single Market Validity

Market Access Strength

direct

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Same Device Required

Yes

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • medical devices and IVDs subject to route-specific scope
  • valid CE conformity route for the device
  • country language, economic-operator, EUDAMED, and national vigilance obligations still apply

EU-level source confirms the single-market validity of CE marking; national Bulgarian layer (ЗМИ registration for class I route, Bulgarian IFU, wholesale permits, vigilance) still applies as conditions state.

CanadaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

No

Benefit

Not recognized

Timeline Savings

None

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ChileEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Chile requires ISP registration only for the controlled device families; for everything else the certificate supports importation rather than a registration decision. Where registration does apply, the ISP period does not vary with origin.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ChinaNMPA · US FDA · EU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Hainan Boao Pilot Zone

Name

Hainan Boao Pilot Zone

Description

Fast-track initial use with real-world data collection

Timeline Reduction

4 months vs 3-5 years standard

Eligibility
  • Approved overseas (FDA, CE)
  • Not yet registered in China nationally

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ChinaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Required as home country approval

Timeline Savings

Required documentation

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ColombiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class IIa

Id

class-iia

Class Name

Class IIa

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Registration (NSO)

Official Timeline
Min

2

Max

2

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Decreto 4725 de 2005 — INVIMA statutory review clocks (Arts. 21-22)

Url

https://normograma.invima.gov.co/normograma/compilacion/docs/decreto_4725_2005.htm

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

1

Max

2

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

2

Max

3

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • FDA
  • Health Canada
  • Japan MHLW
  • Australia TGA
Notes
  • Decreto 4725/2005 Arts. 21-22: automatic registro administrative act within 2 working days once documents are complete (Classes I and IIa)
  • Reliance pathway available for recognized approvals
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ColombiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class IIb

Id

class-iib

Class Name

Class IIb

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Registration (RSO)

Official Timeline
Min

90

Max

90

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Decreto 4725 de 2005 — INVIMA statutory review clocks (Arts. 21-22)

Url

https://normograma.invima.gov.co/normograma/compilacion/docs/decreto_4725_2005.htm

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

6

Max

12

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

4

Max

6

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • FDA
  • Health Canada
  • Japan MHLW
  • Australia TGA
Notes
  • Decreto 4725/2005: 90 working days for registro sanitario evaluation once documents are complete (Classes IIb and III)
  • Incomplete dossiers are rejected at filing (not suspended)
  • Technical documentation review required
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

Costa RicaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Accepted as evidence of conformity alongside the certificate of free sale. Decreto 38409-S art. 34.2 sets the same decision deadline for every class, so origin does not move it.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

Côte d'IvoireEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking / notified-body certificate

Authority

EU CE marking / notified-body certificate

Accepted

No

Benefit

Not a substitute for the AIRP Autorisation de Commercialisation, but a certified copy of the attestation de conformité obtained through the international procedures recognised by the AIRP is a required item of the Ivorian dossier, so the CE technical file is reusable evidence.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

CroatiaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking under MDR/IVDR — direct access to the Croatian market

reliance.eu-ce-marking-single-market-access
Fact-level verified
Statement

A device lawfully bearing CE marking under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 or Regulation (EU) 2017/746 may be placed on the Croatian market on the strength of that certificate. Croatia secures the implementation of the two Union regulations by the Zakon o provedbi Uredbe (EU) 2017/745 ... (NN 100/2018), which establishes the national competent authorities, the national procedural duties and the penalties, but creates no additional national product approval, no national certificate and no national re-assessment of the notified body's technical assessment.

Source Approval

EU CE Marking under MDR (EU) 2017/745 / IVDR (EU) 2017/746

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • The CE certificate must be issued by a notified body designated under MDR/IVDR for the device class and, for Class I devices, the manufacturer's own EU declaration of conformity applies.
  • Local duties still attach to the CE holder: registration of the manufacturer/authorised representative/importer with a unique registration number (Article 10 NN 100/2018), device registration in EUDAMED, the distributor register where the holder also distributes, Croatian-language information for patients and lay users (Article 30), market notification where the device is not in EUDAMED with Croatia listed, and vigilance reporting to HALMED.
  • Croatia applies MDR and IVDR directly; the implementing act exists to designate authorities and add national procedure, not to re-approve the device.
  • Applies equally to medical devices under the MDR and to in vitro diagnostic medical devices, which carry the CE marking under the IVDR.

Croatian (source language). Verbatim: "Ovim se Zakonom osigurava provedba sljedećih uredbi Europske unije: – Uredbe (EU) 2017/745 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 5. travnja 2017. o medicinskim proizvodima ... – Uredbe (EU) 2017/746 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 5. travnja 2017. o in vitro dijagnostičkim medicinskim proizvodima ...". Translation: "This Act secures the implementation of the following European Union regulations: Regulation (EU) 2017/745 ... Regulation (EU) 2017/746 ...".

CubaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Registration in a country with an essential-principles programme opens proceder B and waives some test reports

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

CyprusEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE marking under the Union regulations is the domestic route; Cyprus adds no requirement beyond Union and national law

reliance.eu-ce-marking-is-the-domestic-route
Fact-level verified
Statement

A CE mark under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (or 2017/746 for in vitro diagnostic medical devices) is the domestic route into Cyprus and is valid throughout the EU/EEA; CYMDA states that it has so far imposed no additional requirement beyond those provided for by Union and national legislation. What a CE holder still owes Cyprus is local: notify each device to CYMDA under Decree No. 7, ensure the importer is identified on the device, its packaging or an accompanying document, supply the information needed for safe and proper use in English and/or Greek (Greek mandatory for use by non-healthcare professionals), register in EUDAMED, and accept the market-surveillance and penalty powers under Law 225(I)/2022.

Source Approval

EU CE Marking under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) for medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) for in vitro diagnostic medical devices

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • The device notification under Decree No. 7 (Official Gazette No. 4462, 5 January 2012) must be made by each economic operator separately: CYMDA states that the notification of a device by one economic operator is independent of its notification of the same device by another economic operator.
  • The importer's name, registered trade name or registered trade mark, registered place of business and address must appear on the device, its packaging or an accompanying document, in addition to the manufacturer's marking under MDR Annex I point 23.1 / IVDR Annex I point 20.2, and any additional labelling must not cover information provided by the manufacturer.
  • Information required for the safe and proper use of the product must be provided in English and/or Greek; for products intended for use by non-healthcare professionals it must necessarily also be provided in Greek (Decree No. 6).
  • Economic operators (manufacturers, authorised representatives and importers) must register in the EUDAMED Actor module and manufacturers must register their devices in the UDI/Devices module; as at 15 September 2026 the first four EUDAMED modules have been mandatory since 28 May 2026.
  • A manufacturer without an establishment in a Member State may place the device on the Union market only by designating a sole authorised representative (Regulation (EU) 2017/745 Article 11(1)).
  • CYMDA states that on physical inspections the absence of the importer's details where required, incomplete manufacturer labelling, and the absence of instructions for use in Greek where required for lay use, make the device non-compliant with the MDR/IVDR and make its import and/or movement an infringement of Article 5(1) that may lead to fines.

Effective from 2025-11-06

Greek source, notice of 6 November 2025. Translation of the excerpt: 'the Competent Authority, responsible for market surveillance and the safety of medical devices in the Republic of Cyprus, and for supervising the application of the relevant Regulations, has so far not imposed any additional requirement beyond those provided for by Union and national legislation.' The excerpt supports the bounded claim that Cyprus itself adds nothing to the Union route; the CE mark's EU/EEA-wide effect rests on Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (source res-cy-mdr-2017-745).

Czech RepublicEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE under MDR/IVDR — single market validity

reliance.reliance-edge-eu-ce-to-eea30-approval-eu-ce-mdr-ivdr-czechia
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:cze

Source Approval

EU CE under MDR/IVDR

Edge Type

Single Market Validity

Market Access Strength

direct

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Same Device Required

Yes

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • medical devices and IVDs subject to route-specific scope
  • valid CE conformity route for the device
  • country language, economic-operator, EUDAMED, and national vigilance obligations still apply

EU-level baseline confirming the edge; national obligations verified separately in this file.

Dominican RepublicUS FDA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Australia TGA · EU conformity assessment · Iceland · Norway

Prior approval / evidence record

WHO Strict Authorities — US FDA, Health Canada, Japan NIHS, Australia TGA, EMA, Icelandic Medicines Agency, Norwegian Medicines Agency, Liechtenstein AML

Authority

WHO Strict Authorities — US FDA, Health Canada, Japan NIHS, Australia TGA, EMA, Icelandic Medicines Agency, Norwegian Medicines Agency, Liechtenstein AML

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Eligibility for the simplified registration procedure under Resolución No. 000004 on a Certificate of Free Sale plus a good-manufacturing-practices certificate from that authority, for new registrations and renewals of imported products; the remaining legal requirements still apply and DIGEMAPS retains the decision.

Timeline Savings

No published period: the MSP service listing shows 'Inmediatamente' rather than a number of days.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

EcuadorEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

A device already registered in a reference country is what makes the ARCSA homologation route available, and the certificate of free sale plus that reference registration are the substance of the dossier. ARCSA publishes its periods per procedure, not per origin.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

EgyptEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

A CE certificate and ISO 13485:2016 are the international quality certificates that open the GL.CAMD.002 route; Class I non-sterile devices are exempt from the CE requirement

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

EstoniaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE marking under MDR/IVDR is the domestic route

reliance.eu-ce-marking-domestic-route
Fact-level verified
Statement

For Estonia the CE marking route is not a foreign approval but the domestic route: Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746 apply directly in Estonia and the Estonian Medical Devices Act does not apply where those regulations apply, so a device holding a valid MDR/IVDR conformity assessment enters the Estonian market through the Union route. Only the national residual duties attach: notification of first distribution (MSS § 26(4)), Estonian-language information (MSS § 16(3)-(5)), data submission to the MSA register (MSS § 29) and the Union registration duties.

Source Approval

EU CE marking under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) or Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR)

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Estonia is an EU member state, so the recognition runs through the Union single market rather than through a bilateral instrument.
  • The Medical Devices Act's own market-placement conditions in § 16(1)-(2) were repealed with effect from 1 January 2023; the placement rule now rests on the directly applicable Union regulations.
  • National residual duties listed in the statement are each evidenced by their own fact in this file.

Effective from 2023-01-01

Estonian source. Verbatim: "(2) Käesolevat seadust ei kohaldata juhtudel, kui kohaldub Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus (EL) 2017/745, milles käsitletakse meditsiiniseadmeid, ... või Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrus (EL) 2017/746 in vitro diagnostikameditsiiniseadmete kohta ning millega tunnistatakse kehtetuks direktiiv 98/79/EÜ ja komisjoni otsus 2010/227/EL (ELT L 117, 05.05.2017, lk 176–332)." Consolidated text RT I, 12.07.2025, 23, in force 01.10.2025–30.09.2026.

EthiopiaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

For low-risk devices a CE certificate replaces the free-sale / marketing authorisation certificate

reliance.ce-certificate-waives-free-sale-low-risk
Fact-level verified
Statement

In the low-risk device route (Class I non-IVD and Class A IVD), EFDA states that if the applicant submits a CE certificate, the free-sale certificate or marketing authorisation certificate is not mandatory. Otherwise the applicant must supply an original and valid free-sale or marketing authorisation certificate from the responsible regulatory authority where the device is marketable. This is a documentation substitution for the lowest-risk classes and does not shorten the substantive review.

Source Approval

EU CE certificate (including CE marking under MDR 2017/745 / IVDR 2017/746 or the predecessor directives)

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Applies only to devices within the published low-risk list (GDL/092 Annex I) — Class I non-IVD and Class A IVD that are not sterile and have no measuring function.
  • The CE certificate does not replace the ISO 13485 quality management system certificate or the declaration of conformity.
  • Devices not on the low-risk list are routed to the ordinary registration requirements (GDL/097 / GDL/087).

Effective from 2026-06-30

Verbatim: 'If the applicant submits a CE certificate, these certificates are not mandatory. Otherwise, the applicant should submit an original and valid free sale certificate or marketing authorization certificate issued by the responsible regulatory authority where the medical device is marketable, to attest that the device is marketable, without any restriction at their jurisdiction.'

EthiopiaUS FDA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Australia TGA · Singapore HSA · EU conformity assessment · UK MHRA · Health Canada · South Korea MFDS

Prior approval / evidence record

Registration route for devices approved by a listed Stringent Regulatory Authority (FDA, EU, Japan, Australia, Singapore, UK, Canada, Korea)

reliance.sra-verification-route
Fact-level verified
Statement

A medical device that already holds a marketing authorisation, registration certificate or free-sale certificate from one of the authorities EFDA lists as a Stringent Regulatory Authority can be filed on the SRA route (EFDA/GDL/046 §9.4). The applicant still submits the complete administrative and technical dossier required by the ordinary registration guidelines, but EFDA reviews it as a verification exercise focused on the genuineness of the submitted information rather than a de-novo assessment, so the application takes shorter processing time. EFDA keeps the right to conduct a full assessment and to request further information whenever it deems necessary.

Source Approval

US FDA marketing authorisation / registration certificate / free-sale certificate; Japan MHLW; Australia TGA; Singapore HSA; a competent authority of one of the 27 EU Member States (Directive 93/42/EEC, Directive 98/79/EC, MDR 745/2017, IVDR 746/2017); UK MHRA; Health Canada; South Korea MFDS

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The route is a shortened review, not a dossier waiver: 'The applicants should submit all documentation required for registration of medical devices through full assessment path way, but it takes shorter processing time as it will focus on verifiying genuinness of submitted information.'
  • The claim must be supported by a marketing authorisation certificate or registration certificate or free-sale certificate issued by the listed authority (or by WHO/UNFPA prequalification evidence).
  • EFDA determines eligibility for the SRA route after screening the eRIS submission; an application filed as SRA on misleading information is rejected at screening or evaluation.
  • EFDA may still carry out a full assessment and request further information where a foreign approval does not provide the same assurance for use in Ethiopia.
  • The SRA list is published in GDL/046 §9.4 and 'will be updated as deemed necessary'.
  • The same list also appears (without Singapore HSA, UK MHRA and Korea MFDS) in the non-IVD and IVD registration requirement guidelines, which state that registration with those authorities is 'considered to be registered with Stringent Regulatory Authority approved devices registration procedures'.

Effective from 2026-06-25

Verbatim: 'At present, EFDA accepts the registration submissions as an SRA or prequalified products application if they're supported by one or more of the following document(s). 1. A Marketing Authorization certificate or registration certificate or free sale certificate issued by one of the following competent national regulatory authority: US Food and Drug Administration; Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan; Trapeutic Goods Administration, Australia; Health Science Authority, Singapore; Competent Authorities from one of the 27 Member States of the European Union who are responsible in Europe for the oversight of Directive 93/42/EEC, Directive 98/79/EC, MDR 745/2017, IVDR 746/2017.; Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, UK; Health Canada, Canada; Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, South Korea'. The passage also states: 'The applicants should submit all documentation required for registration of medical devices through full assessment path way, but it takes shorter processing time as it will focus on verifiying genuinness of submitted information.' Typographical errors are reproduced as they appear in the source.

European UnionEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Legacy Device Transition

Name

Legacy Device Transition

Description

Extended deadlines for MDD-certified devices

Timeline Reduction

Until Dec 2027 (Class III) or Dec 2028 (others)

Eligibility
  • Valid MDD certificate on Mar 20, 2023
  • No significant changes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

European UnionEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

MDD CE Mark

Authority

MDD CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Extended market access during transition

Timeline Savings

Until 2027-2028

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

GeorgiaEU conformity assessment · ISO

Prior approval / evidence record

Dental material, invasive contraceptive mechanical devices and diagnostic products: an ISO certificate, an EC certificate or a free sale certificate stands in for the CPP

reliance.iso-ec-or-free-sale-certificate-in-lieu-of-cpp
Fact-level verified
Statement

For the three device-type categories that are registered under the Law on Medicines — dental material, invasive mechanical means of contraception, and means of diagnostics (test systems, allergens, reagents, sera) — the administrative dossier may carry, in place of a WHO-format Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product and in place of the GMP document or manufacturing licence that substitutes for it, an ISO certificate or an EC certificate of the product manufacturer, or a free sale certificate. This is origin-country documentary evidence: it is required paperwork for the national registration dossier, and the Georgian registration decision is still taken locally.

Source Approval

EU EC certificate of the product manufacturer; ISO certificate of the product manufacturer; or a free sale certificate — accepted in lieu of a WHO-format Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product

Edge Type

Origin Country Evidence

Market Access Strength

Evidence Only

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Applies only to the three categories named in Art. 11^11(19)(d): dental material, an invasive mechanic means of contraception, or means of diagnostics.
  • These are also the only device-type categories given their own registration document list in Art. 11^11(20)(i)–(k) (contraceptive mechanical devices, dental product, diagnostic products).
  • The alternative is offered in the same sub-paragraph that requires the CPP, so it displaces the CPP requirement rather than adding to it; the rest of the dossier under Art. 11^11(19)–(20) still applies.

Language of source: English consolidated text on matsne.gov.ge. Verbatim: "d) a (original) CPP in the form recommended by the World Health Organization, and if it is not available – a document certifying that the pharmaceutical product has been manufactured according to the GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) standard, or a pharmaceutical product manufacturing licence issued by an authorised body of the manufacturing country. In the case of dental material, an invasive mechanic means of contraception, or means of diagnostics, an ISO certificate or an EC certificate of the product manufacturer, or a free sale certificate may be submitted;"

GeorgiaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking under MDR/IVDR

Authority

EU CE marking under MDR/IVDR

Accepted

No

Benefit

No recognition route for devices. An EC certificate of the product manufacturer is, however, expressly accepted in the administrative dossier of the three device-type categories registered under the Law on Medicines in place of a certificate of pharmaceutical product (Article 11^11(19)(d)), which is documentary relief rather than an approval. Georgia separately recognises EU technical regulations as such under Article 56(11) of the Product Safety and Free Movement Code.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

GhanaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

A CE certificate is the technical dossier and QMS evidence behind a reliance submission, and supports a desk-review waiver of the QMS audit.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

GuatemalaWHO · US FDA · EU conformity assessment · Japan MHLW / PMDA · South Korea MFDS

Prior approval / evidence record

Homologation on a WHO-listed-authority approval exists but is scoped to medicines and vaccines, not devices

reliance.homologation-who-listed-authority-medicines-vaccines-only
Fact-level verified
Statement

Guatemala does operate a reliance route: Norma Técnica 77 versión 8-2023 homologates a Guatemalan health registration on a registration already granted by a WHO-listed authority of high maturity and performance (WLA/ACO, ML3+). Article 2 confines that route expressly to pharmaceutical specialities of chemical synthesis and to vaccines (biological and biotechnological). It does not reach medical devices or in vitro diagnostics.

Source Approval

Approval by a WHO-listed authority (WLA/ACO, maturity level 3 or above) — e.g. US FDA, EMA, Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS — for chemical-synthesis medicines and vaccines only

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

none

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Scope limited to especialidades farmacéuticas de síntesis química and vacunas (biológicas y biotecnológicas).
  • Not available for medical devices or IVDs; marketAccessStrength is 'none' for those domains because the route exists but gives them nothing.
  • The WHO-listed authorities eligible are those published in the DRCPFA's own official lists.

Spanish source (Guatemala). Translation: "Article 2. Scope of application. This Technical Norm applies to pharmaceutical specialities of chemical synthesis and vaccines (biological and biotechnological) that hold a Health Registration granted by high-maturity-and-performance Regulatory Authorities as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), published in the official lists of the Department of Regulation and Control of Pharmaceutical and Related Products, hereinafter THE DEPARTMENT." The norm's own title is 'HOMOLOGACIÓN DEL REGISTRO SANITARIO DE MEDICAMENTOS Y VACUNAS'. Art. 4.3 of the same norm defines the WLA/ACO concept and states that authorities reaching at least general maturity level 3 (ML3) qualify.

GuatemalaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Japan MHLW / PMDA · South Korea MFDS

Prior approval / evidence record

WHO-listed authorities of high maturity and performance (US FDA, EMA, Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS and others)

Authority

WHO-listed authorities of high maturity and performance (US FDA, EMA, Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS and others)

Accepted

No

Benefit

A foreign marketing approval is not among the NT-37 Art. 5.1 dossier items and opens no recognition route for devices. A Certificate of Free Sale from any competent origin-country authority is required paperwork, and a manufacturing-guarantee certificate from a named authority (FDA, DGKC, IFCC, ISO or a GMP certificate) satisfies one dossier item (NT-37 Arts. 5.1.5-5.1.6 and 6.12.6). The full local review still runs.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

Hong KongEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

MDR certificates, or MDD certificates with a Regulation (EU) 2023/607 extension letter, satisfy D002; an EU ER or GSPR checklist may then replace the MD-CCL

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

IcelandEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

The CE route reaches Iceland through EEA Agreement incorporation, not EU membership

reliance.eea-agreement-incorporation-mechanism
Fact-level verified
Statement

Iceland is not an EU member state. The EU route exists in Iceland because the EEA Joint Committee took MDR (EU) 2017/745, IVDR (EU) 2017/746 and Regulation (EU) 2020/561 up into the EEA Agreement (Decisions No 288/2019 and 301/2019 of 13 December 2019, and No 90 of 18 June 2020) and the Icelandic parliament then gave them the force of law by Article 2 of Act No. 132/2020, with the EEA adaptations. The practical consequence is that a CE-marked device lawfully placed on the EEA market may be placed on the Icelandic market and that the substantive obligations are the Union text as adapted, not a separate Icelandic regime.

Source Approval

EEA incorporation of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (EEA Joint Committee Decisions No 288/2019, No 301/2019, No 90/2020)

Edge Type

Single Market Validity

Market Access Strength

direct

Regulatory Layer

Regional Harmonisation

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

Effective from 2021-05-26

Icelandic. edgeType reuses the established token single_market_validity because the effect is single-market validity; the distinct mechanism recorded here is the EEA treaty incorporation itself (regulatoryLayer regional_harmonisation), which matters to a filer because the citation to give a regulator is the EEA Joint Committee decision read with the national lögfesting, and because the same route extends to all EEA states rather than only to Iceland.

IcelandEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Notified body certificate under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 issued in any EEA State

Authority

Notified body certificate under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 issued in any EEA State

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

The certificate and the CE marking it supports are valid for the Icelandic market without any Icelandic recognition step, and no Icelandic authority re-examines the conformity assessment. This is the practical reliance route into Iceland, and the reason Lyfjastofnun operates no national approval of its own.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

IcelandEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking under MDR/IVDR is the Icelandic market-access route, with no separate local application

reliance.ce-marking-eea-single-market
Fact-level verified
Statement

A device that carries CE marking under MDR (EU) 2017/745 or IVDR (EU) 2017/746 and a valid EU declaration of conformity may be placed on the Icelandic market and put into service without any Icelandic pre-market approval, registration of the device, or conformity assessment. Iceland applies the same MDR/IVDR text as the EU/EEA single market, so the notified-body certificate is the market-access decision; Iceland runs no parallel review and issues no national device approval of its own.

Source Approval

EU CE under MDR/IVDR (notified-body certificate plus EU declaration of conformity per MDR Annex IV)

Edge Type

Single Market Validity

Market Access Strength

direct

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

Effective from 2021-05-26

Icelandic. 'Áður en lækningatæki er sett á markað, selt eða tekið í notkun er skylt að CE-merkja tækið í samræmi við nánari fyrirmæli reglugerðanna og það ferli sem sett er fram í IX.–XI. viðauka með reglugerðunum.' marketAccessStrength is written as 'direct' rather than the round's 'facilitated' because no local route exists at all: there is nothing for the CE mark to shorten, and the registry already uses 'direct' with single_market_validity for the other EEA/EFTA states (Norway, Liechtenstein) and the EU member states. 'facilitated' would understate the position and imply a residual Icelandic review.

IndiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · GHTF

Prior approval / evidence record

Class A

Id

class-a

Class Name

Class A

Risk Level

low

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

45

Max

45

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

CDSCO Medical Devices Rules, 2017 (G.S.R. 78(E))

Url

https://cdsco.gov.in/opencms/resources/UploadCDSCOWeb/2022/m_device/Medical%20Devices%20Rules%2C%202017.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

6

Max

9

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

3

Max

5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • GHTF country approval (FDA, EU, Japan, Australia, UK)
Notes
  • Licence granted or rejected within 45 days of application (Rule 20(4)); Notified Body audit happens within 120 days after licence grant, not before (Rule 20(4) proviso (ii))
  • GHTF approval provides significant advantage
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

IndiaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

A free sale certificate from an EU country triggers the same Rule 36(3) waiver of clinical investigation. The EU is not named in the Rule 63(1) proviso, so a no-predicate device still needs the MD-27 route.

Timeline Savings

None published — the saving is the clinical investigation, not the clock

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

IndonesiaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Supports the Certificate of Free Sale and the technical evidence in the CSDT, but Kemenkes publishes no shorter period for it

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

IndonesiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · ASEAN

Prior approval / evidence record

Class C

Id

class-c

Class Name

Class C

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Full Registration

Official Timeline
Min

30

Max

30

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Kemkes Regalkes — evaluation guideline Annex 8 service-standard clocks

Url

https://regalkes.kemkes.go.id/informasi_alkes/Indonesia%20Guideline%20for%20Evaluation%20of%20Medical%20Device%20and%20IVD%202020.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

6

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • ASEAN MRA countries
  • FDA
  • EU CE Mark
Notes
  • Official service-standard clock for imported Class C izin edar (new application): 30 working days of evaluation (Annex 8)
  • Clinical data may be required
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

IndonesiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · ASEAN

Prior approval / evidence record

Class D

Id

class-d

Class Name

Class D

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Full Registration

Official Timeline
Min

45

Max

45

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Kemkes Regalkes — evaluation guideline Annex 8 service-standard clocks

Url

https://regalkes.kemkes.go.id/informasi_alkes/Indonesia%20Guideline%20for%20Evaluation%20of%20Medical%20Device%20and%20IVD%202020.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

5

Max

7

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • ASEAN MRA countries
  • FDA
  • EU CE Mark
Notes
  • Official service-standard clock for imported Class D izin edar (new application): 45 working days of evaluation (Annex 8)
  • Clinical evidence required
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

IndonesiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · ASEAN

Prior approval / evidence record

Class B

Id

class-b

Class Name

Class B

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

30

Max

30

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Kemkes Regalkes — evaluation guideline Annex 8 service-standard clocks

Url

https://regalkes.kemkes.go.id/informasi_alkes/Indonesia%20Guideline%20for%20Evaluation%20of%20Medical%20Device%20and%20IVD%202020.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

6

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • ASEAN MRA countries
  • FDA
  • EU CE Mark
Notes
  • Official service-standard clock for imported Class B izin edar (new application): 30 working days of evaluation (Annex 8)
  • ASEAN harmonization applies
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

IraqEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Origin-market evidence expected in practice; no Iraqi instrument on a reachable source grants an abridged period for it

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

IrelandEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE under MDR/IVDR — single market validity

reliance.reliance-edge-eu-ce-to-eea30-approval-eu-ce-mdr-ivdr-ireland
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:irl

Source Approval

EU CE under MDR/IVDR

Edge Type

Single Market Validity

Market Access Strength

direct

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Same Device Required

Yes

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • medical devices and IVDs subject to route-specific scope
  • valid CE conformity route for the device
  • country language, economic-operator, EUDAMED, and national vigilance obligations still apply

Re-verified on the Commission CE-marking page; national operator registration and vigilance channels in Ireland are recorded as separate facts.

IsraelUS FDA · UK MHRA · Germany · France · Italy · Spain · Netherlands · Belgium · Ireland · Denmark · Sweden · Finland · Norway · Iceland · Greece · Portugal · Austria · Swissmedic · Australia TGA · Health Canada · New Zealand

Regulatory reference

Recognized-state registration route

reliance.recognized-country-route
Fact-level verified

A device registered, or approved for marketing and actually marketed, in a 'recognized state' (מדינה מוכרת) is registered in the Israeli register for a period not exceeding the period it may be marketed in that state, capped at 5 years from Israeli registration. Recognized states are listed in the First Addendum to the law — 21 states including the US, UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Ireland, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Iceland, Greece, Portugal, Austria, Switzerland, Australia, Canada and New Zealand (no single 'EU' entry: member states are listed individually).

Conditions
  • Device must be registered or permitted for marketing and actually marketed in the recognized state.

First Addendum list per the official Sefer HaChukim text of the law held from gov.il.

IsraelEU conformity assessment

Regulatory reference

EU CE with extended validity

reliance.ce-extended-validity
Fact-level verified

Where registration relies on European approvals extended under EU transition rules, the Israeli register validity is based on the extension granted under the European regulation; the expiry date entered in the application (per new EU rules, e.g. 31.12.2027 or 31.12.2028) must follow those conditions.

Conditions
  • Applies to CE-based registrations with EU-granted extensions.

Confirms the baseline EU-CE reliance edge.

IsraelEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

A recognized-state CE certificate puts a Class I device on the declaration track and an EU Class IIa device or IVDD Self Test / IVDR class B on fast track 1, in both cases with four months of marketing in the recognized state. EU Class IIb and IVDD LIST B / IVDR class C need the CE certificate plus a second independent authority for fast track 2.

Timeline Savings

Declaration track is up to 48 hours and fast track 1 up to 45 working days, against the 120-day regular-track target

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

JapanEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

No

Benefit

ISO 13485 applicable to Ordinance 169; no abridged Japanese period

Timeline Savings

2-4 months prep

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

JordanEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

The أسس adopt the EU directives by reference for the class axis, and the annexes require the CE certificate and a free-sale certificate from the country of origin

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

KazakhstanEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Technical and QMS documentation can be reused, but the EAEU route requires its own national expertise. The 70 and 110 working-day service periods in Order ҚР ДСМ-10 do not change with origin.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

KenyaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Opens the reliance route inside fast track, which replaces the 24-month FIFO review with a 90-day one

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

KuwaitUS FDA · EU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

US FDA approval and the EU route — a CE certificate from an EU-authorized notified body

Authority

US FDA approval and the EU route — a CE certificate from an EU-authorized notified body

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Two of the recognised reference authorities for the Abridged Review Pathway and the first two entries in the class B/C/D dossier's product verification and validation list; an accelerated assessment that still runs under Kuwaiti requirements and post-market obligations, with the acceptance decision reserved to the Administration.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

LatviaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE marking under the Union regulations is the domestic route; no separate Latvian approval decision

reliance.eu-ce-marking-is-the-domestic-route
Fact-level verified
Statement

A CE mark under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (or 2017/746 for IVDs) is the domestic route into Latvia and is valid throughout the EU/EEA. Once the Latvian notification procedure is complete, the notifier is entitled to place the device on the Latvian market without any decision or approval of the State Agency of Medicines; the agency publishes the notification data and the procedure is then deemed complete. What remains are local obligations: a manufacturer without an EU establishment must designate a sole authorised representative, and a distributor established in Latvia must be entered in the LATMED database before making devices available.

Source Approval

EU CE Marking under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) for medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) for in vitro diagnostic medical devices

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • The notification attaches to class IIa, IIb and III medical devices (MK noteikumi Nr. 461 paragraph 9) and to class B, C and D, A-list, B-list and self-test IVDs (MK noteikumi Nr. 582 paragraph 8).
  • The agency checks the submitted declaration of conformity and notified-body certificates against the national regulation, Regulation (EU) 2017/745 and directly applicable EU acts, and may require corrections or translations (MK noteikumi Nr. 461 paragraphs 10 and 16).
  • Manufacturers not established in a Member State may place a device on the Union market only if they designate a sole authorised representative (source res-lv-mdr, Article 11(1)).
  • Distributors established in Latvia may make devices available on the Latvian market only if information about them is entered in the LATMED database (MK noteikumi Nr. 461 paragraph 41.1).
  • Notification may be omitted once the manufacturer complies with MDR Article 29(4) EUDAMED registration, in the window from six to eighteen months after the Commission announces full EUDAMED functionality (MK noteikumi Nr. 461 paragraph 13).

Effective from 2023-08-23

Latvian source; translation: '12. The persons referred to in paragraph 9 of these Regulations, after completion of the notification procedure, are entitled to place the medical device on the market of the Republic of Latvia without a decision or approval of the agency.' The excerpt supports the bounded claim that Latvia issues no separate national approval for a CE-marked device; the EU/EEA-wide validity of the CE mark rests on Regulation (EU) 2017/745 itself (source res-lv-mdr).

LebanonUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Swissmedic · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

US FDA (510(k)/PMA approval or approval letter), European Union (conformity certificate issued by the manufacturer and by EU-notified bodies), Swiss, Australian, Canadian or Japanese competent health authorities (conformity certificate)

Authority

US FDA (510(k)/PMA approval or approval letter), European Union (conformity certificate issued by the manufacturer and by EU-notified bodies), Swiss, Australian, Canadian or Japanese competent health authorities (conformity certificate)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Accepted and in practice required for an implantable device: Decision 455/1 Art. Six lists them as the conformity documents that go into the registration file — a European-standards certificate from the manufacturer and EU-notified bodies, an FDA marketing approval or approval letter, or a conformity certificate from the health authorities of Switzerland, Australia, Canada or Japan — and Decision 1506/1 Art. Four requires a GHTF/IMDRF free-sale certificate on top. The Ministry's service records for sterile instruments and laboratory reagents require FDA evidence for US-origin goods and CE evidence for European ones. The benefit is documentary, not a shortened clock: none of the instruments publishes an abbreviated examination period, and the registration certificate is still issued on the Health Technology Unit's advice to the Minister.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

LiechtensteinEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE under MDR/IVDR - single market validity

reliance.reliance-edge-eu-ce-to-eea30-approval-eu-ce-mdr-ivdr-liechtenstein
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:lie

Source Approval

EU CE under MDR/IVDR

Edge Type

Single Market Validity

Market Access Strength

direct

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Same Device Required

Yes

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • medical devices and IVDs subject to route-specific scope
  • valid CE conformity route for the device
  • country language, economic-operator, EUDAMED, and national vigilance obligations still apply

Effective from 2021-05-26

LithuaniaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE under MDR/IVDR — single market validity

reliance.reliance-edge-eu-ce-to-eea30-approval-eu-ce-mdr-ivdr-lithuania
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:ltu

Source Approval

EU CE under MDR/IVDR

Edge Type

Single Market Validity

Market Access Strength

direct

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Same Device Required

Yes

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

National Verification

HSL Art. 59-1(1) permits on the Lithuanian market only devices conforming to Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (or, for IVDs, the technical regulation later replaced by references to Regulation (EU) 2017/746); national law adds only registration/notification, language and vigilance duties — it creates no separate national approval.

Conditions
  • medical devices and IVDs subject to route-specific scope
  • valid CE conformity route for the device
  • country language, economic-operator, EUDAMED, and national vigilance obligations still apply
LuxembourgEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE under MDR/IVDR — single market validity

reliance.reliance-edge-eu-ce-to-eea30-approval-eu-ce-mdr-ivdr-luxembourg
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:lux

Source Approval

EU CE under MDR/IVDR

Edge Type

Single Market Validity

Market Access Strength

direct

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Same Device Required

Yes

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • medical devices and IVDs subject to route-specific scope
  • valid CE conformity route for the device
  • country language, economic-operator, EUDAMED, and national vigilance obligations still apply

Confirmed on the Luxembourg CA website; national conditions (registration, language, vigilance) still apply.

MacauEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Usable as supporting technical evidence. Administrative Regulation 11/2026 sets the 5, 70 and 100 working-day periods by class, not by origin.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MalaysiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Singapore HSA · TFDA (jurisdiction not specified in this entry)

Prior approval / evidence record

Class B

Id

class-b

Class Name

Class B

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

30

Max

30

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

MDA/GD/0070 — registration submission guide, cl. 6.4 turnaround

Url

https://www.mda.gov.my/index.php/documents/ukk/3766-final-medical-device-registration-submission-guide-for-conformity-assessment-by-way-of-verification-process-and-submission-of-application-in-medc-st-second-edition

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

3

Max

6

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

3

Max

6

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • MHLW
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • FDA
  • MHRA
  • HSA
  • TFDA
Notes
  • MDA/GD/0070 cl. 6.4: Class B registration turn-around 30 working days from complete documents and cleared payment
  • ASEAN harmonization applies
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MalaysiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Singapore HSA · TFDA (jurisdiction not specified in this entry)

Prior approval / evidence record

Class C

Id

class-c

Class Name

Class C

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

30

Max

30

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

MDA/GD/0070 — registration submission guide, cl. 6.4 turnaround

Url

https://www.mda.gov.my/index.php/documents/ukk/3766-final-medical-device-registration-submission-guide-for-conformity-assessment-by-way-of-verification-process-and-submission-of-application-in-medc-st-second-edition

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

3

Max

6

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

3

Max

6

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • MHLW
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • FDA
  • MHRA
  • HSA
  • TFDA
Notes
  • MDA/GD/0070 cl. 6.4: Class C registration turn-around 30 working days from complete documents and cleared payment
  • Clinical data may be required
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MalaysiaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Singapore HSA · TFDA (jurisdiction not specified in this entry)

Prior approval / evidence record

Class D

Id

class-d

Class Name

Class D

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Full Registration

Official Timeline
Min

30

Max

30

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

MDA/GD/0070 — registration submission guide, cl. 6.4 turnaround

Url

https://www.mda.gov.my/index.php/documents/ukk/3766-final-medical-device-registration-submission-guide-for-conformity-assessment-by-way-of-verification-process-and-submission-of-application-in-medc-st-second-edition

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

3

Max

6

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

3

Max

6

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark
  • MHLW
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • FDA
  • MHRA
  • HSA
  • TFDA
Notes
  • MDA/GD/0070 cl. 6.4: Class D registration turn-around 30 working days from complete documents and cleared payment
  • Clinical evidence required
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MalaysiaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Accepted as reference-country evidence supporting the conformity assessment, but the MDA publishes no shorter period for it

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MaltaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU/EEA CE marking under MDR/IVDR — the domestic route, free movement into Malta

reliance.eu-ce-marking-single-market-route
Fact-level verified
Statement

CE marking under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) or Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) is not a foreign approval in Malta — it is the domestic route. A device that complies with the applicable Union Regulation may be placed on the Maltese market without any Maltese pre-market review of the device, because Member States may not refuse, prohibit or restrict the making available of a compliant device on their territory. The device does not need to be re-certified, re-registered or re-approved in Malta. Local obligations still attach to the entities and to the presentation of the device: the Maltese economic operator must register with the Malta Medicines Authority, appoint a registered Medical Device Registered Person, enter the devices in the national medical device database, and label in English or Maltese.

Source Approval

EU CE Marking under MDR (Regulation (EU) 2017/745) / IVDR (Regulation (EU) 2017/746)

Edge Type

Single Market Validity

Market Access Strength

direct

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • This is the domestic conformity route, not a recognition of another jurisdiction's approval; a CE certificate issued by a notified body anywhere in the Union or EEA is valid for Malta.
  • Operator-side duties remain: organisation registration, MDRP registration, device notification and the national database entry (S.L. 458.59 regs. 5(2)(f)-(g) and 6; MMA GL-MDF02 and GL-MDF05).
  • Information supplied with the device must be in English, Maltese or both (MMA Factsheet for Importers & Distributors).
  • IVDR equivalent of the free-movement clause: Article 21, Regulation (EU) 2017/746.
  • Where the device relies on a Directive-era certificate, Regulation (EU) 2023/607 extended validity to 31 December 2027 (class III and class IIb implantable) or 31 December 2028 (other class IIb, class IIa, and class I sterile or with a measuring function).

Effective from 2021-05-26

The quoted free-movement clause is the Union rule that makes a CE-marked device directly placeable in Malta; the operator-side conditions listed here come from the Maltese instrument and the Authority's own guidance, and are recorded as separate facts.

MexicoNMPA · US FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Swissmedic · South Korea MFDS · Singapore HSA · Brazil ANVISA · IMDRF member authorities · MDSAP · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

Vía regulatoria abreviada — ARR equivalence (COFEPRIS-04-050)

Name

Vía regulatoria abreviada — ARR equivalence (COFEPRIS-04-050)

Description

The single reliance route since the DOF Acuerdo of 18 July 2025, which took effect 30 working days after publication and abrogated every individual equivalence agreement issued between 2012 and June 2025 — the separate FDA, Swissmedic, European Commission, Health Canada, TGA and WHO prequalification acuerdos no longer exist. COFEPRIS now recognises the decision of any Reference Regulatory Authority from a country sitting on the IMDRF Management Committee, and MDSAP full membership for GMP certificates. The dossier drops to an administrative-legal section plus technical information under RIS Art. 31.

Timeline Reduction

Resolution within a maximum of 30 working days

Eligibility
  • Prior authorisation by a Reference Regulatory Authority in one of the twelve IMDRF Management Committee jurisdictions: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the United States
  • MDSAP full members are recognised for the good-manufacturing-practice certificate
  • Filed under homoclave COFEPRIS-04-050 rather than the ordinary COFEPRIS-04-060 registration
  • Post-market surveillance or technovigilance evidence from the reference market, translated into Spanish under RIS Art. 153

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MexicoEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

The European Union sits on the IMDRF Management Committee, so it became a Reference Regulatory Authority under the July 2025 Lineamientos

Timeline Savings

Resolution capped at 30 working days

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

MoldovaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR)

Authority

EU CE marking under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) and Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

AMDM states that medical devices bearing the CE marking are placed on the market by way of the registration procedure, so the CE marking is the conformity input to the national route and there is a dedicated notification and registration procedure for it; the Agency describes the framework introduced by Ordinul nr. Rg04-264 din 08.09.2026 as aligned with the relevant European framework, including Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746. Moldova is an EU candidate state and not a member, the MDR is not directly applicable, and the CE marking does not remove the entry in the State Register.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

MongoliaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Japan MHLW / PMDA · South Korea MFDS · NMPA

Prior approval / evidence record

FDA 510(k)/PMA, EU CE marking, Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS, China NMPA or any other foreign device approval

Authority

FDA 510(k)/PMA, EU CE marking, Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS, China NMPA or any other foreign device approval

Accepted

No

Benefit

Mongolia recognises none of them and names none of them. Art. 33.2 requires the Agency to take into account that the device has been placed on the market in its country of manufacture, Order A/136 §3.6 permits the foreign risk grade to be considered, and Annex Two §§3.9.5 and 3.10.5 require a marketing authorisation or free-sales certificate — but no authority, country or reference list appears anywhere in the Law, in Order A/206 or in Annex Two, the foreign element is evidence of origin-country market placement rather than a recognised authorisation, no clock is shortened, and the Medical Devices Council still takes the decision.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

MontenegroEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Direct recognition is limited to EU notified-body documents and CE marking

reliance.direct-recognition-limited-to-eu-notified-body-documents
Fact-level verified
Statement

A foreign document, or the CE mark, is directly recognised in Montenegro if it was issued by a notified body of the European Union, or if it was affixed to the device in accordance with the harmonised technical regulation of the European Union. Direct recognition is conditional on the foreign technical regulation providing at least the same level of protection of safety, health, environment and consumers as the corresponding Montenegrin technical regulation, and on the requirements the foreign conformity-assessment body has to meet not being laxer than the Montenegrin ones. A recognition decision is valid until the foreign document expires, or at most three years from its issue if no expiry is stated.

Source Approval

EU CE Marking issued by an EU notified body (prijavljeno tijelo) under the EU harmonised technical regulation

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The recognition request must name the foreign document/CE mark, the foreign technical regulation under which it was issued, the conformity-assessment body that issued it, and the state that notified that body (Rulebook Art. 7).
  • Validity: until the foreign document expires; at most three years if the foreign document states no expiry (Rulebook Art. 8(3)).

Effective from 2022-08-10

Verbatim Član 6: "Inostrana isprava, odnosno CE znak se direktno priznaje u Crnoj Gori ako je izdata od strane prijavljenog tijela Evropske unije, odnosno ako je postavljen na medicinsko sredstvo u skladu sa harmonizovanim tehničkim propisom u Evropskoj uniji." Član 5 st. 1 sets the two equivalence conditions; Član 8 st. 2-3 sets validity. Translation: a foreign document, i.e. the CE mark, is directly recognised in Montenegro if issued by an EU notified body or affixed in accordance with the EU harmonised technical regulation. Source language: Montenegrin.

MontenegroEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

IVDR-compliant declaration of conformity required for in vitro diagnostic devices

reliance.ivdr-compliant-declaration-of-conformity-required
Fact-level verified
Statement

For in vitro diagnostic devices that were "other IVD" under Directive 98/79/EC and are Class A under IVDR (EU) 2017/746 — i.e. needing no notified body — a declaration of conformity issued under Directive 98/79/EC is no longer a valid document after 26 May 2022 and will not be recognised by the Institute; the declaration of conformity must comply with IVDR (EU) 2017/746. Legacy IVDD certificates that were valid on 26 May 2022 and not withdrawn may keep devices on the market at the latest until 31 December 2027, subject to the IVDR Art. 110(3) conditions.

Source Approval

EU CE Marking under IVDR (EU) 2017/746

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The Institute's notice relies on IVDR Art. 110(3) as amended by EU 2022/112, EU 2023/607 and EU 2024/1860, and on opinions of the Montenegrin Ministry of Health of 23.11.2022 and 14.12.2023.

Effective from 2025-06-18

Verbatim: "Nakon 26.05.2022. godine, Deklaracija o usaglašenosti izdata u skladu sa zahtjevima Direktive 98/79 EC ne može se smatrati validnim dokumentom, te takva Deklaracija neće biti priznata u postupcima koji se vode pred Institutom za ljekove i medicinska sredstva. Deklaracija o usaglašenosti mora biti u skladu sa zahtjevima Regulative EU 2017/746." and "... in vitro dijagnostičko sredstvo može biti u prometu najkasnije do 31.12.2027. godine". Source language: Montenegrin.

MontenegroEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR)

Authority

EU CE marking under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

A declaration of conformity or EC certificate issued by an EU manufacturer or an EU-notified body is recognised as the conformity input in the CInMED registration procedure under the Pravilnik o priznavanju inostranih isprava i CE znaka, and it lowers the fee line for devices that would otherwise be registered without an EU conformity document. It does not remove the national registration, and CInMED no longer accepts declarations issued under the MDD/AIMD that are not aligned with Regulation (EU) 2017/745.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

MoroccoEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking certificate

Authority

EU CE marking certificate

Accepted

No

Benefit

Mandatory dossier item 4 for classes Is, Im, II A, II B and III, with a CE design-examination certificate additionally required for class III. It does not shorten the review: the device is still registered nationally by the AMMPS, and the AMMPS recognition framework covers medicines and vaccines only.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

MyanmarEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Usable as technical and QMS evidence in the import dossier. Myanmar has no Medical Device Act and DFDA publishes no recognition route, so a CE certificate carries no defined standing beyond the documents it supplies.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

New ZealandEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Neither required nor rewarded. WAND is a sponsor notification rather than an assessment: Medsafe does not review the device before it goes on the database, so there is no decision for a foreign approval to influence. The certificate matters as evidence the sponsor holds behind the notification.

Timeline Savings

None — there is no review period to shorten

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

North MacedoniaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking — a certificate of EC conformity issued by a notified body

Authority

EU CE marking — a certificate of EC conformity issued by a notified body

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

A device that holds a certificate of EC conformity follows the abridged documentation route in чл. 7 of the 151/2010 rulebook (declaration of conformity, EC certificate, EN ISO 13485 certificate, free-sale certificate, insurance policy and representation contract) instead of the full quality, safety and efficacy dossier required by чл. 8, and чл. 22 of the same rulebook ties the register entry's validity to the validity of the certificate. It does not remove the national register entry: чл. 131 of the Law still requires the device to be entered in MALMED's register, and чл. 119 ст. 3 governs the EC mark on the device. A declaration under the MDD or AIMD is not converted into a certificate under Regulation (EU) 2017/745 by this route, because North Macedonia is not an EU/EEA member state and does not apply that Regulation.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

North MacedoniaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

An EU-recognised notified body's EC certificate opens an abridged national dossier route, but the national registration decision is still taken

reliance.eu-notified-body-ec-certificate-abridged-route
Fact-level verified
Statement

North Macedonia recognises conformity assessment performed through institutions recognised in the European Union. A device whose conformity is assessed by a notified body recognised in the European Union is marked with the EC mark, and the Agency accepts the resulting EC certificate or the manufacturer's EC declaration of conformity in place of full quality, safety and efficacy data. Where the device holds an EC certificate the registration dossier is the short documentary set in Article 7 of the 151/10 rulebook; where it does not, Article 8 requires the full administrative dossier plus quality, safety and efficacy data and an Agency opinion on efficacy, with risk analysis for class IIb, III, AIMD and List A/B IVDs. CE marking does not by itself confer market access: the device must still be entered in the national register of medical devices by decision of the Agency.

Source Approval

EU CE marking — EC certificate of conformity issued by a notified body recognised in the European Union, or (for class I devices and general IVDs) the manufacturer's European EC declaration of conformity

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • A local application is always required: the device must be entered in MALMED's register of medical devices and the applicant must be a domestic manufacturer, a legal representative, a branch or a trade representation with a registered seat in the country and insurance covering its territory.
  • The abridged dossier is documentary only — declaration of conformity, EC certificate (except class I and general IVDs), EN ISO 13485 certificate, free-sale certificate, insurance and representation contract — and the Agency may still require further data.
  • A nationally authorised conformity-assessment body may be used instead; the Law provides for bodies authorised by the Minister of Health.
  • The Law's conformity-assessment provisions are based on the pre-MDR MDD/AIMDD/IVDD certificate architecture; MDR (EU) 2017/745 and IVDR (EU) 2017/746 do not apply directly in North Macedonia.

Macedonian. Article 118(1) states the two permitted conformity-assessment routes: 'со оцена на сообразноста преку институции препознаени во Европската унија, односно соодветно тело за оцена на сообразноста или преку тела овластени од страна на министерот за здравство'. Article 119(3): 'медицинско средство, чија сообразност со општите и посебните услови е проценето од тело за оцена на сообразноста, односно од нотифицирано тело препознаено во Европската унија, е означено со ЕC ознака.' marketAccessStrength is 'facilitated' and not 'direct' because the recognised certificate opens a shortened documentary route only; the Agency retains and exercises its own registration decision.

NorwayEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE under MDR/IVDR — single market validity

reliance.reliance-edge-eu-ce-to-eea30-approval-eu-ce-mdr-ivdr-norway
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:nor

Source Approval

EU CE under MDR/IVDR

Edge Type

Single Market Validity

Market Access Strength

direct

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Same Device Required

Yes

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • medical devices and IVDs subject to route-specific scope
  • valid CE conformity route for the device
  • country language, economic-operator, EUDAMED, and national vigilance obligations still apply

CA treats Norway as part of the single EU/EEA market: registration (not approval) is the national act; MDR/IVDR are Norwegian law via the EEA Agreement (Lov om medisinsk utstyr § 1).

OmanEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

A conformity certificate and a certificate of free sale from the country of origin are what the dossier is built on. The published service period does not change with origin.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

PanamaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Free-sale certificate and ISO 13485 evidence satisfy the technical-criterion documentary requirements

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ParaguayBrazil ANVISA · US FDA · Health Canada · Austria · Belgium · Denmark · Finland · France · Germany · Hungary · Ireland · Italy · Netherlands · New Zealand · Norway · Spain · Sweden · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Swissmedic · Australia TGA · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

IVD Annex I reference-country list drives the 30/45/120-business-day clocks

reliance.ivd-anexo-i-reference-country-list
Fact-level verified
Statement

For IVDs, DINAVISA decides within 30 business days for products manufactured nationally or in a country of Annex I, within 45 business days for products manufactured outside Annex I but registered and commercialised in an Annex I country (which must additionally file the foreign registration certificate and free-sale certificate), and within 120 business days for other imports. Annex I names high-surveillance and adequate-surveillance authorities and the full MERCOSUR members; the United States and Japan are on it and Korea is not.

Source Approval

Sanitary registration and free-sale certificate in force in an Annex I country — high-surveillance authorities (Germany, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Spain, United States, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Sweden, Switzerland) or adequate-surveillance authorities (Australia, Chile, Cuba, Finland, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Mexico, Norway, New Zealand); Annex I also lists full MERCOSUR members (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay) and PAHO/WHO reference authorities

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The Annex I list derives from Ley N° 3283/2007 Art. 11 (high and adequate sanitary surveillance).
  • A product made outside Annex I is admitted on a 45-day clock only if it is registered and commercialised in an Annex I country.
  • Korea (MFDS) does not appear in Annex I, so a Korean-only IVD authorisation does not by itself reach the 30/45-day clocks.
  • A Paraguayan sanitary registration is still required in every case.

Source language: Spanish. Translation of the quoted Annex I heading and entries: 'Countries with High and Adequate Sanitary Surveillance Authorities (Law 3283/07 Article 11)' / 'Countries with high sanitary surveillance regulatory authorities: Germany, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Spain, United States, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Sweden and Switzerland.' / 'Full MERCOSUR members: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay.' The excerpt is taken from the resolution's own Annex I; Art. 6 supplies the 30- and 45-business-day clocks.

ParaguayEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking / EU notified body certificate

Authority

EU CE marking / EU notified body certificate

Accepted

No

Benefit

The European Commission (DG SANTE), EMA and EU national authorities appear in the Listado Anual Oficial with an Alcance of medicamentos and vacunas; a CE certificate is accepted as quality-system evidence under Art. 6(a) but does not replace Paraguayan registration.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

ParaguayBrazil ANVISA · EU conformity assessment · US FDA · Health Canada · Singapore HSA · IMDRF member authorities · Portugal · Spain · South Korea MFDS · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · NMPA · Taiwan TFDA · Australia TGA · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

IVD simplified registration (PSR) for products authorised by PAHO/WHO, IMDRF or bilateral-partner authorities

reliance.ivd-psr-reference-authorities
Fact-level verified
Statement

Class II, III and IV in-vitro diagnostic products already authorised and commercialised in countries regulated by PAHO/WHO reference regulatory authorities, by authorities of IMDRF Management Committee member countries, or by authorities with bilateral agreements with DINAVISA enter the Proceso Simplificado de Registro Sanitario (PSR). DINAVISA has 15 business days to validate and decide, and approval follows by positive silence if no report is issued.

Source Approval

PAHO/WHO reference regulatory authorities; authorities of IMDRF Management Committee member countries (the IMDRF committee includes US FDA, EU, Japan PMDA/MHLW, Health Canada, TGA, ANVISA, China NMPA, Korea MFDS, Singapore HSA and UK MHRA); authorities with bilateral agreements with DINAVISA

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • Applies to class II, III and IV IVDs (Res. 44/2024 Art. 7: 'Clases II, III y IV'); class I IVDs are registered automatically under Res. 266/2022 Art. 14.
  • The IVD must actually be commercialised in one of those countries and the foreign registration must correspond specifically to the same product being registered.
  • 15 business days to validate; approval by positive silence.
  • Objections may be answered only once (Art. 3), with 30 business days to rectify.
  • Not applicable to the cases in Arts. 13 and 16 of Res. DINAVISA N° 266/2022 (Art. 11).

Effective from 2024-01-30

Source language: Spanish. Translation of the operative part of Art. 2: 'Applications for sanitary registration of In Vitro Diagnostic Products ... that are authorised and commercialised in countries regulated by: PAHO/WHO Reference Regulatory Authorities; Regulatory Authorities of member countries of the Committee of the International Medical Device Regulators Forum - IMDRF; Regulatory Authorities with which bilateral agreements with DINAVISA exist, shall be subject to the Simplified Sanitary Registration Process (PSR).' and 'DINAVISA shall have a term of 15 (fifteen) business days to validate the required documentation and decide thereon. Once the term has elapsed with no report from DINAVISA, the application shall be approved.' Article numbering confirmed by reading the page image of the official PDF.

PeruUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Brazil ANVISA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class III

Id

class-iii

Class Name

Class III

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

66

Max

66

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

DIGEMID TUPA (D.S. 011-2026-SA) — device procedure attention periods

Url

https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/10349703/8409411-tupa-parte-2.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

6

Max

12

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

4

Max

7

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA 510(k)/PMA
  • EU CE Mark
  • ANVISA
Notes
  • TUPA (D.S. 011-2026-SA): Clase III within 66 business days; statutory parallel cap 90 calendar days (Art. 136)
  • Technical file review required
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

PeruUS FDA · EU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Class IV

Id

class-iv

Class Name

Class IV

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Full Registration

Official Timeline
Min

66

Max

66

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

DIGEMID TUPA (D.S. 011-2026-SA) — device procedure attention periods

Url

https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/10349703/8409411-tupa-parte-2.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

8

Max

15

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

5

Max

8

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA PMA
  • EU CE Mark Class III
Notes
  • TUPA (D.S. 011-2026-SA): Clase IV within 66 business days; statutory parallel cap 90 calendar days (Art. 136)
  • All device procedures carry negative administrative silence (no deemed approval on lapse)
  • Clinical data may be required
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

PeruUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Brazil ANVISA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class II

Id

class-ii

Class Name

Class II

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

44

Max

44

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

DIGEMID TUPA (D.S. 011-2026-SA) — device procedure attention periods

Url

https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/10349703/8409411-tupa-parte-2.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

8

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

3

Max

5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA 510(k)
  • EU CE Mark
  • ANVISA
Notes
  • TUPA (D.S. 011-2026-SA): Clase II within 44 business days; statutory parallel cap 60 calendar days (Art. 136)
  • CAN harmonization applies
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

PeruEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Accepted where the certificate of free sale comes from one of the eleven EU or EFTA states on the high-surveillance list. A CE certificate from a notified body in a member state outside that list does not by itself carry the same standing.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

PeruUS FDA · UK MHRA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · Australia TGA · Swissmedic · South Korea MFDS · Germany · France · Netherlands · Spain · Italy · Belgium · Portugal · Ireland · Austria · Hungary · Denmark · Norway · Sweden

Prior approval / evidence record

País de Alta Vigilancia Sanitaria (art. 9 D.S. 016-2011-SA): United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, Switzerland, South Korea, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Hungary, Denmark, Norway, Sweden

Authority

País de Alta Vigilancia Sanitaria (art. 9 D.S. 016-2011-SA): United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, Switzerland, South Korea, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Portugal, Ireland, Austria, Hungary, Denmark, Norway, Sweden

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

The Peruvian route to relying on a foreign approval is documentary, not procedural. A certificate of free sale or a GMP certificate issued by a high-surveillance authority is accepted directly, and if the issuing authority appears on the Resolución Directoral 169-2014-DIGEMID list the document does not need an apostille. Everything else still goes through DIGEMID certification.

Timeline Savings

None published — the TUPA period is set by class, not by origin

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

PhilippinesEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Supports the Certificate of Free Sale and the CSDT technical evidence, but the Philippine FDA publishes no shorter period for it

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

PhilippinesUS FDA · EU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Class D

Id

class-d

Class Name

Class D

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Full Registration

Official Timeline
Min

180

Max

180

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

FDA Philippines AO 2018-0002 — statutory evaluation clocks

Url

https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/10/89924

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

9

Max

18

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

6

Max

10

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA PMA
  • EU CE Mark Class III
Notes
  • AO 2018-0002 Sec. VII.A.4: initial applications evaluated within 180 days upon filing
  • Abridged processing (ASEAN NRA-approved): 30 working days (FDA Circular 2022-008)
  • Clinical evidence required
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

PhilippinesUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · ASEAN

Prior approval / evidence record

Class B

Id

class-b

Class Name

Class B

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

80

Max

80

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

FDA Philippines Citizen’s Charter 2025 — CDRRHR total processing times

Url

https://www.fda.gov.ph/citizen-charter-cdrrhr-2025/

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

9

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

3

Max

5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA
  • EU CE Mark
  • ASEAN MRA
Notes
  • 2025 Citizen's Charter: CMDR Class B initial registration decided in 80 total working days for complete applications
  • Abridged processing (ASEAN NRA-approved Class B/C/D): 30 working days from receipt of proof of payment (FDA Circular 2022-008)
  • ASEAN harmonization applies
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

PhilippinesUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · ASEAN

Prior approval / evidence record

Class C

Id

class-c

Class Name

Class C

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

180

Max

180

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

FDA Philippines AO 2018-0002 — statutory evaluation clocks

Url

https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/10/89924

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

6

Max

12

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

4

Max

7

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA
  • EU CE Mark
  • ASEAN MRA
Notes
  • AO 2018-0002 Sec. VII.A.4: initial applications evaluated within 180 days upon filing
  • Abridged processing (ASEAN NRA-approved): 30 working days (FDA Circular 2022-008)
  • Clinical data may be required
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

RussiaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Technical and QMS documentation can be reused, but the EAEU route requires its own expertise at VNIIMT and its own Russian-language dossier. Roszdravnadzor publishes no reduced period for CE-marked devices.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

RwandaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Japan MHLW / PMDA · South Korea MFDS · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

Abridged assessment route taking account of prior assessment and inspection outcomes from WHO prequalification or a competent NRA, on a sameness declaration with SRA / WHO PQ / EAC registration

reliance.abridged-assessment-sra-who-pq-eac
Fact-level verified
Statement

Rwanda FDA operates an abridged assessment procedure for medical device registration. Abridged assessment is defined as a limited independent assessment of specific parts of the dossier, taking into account prior assessment (dossier review and/or independent performance evaluation) and inspection outcomes from WHO prequalification or any National Regulatory Authority the Authority deems competent. The cover letter template for an abridged application (Appendix 1 of DHT/GDL/024) requires the applicant to confirm that the product dossier submitted is the same in all aspects as the product registered with the relevant SRA, WHO PQ and EAC. The statutory basis is Article 16 of the device registration regulations, which allows the Authority to rely on regulatory decisions of regional, international and other stringent regulatory authorities for product market authorisation. For devices under abridged assessment, QMS compliance of the manufacturing site is confirmed by desk review rather than an on-site inspection, although the Authority may still conduct an on-site inspection if necessary.

Source Approval

US FDA; EU CE marking under MDR 2017/745 / IVDR 2017/746 or the predecessor directives; Japan PMDA/MHLW; Korea MFDS; and any other authority the Rwanda FDA deems competent under the SRA concept, where the product is registered with that authority as an SRA; WHO Prequalification; EAC registration

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The applicant must declare sameness of the dossier with the product registered with the relevant SRA, WHO PQ and EAC; the declaration is a tick-box on the Appendix 1 cover letter marked 'Only for Abridged Applications' (p. 67).
  • The abridged procedure is assessed within 60 working days, against 180 working days for full assessment.
  • QMS audit compliance for abridged devices is confirmed by desk review; the Authority may nevertheless conduct an on-site inspection where necessary.
  • Neither DHT/GDL/024 nor the reliance guideline names US FDA, the EU, Japan or Korea as SRAs; the SRA concept is incorporated by reference and eligibility of a specific authority is determined by the Authority.
  • Class C and Class D devices under the ordinary route must file a Rwanda FDA QMS audit certificate or proof of QMS audit application.

Effective from 2025-11-01

Verbatim (Glossary 2): "'Abridged assessment' a limited independent assessment of specific parts of the dossier, or regulatory submission of data for suitability of use under local conditions and regulatory requirements, taking into account prior assessment (including dossier review and/or independent performance evaluation) and inspection outcomes from WHO prequalification or any National Regulatory Authority (NRA) deemed by the Authority as competent to inform the latter in its decision." Verbatim (application form): 'I confirm that the Product Dossier information submitted is the same in all aspects as the product registered with the relevant SRA, WHO PQ and EAC (Only for Abridged Applications)'.

RwandaUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Japan MHLW / PMDA · South Korea MFDS

Prior approval / evidence record

FDA 510(k) / PMA, EU CE marking, Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS

Authority

FDA 510(k) / PMA, EU CE marking, Japan PMDA, Korea MFDS

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Handled through the SRA concept rather than by a substitute approval; the Rwandan registration and certificate are still issued by Rwanda FDA and the reliance decision is discretionary.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

RwandaWHO · EU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Reliance guideline recognises WHO PQ/CRP, SRAs, WHO Listed Authorities and transitional WLA category B, EMA/EAC joint assessments and ML3 authorities with an MoU

reliance.reference-authority-categories
Fact-level verified
Statement

Rwanda FDA's Guidelines on Reliance for Regulatory Decision-Making (ODG/RAHC/GDL/001 Rev 3) apply to all types of medical products and to registration, marketing authorisation, GMP/GCP inspections, clinical trials, vigilance, post-marketing surveillance and laboratory testing. For marketing authorisation the Authority may apply reliance where the product has been evaluated and listed as a WHO Prequalified Product (including the WHO PQ collaborative registration procedure), approved by stringent regulatory authorities, registered by WHO Listed Authorities (WLAs) or WHO transitional Listed Authorities (category B), recommended by continental or regional harmonisation initiatives such as EMA and the East African Community through joint dossier assessments, or registered by an ML3 functioning regulatory authority holding a memorandum of understanding with Rwanda FDA. The reliance pathway for marketing authorisation is stated to take 90 working days excluding clock stops.

Source Approval

WHO Prequalification and the WHO PQ Collaborative Registration Procedure; Stringent Regulatory Authorities; WHO Listed Authorities and WHO transitional Listed Authorities (category B); EMA and EAC joint dossier assessments; ML3 authorities holding an MoU with Rwanda FDA

Edge Type

Abridged Or Recognition Route

Market Access Strength

facilitated

Regulatory Layer

Premarket Review

Local Application Required

Yes

Target Decision Retained

Yes

Conditions
  • The guideline defines 'Reference Regulatory Authority' as a national, regional or international authority or trusted institution such as WHO prequalification and WHO transitional Listed Authorities whose decisions or work products are relied upon.
  • Reliance is stated to be a sovereign decision: 'The Authority decides when and how to use reliance and in which circumstances.'
  • The guideline does not publish an enumerated annex of named SRAs; it adopts the WHO categories.
  • Reliance requires verification of sameness between the product submitted to Rwanda FDA and the product assessed by the reference authority.

Effective from 2024-02-14

Verbatim (5.1): 'The Authority may apply reliance procedures for granting Marketing Authorization in the following situations: a) The product should have been evaluated and listed as a WHO Prequalified Product including the WHO PQ collaborative registration procedure between WHO and the Authority. b) The product should have been approved by Stringent regulatory authorities. c) The product should have been registered by a WHO listed Authorities (WLAs) and WHO transitional Listed Authorities (B category). d) The product should have been recommended by Continental and Regional regulatory harmonization initiatives and networks such as EMA and EAC, through the Joint Dossier Assessments e) The product should have been registered by ML3 functioning regulatory Authorities having Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Rwanda FDA.' Verbatim (Scope): 'These Guidelines cover reliance activities regarding all types of medical products and regulatory activities using reliance approaches.'

Saudi ArabiaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

No

Benefit

GHTF route canceled Jan 2022

Timeline Savings

None

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

SenegalEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE marking / notified-body certificate

Authority

EU CE marking / notified-body certificate

Accepted

No

Benefit

Not a substitute for ARP registration, but the technical file, the déclaration de conformité and the test reports behind a CE certificate are the same evidence the ARP requires for the enregistrement dossier.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

SerbiaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

ALIMS registration is EU-aligned and rests on the CE certificate, but the 30-day decision period in Art. 52 of the Law on Medical Devices is the same whatever the origin.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

SingaporeUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class C

Id

class-c

Class Name

Class C

Risk Level

high

Pathway

IBR/Expedited/Full Route

Official Timeline
Min

0

Max

220

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

HSA fees and turnaround time for medical devices

Url

https://www.hsa.gov.sg/medical-devices/fees/

Effective Date

2026-03-26

Accessed Date

2026-08-13

Realistic Timeline
Min

6

Max

12

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

0.03

Max

0.03

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • MHLW
  • FDA
  • EU NB
Notes
  • Five Class C routes: an immediate route confined to standalone medical mobile applications, expedited (ECR) at 120 working days, abridged at 160, full at 220, and full under the Priority Review Scheme at 143
  • ECR-1 needs one reference approval plus three years of marketing there; ECR-2 needs two reference approvals. Both require no prior rejection or withdrawal by HSA or a reference agency
  • Hip, knee and shoulder joint replacement non-bioactive implants are barred from ECR and must go full or abridged
  • HSA turnaround times exclude applicant stop-clock time
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

SingaporeUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class B

Id

class-b

Class Name

Class B

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

IBR/Expedited/Full Route

Official Timeline
Min

0

Max

160

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

HSA fees and turnaround time for medical devices

Url

https://www.hsa.gov.sg/medical-devices/fees/

Effective Date

2026-03-26

Accessed Date

2026-08-13

Realistic Timeline
Min

3

Max

9

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

0.03

Max

0.03

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • MHLW
  • FDA
  • EU NB
Notes
  • Four Class B routes, and which one applies is decided by how many reference approvals the device already holds rather than by choice: Immediate Class B Registration is granted on submission, abridged takes 100 working days, full takes 160, and full under the Priority Review Scheme takes 104
  • IBR needs either one reference approval plus three years of marketing in that jurisdiction, or two reference approvals, and in both cases no global safety issue and no prior rejection or withdrawal. A standalone medical mobile application qualifies for an immediate route on one reference approval with no marketing history
  • Abridged needs at least one reference approval; a device with none must go full route
  • HSA turnaround times exclude applicant stop-clock time
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

SingaporeUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Two reference approvals (any two of US FDA, EU Notified Body, Health Canada, Australia TGA, Japan MHLW)

Authority

Two reference approvals (any two of US FDA, EU Notified Body, Health Canada, Australia TGA, Japan MHLW)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

At Class B this is the IBR trigger and registration is granted on submission. At Class C and D it is the ECR-2 or EDR trigger.

Timeline Savings

Class B immediate against 160 working days; Class C 120 against 220; Class D 180 against 310

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

SingaporeEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Qualifies for the abridged route on the same terms, but only via the specific EC certificate routes HSA lists — a self-declared Class I CE mark does not count, and neither does a reference-agency Class I or Class II exempt classification.

Timeline Savings

Class B 100 working days against 160; Class C 160 against 220; Class D 220 against 310

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

SingaporeUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class D

Id

class-d

Class Name

Class D

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

IBR/Expedited/Full Route

Official Timeline
Min

180

Max

310

Unit

working-days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

HSA fees and turnaround time for medical devices

Url

https://www.hsa.gov.sg/medical-devices/fees/

Effective Date

2026-03-26

Accessed Date

2026-08-13

Realistic Timeline
Min

9

Max

18

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

6

Max

12

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • MHLW
  • FDA
  • EU NB
Notes
  • Four Class D routes: expedited (EDR) at 180 working days, abridged at 220, full at 310, and full under the Priority Review Scheme at 202. There is no immediate route at Class D
  • EDR needs two reference approvals and no prior rejection or withdrawal. Active implantables, devices contacting the central circulatory or central nervous system, bioactive joint replacements, devices with a registrable drug in a secondary role, and HIV or donor-compatibility IVD assays are barred from EDR
  • A Class D device with a registrable drug in a secondary role has only abridged at 220 and full at 310, and is excluded from the Priority Review Scheme
  • HSA turnaround times exclude applicant stop-clock time
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

South AfricaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

A CE certificate is the technical dossier and QMS evidence SAHPRA works from on the reliance pathways.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

South KoreaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

No

Benefit

No direct recognition

Timeline Savings

None

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

SwedenEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE under MDR/IVDR — single market validity

reliance.reliance-edge-eu-ce-to-eea30-approval-eu-ce-mdr-ivdr-sweden
Fact-level verified
Target

geo:swe

Source Approval

EU CE under MDR/IVDR

Edge Type

Single Market Validity

Market Access Strength

direct

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Same Device Required

Yes

Local Application Required

No

Target Decision Retained

No

Conditions
  • medical devices and IVDs subject to route-specific scope
  • valid CE conformity route for the device
  • country language, economic-operator, EUDAMED, and national vigilance obligations still apply

Confirmed with a national official source: approvals from other geographic regions cannot replace CE marking for Sweden.

SwitzerlandEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark (MDR)

Authority

EU CE Mark (MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Full recognition - immediate Swiss market access

Timeline Savings

Immediate

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

SwitzerlandEU conformity assessment · Swissmedic

Prior approval / evidence record

Unilateral recognition of EU/EEA certificates

Name

Unilateral recognition of EU/EEA certificates

Description

The device chapter of the EU-Switzerland MRA has not applied since 26 May 2021 and has not been restored; Switzerland instead recognises EU/EEA notified-body certificates one-way under MepV Art. 25(4), which is why a CH-REP and Swiss labelling are still required

Timeline Reduction

No second conformity assessment

Eligibility
  • Certificate from a body designated under EU law and established in an EU or EEA state
  • Procedures must meet Swiss requirements and the body must hold equivalent qualification

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

SwitzerlandEU conformity assessment · Swissmedic

Prior approval / evidence record

Class I

Id

class-i

Class Name

Class I

Risk Level

low

Pathway

Self-declaration (no conformity assessment body)

Official Timeline
Min

0

Max

0

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Medizinprodukteverordnung (MepV, SR 812.213), Stand 1. Juli 2026 — Art. 23 conformity assessment by reference to EU MDR, Art. 25(4) equivalence of EU/EEA notified-body certificates

Url

https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/552/de

Effective Date

2026-07-01

Accessed Date

2026-08-29

Realistic Timeline
Min

3

Max

5

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

1

Max

2

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark (recognised unilaterally by Switzerland)
Notes
  • MepV Art. 23 applies the EU MDR conformity assessment procedures, so a Class I device that is not sterile, has no measuring function and is not a reusable surgical instrument is self-declared with no body involved and no review clock
  • Swissmedic runs no product approval at all: the only Swiss step is swissdamed registration, which carries a filing deadline rather than a review period
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

No

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

SwitzerlandEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark (MDD)

Authority

EU CE Mark (MDD)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Recognized until certificate expiry

Timeline Savings

Immediate

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

SwitzerlandEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark Recognition

Name

EU CE Mark Recognition

Description

Full recognition of EU CE marked devices until 2028

Timeline Reduction

Immediate market access

Eligibility
  • Valid EU MDR CE Mark
  • MDD CE Mark until expiry

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

TaiwanUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class II

Id

class-ii

Class Name

Class II

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

140

Max

140

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

TFDA people’s application handling-period table (FDA器字第1151604804號) — Class I 80, Class II 140, Class III 200 calendar days

Url

https://www.fda.gov.tw/tc/newsContent.aspx?cid=3&id=31695

Effective Date

2026-08-17

Accessed Date

2026-08-29

Realistic Timeline
Min

9

Max

14

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

6

Max

9

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA 510(k)
  • EU CE Mark
  • Japan PMDA
Notes
  • Statutory handling period 140 calendar days (initial review 75 + post-supplement review 65)
  • Class II in-vitro diagnostic reagents run on a separate 150-calendar-day clock (80 + 70)
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

TaiwanUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Japan MHLW / PMDA

Prior approval / evidence record

Class III

Id

class-iii

Class Name

Class III

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Registration with clinical data

Official Timeline
Min

200

Max

200

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

TFDA people’s application handling-period table (FDA器字第1151604804號) — Class I 80, Class II 140, Class III 200 calendar days

Url

https://www.fda.gov.tw/tc/newsContent.aspx?cid=3&id=31695

Effective Date

2026-08-17

Accessed Date

2026-08-29

Realistic Timeline
Min

12

Max

18

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

8

Max

11

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA 510(k)/PMA
  • EU CE Mark
  • Japan PMDA
Notes
  • Statutory handling period 200 calendar days (initial review 105 + post-supplement review 95)
  • Class III in-vitro diagnostic reagents run on the same 200-calendar-day clock (105 + 95)
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

TanzaniaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Usable as supporting technical evidence. The TMDA Compendium sets one 20-45 working-day service standard per class and publishes no origin-based reduction.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ThailandEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Supports the Certificate of Free Sale and the CSDT technical evidence, but the Thai FDA publishes no shorter period for it

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ThailandUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

Class 3

Id

class-3

Class Name

Class 3

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

250

Max

250

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Thailand Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2563 — statutory review clocks (ข้อ ๕-๖)

Url

https://medical.fda.moph.go.th/media.php?id=478924090456023040&name=กฏกระทรวงการแจ้งรายการละเอียดและการการออกใบรับแจ้งรายการละเอียดผลิตหรือนำเข้าเครื่องมือแพทย์ พ.ศ. 2563.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA
  • EU CE Mark
  • Japan
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • WHO (for IVD)
Notes
  • Statutory cap: class-3 registration decided within 250 days (Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2563 ข้อ ๖)
  • Fee payment due within 60 days of the invoice; submission receipt issued within 7 days of a complete file
  • Clinical data may be required
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ThailandUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

Class 2

Id

class-2

Class Name

Class 2

Risk Level

medium

Pathway

Registration

Official Timeline
Min

250

Max

250

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Thailand Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2563 — statutory review clocks (ข้อ ๕-๖)

Url

https://medical.fda.moph.go.th/media.php?id=478924090456023040&name=กฏกระทรวงการแจ้งรายการละเอียดและการการออกใบรับแจ้งรายการละเอียดผลิตหรือนำเข้าเครื่องมือแพทย์ พ.ศ. 2563.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA
  • EU CE Mark
  • Japan
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • WHO (for IVD)
Notes
  • Statutory cap: class-2 registration decided within 250 days (Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2563 ข้อ ๖)
  • Fee payment due within 60 days of the invoice; submission receipt issued within 7 days of a complete file
  • ASEAN harmonization applies
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

ThailandUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · WHO

Prior approval / evidence record

Class 4

Id

class-4

Class Name

Class 4

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Full Registration

Official Timeline
Min

300

Max

300

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Thailand Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2563 — statutory review clocks (ข้อ ๕-๖)

Url

https://medical.fda.moph.go.th/media.php?id=478924090456023040&name=กฏกระทรวงการแจ้งรายการละเอียดและการการออกใบรับแจ้งรายการละเอียดผลิตหรือนำเข้าเครื่องมือแพทย์ พ.ศ. 2563.pdf

Accessed Date

2026-08-25

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

5

Unit

months

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA
  • EU CE Mark
  • Japan
  • TGA
  • Health Canada
  • WHO (for IVD)
Notes
  • Statutory cap: class-4 registration decided within 300 days (Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2563 ข้อ ๖)
  • Fee payment due within 60 days of the invoice; submission receipt issued within 7 days of a complete file
  • Clinical evidence required
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

Yes

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

TunisiaEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE certificate of conformity (Regulation (EU) 2017/745, NANDO-listed notified body)

Authority

EU CE certificate of conformity (Regulation (EU) 2017/745, NANDO-listed notified body)

Accepted

No

Benefit

Mandatory dossier evidence for every class except class I, and the regime the ANMPS guide names as the benchmark; where no valid MDR certificate exists the agency accepts an Annex VII §4.3 written agreement with a notified body or a notified-body letter under Regulation (EU) 2023/607. It does not replace the Tunisian AMC, which the ANMPS issues after its own avis technique or analyse.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

TurkeyEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

The Tıbbi Cihaz Yönetmeliği transposes EU MDR essentially verbatim, so a CE certificate from an EU notified body is directly usable for the ÜTS filing and there is no separate Turkish product approval to shorten. One divergence matters going forward: from 25 February 2027 the EU notified body issuing that certificate is capped at 170 days by Regulation (EU) 2026/977, while a Turkish-designated body issuing the same certificate stays uncapped because Turkey has not transposed it.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

United Arab EmiratesEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

An EC certificate is one of the accepted conformity certificates for the same mandatory document slot, with an EC declaration of conformity acknowledgement required in addition.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

UgandaAustralia TGA · Health Canada · EU conformity assessment · Japan MHLW / PMDA · US FDA · IMDRF member authorities

Prior approval / evidence record

Licence or approval from an IMDRF founding-member country — Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, the United States

Authority

Licence or approval from an IMDRF founding-member country — Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, the United States

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Track 1: an abridged evaluation in which the foreign approval carries the technical assessment, with a much smaller submission (attestation, abbreviated product and manufacturer details, notarized copy of the licence, Certificate of Analysis to an accepted quality-system standard, evidence of repeat sales and product samples where practicable). It is an expedited review with shortened registration timelines, but NDA publishes no number for the shortening and the final decision remains NDA's.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

UgandaUS FDA · Health Canada · Japan MHLW / PMDA · EU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Recognised-country certification or CE certification — an eligibility gate for classes B, C and D

Authority

Recognised-country certification or CE certification — an eligibility gate for classes B, C and D

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

DAR/GDL/028 §4.11 makes certification from a recognised country (United States, Canada, Japan, Europe) or CE certification mandatory for classes B, C and D: devices not certified by any recognised country will be examined and may be exempted from the requirement only if they are class A. The European certificate required scales with class — full quality assurance or EC Type Examination Certificate for classes B and C, and full quality assurance or EC Design Examination Certificate for class D, from a notified body approved by European health authorities. This is a gate, not a fast track: it conditions eligibility and shortens nothing by itself.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

United KingdomUS FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Health Canada · UK MHRA

Prior approval / evidence record

International Reliance (draft legislation, not in force)

Name

International Reliance (draft legislation, not in force)

Description

Stand-alone route giving a Certificate of International Reliance to devices already authorised by the FDA, Health Canada or the TGA, without UKCA marking; the EU is deliberately excluded pending the separate CE-recognition decision

Timeline Reduction

Not quantified — the draft fixes no review period

Eligibility
  • Draft Medical Devices (Amendment) Regulations 2026, WTO-notified 8 May 2026
  • Route 1 lowest-risk: self-declaration and registration only
  • Routes 2 and 3: certificate from a UK approved body first
  • Anticipated in force mid-2028

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

United KingdomEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark Recognition (Transition)

Name

CE Mark Recognition (Transition)

Description

EU CE marks accepted during transition period

Timeline Reduction

Immediate market access

Eligibility
  • Class III & IIb implantable: until Dec 2027
  • Other classes: until Jun 2028
  • MDR/IVDR compliant: until Jun 2030

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

United KingdomEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

Class I

Id

class-i

Class Name

Class I

Risk Level

low

Pathway

Self-declaration (no approved body)

Official Timeline
Min

0

Max

0

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

The Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/618, as amended) — reg. 16(1) and 29(1) 60-day clinical investigation notice, and the 210-day Secretary of State opinion on ancillary medicinal substances

Url

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/618

Accessed Date

2026-08-29

Realistic Timeline
Min

0.5

Max

1

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

2

Max

3

Unit

weeks

Prior Approval Benefits
  • EU CE Mark (accepted until 2028+)
Notes
  • UK MDR 2002 Part II: Class I devices that are not sterile and have no measuring function are self-declared, so no approved body or MHRA review of the file takes place and no review clock runs
  • Class Is and Im still need a UK approved body for the sterile barrier or the metrological function, and no statutory or published period binds that assessment
  • Registration with the MHRA under reg. 7A is a precondition for placing the device on the GB market, but the DORS service is self-declared and the MHRA guidance publishes no processing time
  • CE mark provides immediate access during transition
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

No

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

United KingdomEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Full recognition during transition (until 2027-2030)

Timeline Savings

Months → Weeks

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

UkraineEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Ukraine still runs the old EU directives rather than MDR, and Law No. 1207 as amended for martial law lets a CE-marked device onto the market on that basis, so the CE certificate is the route rather than an accelerant. No provision puts a period on the conformity assessment either way.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

UruguayEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Uruguay works from the certificate of free sale and the technical dossier behind the CE certificate. The MSP period is set by the procedure, not by where the device was approved.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

UzbekistanEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Authority

CE Mark (EU MDR)

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Reference-jurisdiction registration is the trigger for the recognition route below; on the ordinary route the CE dossier is reused but the Annex-1 periods are unchanged.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-30

VietnamNMPA · US FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Swissmedic · South Korea MFDS

Prior approval / evidence record

Class C

Id

class-c

Class Name

Class C

Risk Level

high

Pathway

Circulation number registration (Ministry of Health)

Official Timeline
Min

45

Max

45

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Nghị định 98/2021/NĐ-CP on the management of medical devices (as amended by Decrees 07/2023, 96/2023, 04/2025) — Art. 28 declaration for Class A/B and Art. 32 appraisal periods for Class C/D

Url

https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=204442

Effective Date

2022-01-01

Accessed Date

2026-08-29

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

5

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

10

Max

10

Unit

working-days

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA
  • TGA
  • MHLW
  • EU
  • MHRA
  • Swissmedic
  • NMPA
  • MFDS
Notes
  • Decree 98/2021 Art. 32(5): the Minister of Health must appraise and grant the circulation number within 45 days of a complete and valid dossier, counted only once the appraisal fee receipt is in, and must issue any request for supplementation within 40 days
  • Art. 32(2) shortens this to 30 days, with a 25-day supplementation notice, where a corresponding national technical regulation (QCVN) exists for the device, and the same 30 days applies to measuring instruments that need pattern approval
  • Art. 32(3): the fast track for devices already authorised in a reference country, or previously import-licensed, is decided in 10 working days with a 10-working-day supplementation notice — here the Ministry appraises only the legal documents and verifies the rest after the number is granted
  • Art. 32(4): the emergency route is also 10 working days, with an 8-working-day supplementation notice
  • The clock does not simply run out in the applicant favour: if the dossier is not corrected within 90 days of a request, or fails after five rounds of supplementation, the procedure restarts from the beginning
  • Art. 32(6): the granted number and the dossier are published on the medical device portal within 1 working day
Clinical Trial Required

No

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

VietnamEU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

EU CE Mark

Authority

EU CE Mark

Accepted

Yes

Benefit

Serves the same role as a US clearance in the dossier, with no recognition route and no published reduction.

Timeline Savings

None published

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

VietnamNMPA · US FDA · EU conformity assessment · Australia TGA · Japan MHLW / PMDA · UK MHRA · Swissmedic · South Korea MFDS

Prior approval / evidence record

Class D

Id

class-d

Class Name

Class D

Risk Level

highest

Pathway

Circulation number registration (Ministry of Health)

Official Timeline
Min

45

Max

45

Unit

days

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Source
Title

Nghị định 98/2021/NĐ-CP on the management of medical devices (as amended by Decrees 07/2023, 96/2023, 04/2025) — Art. 28 declaration for Class A/B and Art. 32 appraisal periods for Class C/D

Url

https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=204442

Effective Date

2022-01-01

Accessed Date

2026-08-29

Realistic Timeline
Min

4

Max

5

Unit

months

With Prior Approval
Min

10

Max

10

Unit

working-days

Prior Approval Benefits
  • FDA
  • TGA
  • MHLW
  • EU
  • MHRA
  • Swissmedic
  • NMPA
  • MFDS
Notes
  • Decree 98/2021 Art. 32(5): the Minister of Health must appraise and grant the circulation number within 45 days of a complete and valid dossier, counted only once the appraisal fee receipt is in, and must issue any request for supplementation within 40 days
  • Art. 32(2) shortens this to 30 days, with a 25-day supplementation notice, where a corresponding national technical regulation (QCVN) exists for the device, and the same 30 days applies to measuring instruments that need pattern approval
  • Art. 32(3): the fast track for devices already authorised in a reference country, or previously import-licensed, is decided in 10 working days with a 10-working-day supplementation notice — here the Ministry appraises only the legal documents and verifies the rest after the number is granted
  • Art. 32(4): the emergency route is also 10 working days, with an 8-working-day supplementation notice
  • The clock does not simply run out in the applicant favour: if the dossier is not corrected within 90 days of a request, or fails after five rounds of supplementation, the procedure restarts from the beginning
  • Art. 32(6): the granted number and the dossier are published on the medical device portal within 1 working day
Clinical Trial Required

Yes

Local Testing Required

No

Gmp Required

Yes

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

ZambiaIMDRF member authorities · WHO · US FDA · EU conformity assessment

Prior approval / evidence record

WHO Prequalification; US FDA approval; EU CE marking; approval in any IMDRF member state

Authority

WHO Prequalification; US FDA approval; EU CE marking; approval in any IMDRF member state

Accepted

No

Benefit

Disclosure only. The Annex I application form requires the applicant to state whether the device is WHO prequalified, US FDA approved, CE marked or approved in any IMDRF member state and to attach valid documentation, but neither the non-IVD nor the IVD guideline attaches any procedural consequence — no shortened clock, no abridged dossier and no substitute for ZAMRA's own evaluation.

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-09-16

Prior approvals and evidence for Spain (2 records)

SpainUS FDA

Prior approval / evidence record

FDA 510(k)/PMA

Authority

FDA 510(k)/PMA

Accepted

No

Benefit

No substitute for EU MDR conformity assessment; useful as predicate documentation in the technical file

Maintained reference · planning ranges remain estimates · reviewed 2026-08-29

SpainNMPA

Regulatory reference

NMPA certificate does not replace EU conformity assessment

reliance.china-nmpa-no-recognition-route
Fact-level verified
Statement

For ordinary market placement under MDR/IVDR, a Chinese approval does not replace conformity assessment under MDR Article 52 or IVDR Article 48. The applicable EU class and procedure must be established independently; lower-risk devices may self-declare, while other devices require notified-body assessment. This is a finding about the ordinary conformity route, not a ban on Chinese devices or their technical evidence.

Source Jurisdiction Id

china

Source Authority Id

nmpa

Source Approval

China NMPA medical device registration certificate (Class II/III) or Class I filing record

Target Jurisdiction Id

spain

China Classes In Scope

All NMPA classes (I filing, II, III) -> all EU MDR/IVDR classes

Edge Type

No Reliance Route

Market Access Strength

none

Regulatory Layer

Product Marketing

Local Application Required

null

Target Decision Retained

null

Conditions
  • Determine the local class independently; NMPA Class III is not an automatic EU class assignment.
  • A local regulatory application/decision is not universal: MDR Article 52(7) and IVDR Article 48(10) permit specified self-declaration routes.
  • Clinical, performance and technical evidence must meet the applicable EU requirements; the certificate alone does not replace them.
  • Special-purpose, investigational, custom-made and derogation regimes require separate assessment.

Independent review of current EUR-Lex consolidations supports this bounded ordinary-route conclusion. It does not establish the absence of every special route.

Review clocks

What review, validation, and applicant stop-clock rules apply?

Compare countries

Establishment-licence decision clock

clocks.licence-decision-3-months
Fact-level verified

AEMPS must notify the decision on operating-licence applications within three months from the date the application and accompanying documentation entered its electronic register (same rule in RD 192/2023 art. 7.3 and RD 942/2025 art. 7.3).

Conditions
  • Applies to manufacture/import/grouping/sterilisation licences.

Effective from 2023-03-23

Article 7.3 also provides that AEMPS resolutions end the administrative route.

UDI, listing & traceability

Which UDI, device listing, database, and traceability duties apply?

Compare countries

Map the actual reference, model and UDI change

answers.central.ivd-reference-model-udi
Fact-level verified

A commercial REF, order number or catalogue code must first be mapped to the actual device identifier. Annex VI requires a new UDI-DI when a change could cause misidentification or ambiguity in traceability, including a device name/trade name or version/model change and the other listed triggers. A database element that does not require a new UDI-DI is updated within 30 days. Annex IV distinguishes product code/catalogue identification from Basic UDI-DI; a commercial-code edit is not automatically a model or UDI change.

Conditions
  • Check the changed field, issuing-entity rules, device/packaging level and existing registration before deciding whether a new identifier is needed.
  • The 30-day database duty is an operator update deadline, not an authority review period.

Official UDI or listing surface

udi.official-listing-surface
Fact-level verified
Submission Surface

EUDAMED (UDI/device registration) plus national RECOPS commercialization registration from 15 June 2026

Verified Highlights
  • RECOPS requires the product to be notified and visible in EUDAMED and downloads product data from EUDAMED.
  • The RECOPS communication must include the UDI-DI (product identifier) and the labelling and instructions for use used in Spain (RD 192/2023 art. 18.2).
Conditions
  • Custom-made devices excluded from RECOPS (RPS route).

Effective from 2026-06-15

Baseline fact confirmed with the AEMPS RECOPS note and RD 192/2023 art. 18.2 (UDI-DI content requirement).

Related structured datasets

Classification systems · 0 records

No maintained record.

Registration pathways, prior approvals and planning · 1 record

These country-level records can cover multiple product types. Check each item's scope and conditions before applying a fee, pathway or licence to an IVD.

Open Spain registration →
Country

Spain

Jurisdiction Id

spain

Country Code

ES

Flag

🇪🇸

Regulator

Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices

Regulator Abbrev

AEMPS

Region

europe

Tier

3

Risk Classification

4-class (I, IIa, IIb, III) — EU MDR

Classes
  • Id

    class-i

    Class Name

    Class I

    Risk Level

    low

    Pathway

    Self-declaration (no notified body)

    Official Timeline
    Min

    0

    Max

    0

    Unit

    days

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Official Source
    Title

    EUR-Lex Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR)

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-25

    Realistic Timeline
    Min

    6

    Max

    9

    Unit

    months

    Notes
    • MDR Art. 52(7): non-sterile, non-measuring, non-reusable-surgical Class I devices are self-declared, so no authority or notified body reviews the file and there is no review clock
    • Elapsed time is Eudamed actor and device registration, which has no guaranteed processing time, plus any national registration duty
    Clinical Trial Required

    No

    Local Testing Required

    No

    Gmp Required

    Yes

Key Requirements
  • EU Authorized Representative (for non-EU manufacturers)
  • Clinical investigation: 10-day validation, 45-day evaluation (+20 with experts)
  • Establishment licence (companies) resolved within 3 months; licence valid 5 years
Prior Approvals
  • Authority

    FDA 510(k)/PMA

    Accepted

    No

    Benefit

    No substitute for EU MDR conformity assessment; useful as predicate documentation in the technical file

Local Rep Required

Yes

Local Rep Name

EU Authorized Representative

Mdsap Accepted

No

Mdsap Benefit

ISO 13485 accepted as QMS evidence

Registration Validity

5 years (CE certificate)

Last Updated

2026-08-29

Verification Status

partially-verified

Official Sources
  • Title

    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/977, Art. 2 — maximum notified-body conformity assessment timelines (30 + 120/90 parallel + 20 days)

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2026/977/oj

    Effective Date

    2027-02-25

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-29

  • Title

    EUR-Lex Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR)

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-25

  • Title

    EUR-Lex MDR consolidated text — Annex IX §5.1 (expert-panel clinical evaluation consultation: 21/60 days) and §5.2(d) (ancillary medicinal-substance opinion: 210 days)

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02017R0745-20250110

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-29

Reviewed On

2026-08-29

Process
Template Id

default

Status

planning-template

Usage Rule

Maintained planning steps and estimates, not verified regulator deadlines.

Steps
  • Step

    1

    Title

    Pre-Submission Preparation

    Description

    Gather technical documentation, quality management system (QMS) records, and clinical data required by AEMPS. Appoint a EU Authorized Representative.

    Duration

    1-3 months

    Icon

    📋

  • Step

    2

    Title

    Application Submission

    Description

    Submit complete registration dossier to AEMPS including device description, risk analysis, and testing reports.

    Duration

    1-2 weeks

    Icon

    📤

  • Step

    3

    Title

    Administrative Review

    Description

    AEMPS reviews application for completeness. May request additional documents or clarifications.

    Duration

    2-4 weeks

    Icon

    🔍

  • Step

    4

    Title

    Technical Evaluation

    Description

    In-depth technical assessment of device safety and performance. AEMPS may issue questions.

    Duration

    0 days

    Icon

    ⚙️

  • Step

    5

    Title

    Registration Approval

    Description

    Upon successful review, AEMPS issues Spain market authorization certificate.

    Duration

    1-2 weeks

    Icon

    ✅

Government fee schedules · 1 record

These country-level records can cover multiple product types. Check each item's scope and conditions before applying a fee, pathway or licence to an IVD.

Open Spain fees →
Jurisdiction Id

spain

Country

Spain

Country Code

ES

Authority

AEMPS

Low Risk Local
Min

99.71

Max

99.71

Currency

EUR

Per Product

No

High Risk Local
Min

1553.51

Max

1553.51

Currency

EUR

Per Product

No

Details
  • Id

    registration-communication

    Item

    Registration/communication of medical devices (code 5.01)

    Currency

    EUR

    Amount Local

    99.71

    Amount Local Formatted

    EUR 99.71

    Frequency

    Per communication

    Notes

    Transfer of communications to the new Registro de comercialización (RECOPS) is exempt per RD 192/2023 DT séptima.

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.aemps.gob.es/la-aemps/tasas/relaciontasas

    Source Title

    AEMPS fee table (tipo 5: productos sanitarios)

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

  • Id

    manufacturing-licence

    Item

    Prior operating licence - manufacturing, sterilisation, reprocessing establishments (code 5.17)

    Currency

    EUR

    Amount Local

    983.85

    Amount Local Formatted

    EUR 983.85

    Frequency

    Per licence

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.aemps.gob.es/la-aemps/tasas/relaciontasas

    Source Title

    AEMPS fee table (tipo 5: productos sanitarios)

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

  • Id

    manufacturing-licence-modification

    Item

    Manufacturing-licence modification/revalidation (code 5.19)

    Currency

    EUR

    Amount Local

    983.85

    Amount Local Formatted

    EUR 983.85

    Frequency

    Per modification

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.aemps.gob.es/la-aemps/tasas/relaciontasas

    Source Title

    AEMPS fee table (tipo 5: productos sanitarios)

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

  • Id

    import-grouping-licence

    Item

    Prior operating licence - import and grouping establishments (code 5.18)

    Currency

    EUR

    Amount Local

    491.92

    Amount Local Formatted

    EUR 491.92

    Frequency

    Per licence

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.aemps.gob.es/la-aemps/tasas/relaciontasas

    Source Title

    AEMPS fee table (tipo 5: productos sanitarios)

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

  • Id

    import-licence-modification

    Item

    Import-licence modification/revalidation (code 5.20)

    Currency

    EUR

    Amount Local

    491.92

    Amount Local Formatted

    EUR 491.92

    Frequency

    Per modification

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.aemps.gob.es/la-aemps/tasas/relaciontasas

    Source Title

    AEMPS fee table (tipo 5: productos sanitarios)

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

  • Id

    minor-modification

    Item

    Minor modification of licences (code 5.21)

    Currency

    EUR

    Amount Local

    245.96

    Amount Local Formatted

    EUR 245.96

    Frequency

    Per modification

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.aemps.gob.es/la-aemps/tasas/relaciontasas

    Source Title

    AEMPS fee table (tipo 5: productos sanitarios)

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

  • Id

    clinical-investigation-authorisation

    Item

    Authorisation of clinical investigations / IVD evaluation studies (code 5.22)

    Currency

    EUR

    Amount Local

    1553.51

    Amount Local Formatted

    EUR 1,553.51

    Frequency

    Per application

    Notes

    Fee proof must accompany the application; the fee lapses 10 working days after payment.

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.aemps.gob.es/la-aemps/tasas/relaciontasas

    Source Title

    AEMPS fee table (tipo 5: productos sanitarios)

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

  • Id

    ci-substantial-modification

    Item

    Substantial modification of a clinical investigation (code 5.23)

    Currency

    EUR

    Amount Local

    543.73

    Amount Local Formatted

    EUR 543.73

    Frequency

    Per modification

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.aemps.gob.es/la-aemps/tasas/relaciontasas

    Source Title

    AEMPS fee table (tipo 5: productos sanitarios)

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

  • Id

    classification-consultation

    Item

    Classification/qualification analysis consultation (code 5.26)

    Currency

    EUR

    Amount Local

    211.61

    Amount Local Formatted

    EUR 211.61

    Frequency

    Per consultation

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.aemps.gob.es/la-aemps/tasas/relaciontasas

    Source Title

    AEMPS fee table (tipo 5: productos sanitarios)

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

  • Id

    human-origin-material-import

    Item

    Authorisation of import of human-origin raw materials for IVD manufacture (code 5.24)

    Currency

    EUR

    Amount Local

    87.4

    Amount Local Formatted

    EUR 87.40

    Frequency

    Per authorisation

    Amount Status

    exact-current

    Verification Status

    official-verified

    Source Url

    https://www.aemps.gob.es/la-aemps/tasas/relaciontasas

    Source Title

    AEMPS fee table (tipo 5: productos sanitarios)

    Verified On

    2026-08-25

Notes
  • Amounts follow the published AEMPS fee table (tabla de tasas, tipo 5) as updated on the official site.
Last Updated

2026-08-25

Verification Status

official-verified

Official Sources
  • Title

    AEMPS fee table (tipo 5: productos sanitarios)

    Url

    https://www.aemps.gob.es/la-aemps/tasas/relaciontasas

    Accessed Date

    2026-08-25

Reviewed On

2026-08-25

Amount Status

exact-current

Range Available

Yes

Additional certifications and licences · 1 record

These country-level records can cover multiple product types. Check each item's scope and conditions before applying a fee, pathway or licence to an IVD.

Open Spain certifications →
Slug

spain

Market

Spain

Confidence

high

Schemes
  • Id

    lvd-medical-exclusion-mdr-electrical-safety

    Name

    MDR electrical safety in place of the Low Voltage Directive

    Category

    Medical Electrical Safety

    Status

    Included In Medical Registration

    Object

    Finished Device

    Note

    Annex II of Directive 2014/35/EU places electrical equipment for radiology and medical purposes outside the Low Voltage Directive, so there is no separate national electrical-safety certificate for a medical device. Electrical safety is assessed inside the MDR conformity assessment against MDR Annex I, with the harmonised IEC/EN 60601 series carrying the presumption of conformity.

    Source Urls
    • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/35/oj
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    emc-directive-disapplied-by-mdr

    Name

    MDR electromagnetic compatibility in place of the EMC Directive

    Category

    emc

    Status

    Included In Medical Registration

    Object

    Finished Device

    Note

    Article 2(3) of Directive 2014/30/EU switches the EMC Directive off where other Union legislation lays the same essential requirements down more specifically, which MDR Annex I sections 18.5 and 18.6 do for medical devices. EMC is therefore dossier evidence inside the CE route and not a separate national EMC conformity step.

    Source Urls
    • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/30/oj
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    rd-188-2016-radio-equipment-and-cnaf

    Name

    RD 188/2016 radio equipment and the CNAF use condition

    Category

    Radio Spectrum

    Status

    Mandatory If Feature

    Object

    Radio Equipment

    Note

    Market access rests on the RED conformity assessment in chapter III of the reglamento approved by Real Decreto 188/2016; article 34 makes the Secretaría de Estado de Telecomunicaciones the market surveillance body. There is no Spanish homologation, but Spain does add a use-side condition worth planning around: article 6(1) permits putting into service and use of equipment that complies with the reglamento and is properly installed, maintained and used, article 6(3) permits putting into service only equipment built for the spectrum use set out in the Cuadro Nacional de Atribución de Frecuencias and the Spanish radio interfaces, and article 6(5) requires visible packaging labelling where equipment placed on the Spanish market cannot be used in Spain.

    Source Urls
    • https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2016-4444
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    rd-219-2013-rohs-substance-restriction

    Name

    RD 219/2013 substance restriction (RoHS)

    Category

    Environmental And Batteries

    Status

    Evidence Only No Separate Certificate

    Object

    Electrical Electronic Medical Device

    Note

    Article 6(1) of Real Decreto 219/2013 prohibits placing electrical and electronic equipment, cables and spare parts on the market above the Annex II concentration values, and article 6(2) applies the restriction to productos sanitarios and monitoring and control instruments placed on the market from 22 July 2014 and to in vitro diagnostics from 22 July 2016. Surveillance is decentralised: article 4(6) leaves the autonomous communities and Ceuta and Melilla to designate their own authorities, while article 4(3) designates the Secretaría de Estado de Telecomunicaciones for telecommunications equipment. Directive 2011/65/EU Annex I category 8 covers medical devices, Article 4(3) has bound medical devices since 22 July 2014 and in vitro diagnostic medical devices since 22 July 2016, and Article 2(4)(h) excludes active implantable medical devices.

    Source Urls
    • https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2013-3210
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    rd-110-2015-rii-aee-registration

    Name

    RII-AEE producer registration

    Category

    Environmental And Batteries

    Status

    Mandatory If Feature

    Object

    Producer Or Authorised Representative

    Note

    Article 8(1) of Real Decreto 110/2015 requires producers of electrical and electronic equipment or their authorised representatives, including distance sellers into Spain, to enrol in the special section for such producers of the Registro Integrado Industrial created under Ley 21/1992 and Real Decreto 559/2010, and article 8(4) adds quarterly electronic reporting of the Annex VI part 2 information. Unlike the Italian article 29, the Spanish article does not spell out registration as a condition of placing equipment on the market, and none is asserted here. Directive 2012/19/EU Article 2(4)(g) excludes devices expected to be infective before end of life and active implantable devices; other medical devices are in scope, and Article 16 requires each Member State to keep a producer register.

    Source Urls
    • https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2015-1762
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    batteries-regulation-draft-real-decreto

    Name

    Batteries Regulation with the implementing real decreto still in consultation

    Category

    Environmental And Batteries

    Status

    Transition Not Yet Mandatory

    Object

    Battery Producer Or Authorised Representative

    Note

    No Spanish instrument implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 is in force and no Article 55 register has been designated. MITECO has a proyecto de real decreto sobre las pilas y baterías y la gestión de sus residuos in public consultation, stated to close on 3 September 2026, whose purpose is to secure application of the Regulation in Spain. Until it is adopted the operative rules are the directly applicable Regulation plus Real Decreto 106/2008 as amended by Real Decreto 710/2015, whose first additional provision keeps battery producers enrolled in the industry register now called RII-PYA, operated by the Ministerio de Industria y Turismo. Because the consultation closes on that date, the BOE should be re-checked shortly afterwards. Article 11(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 lets professional medical imaging and radiotherapy devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices restrict portable-battery replacement to independent professionals, and Article 11(3) lifts the removability duty where continuity of supply is needed for safety or data integrity.

    Source Urls
    • https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/calidad-y-evaluacion-ambiental/participacion-publica/pp-2026-informacion-publica-proyecto-real-decreto-sobre-pilas-y-baterias-y-gestion-residuos.html
    Source Binding

    candidate

  • Id

    xray-installation-declaration-and-registration

    Name

    Autonomous Community X-ray installation declaration and registration

    Category

    Ionizing Radiation

    Status

    Mandatory For Use Site

    Object

    Medical X Ray Installation

    Note

    Real Decreto 1085/2009 art. 12 requires the holder to declare a medical diagnostic X-ray installation to the competent body of the Autonomous Community before it is put into service, filing the Annex I.a and I.b declaration of intended use and operating conditions, an Annex II certificate from the authorised sales and technical assistance company that the equipment meets art. 7, and an Annex III shielding certificate from a Radiological Protection Service or Technical Unit. Art. 13 repeats the declaration and registration step for equipment changes, additional generators or tubes, relocation and layout changes, and art. 15 records every declaration both in the regional register and in the central register held by the ministry.

    Source Urls
    • https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2009-11932
    Source Binding

    reviewed

  • Id

    xray-sales-and-technical-assistance-company-authorisation

    Name

    X-ray sales and technical assistance company authorisation

    Category

    Ionizing Radiation

    Status

    Mandatory If Feature

    Object

    X Ray Equipment Supplier Or Service Company

    Note

    Real Decreto 1085/2009 art. 3(a) requires companies that sell and provide technical assistance for X-ray equipment to be authorised by the competent body of the Autonomous Community after a favourable report from the Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear; the authorisation is recorded in the corresponding central register and is valid throughout Spain on the terms recorded there. Art. 7 separately restricts placing on the market and putting into service to X-ray equipment that also complies with the medical device rules, so the supplier authorisation sits alongside, not instead of, the device conformity route.

    Source Urls
    • https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2009-11932
    Source Binding

    reviewed

Official Sources
  • Authority

    EUR-Lex

    Topic

    Low Voltage Directive 2014/35/EU Annex II — electrical equipment for radiology and medical purposes outside scope

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/35/oj

  • Authority

    EUR-Lex

    Topic

    EMC Directive 2014/30/EU Article 2(3) — more specific Union legislation displaces the directive

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/30/oj

  • Authority

    EUR-Lex

    Topic

    RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU Annex I category 8 and Article 4(3) medical-device application dates

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/65/oj

  • Authority

    EUR-Lex

    Topic

    WEEE Directive 2012/19/EU Article 2(4)(g) medical-device exclusions and Article 16 national producer register

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2012/19/oj

  • Authority

    EUR-Lex

    Topic

    Batteries Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 Articles 11 and 55 — medical-device removability derogation and producer register

    Url

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1542/oj

  • Authority

    BOE (Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado)

    Topic

    Real Decreto 188/2016 arts. 6 and 34 — radio equipment use conditions and market surveillance

    Url

    https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2016-4444

  • Authority

    BOE (Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado)

    Topic

    Real Decreto 219/2013 arts. 4 and 6 — RoHS restriction and decentralised surveillance

    Url

    https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2013-3210

  • Authority

    BOE (Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado)

    Topic

    Real Decreto 110/2015 art. 8 — RII-AEE producer registration and quarterly reporting

    Url

    https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2015-1762

  • Authority

    MITECO

    Topic

    public consultation on the proyecto de real decreto implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1542

    Url

    https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/calidad-y-evaluacion-ambiental/participacion-publica/pp-2026-informacion-publica-proyecto-real-decreto-sobre-pilas-y-baterias-y-gestion-residuos.html

  • Authority

    Ministerio de Industria y Turismo

    Topic

    RII-PYA battery producer register under RD 106/2008 disposición adicional primera

    Url

    https://industria.gob.es/registros-industriales/pilas/Paginas/Inicio.aspx

  • Authority

    BOE (Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado)

    Topic

    Real Decreto 1085/2009 on installing and using medical diagnostic X-ray equipment

    Url

    https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2009-11932

Keep researching this market
View the Spain resource hub →
DJ Fang
Need to apply Spain's requirements to a product?
Confirm the current AEMPS pathway, evidence, and local-role details for the actual device before filing.
Pricing